For a casual fling I wouldn't mind but I'm not sure I would want to invest in a serious relationship with someone with dozens and dozens of previous partners. Shows commitment isn't too high on this person's ladder and chances are high you'll get cheated on once they find better dick/pussy.
Oh, bullshit. I'd never cheat on my husband. Doesn't mean I didn't enjoy the hell out of a good fuck, and often, when I was younger.
I really don't understand all the generalizing I'm seeing. This thread: Arbitrary measurement = x, always.
Life tip: people can behave situationally. People can change. People often do change and are not the same at 13, at 23, at 33, etc. Behaving like x at one stage does not mean a person will behave in y fashion at another stage.
Possible problem: someone who had a lot of risky unprotected sex (just as frequent blackout drunks or unsafe drug use can be red flags). Or if someone has unaddressed psychological trauma that has caused them to "act out." But general human behavior has levels. Maybe Person A's level isn't compatible with Person B's. That makes sense. We all want/expect different things; a good relationship often means finding compatibility on our wants and needs. But all these OMG reactions that end in THEY WILL CHEAT! THEY ARE CRAZY! SUMFIN WRONG WITH DEM BITCHES are mindboggling to me. Like, I know it's hip to make these ironclad declarations of opinion-as-fact, but damn, y'all. At some point, can we generalize less and discuss gray area and interpretation more?
eta: not saying that trauma = bad person, but rather that trauma should be handled, treated if necessary, etc., particularly if it's negatively impacting behavior