10% isn't that much.
When you don't have enough in the first place 10% is huge.
10% isn't that much.
When you don't have enough in the first place 10% is huge.
If you load a browser within the snap i assume it loads at mobile width, which is smart because fluid sites (becoming more common) would "snap" into place, displaying content for smaller screens.
If thats the case (and i prefer mobile browsing on Gaf then Desktop) i could have NeoGaf on the right while a game loads then snap back into gaming.
IF it works this way it will most likely be a key feature for me, and many other gamers.
Looks cool.
But I see no use for it imo
Good luck trying to watch a Youtube clip in that tiny 1/3 of a screen.It's for FAQ's and youtube walkthroughs/
Every system reserves a certain percentage of power for their OS to use. The Xbox 360 and PS3 do that and so does the PS4. Devs don't have, and never will have, access to 100% of the power on either systems.Snap and other things like it, at launch, are controlling 10% of the GPU on the Xbone, even if you don't use it.
No, the 10% of the GPU power that is reserved isn't the biggest reason why the Xbox One is slower. It's that very same GPU in the first place, not the power reservation. The power reservation is just a slight increase to the power gap.This snap feature is a big reason why the Xbone is significantly less powerful than the PS4. It's not just an option that you don't have to use. The requirement for the system to have it has hindered the machine's ability to play games versus the competition.
These are the silliest statements ever. Don't have enough what? Games will be fine on X1 everyone is just caught up in the console war right now.
Every system reserves a certain percentage of power for their OS to use. The Xbox 360 and PS3 do that and so does the PS4. Devs don't have, and never will have, access to 100% of the power on either systems.
It's just another spin on the multi-screen hype that's going on at the moment. It has the same utility as the WiiU controller/smartglass/psvita connection, and all other asymertrical solutions. The xBone version just happens to be the most clumsy solution really.
when i sit down to play a game, i just want to play a game. i dont want to surf on the web, watch tv or youtube, use apps, read in forums. hell for 99% i dont even listen to other music while im gaming. so yeah.... why?_? do i need ADHS to find this "feature" useful?
Good luck trying to watch a Youtube clip in that tiny 1/3 of a screen.
No, the 10% of the GPU power that is reserved isn't the biggest reason why the Xbox One is slower. It's that very same GPU in the first place, not the power reservation. The power reservation is just a slight increase to the power gap.
It's just another spin on the multi-screen hype that's going on at the moment. It has the same utility as the WiiU controller/smartglass/psvita connection, and all other asymertrical solutions. The xBone version just happens to be the most clumsy solution really.
Yeah, those 30 second reads at gaf on the tv screen...instead of doing it on your mobile wtih probably a much better redability...that's a KILLER feature. Guys, please...
So you can read all that in the video? You think you'd be able to see the action (imagine watching Madden tips). You'll be able to see what options players would be choosing? I don't think so.Been doing that for a year in Windows 8 already.
Doing it right now.
Problem? Nope.
30 seconds without looking anywhere is convenient and i suppose many more seconds while you wait for multiplayer games to be setup. I know many will be happy with this.
Imagine that tiny window at 6-10+ feet away. Gluck trying to see any detail.
Been doing that for a year in Windows 8 already.
Doing it right now.
Problem? Nope.
Gonna be more of a problem on a bigger TV screen? Noooope. (37 inch TV for PC monitor in man cave, bigger TV in living room)
Wait it's now down to a, well we all have smart phones, tablets, etc. But I don't want to move my eye balls.
Insane.
Imagine that tiny window at 6-10+ feet away. Gluck trying to see any detail.
And how does my post neglect all of this?This discussion has happened a bunch of times. The 10% is not what I'm talking about. It's bigger than that. Here, once more:
Multitasking like this is a big reason why the Xbone had to have 8GB of RAM. A decision they made a long time ago and since they needed so much RAM and couldn't count on cheap GDDR5, they had to use slower DDR3 RAM. Which means they needed on chip cache to speed things up for graphics, which took away from their GPU budget on the chip.
Which left us with a 1.34 TFLOPS GPU.
THEN, you take off another 10% for some of the window scaling tricks and we have a machine with 600 GFLOPS less than the PS4.
clearly the text will scale, or be scaleable.
Imagine that tiny window at 6-10+ feet away. Gluck trying to see any detail.
clearly the text will scale, or be scaleable.
That's great if you sit up close to a monitor.What is wrong with some of you people? Is it impossible for some to use their imaginations?
He is primarily on GAF while also having Youtube up. He can choose to watch the Video in that smaller window, and depending on the size of his monitor it is absolutely possible that he may see "detail" or whatever he wants to see in the Youtube video.
Or...or...wait for it....He could freaking switch them around. He could make the Youtube video bigger and shrink GAF for however long it takes for him to "see any detail". I know, I know. Amazing!! Who would have ever thought of that? :-/
Options. How do they work?
Yes, this post of yours sure has a lot more content than my opinion about video game consoles.
And how does my post neglect all of this?
That's great if you sit up close to a monitor.
I use snap on 60" TV and I sit maybe 10 feet away from it and all you see is something moving in the top right of the screen, you can't see any detail just colour.
I REALLY don't see the point in snapping something to the TV, you can't see whats happening and you are compromising the real estate for whatever else you are doing on the console at the same time.
In an age where a lot of people have tablets and smartphones is this REALLY a killer feature?
That's great if you sit up close to a monitor.
I use snap on 60" TV and I sit maybe 10 feet away from it and all you see is something moving in the top right of the screen, you can't see any detail just colour.
I REALLY don't see the point in snapping something to the TV, you can't see whats happening and you are compromising the real estate for whatever else you are doing on the console at the same time.
In an age where a lot of people have tablets and smartphones is this REALLY a killer feature?
You don't watch TV whilst playing a game, if you did the size of the screen would be irrelevant, you'd miss most of the content you're watching because you're trying to do two things at once. It's brilliant for watching sports, for example England football team. Unlike my beloved Liverpool, I don't want to watch every second of an England game, with snap I could snap the match to the side of the screen so I have an overview of what's going on, and then I could maximise the screen when something interesting happens, all with one voice command, beautifully elegant.
On a side point, do people really sit 10 feet away whilst playing a game? Even on big screens I have to sit within 5 foot.
I need to post a picture of my man cave sometime. I have 2 TVs mounted right next to each other so I can watch TV while playing games.
Each to their own I guess, and do it!
Been doing that for a year in Windows 8 already.
Doing it right now.
Problem? Nope.
Gonna be more of a problem on a bigger TV screen? Noooope. (37 inch TV for PC monitor in man cave, bigger TV in living room)
This is more akin to listening to the radio than being able to watch the clip.
Imagine that tiny window at 6-10+ feet away. Gluck trying to see any detail.
That's pretty awesome imo. I wish PS4 had this too. I'd use it for sport matches.
The rumors of snap crashing games might still be true. Just because one game is running without a crash for a few minutes doesn't really prove much.
Whatever. I trust the insiders. Let me know when it's in thousands of homes and no reports of it crashing games.
It might still be true, but based on what we're seeing, it doesn't make the console crash when it's used in game as was claimed by a number of insiders. That's really my only issue, they made it sound like even attempting to use it would cause it to crash and yet here we have video evidence that directly contradicts that claim.
As do I, famous has been right on virtually everything he's leaked and yet...
What I'm confused by is how Snap is causing the games to crash. Aren't they run by different parts of the system?
Just give me the 10% GPU more.
from what we've hear it has something to do with RAM management
edited...
Also, Devs don't have to use snap, but I'm sure if some dev creates a realistic CSI game, you could bing what you should look for in a muder situation. Though it could tell you, but what if it didnt? You could just wing it, and that makes the game more interesting. So the game can be more immersive that way too, because theres no screen popping up telling you what to do, you have to figure it out, guessing it or actually looking it up.
There are many possibilities.
I think it's because some of the xbox one's power is reserved for snap and kinect even if you don't use them, effecting power/resources used for games. Well if what's said about that is true. Like how memory is reserved for OS on both, GPU apparently have reserves for processing kinect and snap things just in case the player calls for it allowing the game to still work (snap to skype video chat for example).
Been doing that for a year in Windows 8 already.
Doing it right now.
Problem? Nope.
Gonna be more of a problem on a bigger TV screen? Noooope. (37 inch TV for PC monitor in man cave, bigger TV in living room)
So you can read all that in the video? You think you'd be able to see the action (imagine watching Madden tips). You'll be able to see what options players would be choosing? I don't think so.