• Hey, guest user. Hope you're enjoying NeoGAF! Have you considered registering for an account? Come join us and add your take to the daily discourse.

Xbox One UI vid w/Snap

Thrakier

Member
If you load a browser within the snap i assume it loads at mobile width, which is smart because fluid sites (becoming more common) would "snap" into place, displaying content for smaller screens.

If thats the case (and i prefer mobile browsing on Gaf then Desktop) i could have NeoGaf on the right while a game loads then snap back into gaming.

IF it works this way it will most likely be a key feature for me, and many other gamers.

Yeah, those 30 second reads at gaf on the tv screen...instead of doing it on your mobile wtih probably a much better redability...that's a KILLER feature. Guys, please...
 
Looks cool.

But I see no use for it imo

I don't think the video is showing an ideal use for the snap feature. There will be apps tailored to the snap feature to give you and much easier and accessible view of information.

I envision using this for live updated sports scores, skype calls and fantasy sports while playing or watching games. This works while playing a game or watching tv so I would imagine the skype call being the biggest item.
 

XTERC

Member
With all of the fuss made recently about the OS I wasn't expecting it to look that good. Hopefully the release will go smoother than some people expect.
 

Caayn

Member
Snap and other things like it, at launch, are controlling 10% of the GPU on the Xbone, even if you don't use it.
Every system reserves a certain percentage of power for their OS to use. The Xbox 360 and PS3 do that and so does the PS4. Devs don't have, and never will have, access to 100% of the power on either systems.
This snap feature is a big reason why the Xbone is significantly less powerful than the PS4. It's not just an option that you don't have to use. The requirement for the system to have it has hindered the machine's ability to play games versus the competition.
No, the 10% of the GPU power that is reserved isn't the biggest reason why the Xbox One is slower. It's that very same GPU in the first place, not the power reservation. The power reservation is just a slight increase to the power gap.
 
I just don't get this snapping thing.

Snapping a version of IE, with a borderline unusable aspect ratio, seems like an inferior experience to just pulling out my iPad. I get the use scenario for fantasy football stuff, but everything else just seems to be a poor solution to a problem that doesn't exist.
 

DBT85

Member
These are the silliest statements ever. Don't have enough what? Games will be fine on X1 everyone is just caught up in the console war right now.

What do you mean don't have enough what? The subject of those posts is that 10% of the GPU is used for Snap and other similar features, most of which many people have said they do not want.

The Xbone GPU is only 1.31TF in the first place, against 1.84 for its cheaper competitor. They are giving up an additional 10% for these features, making that gap even larger.

If the prices were swapped over almost ALL of this fighting and crying and shit that's been all over GAF for months wouldn't be close to as big an issue. People would really not care and just make the choice, cheaper machine, lower res, more expensive machine, higher res.

But that isn't where we are.

People that have an Xbone will, I'm sure, love the games they play, and will think they look great. That is not in question.

Every system reserves a certain percentage of power for their OS to use. The Xbox 360 and PS3 do that and so does the PS4. Devs don't have, and never will have, access to 100% of the power on either systems.

I forget where I said that any did. But 10% of a GPU (I'm totally guessing here) is substantially more than the PS3, the PS4, the Xbox, The 360 allocate to something other than gaming. Every system reserves CPU time and RAM for the Os and other tasks, but not that much GPU time, because they don't need to.

As I said above, people who have an Xbone will enjoy the games, think they look great, and I've no doubt that plenty will never even know that the PS4 is different. Their enjoyment shall not be spoiled, their lives shall not change, they will be happy with their purchase.
 

Dega

Eeny Meenie Penis
It's just another spin on the multi-screen hype that's going on at the moment. It has the same utility as the WiiU controller/smartglass/psvita connection, and all other asymertrical solutions. The xBone version just happens to be the most clumsy solution really.

Maybe, I'll give it a chance though and seeing some of the apps like Machinima has me anxious to see what else can be developed in the future. As a programmer myself stuff like this is very interesting to me.
 

RayMaker

Banned
when i sit down to play a game, i just want to play a game. i dont want to surf on the web, watch tv or youtube, use apps, read in forums. hell for 99% i dont even listen to other music while im gaming. so yeah.... why?_? do i need ADHS to find this "feature" useful?

I agree I use my phone to browse the net when i'am playing,if i need a game guide or youtube tip videos.

The benefit of this interface is that it will make gaming more accessible.

When I game now, I boot up my PS3 and change my AV input then wait for the game to load, it probably takes about 1-2 mins total time to get into the game, and although this does not seem much, there are times when I intend to game but cant be bothered in waiting and rather just stay on PC and read gaf, watch movies,youtube etc (my PC is connected to my 40''tv by the way)

So in a way the XBOX one is trying to replace your av equipment, which will mean the xbox one will be switched on a lot of the time, personally this wont benefit me because I use my PC for movies/internet and the rest of my multimedia things, if I could hdmi passthrough my PC through the X1 it would be cool because then I could switch instantly into my paused game rather then have to wait a few mins.

Familys and people who dont have there pc attached to there main TV's would also benefit from the instant switching, with the X1 becoming the multimedia hub.

I think it will become a lot of ppls main hub, because this generation the only thing that made people switch off there PS3/360's was when they wanted to watch tv, now with the X1 its really makes your entertainment more accessible with instant access to every type of media you could want from your tv.

but having a PC attached to your tv kind of wrecks Microsofts vision of having there device always on when your using your TV.

In 20 years Microsoft and sony and maybe some other companies will offer a device that does everything that works with multiple screens wirelessly, and is designed to work for entertainment and work, consoles and PC's will be a dieing breed.

I think I have just described steam machines/steam OS, holy shit valve are ingenious .
 
Good luck trying to watch a Youtube clip in that tiny 1/3 of a screen.

Screenshot_11.png


Been doing that for a year in Windows 8 already.

Doing it right now.

Problem? Nope.

Gonna be more of a problem on a bigger TV screen? Noooope. (37 inch TV for PC monitor in man cave, bigger TV in living room)
 

LCfiner

Member
No, the 10% of the GPU power that is reserved isn't the biggest reason why the Xbox One is slower. It's that very same GPU in the first place, not the power reservation. The power reservation is just a slight increase to the power gap.

This discussion has happened a bunch of times. The 10% is not what I'm talking about. It's bigger than that. Here, once more:

Multitasking like this is a big reason why the Xbone had to have 8GB of RAM. A decision they made a long time ago and since they needed so much RAM and couldn't count on cheap GDDR5, they had to use slower DDR3 RAM. Which means they needed on chip cache to speed things up for graphics, which took away from their GPU budget on the chip.

Which left us with a 1.34 TFLOPS GPU.

THEN, you take off another 10% for some of the window scaling tricks and we have a machine with 600 GFLOPS less than the PS4.
 

Prine

Banned
It's just another spin on the multi-screen hype that's going on at the moment. It has the same utility as the WiiU controller/smartglass/psvita connection, and all other asymertrical solutions. The xBone version just happens to be the most clumsy solution really.

Not really, this is an integrated implementation with options for tailored apps to snap on. And you have the option to bolt on apps being used on your Xbox One. We dont know the extent of this, but we know you can share game meta data in real time, where as the others dont offer nearly as much options.
 

Prine

Banned
Yeah, those 30 second reads at gaf on the tv screen...instead of doing it on your mobile wtih probably a much better redability...that's a KILLER feature. Guys, please...

30 seconds without looking anywhere is convenient and i suppose many more seconds while you wait for multiplayer games to be setup. I know many will be happy with this.
 

dose

Member
Been doing that for a year in Windows 8 already.

Doing it right now.

Problem? Nope.
So you can read all that in the video? You think you'd be able to see the action (imagine watching Madden tips). You'll be able to see what options players would be choosing? I don't think so.
 

jaxpunk

Member
30 seconds without looking anywhere is convenient and i suppose many more seconds while you wait for multiplayer games to be setup. I know many will be happy with this.

Wait it's now down to a, well we all have smart phones, tablets, etc. But I don't want to move my eye balls.

Insane.
 
Screenshot_11.png


Been doing that for a year in Windows 8 already.

Doing it right now.

Problem? Nope.

Gonna be more of a problem on a bigger TV screen? Noooope. (37 inch TV for PC monitor in man cave, bigger TV in living room)
Imagine that tiny window at 6-10+ feet away. Gluck trying to see any detail.
 
Nice. Figured something like this would come out before a true live demo after all the hubbub. I'd like to see all of it though.

But yeah, it's basically Windows 8. Oh for stuff like Twitter/Facebook/stuff that's an app that takes the size into account, it kicks ass. But if I wanted that on my TV, I'd just install it on my HTPC.

It works sweet for tablets too, but I don't really want to apply it to consoles. Navigating the app while playing sounds like hell on earth. Shit, the DS4 would work perfect for it with that trackpad :p

Also: How comes Windows 8 is so derided, but the same exact feature/OS on a console causes this sort of reaction? Have you guys not used it before? All your ideas are old hat.
 

Prine

Banned
Wait it's now down to a, well we all have smart phones, tablets, etc. But I don't want to move my eye balls.

Insane.

I didnt say that, thats how you choose to put it.

I only take out my phone because thats the quickest option. This implementation seems to help with that.
 

Caayn

Member
This discussion has happened a bunch of times. The 10% is not what I'm talking about. It's bigger than that. Here, once more:

Multitasking like this is a big reason why the Xbone had to have 8GB of RAM. A decision they made a long time ago and since they needed so much RAM and couldn't count on cheap GDDR5, they had to use slower DDR3 RAM. Which means they needed on chip cache to speed things up for graphics, which took away from their GPU budget on the chip.

Which left us with a 1.34 TFLOPS GPU.

THEN, you take off another 10% for some of the window scaling tricks and we have a machine with 600 GFLOPS less than the PS4.
And how does my post neglect all of this?
 
clearly the text will scale, or be scaleable.

Video windows won't, the whole point of using it is so you can watch TV or watch youtube walkthroughs, etc.. while you play.

If it's snapped in the way he showed if you are the recommended viewing distance away from a big TV how are you going to see the detail?
 
Imagine that tiny window at 6-10+ feet away. Gluck trying to see any detail.

What is wrong with some of you people? Is it impossible for some to use their imaginations?

He is primarily on GAF while also having Youtube up. He can choose to watch the Video in that smaller window, and depending on the size of his monitor it is absolutely possible that he may see "detail" or whatever he wants to see in the Youtube video.

Or...or...wait for it....He could freaking switch them around. He could make the Youtube video bigger and shrink GAF for however long it takes for him to "see any detail". I know, I know. Amazing!! Who would have ever thought of that? :-/

Options. How do they work?
 
What is wrong with some of you people? Is it impossible for some to use their imaginations?

He is primarily on GAF while also having Youtube up. He can choose to watch the Video in that smaller window, and depending on the size of his monitor it is absolutely possible that he may see "detail" or whatever he wants to see in the Youtube video.

Or...or...wait for it....He could freaking switch them around. He could make the Youtube video bigger and shrink GAF for however long it takes for him to "see any detail". I know, I know. Amazing!! Who would have ever thought of that? :-/

Options. How do they work?
That's great if you sit up close to a monitor.

I use snap on 60" TV and I sit maybe 10 feet away from it and all you see is something moving in the top right of the screen, you can't see any detail just colour.

I REALLY don't see the point in snapping something to the TV, you can't see whats happening and you are compromising the real estate for whatever else you are doing on the console at the same time.

In an age where a lot of people have tablets and smartphones is this REALLY a killer feature?
 

Godslay

Banned
Yes, this post of yours sure has a lot more content than my opinion about video game consoles.

I went to bed after this post. I stated my opinion, and moved on with the discussion, whereas you had to reiterate to everyone over and again why you hated it. Definition of thread shitting. Don't like it, don't use it.
 

LCfiner

Member
And how does my post neglect all of this?

I was still just speaking about your first post that I replied to, where you asked why someone would not want this feature as an option on PS4 even if we were to not use it. it was in response to someone who said that "thankfully" the PS4 does not do snapping of apps and multitasking

The reason why some of us are glad PS4 does not do this is because we know it would compromise other aspects of the machine that we happen to care more about.

that's pretty much it.
 
That's great if you sit up close to a monitor.

I use snap on 60" TV and I sit maybe 10 feet away from it and all you see is something moving in the top right of the screen, you can't see any detail just colour.

I REALLY don't see the point in snapping something to the TV, you can't see whats happening and you are compromising the real estate for whatever else you are doing on the console at the same time.

In an age where a lot of people have tablets and smartphones is this REALLY a killer feature?

I just tested your scenario with my 37 inch PC monitor/tv and if you can't make out anything on a 60 inch at ten feet, then my conclusion is that you could possibly do with some glasses imo.

To add to that, videos also have audio in them.

The screenshot I showed had a video of Total Biscuit running through big deals in the Halloween Steam sale while I was browsing GAF.

I didn't need to be watching it intensely to get the information I needed, but if I wanted to see what he was talking about, I could look over and see what he's talking about.

If there was something he talked about or that I saw that I wanted to see in greater detail, all it took was for me to resize the window as I shifted my primary focus to his video instead of GAFing. Once I saw what I wanted to see, made GAF my main focus again and continued to listen while I chatted.

Replace my TotalBiscuit video with podcasts, twitch streams, news outlets, youtube commentators where a lot of the time you're actually listening to them more than you're watching some random gameplay they put "under" voice and you can see where it could easily work well.



Just because you can't imagine a scenario where it would work, doesn't mean they don't exist. A feature also doesn't have to cater to you personally in order to have worth in the world. If its something you find not useful, that's okay.

So many posts in these kinds of threads basically amount to "I don't like this, so why should it exist?"

Companies are allowed to do things that interest people other than yourself, and you're allowed to be disinterested. Especially when its optional functionality that will present itself in many different ways to many different people.
 
That's great if you sit up close to a monitor.

I use snap on 60" TV and I sit maybe 10 feet away from it and all you see is something moving in the top right of the screen, you can't see any detail just colour.

I REALLY don't see the point in snapping something to the TV, you can't see whats happening and you are compromising the real estate for whatever else you are doing on the console at the same time.

In an age where a lot of people have tablets and smartphones is this REALLY a killer feature?

You don't watch TV whilst playing a game, if you did the size of the screen would be irrelevant, you'd miss most of the content you're watching because you're trying to do two things at once. It's brilliant for watching sports, for example England football team. Unlike my beloved Liverpool, I don't want to watch every second of an England game, with snap I could snap the match to the side of the screen so I have an overview of what's going on, and then I could maximise the screen when something interesting happens, all with one voice command, beautifully elegant.

On a side point, do people really sit 10 feet away whilst playing a game? Even on big screens I have to sit within 5 foot.
 
You don't watch TV whilst playing a game, if you did the size of the screen would be irrelevant, you'd miss most of the content you're watching because you're trying to do two things at once. It's brilliant for watching sports, for example England football team. Unlike my beloved Liverpool, I don't want to watch every second of an England game, with snap I could snap the match to the side of the screen so I have an overview of what's going on, and then I could maximise the screen when something interesting happens, all with one voice command, beautifully elegant.

On a side point, do people really sit 10 feet away whilst playing a game? Even on big screens I have to sit within 5 foot.

I need to post a picture of my man cave sometime. I have 2 TVs mounted right next to each other so I can watch TV while playing games.
 

scitek

Member
I'm not getting an X1, but this kinda feature is really useful. I'm always Shift+TABbing on PC to read GAF while games load.
 

xxracerxx

Don't worry, I'll vouch for them.
Screenshot_11.png


Been doing that for a year in Windows 8 already.

Doing it right now.

Problem? Nope.

Gonna be more of a problem on a bigger TV screen? Noooope. (37 inch TV for PC monitor in man cave, bigger TV in living room)

This is more akin to listening to the radio than being able to watch the clip.
 
The rumors of snap crashing games might still be true. Just because one game is running without a crash for a few minutes doesn't really prove much.

It might still be true, but based on what we're seeing, it doesn't make the console crash when it's used in game as was claimed by a number of insiders. That's really my only issue, they made it sound like even attempting to use it would cause it to crash and yet here we have video evidence that directly contradicts that claim.

Whatever. I trust the insiders. Let me know when it's in thousands of homes and no reports of it crashing games.

As do I, famous has been right on virtually everything he's leaked and yet...
 
It might still be true, but based on what we're seeing, it doesn't make the console crash when it's used in game as was claimed by a number of insiders. That's really my only issue, they made it sound like even attempting to use it would cause it to crash and yet here we have video evidence that directly contradicts that claim.



As do I, famous has been right on virtually everything he's leaked and yet...

What I'm confused by is how Snap is causing the games to crash. Aren't they run by different parts of the system?
 
from what we've hear it has something to do with RAM management

Hmmm. But aren't 3GBs reserved to cover the OS and deal with the snap? The other 5GBs deal with the game. If there is an issue (which there may have been, but is likely fixed) it must had been an issue with compressing the image.
 

cool_dude

Banned
edited...
Also, Devs don't have to use snap, but I'm sure if some dev creates a realistic CSI game, you could bing what you should look for in a muder situation. Though it could tell you, but what if it didnt? You could just wing it, and that makes the game more interesting. So the game can be more immersive that way too, because theres no screen popping up telling you what to do, you have to figure it out, guessing it or actually looking it up.

There are many possibilities.

Yes, many creative possibilities. The "CSI" type game could be a small Xbox Live game where you "scavenger hunt" and can browse the Web for clues....like viral marketing of sorts. Also, Indie developers can really take this "educational" angle and make games to help learn anatomy, chemistry, geography, etc.

Also, if it gets popular, this could plug into live TV game shows. You could vote for someone and/or participate in quizzes, matches, sports chat, etc.

I play Xbox World Poker Tour a lot. This would be very useful while waiting for my turn (esp those slllllooooow players). I could catch up on my streaming TV shows, study/read, chat with friends/family, or browse the net. That would be perfect for these types of games.
 

USC-fan

Banned
I think it's because some of the xbox one's power is reserved for snap and kinect even if you don't use them, effecting power/resources used for games. Well if what's said about that is true. Like how memory is reserved for OS on both, GPU apparently have reserves for processing kinect and snap things just in case the player calls for it allowing the game to still work (snap to skype video chat for example).

DING DING DING

We already had reports of this causing problem with games. Running both apps has to take some power away from gaming. Its just common sense.

They have yet to really show why this is worth it. Seem half baked....
 

diffusionx

Gold Member
Screenshot_11.png


Been doing that for a year in Windows 8 already.

Doing it right now.

Problem? Nope.

Gonna be more of a problem on a bigger TV screen? Noooope. (37 inch TV for PC monitor in man cave, bigger TV in living room)

What app do you have snapped there?

So you can read all that in the video? You think you'd be able to see the action (imagine watching Madden tips). You'll be able to see what options players would be choosing? I don't think so.

I don't think it would be a problem on my TV. It's a cool feature.
 
Top Bottom