Lots of people seem to suffer from a persecution complex and a lack of introspection. Much has been made recently of the gaming media and their failings to report issues a certain way. Much has been made of commenters on other sites and their seeming disdain for neogaf. Notwithstanding the only conclusion many seem to draw is that everyone else is wrong and only the people on neogaf see the 'truth'.
I've seen a repeated trend where people have accused the gaming media of a double standard - claiming they made a big deal of the differences between PS3 and 360 versions of games, and are now downplaying the differences between the Xbox One and PS4 versions of games. I think this exists more in their memory then in reality. The gaming media did not make a big deal of the the platform differences - people on internet forums did. Some games received slightly higher review scores - something we may well see in this generation.
The other issue I've referred to is the near universal rejection of any outside criticism of neogaf. Like any other site neogaf has it's strengths and weaknesses. However there's a glaring lack of introspection when outside criticisms and suggestions of bias are dismissed without any examination. Personally it's a bit disconcerting to see nearly every thread loaded with dismissive gifs and jabs at the coming consoles. There's also a disturbing trend of some people who barely seem to hide their hope that one console fail.
Having been around for the last several console launches this is little different then most - some actual differences and lots of buzz words. One of the biggest mistakes a person who participates in enthusiast forums can make is assuming that everyone is (or should be) the same issues they are. Some people dismissing the differences as unimportant obviously are doing so based on a personal bias - however this is clearly not true for everyone doing so.
I largely agree with this.
I honestly think a lot of the furor this time though is that the consoles are launching head to head in the same timeframe and some members of the media/enthusiast press seem to be trying to hard to either downplay any differences or appear impartial which in some instances actually does readers a disservice. There was a pretty decent time gap between the launch of the 360 and PS3 which in hindsight makes a lot of the issues and price with the PS3 even more laughable. Here they're launching head to head, so outside of the console warriors who have made decisions either way people are looking for potential purchasing decisions and seeing some people/outlets gloss over what are some pretty objective performance issues and differences.
Couple that with Microsoft having unbelievably terrible messaging and multiple reverals on VERY unpopular policies (DRM, Kinect, etc) there's an audience already out for blood. So that's certainly part of it, but I do feel that certain people in the press are definitely underplaying things, intentionally or not. I feel it's a bit premature to start aggressively calling out most outlets though until both systems are actually out and we have direct head to head comparisons of multiple games on both platforms. If at launch direct comparisons between versions show clear and noticeable differences and there is little or no difference in the review scores between the versions and/or outlets start/continue to downlplay that then I think people will have a legitimate axe to grind.
I think certain people are just being given too much attention at the moment since everyone's in full on console launch mode and grasping at everything out there. Most of the individuals being called out for playing favorites or being fanboys on either side were almost all people I largely ignored already beforehand, so I'm seeing a trend there.