So if someone in another conversation responded to something you had written by saying, "I got a sentence into your post and stopped reading. What you said sounded ego driven and stupid. I'd rather close my eyes than finish looking at your post," would you find that negative? That's my underlying point. I feel like this is worth bringing up, even in a review thread for a different game, because you're not alone in doing this. It's a bad attitude to put into words, even if it's how you feel about the particular reviewer. Once it's become a personal comment about the reviewer, that in itself is off-topic; the game and the review is no longer the subject.
I'd be the last to declare the "authority" of any particular reviewers. It's the nature of editorializing. Outside of having reference points from people I'm familiar with, you'll tend to see me making the same point you have in the broader sense. I'm just saying in a discussion about particular reactions, don't bring in outside dirt about how "stupid" someone sounds if you're not going to even bother commenting on the ideas you're dismissing. I would never say the example I posed up above in one of these conversations. You've doubled down that it's a reasonable part of discourse, and I strongly disagree.
Because nobody ever cares about achievements or trophies right?
Are there going to be achievements for having high scores in the game?
are their achievements for having the leaderboards top spot in resogun? Stop telling me what every gamer plays for, there are plenty out there who play only for leaderboards and not achievements or trophys, there are other gamers who play for achievements, there are gamers who play for story, and there are gamers who want to just jump into a hack and slash when they only have 30 minutes to spare anyways
Wow, that's an interesting take on that. So majority rules in everything? That might be the dumbest thing that I've seen today. It's perfectly acceptable to say "I think I will like this thing" even if other people don't like it.
The idiots here are those that think they can dictate what other people are allowed to enjoy. I would imagine that you like some movies or games that are below "good" on Metacritic as well.
Saying "I think I'm going to enjoy it" (and not trying to force other people to enjoy it or change their minds) is just fine. Piling on somebody and not being able to accept that is beyond pitiful. Grow the fuck up.
No, it's unforgivable for a COMBAT ONLY game to have a pathetically paltry bit of enemy variety. It's not bad at all for a game to be combat focused - Devil May Cry does it and very successfully, because it has the greatest action combat system on Earth.
What does not work is a game with no variety at all but an insanely limited depth and variety to your arsenal, versus a grotesquely tiny amount of enemy types. That does not work. It will never work. People making excuses for it are just that: excuses. Most people will never excuse that type of game anywhere, and we never will, because we value our money.
It's not because some people DONT GET WHAT THEY WERE GOING FOR, as Senjutsu embarrassingly tried to imply. Action combat games are one of my favorite types of games.
I can't wait to try tonight to see if the combat is poopoo in my hands, the reaction i saw on the knack reviews i would of figured it was poopoo but the game is beautiful and super fun - I am going in blind though because if i read reviews I'll just constantly focus on trying to see the negatives lol
these are the sort of high level posts we have in here from people who havent even played the game?
It is a lot of fun and it looks and sounds great. It's not a great game by any means but a solid 7.5/10 for me - decent launch title and really shows off the new xbox well.
Just because someone likes a game, doesnt mean they are biased.
You guys seem to spend more time on here trolling and complaining rather than playing actual games.
and you guys seem to spend more time complaining about the guys trolling and complaining than playing the actual game..and what?
What the...(from rev3 vid review)
What the...(from rev3 vid review)
What the...(from rev3 vid review)
Knack gets shit reviews: WAHT ARE THEY TALKING ABOUT GOTY
Ryse gets shit reviews: See? Xbox sucks.
They're launch titles. It's rare that launch titles are great. But the Sony bias on this board is at a fever pitch right now.
At least Xbox gamers have 3 exclusive games to play at launch. I went with ps4 and there's a wasteland until 2014.
Damn, his ancestor was in a bad game.
What the...(from rev3 vid review)
What the...(from rev3 vid review)
and you guys seem to spend more time complaining about the guys trolling and complaining than playing the actual game..and what?
Bottom teeth in front of top teeth, only a true monster smiles like that.
Bottom teeth in front of top teeth, only a true monster smiles like that.
You put yourself in a magical loop, first trolling of any kind should be squashed, raising concerns about it is everyone's duty, second Mike has played the game and is speaking from hindsight, he is in a position to voice his opinion based on his playtime, a position better than most here.
Don't worry it's better than Batman Arkham Asylum combat, just as deep, Senjutsu told me so.
he was supposed to make a thread proving it but that never materialized, shockingly enough. I have no idea why, it was such a good idea.
I am getting tired of this bullshit... Anyone who likes MS games is put under a microscope. God I miss the good ol' days where people were just fanboys. MS must be going broke from all the shill money they are paying out.
I don't really need the thought police telling me how I need to interperate video podcasts, or those who are presenting them. If I find the people delivering them too immature or trying to hard to be quirky, I will turn it off. It is my prerogative, as they need to earn me as an audience member. Please, deal with it.
So, I was right. I went ahead and watched the WHOLE Knack "quick look."
There was almost nothing of any real substance. Mostly saying it was repetitive, and a lot of them dying and being upset at unfriendly checkpoints. They seem jaded and part of their own echo chamber. Not impressed.
So I do not see why you would push that video. I was a waste of time to be honest. I have seen better overviews watching Twitch.
What the...(from rev3 vid review)
Someone pointing out that it's poor form to bring insults about how "stupid" someone sounds without addressing the reason they were brought into the conversation in the first place is not anything close to pushing that point of view on you. And calling someone the "thought police" when they bring something up in a discussion is a simplistic way to avoid actually responding. You still seem to be under the impression I'm saying "you must love reviewer Y" or "X game is terrible." I've said neither of those things, but you're responding as if I have while ignoring my actual words. If you think a response is necessary, I'm happy to keep going, but the few points I tried to rise are already overstated as they are (and we're now way deep into off-topic territory). My original curiosity about what you thought about that game is long dead.
can someone make a gif of smashing the A button to do an attack and on every hit it's a bad review score?
*summons El Torro humbly*
killer instict has only 6 opponents and its still great.
devil may cry you say it had the best combat system, well
ryse has the best graphics
also its set in a not very common era.
plus, the replayability will come -if it comes- from mastering the combat system and going for highscores. kind of makes sense, doesnt it?
Considering the fact that the story apparently includes the Britons invading Rome with elephants, I would call it laughable.
You should watch the 45 minute quick look on GiantBomb.
I don't understand the incredibly lazy lumping together of Knack and Ryse. The problems with each game are obviously very different for each title. Ryse has a good challenging combat system that they say is fun, not to mention a unique setting powered by incredible graphics. The fatal problem is that there is nothing else to the gameplay beyond combat which makes it seem really thin in comparison to top tier action games like Batman Arkham or Assassin's Creed. By all accounts from the GiantBomb quick look if a game like Ryse with it's combat and graphics was a big sandbox open world game it could be a great game.
2 posts since joining in June & only to talk about how great Ryse is?
Knack gets shit reviews: WAHT ARE THEY TALKING ABOUT GOTY
Ryse gets shit reviews: See? Xbox sucks.
They're launch titles. It's rare that launch titles are great. But the Sony bias on this board is at a fever pitch right now.
At least Xbox gamers have 3 exclusive games to play at launch. I went with ps4 and there's a wasteland until 2014.
God dayumn, this was beautiful. Well said.Can we just get one thing straight? When you say "fuck the haters, I'm going to buy this game even though the impressions from people who, unlike me, have actually played it say that it's awful" you are not taking some grand stand against The Haters or The Man; you are bending over and getting forcibly fucked by a gigantic canoe wielded by a multi-million dollar marketing machine which thrives on generating defensive reactionary sentiment and irrational hype in order to take your money from you.
Well the game has more combat moves and I really doubt it has a smaller enemy variety than Arkham Asylum (which has normal, armored, knife thugs and titans - normal thugs can use stun rods, pipes and guns). So if you just look at the combat part of the game I wouldn't be surprised if the game was just as deep or deeper than AA