• Hey, guest user. Hope you're enjoying NeoGAF! Have you considered registering for an account? Come join us and add your take to the daily discourse.

Ryse: Son Of Rome |Reviews| It's going to be a bloodbath!

Warewolf

Member
I'm looking forward to Ryse more than the next guy I'm sure, but man, that Kotaku review. . . . Talk about mixed messages.

I find it weird how focussed it was on what the reviewer brought to the game, I get that you can learn the animations and anticipate the button prompts but let's be honest. That's hardly how the combat was designed right? Can the prompts be turned off? That would be a different story.

I have a lot of fun with objectively terrible games all the time but that's me bringing something to the table that wasn't accounted for in the design process. I mean, I've played Tenchu Z for over 200 hours but I'd hardly recommend it to someone else.
 

tfur

Member
So if someone in another conversation responded to something you had written by saying, "I got a sentence into your post and stopped reading. What you said sounded ego driven and stupid. I'd rather close my eyes than finish looking at your post," would you find that negative? That's my underlying point. I feel like this is worth bringing up, even in a review thread for a different game, because you're not alone in doing this. It's a bad attitude to put into words, even if it's how you feel about the particular reviewer. Once it's become a personal comment about the reviewer, that in itself is off-topic; the game and the review is no longer the subject.

I'd be the last to declare the "authority" of any particular reviewers. It's the nature of editorializing. Outside of having reference points from people I'm familiar with, you'll tend to see me making the same point you have in the broader sense. I'm just saying in a discussion about particular reactions, don't bring in outside dirt about how "stupid" someone sounds if you're not going to even bother commenting on the ideas you're dismissing. I would never say the example I posed up above in one of these conversations. You've doubled down that it's a reasonable part of discourse, and I strongly disagree.

I don't really need the thought police telling me how I need to interperate video podcasts, or those who are presenting them. If I find the people delivering them too immature or trying to hard to be quirky, I will turn it off. It is my prerogative, as they need to earn me as an audience member. Please, deal with it.

So, I was right. I went ahead and watched the WHOLE Knack "quick look."

There was almost nothing of any real substance. Mostly saying it was repetitive, and a lot of them dying and being upset at unfriendly checkpoints. They seem jaded and part of their own echo chamber. Not impressed.

So I do not see why you would push that video. I was a waste of time to be honest. I have seen better overviews watching Twitch.
 
Are there going to be achievements for having high scores in the game?

are their achievements for having the leaderboards top spot in resogun? Stop telling me what every gamer plays for, there are plenty out there who play only for leaderboards and not achievements or trophys, there are other gamers who play for achievements, there are gamers who play for story, and there are gamers who want to just jump into a hack and slash when they only have 30 minutes to spare anyways
 
are their achievements for having the leaderboards top spot in resogun? Stop telling me what every gamer plays for, there are plenty out there who play only for leaderboards and not achievements or trophys, there are other gamers who play for achievements, there are gamers who play for story, and there are gamers who want to just jump into a hack and slash when they only have 30 minutes to spare anyways

I'm not telling you anything. I'm asking.
 

Camp Lo

Banned
Wow, that's an interesting take on that. So majority rules in everything? That might be the dumbest thing that I've seen today. It's perfectly acceptable to say "I think I will like this thing" even if other people don't like it.

The idiots here are those that think they can dictate what other people are allowed to enjoy. I would imagine that you like some movies or games that are below "good" on Metacritic as well.

Saying "I think I'm going to enjoy it" (and not trying to force other people to enjoy it or change their minds) is just fine. Piling on somebody and not being able to accept that is beyond pitiful. Grow the fuck up.

Well said. He completely went left field with that shit.
 

malfcn

Member
I am still getting it and I am sure it will be enjoyable. The title doesn't look like a 10, but I think some of the low scores are a tad harsh.
 

Eppy Thatcher

God's had his chance.
I came for the funnies and now i'm leaving wondering what's wrong with me because I don't despise KZ:SF ...

I know i'm not done with it yet but.. im actually enjoying it. Should i see a doctor gaf?

I would have liked to see this game as a Kinect super star. Seems like a no brainer to have at least ONE of your launch titles be a hardcore gamer focused kinect showcase. At the very least then you could have something special about this game instead of just 'It's bland. It's short. it's pretty."

Maybe they saw how the motion control was coming along and it was not good? Anyone have the behind the scenes on why the change was made?>
 
No, it's unforgivable for a COMBAT ONLY game to have a pathetically paltry bit of enemy variety. It's not bad at all for a game to be combat focused - Devil May Cry does it and very successfully, because it has the greatest action combat system on Earth.

What does not work is a game with no variety at all but an insanely limited depth and variety to your arsenal, versus a grotesquely tiny amount of enemy types. That does not work. It will never work. People making excuses for it are just that: excuses. Most people will never excuse that type of game anywhere, and we never will, because we value our money.

It's not because some people DONT GET WHAT THEY WERE GOING FOR, as Senjutsu embarrassingly tried to imply. Action combat games are one of my favorite types of games.

I can't wait to try tonight to see if the combat is poopoo in my hands, the reaction i saw on the knack reviews i would of figured it was poopoo but the game is beautiful and super fun - I am going in blind though because if i read reviews I'll just constantly focus on trying to see the negatives lol
 

You gotta be kidding me if this is what people are making a fuss over. The performance during sword and shield combat on the outside where the war is going on is consistently in the 26-30fps range with many ally and enemy AI on screen fighting amongst themselves. There's a lot going on in this scene. Performance even goes above 30fps to 32fps a few times, sometimes lingering at 30. This is especially true of the fight on the inside where it's quite regularly in the stable 30-32 fps range, with minor dips to 28 during regular combat.

In fact, from what I noticed, framerate tends to dip most often to the 24-26 range specifically when you enter into the slo motion executions, where the framerate is of far less importance since the entire world is purposely slowed down around the player to begin with. All one has to do is look at the smoothness of everything when in an execution to know that framerate isn't a problem in those situations, which makes the performance criticisms a little misleading, because there's no differentiation being made between regular combat and the slo mo executions. It dips to 26 and very briefly to 24 when he's fighting an opponent surrounded by a wall of flames, but the dip to 24 literally happens at the triggering of the slo mo execution, and then the entire execution actually plays out at a speed of 28fps. This specific instance barely looks like it lasted a second. Framerate becomes it's absolute worst in the whole video at the very moment the player is completing the arrow gun sequence, right before the player gets knocked off as a result of all the flaming boulders raining down on the crowded battlefield, a point in which player input was no longer necessary, since at that point you literally have nothing left to do but wait to be transitioned directly into a cutscene. That's what's going on during the famous 16fps moment people talk about. The player, having already successfully defended everything and completed his objective, is now watching a scripted flaming boulder sequence before it sends you into a cutscene where you have zero control. I'm stunned this is controversial. A sequence where the player's actions were now 100% irrelevant.

Performance was most consistently in the 24-26 range during the arrow gun shooting sequence while the player is overlooking a huge, ongoing battle between countless enemy and friendly ai, with flaming arrows flying through the air, fires burning all over, and multiple thick, black plumes of smoke going off into the air. At no other point in this entire video was performance consistently any worse than this when it mattered, and it happened not while doing the sword and shield combat that surely compromises the heavy majority of the gameplay in this game, but during a moment when the player was overlooking a crowded battlefield with what seemed like easily 50-100 AI streaming in for the fight. Hardly a condemnation of the performance for a game that's mostly about its sword and shield combat. This was with me doing some hardcore nitpicking. I was under the impression that performance was judged on how much of an adverse effect, or lack there of, it had on your ability to play the game. At no point in this entire video does performance ever approach dire enough levels to affect the player's performance.

Lastly, don't forget that it's impossible to fail the executions, so why would a blip in framerate when they're triggered even matter, especially when they're so smooth and in slo motion to begin with? Clearly if you plan to get the timing right for the prompts, framerate isn't an issue for doing that based on available footage. Even negative reviews don't seem to knock the game for this, at least none I've read.

I can't wait to try tonight to see if the combat is poopoo in my hands, the reaction i saw on the knack reviews i would of figured it was poopoo but the game is beautiful and super fun - I am going in blind though because if i read reviews I'll just constantly focus on trying to see the negatives lol

I got to play knack quite a bit at a friend's, and I liked it. So did my friend. So, I don't know, maybe a game having its simplicities doesn't bother me as much as it does others.
 
these are the sort of high level posts we have in here from people who havent even played the game?

It is a lot of fun and it looks and sounds great. It's not a great game by any means but a solid 7.5/10 for me - decent launch title and really shows off the new xbox well.

Just because someone likes a game, doesnt mean they are biased.

You guys seem to spend more time on here trolling and complaining rather than playing actual games.

and you guys seem to spend more time complaining about the guys trolling and complaining than playing the actual game..and what?
 

willybobo

Banned
"If you find yourself alone, riding in the green fields with the 720p sun on your face, do not be troubled. For you are in Elysium, and you're already dead!"
 

Albo

Member
What the...(from rev3 vid review)

px2uwHkmL9_8ssP-4l13uJs7DvcOK6OyFHmV-6Mt4BF7mVVM2KydDiQY2mKE4xD3IcHgNWiidEpN3STdh3RgByEYDd1EBx9QwQzs6SMICxUYxPLeIj3YU2VT3A
6664h2dps.gif
 

Stumpokapow

listen to the mad man
Knack gets shit reviews: WAHT ARE THEY TALKING ABOUT GOTY

Ryse gets shit reviews: See? Xbox sucks.

They're launch titles. It's rare that launch titles are great. But the Sony bias on this board is at a fever pitch right now.

Many people agreed with the negative Knack reviews. Some people are disagreeing with the Ryse reviews. Almost no one actually thinks a bad game in either launch lineup is indicative of the system's broader prospects. Even given that launch titles are rarely revolutionary it appears that Knack and Ryse are, by consensus, shaping up to be bad eggs (of course someone can disagree with consensus).

At least Xbox gamers have 3 exclusive games to play at launch. I went with ps4 and there's a wasteland until 2014.

I'm sorry that you made what you consider to be a poor purchase decision, but I'm not really sure why you are complaining about people talking about Ryse's reception in a thread about Ryse's reception and instead making it about the consoles as a whole. You could easily resell your PS4 for MSRP or a little higher if you feel the Xbox One is a better decision for you.
 

Prine

Banned
and you guys seem to spend more time complaining about the guys trolling and complaining than playing the actual game..and what?

You put yourself in a magical loop, first trolling of any kind should be squashed, raising concerns about it is everyone's duty, second Mike has played the game and is speaking from hindsight, he is in a position to voice his opinion based on his playtime, a position better than most here.
 

foamdino

Member
Knack seems to be getting some interest from people watching twitch streams. If Ryse was streamed would it also gain some ground?

I watched some of the polygon stream and I thought Ryse looked pretty good - but I can definitely see it becoming repetitive.

I think for publishers, streaming may start becoming much more important than metacritic this gen. If your game looks crap on streams, then it's going to have a much bigger impact than initial reviews.
 

willybobo

Banned
Shrek was all smiles upon booting up Ryse.

But soon thereafter he was angry.

Even Doritos Pope couldn't cheer him up.

(For the record, I have not played Ryse or watched any films starring the man in that gif.)
 
You put yourself in a magical loop, first trolling of any kind should be squashed, raising concerns about it is everyone's duty, second Mike has played the game and is speaking from hindsight, he is in a position to voice his opinion based on his playtime, a position better than most here.

what are you even talking about?
 

Hypron

Member
Don't worry it's better than Batman Arkham Asylum combat, just as deep, Senjutsu told me so.

he was supposed to make a thread proving it but that never materialized, shockingly enough. I have no idea why, it was such a good idea.

Well the game has more combat moves and I really doubt it has a smaller enemy variety than Arkham Asylum (which has normal, armored, knife thugs and titans - normal thugs can use stun rods, pipes and guns). So if you just look at the combat part of the game I wouldn't be surprised if the game was just as deep or deeper than AA
 
Anyway I told you all about this game. Crysis 3 was really really poor and bland. It is one of the worst FPS games I have ever played. I knew this game wouldn't be good. Crytek is a crap studio now. I really doubt MS or EA will given them any more publishing deals in the future.
 

Fun Factor

Formerly FTWer
I am getting tired of this bullshit... Anyone who likes MS games is put under a microscope. God I miss the good ol' days where people were just fanboys. MS must be going broke from all the shill money they are paying out.

2 posts since joining in June & only to talk about how great Ryse is?
 

Gestault

Member
I don't really need the thought police telling me how I need to interperate video podcasts, or those who are presenting them. If I find the people delivering them too immature or trying to hard to be quirky, I will turn it off. It is my prerogative, as they need to earn me as an audience member. Please, deal with it.

So, I was right. I went ahead and watched the WHOLE Knack "quick look."

There was almost nothing of any real substance. Mostly saying it was repetitive, and a lot of them dying and being upset at unfriendly checkpoints. They seem jaded and part of their own echo chamber. Not impressed.

So I do not see why you would push that video. I was a waste of time to be honest. I have seen better overviews watching Twitch.

Someone pointing out that it's poor form to bring insults about how "stupid" someone sounds without addressing the reason they were brought into the conversation in the first place is not anything close to pushing that point of view on you. And calling someone the "thought police" when they bring something up in a discussion is a simplistic way to avoid actually responding. You still seem to be under the impression I'm saying "you must love reviewer Y" or "X game is terrible." I've said neither of those things, but you're responding as if I have while ignoring my actual words. If you think a response is necessary, I'm happy to keep going, but the few points I tried to rise are already overstated as they are (and we're now way deep into off-topic territory). My original curiosity about what you thought about that game is long dead.
 

tfur

Member
Someone pointing out that it's poor form to bring insults about how "stupid" someone sounds without addressing the reason they were brought into the conversation in the first place is not anything close to pushing that point of view on you. And calling someone the "thought police" when they bring something up in a discussion is a simplistic way to avoid actually responding. You still seem to be under the impression I'm saying "you must love reviewer Y" or "X game is terrible." I've said neither of those things, but you're responding as if I have while ignoring my actual words. If you think a response is necessary, I'm happy to keep going, but the few points I tried to rise are already overstated as they are (and we're now way deep into off-topic territory). My original curiosity about what you thought about that game is long dead.

So nothing of substance.

I have responded in detail, and it seems you are unable to accept that the only "bad form" is of those in the video that causes people to not be willing to sit through an hour of void.

I am sorry, I don't have to align myself with people who act stupid to pretend to be funny. Again, it is not an insult.

Further, it doesn't matter, since the video you pushed was of little value.
 

pulga

Banned
killer instict has only 6 opponents and its still great.

devil may cry you say it had the best combat system, well
ryse has the best graphics
also its set in a not very common era.


plus, the replayability will come -if it comes- from mastering the combat system and going for highscores. kind of makes sense, doesnt it?

did this guy just put "gud grafix" on the same pedestal as gameplay?

wow

gaming side, you've really gone off the deep end
 
I don't know, as I've grown older, I know what I like. This looks like something I'll love.

I don't have all the time in the world, so the fact that it's easy is fine by me. I love the setting, apparently the story and voice work is solid, and its a looker. Some of my favorite games in the gen that's fading away include Enslaved, Shadows of the Damned, Folklore, Wolverine Origins and yes, Wanted: Weapons of Fate. Not exactly AAA games.

Reviews are okay by me, I get the issues, just don't think they affect me all that much! Still looking forward to playing this tomorrow!
 
You should watch the 45 minute quick look on GiantBomb.

I don't understand the incredibly lazy lumping together of Knack and Ryse. The problems with each game are obviously very different for each title. Ryse has a good challenging combat system that they say is fun, not to mention a unique setting powered by incredible graphics. The fatal problem is that there is nothing else to the gameplay beyond combat which makes it seem really thin in comparison to top tier action games like Batman Arkham or Assassin's Creed. By all accounts from the GiantBomb quick look if a game like Ryse with it's combat and graphics was a big sandbox open world game it could be a great game.
 
You should watch the 45 minute quick look on GiantBomb.

I don't understand the incredibly lazy lumping together of Knack and Ryse. The problems with each game are obviously very different for each title. Ryse has a good challenging combat system that they say is fun, not to mention a unique setting powered by incredible graphics. The fatal problem is that there is nothing else to the gameplay beyond combat which makes it seem really thin in comparison to top tier action games like Batman Arkham or Assassin's Creed. By all accounts from the GiantBomb quick look if a game like Ryse with it's combat and graphics was a big sandbox open world game it could be a great game.

It would be one of the better animated ones.
 

Curufinwe

Member
Knack gets shit reviews: WAHT ARE THEY TALKING ABOUT GOTY

Ryse gets shit reviews: See? Xbox sucks.

They're launch titles. It's rare that launch titles are great. But the Sony bias on this board is at a fever pitch right now.

At least Xbox gamers have 3 exclusive games to play at launch. I went with ps4 and there's a wasteland until 2014.

Just because you prefer those exclusives to Killzone and Resogun doesn't mean everyone will. The PS4 also has superior versions of multiplatform games like AC4 and BF4.
 

Kaako

Felium Defensor
Can we just get one thing straight? When you say "fuck the haters, I'm going to buy this game even though the impressions from people who, unlike me, have actually played it say that it's awful" you are not taking some grand stand against The Haters or The Man; you are bending over and getting forcibly fucked by a gigantic canoe wielded by a multi-million dollar marketing machine which thrives on generating defensive reactionary sentiment and irrational hype in order to take your money from you.
God dayumn, this was beautiful. Well said.
 
Well the game has more combat moves and I really doubt it has a smaller enemy variety than Arkham Asylum (which has normal, armored, knife thugs and titans - normal thugs can use stun rods, pipes and guns). So if you just look at the combat part of the game I wouldn't be surprised if the game was just as deep or deeper than AA

LOL you for real... Have you ever used any of the gadgets while you're in combat? All this game has in the combat part is block/evade/slash and QTE. Don't even try to compare this to Batman series. That game shits over this like there's no tomorrow. This game doesn't even offer you weapons outside of a sword... That's just dumb.
 
Top Bottom