• Hey, guest user. Hope you're enjoying NeoGAF! Have you considered registering for an account? Come join us and add your take to the daily discourse.

Bravely Default censored for western release

Status
Not open for further replies.
It is censorship, and I don't recall seeing any real-life "toddlers" with wide hips and breasts. It sounds like you're just plain against art that doesn't personally appeal to you, regardless of the age of the character.

No it isn't.

Censorship is when some OUTSIDE AGENCY, like the government, forces a change on art.

The creator of the art changing their work is editing.
 

Manu

Member
Children can have wide hips and boobs so I don't really see your point.

You're moving goalposts now. If children can have wide hips and boobs then any sexualization of any kind can be made into pedophilia.

"OMG, that woman is showing some cleavage, you know how some kids have cleavage too? Pedo alert!"
 

AppleMIX

Member
The characters in Bravely Default look like children.

In the Japanese release these children are dressed up in sexy outfits for some situations.

The western release changed it so it's less obviously sexual.

It seems pretty cut and dried to me. if you're against this change (NOT censorship) then you want children in sexy outfits.

I don't even know what to say here.

You completely ignore the whole censorship argument, then make a strawman saying that editing is the same as censorship (which it isn't, editing something out because you're afraid of social scorn is censorship. Especially post launch and especially in different regions.)

Then have the balls to say the anyone who is against this wants children in sexy outfits.

What the actual fuck.

I even like the new designs aesthetically but this is just a load of bullshit.
 

BocoDragon

or, How I Learned to Stop Worrying and Realize This Assgrab is Delicious
If you care enough about peoples social status over something as meaningless as presentation over a fictional character in a video game, then I'd say there is a far deeply concerning matter that should be addressed first.

Just because people don't like a specific change doesn't mean they fall under a social stigma or should be generalized with labels such as being a "pedo" and some of the other gross fucking accusations thrown around in this thread.
Sounds like you're agreeing with me.

Im commenting on the fact that those who are "fine with the new designs" are going to be more vocal than those who actually do find the originals appealing.
 

The Technomancer

card-carrying scientician
Having an in to Japanese culture through my girlfriend, I honestly think the reason why they make this loli stuff is just because they think it's cute.

Pedo is a word that gets thrown around a lot, but I think even this supposed "otaku audience" are more into the designs because they think it's adorable. Not a lot of actual sexual fantasizing going on.

I don't know if that really excuses it for people, but that's what I see when even my 30 year old girlfriend picks up a loli girl in a toy shop and says "CUTE!" Anecdotes and all that.
Yeah, to be fair I'm not really against chibi or "loli" designs in general, although they're not my cup of tea most of the time (just aesthetically, although I do like the style sometimes like in the FF III remake).
 

Tohsaka

Member
No it isn't.

Censorship is when some OUTSIDE AGENCY, like the government, forces a change on art.

The creator of the art changing their work is editing.

Self-censorship is a thing, you know. Higher-ups in the company telling the artists to change the game for the west is not the same as the artists deciding to do it themselves without any pressure from someone else.
 

Owwari

Banned
Because it doesn't matter how old the story says they are, the art makes them look like children.

Also it's not censorship in the first place.

''Should quit gaming and do something he enjoys for once''

Seriously, are you up for a discussion or not? Because all you're spouting is hate and trying to prove your opinion rules over everything else.
 

lethial

Reeeeeeee
I've never heard of this game until reading through this thread. That is some uuuuuugly art style, with or without "censorship".
 
Well Squenix wanted the feel of old-school FF, and Nintendo censored them just like they censored the localized old-school FF titles that were released on SNES and NES. Mission accomplished, I guess.
 
''Should quit gaming and do something he enjoys for once''

Seriously, are you up for a discussion or not? Because all you're spouting is hate and trying to prove your opinion rules over everything else.

What's there to discuss?

The only people mad about this are pedophiles and people who think that any editing is censorship. The first are scum while the second can hopefully be brought around to not be on the same side as the pedophiles.
 

Fantomex

Member
It's cultural sensitivity, not censorship. A couple of cosmetic tweaks and people are cancelling pre-orders? Bizarre.

They added 2 inches of clothing. Of course people are cancelling pre-orders.

FRNr3.gif
 
I don't find either design to be better or worse. I just would like to play the game in its original form. Assets and text included.
 

The Technomancer

card-carrying scientician
If we're going to censor unrealistic outfits in videogames we might as well ban the whole medium to save us the time.

Purpose, intent and above all always context. All ridiculous outfits are not created for the same reasons or with the same purposes.
 

BocoDragon

or, How I Learned to Stop Worrying and Realize This Assgrab is Delicious
What's there to discuss?

The only people mad about this are pedophiles and people who think that any editing is censorship. The first are scum while the second can hopefully be brought around to not be on the same side as the pedophiles.
Wow.
 

AppleMIX

Member
What's there to discuss?

The only people mad about this are pedophiles and people who think that any editing is censorship. The first are scum while the second can hopefully be brought around to not be on the same side as the pedophiles.

Fucking wow.
 

Roubjon

Member
Yeah, it is, that's kind of my point. You don't think of it as a real potato sack, but you recognize that the developers/artists are trying to convey the effect of "potato-sackness". In the same vein plenty of people, myself included, see a fifteen year old character dressed in a ridiculously skimpy outfit in a way that clearly feels like fanservice and we're uncomfortable because the developers are clearly trying to convey the effect of "skimpily-dressed-fifteen-year-old-ness"

And if that is how you do see the characters, then of course I understand why you'd be uncomfortable with it. Everything is relative depending on each person's perspective and there is no right or wrong answer. That's why these threads always are so heated.

I just am so tired of the pedophilia shit that always comes out whenever these topics come up. It's always the one side that sees it one way calling the others pedos and then the "pedo" side screaming back saying no. And then nothing gets accomplished.
 

Tohsaka

Member
What's there to discuss?

The only people mad about this are pedophiles and people who think that any editing is censorship. The first are scum while the second can hopefully be brought around to not be on the same side as the pedophiles.

Your generalizations are pretty sweeping and gross. Isn't pedophile defined as being attracted to pre-pubescent children? None of the characters in this game fit that description, whether in the artwork or in-game models.
 
What's there to discuss?

The only people mad about this are pedophiles and people who think that any editing is censorship. The first are scum while the second can hopefully be brought around to not be on the same side as the pedophiles.

You've pretty much given up on having a discussion because in your mind everyone that's against this is a pedo.

You're wrong.
 

Karkador

Banned
What's there to discuss?

The only people mad about this are pedophiles and people who think that any editing is censorship. The first are scum while the second can hopefully be brought around to not be on the same side as the pedophiles.

it must be the 90s again because Square is making a good RPG and this viewpoint is x-treeemmme
 

Vire

Member
What's there to discuss?

The only people mad about this are pedophiles and people who think that any editing is censorship. The first are scum while the second can hopefully be brought around to not be on the same side as the pedophiles.

Words cannot express how much I enjoy this post.

I can't stop laughing. Bravo.
 

Eusis

Member
No it isn't.

Censorship is when some OUTSIDE AGENCY, like the government, forces a change on art.

The creator of the art changing their work is editing.
Language drifts over time, nevermind that the basic concept is still there (external forces will not look favorably on this and may start something up or we'll get hit with harsher ratings than we want, change it.) You accused someone of being a pedant but this is being pretty pedantic too, and regardless the intent is being conveyed: this is a change done likely more to avoid offense than because they felt it worked better for a work.
 

Okamid3n

Member
I haven't read the whole thread, just the first page, but I disagree with people saying they don't want the text altered. Good localizations have much better script than the original, as far as my tastes are concerned. I wouldn't call that censorship.
 
What's there to discuss?

The only people mad about this are pedophiles and people who think that any editing is censorship. The first are scum while the second can hopefully be brought around to not be on the same side as the pedophiles.

Welcome to the ignore list, brah
 

FryHole

Member
What's there to discuss?

The only people mad about this are pedophiles and people who think that any editing is censorship. The first are scum while the second can hopefully be brought around to not be on the same side as the pedophiles.

While I'm on the 'not bothered' side of the debate, this is easily the most appalling thing said in this thread. You know how smear by association works, right?
 
You've pretty much given up on having a discussion because in your mind everyone that's against this is a pedo.

You're wrong.

I think you should actually read my post.

I said that there were also people who don't really know what censorship is and think any sort of editing of a piece of art is censorship. This isn't true, obviously, but some people think it is and are a bit misguided.
 
Having an in to Japanese culture through my girlfriend, I honestly think the reason why they make this loli stuff is just because they think it's cute.

Pedo is a word that gets thrown around a lot, but I think even this supposed "otaku audience" are more into the designs because they think it's adorable. Not a lot of actual sexual fantasizing going on.

I don't know if that really excuses it for people, but that's what I see when even my 30 year old girlfriend picks up a loli girl in a toy shop and says "CUTE!" Anecdotes and all that.

No way dude. A completely different culture from our own can't possibly feel different about something than us. If you're defending it then you're a pedo.
 

The Technomancer

card-carrying scientician
And if that is how you do see the characters, then of course I understand why you'd be uncomfortable with it. Everything is relative depending on each person's perspective and there is no right or wrong answer. That's why these threads always are so heated.

I just am so tired of the pedophilia shit that always comes out whenever these topics come up. It's always the one side that sees it one way calling the others pedos and then the "pedo" side screaming back saying no. And then nothing gets accomplished.

I guess when it comes to stuff like this I have a hard time believing how someone can not perceive things that way. I mean, its pretty clear: with the unchanged version the developers are very deliberately displaying a very skimpily dressed fifteen year old female character. When people go "eww no I would never think that there was anything less then pure about this teen character wearing less clothing then most strippers, why do you even think that?" it seems almost willfully obtuse to me

its about as straightforward as a potato sack to me
 

Gestault

Member
Can we please maintain the meaningful distinction between actual pedophilia, meaning attraction to the prepubescent, and attraction toward the "inappropriately" young, whether for social/legal/practical reasons?
 
I think you should actually read my post.

I said that there were also people who don't really know what censorship is and think any sort of editing of a piece of art is censorship. This isn't true, obviously, but some people think it is and are a bit misguided.

I read your post, the idea that they are misguided is silly.

You're just trolling at this point.
 

zeldablue

Member
...

Nintendo has done this for over 20 years. It's a cultural thing. Religious talk and sexual content will be removed for the western audience to avoid things that might be taken the wrong way by a different culture.

It's the Japanese who do the edits...not the westerners, they know their audience.
 

Fandangox

Member
Lulu.jpg


I think there's about as many belts on that dress as there are skulls in an MK fatality.

That's certainly over the top. But is it unrealistic? Could that outfit be made in real life?

In the case of a mortal kombat fatality I am pretty sure if a real human explodes there wouldn't be tons of femurs and skulls blowing out of it.

Either way I am pretty indifferent about this change, from a design perspective I dislike both the left and right outfits. I think they both look dumb, although the Japanese black outfit one looks really ridiculous.
 

Clov

Member
Every thread on NeoGaf about chibi characters inevitably becomes a hellhole like this. Nobody is attracted to chibis. This shouldn't be difficult to understand.

Do either versions of the outfit really matter? Not really. There's nothing wrong with either of them. They're silly outfits on some silly looking characters. That's literally it.
 
I read your post, the idea that they are misguided is silly.

They are misguided. Censorship is bad, but no artistic work not trying to be deliberately offensive to make a point will inevitably go through an editing process to try and see if anything might be offensive to people they're trying to show the art to.

Calling this censorship trivializes actual censorship.
 

BocoDragon

or, How I Learned to Stop Worrying and Realize This Assgrab is Delicious
We're quickly approaching the point where Poe's Law applies.
It's pretty unfortunate that relating my personal experience and insight into another culture is being equated to being a pitiable "Expert" just because I mentioned Japan.
 
I think you should actually read my post.

I said that there were also people who don't really know what censorship is and think any sort of editing of a piece of art is censorship. This isn't true, obviously, but some people think it is and are a bit misguided.

I think it's time to turn the mirror towards yourself.
 

Despera

Banned
I didn't expect this thread to have so many posts. GAF never ceases to amaze me.

I'll just say that I was never a big fan of the in-game models, even though I like the artist's style in general. So I don't give a shit whether they change the outfits or not.

As long as the story and related stuff remain unaffected, it's all good imo.

This would've been a fun topic to discuss via swapnote, but alas, Nintendo would deny us even that :(
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top Bottom