Dictator93
Member
That makes me wonder what Ryse would look like or run like on PS4....
Or a competent PC for that matter.
Or a competent PC for that matter.
Not to derail but I disagree with this.
Perhaps on paper, but at launch no one seemed to be able to get it right for PS4 vs xbox spec comparisons. The press was very misleading, or intentionally vague. Resolution-Gate was a very real thing, and it mislead several people that I know personally.
Yeah, that was a poorly worded, over-generalized post I made. It's true that many were mislead by the disingenuous (or straight up ignorant) press to think the differences were truly minimal.Well, in some cases you can blame/applaud MS PR for making it seem like there was more to the story. I and you and many others didn't buy the BS but it could have been just enough to convince those that wanted to be convinced. Also, reviewers/journalists did a nice job of minimizing the differences between the two (Gamestop chart being an egregious example, but polygon also giving XB1 a higher rating).
If 60 frames for PS4 are true, then i think i will buy it again for my collection despite already owning the 360 version.
As an Xbone fan I personally don't care that much anymore about the 1080p/30FPS deal mainly because I don't see a difference between 30/60 unless they are right next to each other. Is the gap really that big though polygon wise? I mean 1.5 is not that big or am I underestimating it?
Using the naturally given skill of basic deduction has nothing to do with some stupid console war.
They are probably just really angry and aren't thinking rationally right now.
Xbox One owner btw
As an Xbone fan I personally don't care that much anymore about the 1080p/30FPS deal mainly because I don't see a difference between 30/60 unless they are right next to each other. Is the gap really that big though polygon wise? I mean 1.5 is not that big or am I underestimating it?
you forget that in theory the esram is faster than the gddr5. not denying that the ps4 always will have the better specs, just saying that the one can make a big leap near the ps4 performance-wise with tiled ressources
LOL. You are on page 74 of a thread about the PS4 version being 60fps and you're still wondering if it's true?!
That's interesting, but unlikely. If you're an Xbox man, then you played enough PGR to know that 30fps kinda sucks for certain games and genres. If you played Ninja Gaiden/Black, you'd know that anything less than 60fps would have been uncivilized. Same with Dead or Alive 4. It's that smoothness that makes everything look more fluid and natural on your screen. Go from playing and panning the screen around in Ninja Gaiden, then pop in a Grand Theft Auto game and pan around. The difference is jarring and always has been.
You always can see when a game is meaningfully above 30fps. That's why people prefer it if they can get their hands on it.
Looks exactly the same with slightly better resolution and/or framerate. Or have the same resolution and framerate and look slightly better.That makes me wonder what Ryse would look like or run like on PS4....
I had to watch that gif like 20 times in a row. It's seamless.
Idk why I laughed so hard at the diagram lolLet me draw a diagram for you:
We seem to have gone full circle again so, once more:
I didn`t read the thread (no time). Is it already confirmed?
Angry at whom though? Who do "they" think is to blame here? Microsoft, for not prioritizing video games the same way Sony seemingly did? Square Enix, for not being able to produce 1080p/60FPS on the Xbox One? Themselves, for buying the console hoping everything would balance out on a hardware level, although the writing was on the wall months before the console came out? I just don't get it.
The PS4 is great, the Xbox One is great. Both have their benefits, both have their shortcomings. You know your preferences, pick one. It's an open market for god's sake.
Like I said any game /s coming out before or around March will not receive driver updates. Any older engines that are labelled as definitive will defiantly not have had access to underlying hardware. But mark my words straight up is a locked frame rate better then massive slow down when you have thousands of effects rendering.
PGR3 and PGR4 are still the two very best racers from last generation. Unbeaten.
30FPS didn't do jack shit in the end.
Beautiful.Let me draw a diagram for you:
Idk why I laughed so hard at the diagram lol
Looks exactly the same with slightly better resolution and/or framerate. Or have the same resolution and framerate and look slightly better.
CoD: Ghosts being 720p on One and 1080p on PS4, and Battlefield 4 being 720p/900p respectively said everything that needed to be said. Assassin's Creed IV, as well.
This Tomb Raider news is just further confirmation of what we've already known since launch, and hypothesized before that.
It has everything to do with the console war, for some people. That's the whole point. Some people are willing to put their head in the sand for the sake of brand loyalty. And, of course, it doesn't help when these poor souls are lied to and believe it.
No one answer this man. If you want to know what's in the thread, read the thread.
Not surprised, we already see the difference with AC4, BF4, CoD Ghosts.
PS4 is simply the more powerful system as we all knew it was going to be.
If you play multi platform games on consoles and want the best looking visual experience, PS4 is the way to go.
30 to ~60 is a pretty massive difference though.
Sure, until you played Forza 3 and remembered what 60FPS looks like on a racing game.
Well if you read through the entirety of this thread, 30fps has now become unacceptable. Really sometimes I don't think people will be happy until MS closes down the Xbox division and probably refunds everyone who bought an X1.Nobody's saying Tomb Raider Xbox One (or the Xbox One itself for that matter) is garbage or unplayable. But facts are facts. What's so tough to understand here? Using the naturally given skill of basic deduction has nothing to do with some stupid console war.
Waiting for the truth to come out obviously.
I found another one with a little more detail:Let me draw a diagram for you:
At times the PS4 version could be running 60fps best case scenario, while at times the Bone could be running 45fps best case scenario. The average is supposed to be somewhere like 35 vs 55 I believe, basically the same as the difference between BF4 where PS4 is running at 900p vs 720p and they achieve framerate partity. Here however they chose pixel parity at the expense of framerate.
Hahahahaha!!!, yeah... and as a side note... XB1 owners with buyers remorse may still be able to sell it at a decent price and get the system with the superior tech specs instead.
No way man. Maybe if your just the general public could you make this claim but before launch there was news item after news item on the differences in 3rd party games. I got a XBone for DR3 and Halo not 3rd party. Anyone that is getting the system thinking it's going to be comparable to the PS4 was just being obtuse
No. Not Forza 2, not Forza 3, not GT5 nor GT6 could reach the heights of the masterpieces created by Bizarre. And I played them all.
How many folks who already have played through the game on PS3/360 are planning to double dip despite the full price?
I don't see how anyone can claim to feel duped by the X1 because it doesn't run games 100% equal to the PS4 or better. There's nothing on the Box or the advertisements that explicitely claims everything you play on this console will be better than the PS4 version. Until it does anyone feeling duped needs to get over themselves and just enjoy the console for the games or trade it in.oh absolutely. I just had a few friends who actually read those initial comparisons prior to the corrections or clearing the air. Damage was already done. My buddy was extremely pissed about CoD being 720p.
Tomb Raider will definitely reinforce the point, but some of the early adopters got duped prior to realworld comparisons.
Hahahahaha!!!, yeah... and as a side note... XB1 owners with buyers remorse may still be able to sell it at a decent price and get the system with the superior tech specs instead.
But when will the system with the superior tech get all of XO's exclusives that they may want to play?
But when will the system with the superior tech get all of XO's exclusives that they may want to play?
Anyone know the story behind that gif?
Hahahahaha!!!, yeah... and as a side note... XB1 owners with buyers remorse may still be able to sell it at a decent price and get the system with the superior tech specs instead.
How many folks who already have played through the game on PS3/360 are planning to double dip despite the full price?
It's a combination of all three to be honest, speaking from experience. I'm even angry!
Angry that I love Halo and need Titanfall after playing the alpha. They've got me by the balls and there is nothing I can do about it. I'm a student and I can't afford both :/
Well if you read through the entirety of this thread, 30fps has now become unacceptable. Really sometimes I don't think people will be happy until MS closes down the Xbox division and probably refunds everyone who bought an X1.