RaySpencer
Member
Did we ever get the split times for the men's 4x100? I want to see how close De Grasse was to Bolt. It looked like he was keeping pace, but it's hard to tell when he started so much later.
80 nations competing vs 140.
1976 Montreal
![]()
1984 Los Angeles
![]()
1988 Seoul
![]()
Just saying. I always side eye when NBC and announcers try and add the success in 84 with what others are doing now or since. If the Soviet Union and East Germany competed in 84, they would've destroyed the US and also a lot of success stories like Mary Lou Retton would probably not have occurred and someone like Carl Lewis would definitely have had his work cut out for him, instead he went unopposed in almost all of his events.
Even after the USSR breakup, the unified former Soviet team still took the top medal count in 92 Barcelona.
Just saying. I always side eye when NBC and announcers try and add the success in 84 with what others are doing now or since. If the Soviet Union and East Germany competed in 84, they would've destroyed the US and also a lot of success stories like Mary Lou Retton would probably not have occurred and someone like Carl Lewis would definitely have had his work cut out for him, instead he went unopposed in almost all of his events.
Even after the USSR breakup, the unified former Soviet team still took the top medal count in 92 Barcelona.
Holy shit that those numbers for East Germany
What was the total population of the country back then ?
Dat german engineering + Soviet doping machine = human freaks
Early handoff on the first or second leg.Wait so why was the US DQ'd in the relay?
He never said 1984 was comparable to a regular Olympics, he said it was closer to one than 1980.
I noticed you skipped posting the 1980 medal table.
Holy shit that those numbers for East Germany
What was the total population of the country back then ?
Dat german engineering + Soviet doping machine = human freaks
Well, yeah of course they're going to talk about the success in '84. It happened. Even if the most competitive countries decided to stay home. Most time when I hear reporters discuss the '84 Olympics, they add a caveat mentioning the Soviet Bloc's boycott.Just saying. I always side eye when NBC and announcers try and add the success in 84 with what others are doing now or since. If the Soviet Union and East Germany competed in 84, they would've destroyed the US and also a lot of success stories like Mary Lou Retton would probably not have occurred and someone like Carl Lewis would definitely have had his work cut out for him, instead he went unopposed in almost all of his events.
Even after the USSR breakup, the unified former Soviet team still took the top medal count in 92 Barcelona.
Well, there are reasons for that. The '80 games were boycotted by 65 nations. The '84 games were only boycotted by 14. There were more than 1,500 more athletes in '84 than in '80 despite the number of events being roughly the same. In addition, despite the boycott, the '84 games had the most nations participating up to that time (next most were '72 with 121 and '68 had 112) and even compared well to the number participating in '88 (159) and '92 (169.)...I've never liked how the the 1980 Moscow games are disregarded for a lot of things, but 1984 is talked about like it was an ordinary games.
Holy shit that those numbers for East Germany
What was the total population of the country back then ?
Dat german engineering + Soviet doping machine = human freaks
I thought you didn't get japanese citizenship if only your mother is japanese ?
We need to invent a new magic product like the brits did in cycling
All these racist morons on twitter saying the only reason Japan won was because they had a half Jamaican half Japanese runner on the team and ignoring that he ran the second slowest leg for them on the team. As if it just cannot be possible for non-white or non-black sprinters to compete. I mean almost every single mention is about their anchor ignoring that two other Japanese sprinters ran their legs faster.
they just showed the womens modern pentathlon on Australian tv because an Aussie won gold.
What a great event that is. The last event is a 4 x 800m run with 4 shooting stations where you have to hit 5 targets before moving on.
The last event starts as a handicapped start and the Aussie was 50 seconds behind the leader when she started.
So she made up about a minute on the run, coming from seventh to win our first ever medal in it.
Its always fun watching these sports you hear of but never see.
Is this coming from the Japanese media?
While her run was great, she made crazy time in the shooting, hardly missed. The Polish girl at one point missed 7 or 8 in a row.
We need to invent a new magic product like the brits did in cycling
It appears that the US appeal was denied and the American relay team remains DQ'd.
Same with Britain's from the earlier race.
Eliza McCartney was a good story from tonight. Only 19 years old and gets Bronze! I think she even surprised herself.
Another Gold for Greece! 23rd in the ranking!
Time for Lin Dan.
I'd say 90% of that was the doping considering their numbers since then.
Today in salty tweets.
![]()
Another GB Gold for the pile... Kayak single 200m.
Early handoff on the first or second leg.
Do we know if the US is protesting it/going to protest?
I love that: immediately before Liam's run, there was a list on the BBC of our remaining medal hopes - Liam wasn't even on it.
So GB has a chance to beat both Gold and total medal counts from London 2012. Wow.
AXELSEN DÄNEMARK!!!
Don't forget we have two at-least-silver guaranteed, which means two more medals beyond that would tie London. Gold is tougher, but by no means out of reach.We would need to run the table to do that, so it's very unlikely but possible. Doesn't really matter though - GB has done far better than anyone expected at these games, across an incredibly wide variety of events.