Nothing official, but ...MickeyKnox said:I'm betting on it choking anything bellow a C2Q with a dual 8800gtx sli.
http://ve3d.ign.com/articles/755/755284p1.html
Nothing official, but ...MickeyKnox said:I'm betting on it choking anything bellow a C2Q with a dual 8800gtx sli.
...on a screenUncleGuito said:
dejan said:Nothing official, but ...
http://ve3d.ign.com/articles/755/755284p1.html
60fps my ass.dejan said:Nothing official, but ...
http://ve3d.ign.com/articles/755/755284p1.html
Same, but I'm not sure why. I think I just love the idea of a frozen jungle. Something so alien but still somewhat familiar is kindof cool.Teknopathetic said:Snowy Jungle still impresses the most.
nitewulf said:damn!
can the ps3/x360 even handle this game at all?
thats probably the best looking real-time graphics i have ever seen.
MickeyKnox said:60fps my ass.
When there are visible frame rate drops on an official trailer, you know them be some heavy system requirements.
And just to be clear on this, I am talking about running the game in at least 1600x1200 with everything maxed out, as well as at least 4x AA and 8x AF. It's a given the game will scale down to run on non ridiculous rigs, but considering the game itself *will* be mediocre at best, not wanting to run this maxed out and experience the awesomeness that is the new Cryengine for yourself seems like a waste.
SpacLock said:next-gen is going to spoil so many people with it graphics.
seattle6418 said:unreal engine am cry
i wonder how much of that is cryengine2 and how much is DX10.
also, how will it work on "next gen" consoles? downgrade total? or not so much?
snack said:That last shot if just ****ING MIND BLOWING! WOW!
v1cious said:they have already said tons of times that this game can't be done on a console.
Yes, cause they know everything about deving for next-gen consoles, especially at this stage.v1cious said:they have already said tons of times that this game can't be done on a console.
Considering the technical prowess they've shown so far, I would be inclined to believe whatever they say.Tieno said:Yes, cause they know everything about deving for next-gen consoles, especially at this stage.
SeatBelts said:This better be coming to the ps3!
dextran said:there is no doubt that these pictures are gorgeous. very impressive. yet - they still don't look like photographs to me. What is it going to take to approach reality 1:1?
Tieno said:Yes, cause they know everything about deving for next-gen consoles, especially at this stage.
Tieno said:Yes, cause they know everything about deving for next-gen consoles, especially at this stage.
Teknopathetic said:"Depends how you interpret what they mean by that. They aren't necesarily saying they don't think a game that looks as good as crysis will be seen on the 360/PS3, maybe just that their engine would be impossible to port"
Incorrect, as Crytek has been working on porting CryEngine 2 to consoles for quite awhile now. Crytek is saying, as it is now, Crysis is impossible on consoles.
X26 said:Depends how you interpret what they mean by that. They aren't necesarily saying they don't think a game that looks as good as crysis will be seen on the 360/PS3, maybe just that their engine would be impossible to port
Pretty much.BlueTsunami said:The texture work will probably be too much for consoles too, seeing as how the 8800 series and various ATI cards are coming equipped with their own 512 worth of high speed RAM. Factor in System RAM too and you got the varied and wonderful texture work your seeing in the pictures.
Ok, I don't. To me it sounds like petting PC users.Operations said:Considering the technical prowess they've shown so far, I would be inclined to believe whatever they say.
Seeing that they're marketing their engine as a console engine as well, it's not in their best interest to downplay it's abilities on the console. I don't think they'd say it was impossible on a console unless they actually meant it.Tieno said:Ok, I don't. To me it sounds like petting PC users.