Yup, really important match for both clubs. Not too confident about it.Was a great game to watch though, excellent foosball. Next Friday's game against Carlton should be a ripper
They really need to review the in the back and holding the ball rules. How can a player have enough time to take a few steps and attempt a fend off, get tackled and make no legal disposal and not be pinged for holding? Ridiculous.
So guys....you seen the ladder?
Wellingham could get 3 weeks, down from 5, with an early plea.
http://www.afl.com.au/news/newsarticle/tabid/208/newsid/140906/default.aspx
He debuted in 2008. The only thing he's entitled to is the early guilty plea 25% reduction. 25% of 5 is 1.25. 1.25 does not equal 2.Any player with more than five years experience who has not been found guilty of an offence attracting demerit points over the previous five years receives a 25% deduction.
What a load of shit. How do you lay a selfish hit like that takes out a player for a month and only get three weeks?
He debuted in 2008. The only thing he's entitled to is the early guilty plea 25% reduction. 25% of 5 is 1.25. 1.25 does not equal 2.
So the AFL are blind to the shit decisions their umps make, deaf to legitimate player/coach criticism, and now shown themselves to be completely incompetent at basic math? I guess I shouldn't be surprised.
couriermail said:The Collingwood midfielder didn't make his AFL debut until Round 6, 2008 - four seasons ago. But he was given credit for a trouble-free 2007 on the Pies' rookie list where he played VFL.
"For the purposes of the tribunal record, both good and bad, the rookie list, scholarship list etc are counted because they're eligible to play in the AFL if you're upgraded," AFL spokesman Patrick Keane said.
"As it turned out Wellingham was upgraded in 2007 to be eligible for the senior list, but didn't play that year.
"In 2008 he was upgraded and played, so the fact that he's available for selection and continues to play in the VFL in that period means he's eligible to gather a good record or a bad record."
With the 'statements' they were sending out last week.. Just seem like an inconsistent bunch of clowns now. The system is so broken. There was absolutely no chance they would have contested the guilty verdict, so why reward them? And if you know that's going to happen, why don't you account for it so that he actually gets the punishment he deserves?Yeah, seeing him only get the 3 weeks feels like a huge joke. Any wonder they were so quick to accept it, they would have been laughing at his lighter sentence.
Here's a clarification on why he is eligible for the 5 year reduction:
I went with
Carlton (by 25)
Fremantle
Essendon
Richmond
Collingwood
St Kilda
Adelaide
Hawthorn
West Coast
Still not entirely sure about the Eagles vs. Swans game, it's going to be an absolute cracker!
I went 3 different than you. I normally play it pretty sensibly but this week I went against the favourites for some reason.
Bunch of dirty kents, these blokes. You're already winning. Why do you have to resort to such thuggery?
This is what happens when the mrp don't do their fucking job and let shitheads like wellingham launch off the ground into opponents without (appropriate) punishment.
Get off the field, ump.
Tuohy out. Walker out. Joseph out. Yep.
Seriously ump. Fuck off.
Judd might be in some hot water for yet again being a dirty dog.
I didn't see the game, what caused this response?
West coast v swans might be the biggest thrashing of us yet at Subiaco Oval... >_>
Judd is getting hung and dry on Bigfooty hehehe....
Personally I think it was just a bad accident.... the video didn't look like it was malicious....
Blaming the umps for a 60 point loss?
I picked the Swans to win. Who really knows what's going to happen though? I've doubted West Coast a few times this year and they've gotten up and won each time.
The Judd incident was just bizarre. I can't understand what he was thinking. Was he trying to stop him from handballing? It was just stupid. Even if it was an accident he should get a week at the very least for causing an injury to someone.
I've cooled down a bit, so I'd like to make it clear that the umps shoddy work (for both sides) had no effect on the overall result (but possibly the extent to which we got thrashed). North really looked good all across the ground and thoroughly deserved the win.Well... I picked North to win but I didn't pick the thrashing. I thought after the Geelong win they were hugely overrated and it showed with them putting in numerous poor games over those following few rounds. But since the Adelaide win and further wins against Saints, almost West Coast and now Carlton they seemed to have really turned their season around. You'd think with their fairly easy run home they should be good enough to get the 13 wins needed to make the 8.
With them finding form it makes it harder for other clubs, like Geelong, St Kilda and Carlton, to find their place in the fast closing 7-8 spots.
Carlton can still make but sounds like injuries are killing them.
I didn't see the game, what caused this response?
WMy initial outburst came about from the bump on Joseph in the second quarter. Second week in a row where one of our guys just had eyes on the ball, and an opposition player had no intention of marking just launched himself off the ground, resulting in a bump that took one of our players out for the rest of the match.
I hadn't seen those photos and my reaction just came from what I saw on TV: http://youtu.be/GQI_mkk9SdQ. It's shot from behind, and happened so quick, so it just looked like he led with his elbow. I concede that Ziebell's intention was genuinely on the ball, but I still think it was reckless. The incident followed the same sequence of events as last week: two players go towards the ball in the air, one launches themselves off the ground, they collide, and the one who kept his feet on the ground is left on the floor. Joseph got caught in the cheek (?) and concussed and played no further part in the game. Ziebell's intention may have been completely different to Wellingham's, but both incidents led to eerily similar results in back to back matches. It just made me wonder, if Wellingham got the punishment he deserved (how they came to the conclusion it was reckless instead of intentional, I still have no idea), would it have dissuaded players from launching themselves in a similar fashion to attack the contest? Perhaps, perhaps not, but seeing similar events transpire two weeks in a row to my team put me in a shitty mood.That's a load of stinky poo right there. Ziebell went into that contest with full intention to take possession of the ball and with his eyes firmly planted on the ball the whole time (and even gets his hands on it in mid air), it was absolutely nothing like the Wellingham incident. Wellingham is weak as piss and had no other intention but to take Simpson out.
Eyes on the ball:
On the Judd incident, I actually believe a part of him really did want to hold Adams arm away so that he couldn't knock the ball out. The problem is the play had stopped and from a viewers perspective it does look very calculated. Will be interesting to see what happens there.
I concede that Ziebell's intention was genuinely on the ball, but I still think it was reckless. It just made me wonder, if Wellingham got the punishment he deserved (how they came to the conclusion it was reckless instead of intentional, I still have no idea), would it have dissuaded players from launching themselves in a similar fashion to attack the contest? Perhaps, perhaps not, but seeing similar events transpire two weeks in a row to my team put me in a shitty mood.
What do you mean when you say play had stopped? Are you referring to the contest? The ump didn't blow the whistle until he paid a free kick to Judd, of all people. If he's gone for a couple, I wouldn't be surprised. Stupid thing to do considering the games we've got coming up.
Yeah, I can't say I'm familiar enough with Ziebell, so the recent Wellingham incident was the first thing that came to my mind. We really need more players like that in our side who'll just crack in. Night and day difference between him and Wellingham, then. I apologise if you took what I initially said as an assault on his character. (Over)reaction came without all the facts and frustration from both incidents.Fair enough too. Ziebell goes into every contest as if the premiership is on the line, it's amazing to watch and it's what has given him such a cult following among North fans, but like you said it can be quite reckless, not just for those around him but also himself (2 broken legs already in his career).
Yeah I was referring to players realising the ball wasn't going anywhere and just standing still. Adams is SUUUPER important to our structure so I'm hoping he isn't out for the remainder of the year.
On a lighter note, Gold Coasts fight back in the last 4 minutes against the Tigers was amazing. Special K has stolen some of the limelight with the goal after the siren but it was a huge team effort to even get them back into the winning position.
Think it looks pretty clear now. With Geelong's draw and form, I think they'll miss the 8 (sorry Andiie). Kangas and Saints for the 8.
It's the MRP/Tribunal. Are you really expecting logic from them? They have their fancy-shmancy system and deemed it Negligent, High Impact and High Contact. That Wellingham incident just makes it all seem so arbitrary, anyway.And Ziebell gets 4, even though they accepted that he had eyes for the ball and was competing for it..... what in the hell?
Been an interesting week of footy. I couldn't be happier for Hunt and Gold Coast. Superb win.
Also, Swannies continue to impress. Saints have them next week at the SCG. Should be interesting and while our contests are usually competitive, I think we'll have to play as good as we did against Essendon last week to even stand a chance.
Yup. See ya guys in 2013!B: P.Bower M.Jamison A.Joseph
HB: A.McInnes N.Duigan C.Yarran
C: B.Gibbs M.Robinson H.Scotland
HF: J.Garlett M.Watson E.Betts
F: D.Armfield B.Thornton A.Collins
Foll: L.Casboult M.Murphy A.Carrazzo
Int: T.Bell, E.Curnow, B.McLean & J.Russell
Emg: F.Dale, D.Ellard & S.White
IN: B.Thornton, J.Russell, P.Bower, L.Casboult & T.Bell
OUT: C.Judd (Suspension), A.Walker (Calf), M.Kreuzer (Hip), L.Henderson (Groin) & K.Lucas (Hamstring)
New: L.Casboult (Beaconsfield/Dandenong U18) & T.Bell (Morningside QLD)