no shit
lol nm, I see what you did there.
When it said Results I was expecting a fully animated PNG of the given scene.
no shit
Exactly. We're already suffering from gifs being too big. It may be an unpopular opinion but I'm honestly not a fan of sunhi's long gifs. A animated gif joke should tell its punchline within seconds. A bonus if it loops well.At that point you should be using uh, video formats to show videos
I have the APNG extension installed on Opera, but neither of those images seem to be animated.
Trying this one for now and having some problems. The delay you recommend is slowed down,maybe I'm not applying it?.And how does selected region work? It seems to do it,but it's not getting the first image.
edit- or was that delay recommended just for screenshots compare?
Animated PNG is obviously superior to an animated GIF, but particularly so in animations that have lots of color gradients.
Here's a couple of such examples of mine.
3000 msec is 3 seconds. I recommended that as a good comparison time (the whole purpose of this thread). Feel free to change it around if you're using it for motion.
lol, trying this on a 12 second clip at 60fps had proven to be... foolish.
lolI don't know why but the APNGs in the OP just slideshow between two different images.
Animated PNG is obviously superior to an animated GIF, but particularly so in animations that have lots of color gradients.
Here's a couple of such examples of mine.
Chrome users can just install an extension to enable support for them. What's the problem?
I can't imagine why anyone would use Chrome in a GIF heavy thread on NeoGAF anyhow. Firefox is the superior experience there. (And everywhere else, for me...)
Only Chrome needs the extension.No extension needed on my Firefox.. I'm seeing everything with no extra effort.
Animated PNG is obviously superior to an animated GIF, but particularly so in animations that have lots of color gradients.
Here's a couple of such examples of mine.
Thanks for the heads up. Had forgotten about GIMP since it's so clumsy to use, but I'll try to give it another shot.Othere's always GIMP ("open source photoshop") with the GIMP extension pack.
Left click > Save file in Firefox 25 works great. Just tried.I try the drop-down arrow on the right, pick "Download", and it still gives me a 404.
Edit: nope doesn't seem to work for me, its just a still image.
Works on Firefox. Needs to be opened in a different tab on Chrome, though.
question... does GAF require anything special to embed video from youtube?
Still doesn't work for me in Chrome.
http://fc04.deviantart.net/fs70/f/2013/317/3/7/animate_by_gattsu25-d6u63u5.png
480x270, 163 frames, 33MB
I'm sorry
Ah good old Google Chrome still having troubles handling GIFs a image format that was introduced in 1987...
What makes you think they will add APNG support anytime soon?
Chrome is becoming the new IE.... with every new version..... Still amazing how they manage to hide from the public how many vulnerabilities have been reported in the past few years..
Edit: nope doesn't seem to work for me, its just a still image.
http://i.minus.com/iBecKxTMkgZhG.png[IMG][/QUOTE]
Is this supposed to match the gif you posted earlier? I see a slideshow with only a handful of the original frames.
If that's intentional, then the animation works fine for me (Firefox).
How much is the filesize for APNGs compared to GIFs?
That gif is also 21 MBs which is like seven time more than anything animated with that number of frames should be!
20.7MB GIF got down to 1.5MB HTML5 video.