As the discussion progressed, one of the men a gentleman who holds a civil engineering degree and is employed as a structural engineer commented that there is no place for visible tattoos in the professional engineering world. This man is certainly a professional. No doubt about it. If I needed a bang-up structural engineer, hed be at the top of my list. But I wondered how he could, with a straight face, make the pronouncement that there is no place for visible ink in his profession. If someone appointed him the arbiter of professionalism within the engineering community, I missed that memo. In fact, Im pretty certain 99.99% of all engineers missed that memo.
Wanting to understand his position better, I asked him the following. If you got a tattoo on your forearm, would that diminish your expertise as an engineer?
He acknowledged that it wouldnt diminish his professional expertise in the least, but added that others wouldnt see it that way. Others? I asked.
Yes, the customers.
Ah. So now were down to the truth of it! There is absolutely nothing about visible ink that is unprofessional. There is merely an opinion, held by some people, that tattoos will be considered to project an unprofessional appearance.
Well, an opinion that tattoos project an unprofessional appearance is certainly different than the statements that were being made, which characterized it as a concrete fact of life, on par with saying the body needs oxygen to survive. Forgive me for saying so, but portraying personal opinion as if it is a hard and fast truth doesnt sound like something a professional should be doing.
All this wouldnt be important if good people werent being hurt by it every day.
Let me be blunt. The statement that visible tattoos project an unprofessional appearance is nothing more than small-minded bigotry. The statement is merely the expression of the personal prejudice of the person speaking. There is no factual basis for it. Those words have no more rationality than if the person said "Black people have no place in the professional world." Both statements are the result of personal prejudice, not intellect, not fact, not evidence, and not reason. Such words are uttered without a shred of evidence to support them. And like racism, the only veneer of correctness they garner comes from others with the same prejudice saying, "Right you are!" It is one dipshit using the agreement of other dipshits that his dipshit statement has some validity. How... um... "professional" of them.