• Hey Guest. Check out your NeoGAF Wrapped 2025 results here!

Anyone think Atheists had a negative impact on the world?

Status
Not open for further replies.
I wouldn't say atheism is depressing but being religious is comforting. I wouldn't call myself an atheist but being honest to myself I'd have to say I do not believe that there is a god which is cool for the moment. I mean I can get a lot of comfort from reason and science. I think it's ten times more satisfying being a good person out of reason or conviction than out of fear of hell or something. But ultimately the big question remains: What's in for me after I've died?

My father once said he went to a secular funeral and it was the most depressing thing. Zero solace. He didn't exactly turned to god afterwards but he became a Hospitaler now, probably just to be save.
 
jaxword said:
For there to be a heaven, it'd be up to us to make it here on Earth for everyone.

huh? I'm talking about an afterlife.


Also I've seen a lot of atheists "preaching" about how deluded people who believe in an afterlife are (That gaffer who told a widow dying of cancer there was no heaven springs to mind). They refuse to listen to anything (related to religion or not) you have to say after that. Is it really so bad to think that you can see someone who has died again? Its not hurting anyone, and it gives you piece of mind. Honestly, who really cares if its not true (or you don't think its true). It is making someone happy and at peace.
 
I think people that impose their ideas on those that don't want to listen are making the world a worst place.

Unfortunately there is a far higher percentage of these people in atheism than their are in other religions.
 
Casp0r said:
I think people that impose their ideas on those that don't want to listen are making the world a worst place.

Unfortunately there is a far higher percentage of these people in atheism than their are in other religions.

In my experience that has been true also. But I have a feeling people are going to get into a rage because you've called atheism a religion.
 
Casp0r said:
I think people that impose their ideas on those that don't want to listen are making the world a worst place.

Unfortunately there is a far higher percentage of these people in atheism than their are in other religions.
Eh, I haven't heard door to door atheists nor atheists giving away pamphlets in public. When it comes to atheists raging about religion it's usually in the internets.

edit. given that there has been some public adds about atheism but still less then religious adds.
 
eh this universe is so boring....
NoduC.gif

our planet holds nothing of mystery - who cares what's at the bottom of our oceans? what's the deal with finding out how life evolved and all the life yet to discover? it's just....drab. the universe in all of it's undiscovered glory is just really boring, who cares? man life is depressing.

wait a minute...
sxbc8.jpg
pK8oN.jpg
Gvhtv.gif


finally.... life has meaning.
 
shanshan310 said:
huh? I'm talking about an afterlife.


Also I've seen a lot of atheists "preaching" about how deluded people who believe in an afterlife are (That gaffer who told a widow dying of cancer there was no heaven springs to mind). They refuse to listen to anything (related to religion or not) you have to say after that. Is it really so bad to think that you can see someone who has died again? Its not hurting anyone, and it gives you piece of mind. Honestly, who really cares if its not true (or you don't think its true). It is making someone happy and at peace.

I'll let them believe in heaven when they allow gay people to get married :)
 
Casp0r said:
I think people that impose their ideas on those that don't want to listen are making the world a worst place.

Unfortunately there is a far higher percentage of these people in atheism than their are in other religions.
With this post I have become convinced that this topic is intelligently designed to raise my blood pressure.

I'm not even going to ask you to back your shit up, I'm just going to go away and read about videogames instead.
 
Casp0r said:
I think people that impose their ideas on those that don't want to listen are making the world a worst place.

Unfortunately there is a far higher percentage of these people in atheism than their are in other religions.


On Gaf, probably. In the world, definitely not.
 
Casp0r said:
I think people that impose their ideas on those that don't want to listen are making the world a worst place.

Unfortunately there is a far higher percentage of these people in atheism than their are in other religions.

Unfortunately, this is a complete lie.

You only have to look at the political clout of Christianity, Islam, and Judaism to realize you're completely wrong, and I doubt anyone on the internet could be that media-blind.

Just say what you really mean: You don't like atheists. It's alright if you're being honest.
 
Casp0r said:
I think people that impose their ideas on those that don't want to listen are making the world a worst place.

Unfortunately there is a far higher percentage of these people in atheism than their are in other religions.

You possibly can't be serious?
The fuck??
Do you ever come out of your house?
I have never been asked on the street if i heard about Atheism, and if i wan't to convert.
People who bother me about Jesus on the other hand..
 
Yeah, those damn atheists, just think about how many wars they started, and how many people they persecuted, tortured and mass murdered. What a bunch of bastards. They'd have a thing or two to learn from the peace loving believers.
 
Melchiah said:
Yeah, those damn atheists, just think about how many wars they started, and how many people they persecuted, tortured and mass murdered. What a bunch of bastards. They'd have a thing or two to learn from the peace loving believers.
Stalin and Mao, perhaps? Ever heard of them?
 
Bulbo Urethral Baggins said:
Stalin and Mao, perhaps? Ever heard of them?

Crusades, inquisition, witch hunts, Third Reich, Pol Pot, the Darfur genocide, Jim Jones, David Koresh, 9/11 and muslim terrorists, ever heard of them?

No-one in their right mind can ever argue, that more wrong would have been done in the name of atheism, than in the name of god.
 
Bulbo Urethral Baggins said:
Stalin and Mao, perhaps? Ever heard of them?
Ah yes. The two great torchbearers of atheism, who killed millions just to try to stop people from believing in various gods.
 
Casp0r said:
I think people that impose their ideas on those that don't want to listen are making the world a worst place.

Unfortunately there is a far higher percentage of these people in atheism than their are in other religions.

How many stories have you heard of atheists disowning their kids because they were religious?
How many atheists are there in Africa trying to convert Africans while telling them that using condoms is a sin and that they help spread aids?
How many atheists go door to door trying to "save" religious people?
How many atheist only countries exist?
 
Religions have caused more wars than atheists so far. Also sounds like you want to believe again. Change your name to Mulder.
 
UrbanRats said:
Don't be racist towards Unicorns now.

You're a Santa skeptic, so you're on his black list and he won't visit you (but he does watch you sleep, from the window).
One could also say that certain claims about Santa are meant to be taken metaphorically. He doesn't actually climb down chimneys physically. Or that he only did that in the olden days when everyone had chimneys. And that now he works through friends and family as the spirit of christmas.

Bulbo Urethral Baggins said:
Stalin and Mao, perhaps? Ever heard of them?
There is no atheist doctrine which could justify the slaughter of millions. Murder, destruction, discrimination etc. fill the pages of certain holy books however.
 
Animals don't need reasons to have empathy and be nice to their own kind. It's only humans that do. And a lot of that hatred in humans (and wars) is based on religious differences. So no. The world would be a better place if civilizations would quit inventing punitive gods to worship.
 
Religious people think of the world through a religious lense. Atheism must be a belief, and Mao and Stalin must be the murderous reseults of the belief. Carl Sagan and Richard Dawkins must be prophets, etc...

Atheism is the lack of religious belief. Anything else the person does depends on their moral compass and judgement.
 
Looks like the trolling is well underway. Is there anything else productive to be said? The shark has been jumped when we get to who starts the most wars.
 
Quick point about logic and theism -

I don't think there is anything too wrong with people being religious, even using the silly religious books we have available to us now - the issue lies mostly in what people do with the messages they receive. Regardless, I know religious people who pretty much keep that shit to themselves, and don't discriminate. But this doesn't make them logical. They can't just be logical because they are not hurting anyone, or because I like them, or because they want to be. And let's be honest, everyone lacks some logic - but I think the best way to say it is, being theistic in itself is illogical. The same way throwing salt over your shoulder is.

At best, you can get away with being a Deist - and honestly, even then, you're sort of reaching, the logical conclusion is "I am unsure about whether or not there is an obscure idea of some sort of deity that may or may not have had any impact on human life, but unless anything points to it being the case, it probably didn't happen".

Now - not being logical -all- the time isn't inherently bad I don't think, sometimes it definitely is, but everyone has their little thing. But, if being told your belief is illogical offends you greatly, I am sorry, you should probably just come to peace with that. The god(s) of the Qu'ran, the Torah or the New Testament are not gods that make any logical sense, these are pretty silly stories when everything is said and done.
 
So the OP was religious because it was "cool"? Not because he actually believe in that stuff?

I didn't read the rest of the thread yet, but that's the impression he gave with so many "cool" in his post.
 
Ketchup Boy said:
Edit: Sorry, for confusing people. What I'm saying is:

It was cool believing that you could go to Heaven, a sick magical place, just if you were a good person which was easy. Then people became party poopers and said there was no such thing.

From what I gather, being in Heaven basically consists of blindly worshiping God for all eternity. Doesn't sound much like fun to me.

ie like it was cool to believe in Santa, Big Foot, the Lockness Monster and all those other magical, mythical creatures that you thought might have existed.

I was always more interested in cool things that actually do exist, like black holes and Lamborghinis. Sure, I find a lot of mythology interesting, but that's about it. It doesn't bother me that none of it is real, when there is a shit load of stuff that is cool and real in the universe, including the universe itself.

I remember the first time I watched a documentary about Gamma Ray Bursts, and that was fucking mind blowing. Big Foot? Nah, not so much.
 
mysticwhip said:
Don't need religion to teach good morals.

morals reinforced by the value of the human experience are worth more to me than values based on omniscient ominpotence deeming it so.

it's what made Jesus so kind of revolutionary in his context, the guy almost seemed to be valuing human beings in a way that you could almost distance it from 'only love people cus God says so'
 
I love the very idea that we have a thread asking if atheism is causing a negative impact on the world, for the simple reason that we annoy and depress theists. Yet we live in a world where because of religious doctrines women are abused and denied rights, children are being killed for the crime of witchcraft and opposing religious zealots are hoping for and even attempting to create a full on armageddon in the hopes that their promised redeemer will return if we fuck this place up enough as prescribed in some old texts.

Oh, but then we get the "hurr durr Stalin and Mao", which is practically like the why we got monkeys argument in evolution debates.
 
Narcosis said:
I love the very idea that we have a thread asking if atheism is causing a negative impact on the world, for the simple reason that we annoy and depress theists. Yet we live in a world where because of religious doctrines women are abused and denied rights, children are being killed for the crime of witchcraft and opposing religious zealots are hoping for and even attempting to create a full on armageddon in the hopes that their promised redeemer will return if we fuck this place up enough as prescribed in some old texts.

Oh, but then we get the "hurr durr Stalin and Mao", which is practically like the why we got monkeys argument in evolution debates.

abso-fucking-lutely spot on
 
Morphis said:
Ah yes. The two great torchbearers of atheism, who killed millions just to try to stop people from believing in various gods.
Don't you get it? Committing an atrocity and being an atheist/Christian means you committed that atrocity in the name of atheism/Christianity.
 
People who wrongfully attribute things to a group of people, or a belief, or that new dish you ate last night, have a negative impact. Keep that in mind, OP.
 
Narcosis said:
I love the very idea that we have a thread asking if atheism is causing a negative impact on the world, for the simple reason that we annoy and depress theists. Yet we live in a world where because of religious doctrines women are abused and denied rights, children are being killed for the crime of witchcraft and opposing religious zealots are hoping for and even attempting to create a full on armageddon in the hopes that their promised redeemer will return if we fuck this place up enough as prescribed in some old texts.

Oh, but then we get the "hurr durr Stalin and Mao", which is practically like the why we got monkeys argument in evolution debates.
Yet, we live in a world where two of the biggest mass murderers/criminals/torturers/killers//abusers in history were not following a religious doctrine.
And, we get posts like this.
Yeah, those damn atheists, just think about how many wars they started, and how many people they persecuted, tortured and mass murdered. What a bunch of bastards. They'd have a thing or two to learn from the peace loving believers.
Now, how should one respond to such an idiotic religion-bashing post other than to point out that the world's largest mass murders/torturers/abusers/criminals were not religious?
 
tiff said:
Don't you get it? Committing an atrocity and being an atheist/Christian means you committed that atrocity in the name of atheism/Christianity.

I'm pretty sure that religious people were persecuted and specifically targeted under Mao. It wasn't just "Mao is atheist look at how bad atheism is!!11!!"

But that wasn't even the OP's point. I think he's more talking about the "ignorance is bliss" factor (not that atheism is the truth, but its seen as the more logical road). Why all the negativity towards theists? Even people who keep to themselves? I don't understand it.
 
I think the Sharia-lawers are having more of a negative impact

everyone who thinks that the rebellions happening will lead to freedom are kidding themselves as soon as Shariah Law replaces military dictatorships.
 
Just after my head was recovering from the facepalming and table-banging from hearing the "logic" of a creationist the other night. (The 6 days God took to create everything wasn't actually 6 days btw, it was however long scientists think it took for the earth to form - it's just days are different to God. Oh and also scientists haven't proven that the earth is older than 5000 years old, also evolution is all bad science - I wasn't aware of that but there you go.)

In response to the (pointless) mention of Stalin and Mao, how about God? As Hitchen's said Heaven is nothing more than a celestial North Korea, God is arguably the biggest tyrannical dictator of them all.
 
Bulbo Urethral Baggins said:
Yet, we live in a world where two of the biggest mass murderers/criminals/torturers/killers//abusers in history were not following a religious doctrine.
And, we get posts like this.

Now, how should one respond to such an idiotic religion-bashing post other than to point out that the world's largest mass murders/torturers/abusers/criminals were not religious?

They were not religious, but their policies were little different from the doctrines imposed by religious dictators and tyrants. They did not kill people in the name of some atheist doctrine, but did so to eliminate any competing schools of thought that did not idolize them. They portrayed themselves in the place of the gods, figures of omnipotence and benevolence:


5KDLn.jpg

gNjY0.jpg

09dEi.jpg

rIpcN.jpg
 
Raist said:
Hitler was a vegetarian. Vegetarianism is the cause of racism, xemophobia, mass murder etc.

The argument is silly, yes. But to imply that Mao's responsibility for the death of all those people had nothing to do with religion is also.

me five minutes ago said:
I'm pretty sure that religious people were persecuted and specifically targeted under Mao. It wasn't just "Mao is atheist look at how bad atheism is!!11!!"

Yes I know it wasn't because he was atheist. This argument is ridiculous.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top Bottom