mrkgoo said:Anecdotal evidence ahoy!
Safari on iPhone was crashtastic on its first iteration. It's pretty damneD solid now. Very in frequent crashes. It hogs memory from other apps though.
On snow leopard safari crashes more than it did on leopard.
Flo_Evans said:You know what is hilarious to me, safari on my mac with flash almost never crashes... yet mobile safari without flash is a crash monster. Probably due to iphone memory limits, but still. I can't remember the last time safari crashed in OSX (and I am using the 32bit tiger version) but it's a daily occurrence on my iphone.
Tobor said:I assume you still have a 3G? Mobile Safari on the 3GS is completely solid.
Sriffat said:btw. Apple just posted a refurbished macbook pro 2.26 13 inch
for the same price as the high end iPad
http://store.apple.com/us/product/F...33&PID=1225267&SID=u408107t1849281f0fp0c0s598
Tobor said:Your point is what? I'm not going to read books on a Macbook Pro turned sideways.
Maybe I should complement my 15" MacBook pro with a 13" MacBook pro.Tobor said:Your point is what? I'm not going to read books on a Macbook Pro turned sideways.
I think his point was that the comparison to the ipad in price is pointless.Sriffat said:develop iPad apps?
Sriffat said:btw. Apple just posted a refurbished macbook pro 2.26 13 inch
for the same price as the high end iPad
http://store.apple.com/us/product/F...33&PID=1225267&SID=u408107t1849281f0fp0c0s598
alterego said:That's the plastic Macbook not the aluminum Macbook Pro.
LovingSteam said:http://www.macrumors.com/2010/02/04/steve-jobs-rumored-to-have-recently-traveled-to-new-york-for-ipad-media-talks/
Silicon Alley Insider reports that Apple CEO Steve Jobs apparently traveled to New York City in recent days to meet with executives at The New York Times and The Wall Street Journal for discussions about bringing their content to the iPad.
Dupy said:I may be impatient but this is why I'm glad the iPad won't be out for another 2 months. With the announcement over Apple is really reaching out to media outlets and app developers to make sure they're ready for the launch.
Should make the coming months really interesting.
Kung Fu Jedi said:Agreed. And that's why I think we haven't heard the entire story yet on the iPad and that there may yet be a surprise or two to come before it launches. I think they unveiled it when they had to, in order to get past FCC rulings and to be able to really pursue some active partnerships for fully.
I'm hoping that in another week or two, we'll start to see a steady stream of info on the iPad with more things being filled in.
Kung Fu Jedi said:Agreed. And that's why I think we haven't heard the entire story yet on the iPad and that there may yet be a surprise or two to come before it launches. I think they unveiled it when they had to, in order to get past FCC rulings and to be able to really pursue some active partnerships for fully.
I'm hoping that in another week or two, we'll start to see a steady stream of info on the iPad with more things being filled in.
mrkgoo said:One that you can enter in ingredients you have in your refrigerator and it suggests something you can make.
As I alluded to earlier, what Stocks, Weather, Voice Memo, Clock, and Calculator have in common is that theyre all simple minor apps that wouldnt know what to do with 1024×768 if you gave it to them. Theyre intended for quick reference, for quick in and out tasks. In short, theyre multitasking apps. Its clear that Apple believes this because with the exception of Voice Memo all these apps were OS X dashboard widgets before the iPhone ever existed. I would put forward that theyre going back to their rightful place.
Stocks and Weather could benefit from enhanced versions with added depth/usability.StrikerObi said:I definitely think we'll see some new apps from Apple and developers prior to the launch. Gruber linked to a blog that mentioned it was very odd that half of the iPhone's pre-installed apps (Clock, Weather, Stocks, Voice Memos, Calculator) are flat out missing from the iPad. It's very strange, especially considering how very basic those things like Weather and Calculator are. There's no way they could run as full-screen apps on an iPad, it'd be overkill. The article postulates that perhaps there is some sort of Dashboard feature for these things that are clearly widget-class applications.
http://fury.com/2010/02/do-the-ipads-missing-apps-point-to-a-multitasking-dashboard/
Definitely looks great, especially like how the app has it's own 'style' rather then using the same bland UI from the OS. More hires pics for satisfaction;Kung Fu Jedi said:Gizmodo has some information on a new comic book viewer coming from Panelfly for the iPad. Looks pretty sweet in the pics. Find out more here.
http://uxmag.com/design/ipad-user-experience-guidelinesSentry said:Definitely looks great, especially like how the app has it's own 'style' rather then using the same bland UI from the OS.
Help people focus on the content by designing your application UI as a subtle frame for the information theyre interested in. Downplay application controls by minimizing their number and prominence. Consider creating custom controls that subtly integrate with your applications graphical style. In this way, controls are discoverable, but not too conspicuous.
Tobor said:/looks at Panelfly pics.
Look's like I'm getting the 64GB after all.
Another example: When we were building the tablet PC in 2001, the vice president in charge of Office at the time decided he didnt like the concept. The tablet required a stylus, and he much preferred keyboards to pens and thought our efforts doomed. To guarantee they were, he refused to modify the popular Office applications to work properly with the tablet. So if you wanted to enter a number into a spreadsheet or correct a word in an e-mail message, you had to write it in a special pop-up box, which then transferred the information to Office. Annoying, clumsy and slow.
So once again, even though our tablet had the enthusiastic support of top management and had cost hundreds of millions to develop, it was essentially allowed to be sabotaged. To this day, you still cant use Office directly on a Tablet PC. And despite the certainty that an Apple tablet was coming this year, the tablet group at Microsoft was eliminated.
Tobor said:Anybody read this piece in the Times from a former MS VP, yet? There's a lot of dirt, but here are the tablet related nuggets:
Wow. First I've heard that MS whacked the tablet group.
http://www.nytimes.com/2010/02/04/opinion/04brass.html?pagewanted=all
Kung Fu Jedi said:Been reading excerpts from his interview all day on a variety of sites. He doesn't pull any punches and doesn't have much good to say about the climate at MS. Hadn't noticed that they killed off their tablet line though. Seems odd. Bet they'll be scrambling to rebuild it soon, or do they just figure that touch is integrated into Windows 7 and it's up to the manufacturers to find a way to use it?
Tobor said:I assume that's why, but man, that is a wrong headed decision.
and if my memory serves me right, ms whacked the team behind the surface interface last year.Tobor said:Wow. First I've heard that MS whacked the tablet group.
http://www.nytimes.com/2010/02/04/opinion/04brass.html?pagewanted=all
WHAT?! The Surface interface was the first genuinely intuitive Microsoft product I've ever seen! It's like Ballmer hates talent or something.blu said:and if my memory serves me right, ms whacked the team behind the surface interface last year.
talent? what does that have to do with bottomline? last year was tough for many, so ms just axed a bunch of stuff an focused on their core business - pushing windows to OEMs.Terrell said:WHAT?! The Surface interface was the first genuinely intuitive Microsoft product I've ever seen! It's like Ballmer hates talent or something.
Tobor said:Wow. First I've heard that MS whacked the tablet group.
http://www.nytimes.com/2010/02/04/opinion/04brass.html?pagewanted=all
Juice said:You mean the Slate group?
Or the Courier group?
Or the Zune touch group?
Or the Windows Phone 7 group doing touch?
Or Microsoft Research Labs touch library development?
Or the Microsoft Surface Team?
Urgh, that is just horrible to read. How the bigger teams literally bully smaller up-and-coming teams who are working on something new and exciting.Tobor said:Anybody read this piece in the Times from a former MS VP, yet? There's a lot of dirt, but here are the tablet related nuggets:
Wow. First I've heard that MS whacked the tablet group.
http://www.nytimes.com/2010/02/04/opinion/04brass.html?pagewanted=all
Big Ass Ramp said:Any thoughts on what it would be reading a book on that screen? Obviously, eink is ideal, but how much of a trade off would an IPS screen be?
Raistlin said:It's not going to be different from using most other LCDs in terms of eye-strain. The viewing angles should be quite awesome however.