• Hey, guest user. Hope you're enjoying NeoGAF! Have you considered registering for an account? Come join us and add your take to the daily discourse.

Arstechnica: Don’t read too much into the PS4’s million day-one sales

Heshinsi

"playing" dumb? unpossible
Its not shitting lol.

Damn yall, its a pretty well sourced piece, its not saying that the PS4 launch is bad. Its just making the basic point that the market leader isn't decided yet.

You might disagree, but does that mean that its an inherently bad article?

But yeah, AssTechnica.

No it's a pretty shitty article all around. They're comparing launch figures in multiple territories over a span of a week, versus units sold in 24hrs in one region. Yet the later example handily outsold the former. Are they idiotic? The sales figures is even more impressive when compared like that.
 

Soriku

Junior Member
What determines sales are the price point and games. PS4 has a good price point and there isn't any conceivable situation where the PS4 doesn't have a good library in the long run.
 
D

Deleted member 20920

Unconfirmed Member
It is?



If it were well sourced then he wouldn't have even brought this up. The PS2's numbers were only 500k because Sony had major shipping issues and had to cut their shipments from 1m to 500k just two weeks before release. So it wasn't a case of the Xbox or GC selling as much or more as the PS2 as much as it was a case that Sony just couldn't make enough units to meet the demand for the console. Had they then it would've absolutely held the record for best selling console. And what did end up doing in the end? Destroying everything in its path in terms of sales.

If it had been well sourced it would have considered the fact that the PS2 sold 980 000 units (not sure it was one or two days) during launch in Japan :p

Some of the people in this thread are being ridiculous here thinking this is some Microsoft pr, get your head out of your ass please. Let's be honest, if they ship 1 million Xboxes for launch they will sell all of them. It's not the launch window that determines how well you do in the console generation.

We can critique an article and a journalist without thinking that he's being paid by MS. He is at the very least, an occasional hypocrite who has been inconsistent and writing tech articles that says that tech is not important.
 

avaya

Member
Anyone comparing a sale of a console to a phone is a genuine cretin. A phone is a necessity and everyone in a household (of suitable age) will need a phone - a console is a pure discretionary purchase.
 
I never bought into the fanboy conspiracy of "ZOMG media is BIASED!" type bullshit posts, buuuuuuut this current minimizing of the ps4 strengths and short term accomplishments is at the very least curious.
 

10k

Banned
This article is a setup for one of two things:

1) the Xbox One sells close to a million day 1 and Ars loses their shit and goes "Wow Xbox is dominating!"

Or

2) the Xbox One sells 320k day one and Ars can say "Again, don't read too much into day one sales".
 

Kurtofan

Member
Its not shitting lol.

Damn yall, its a pretty well sourced piece, its not saying that the PS4 launch is bad. Its just making the basic point that the market leader isn't decided yet.

You might disagree, but does that mean that its an inherently bad article?

But yeah, AssTechnica.

This is a Console War son, no prisoners taken
 

snack

Member
It's really sad to see a company like Sony getting ripped on for being successful for a launch. I kinda understand it though. It's a non-American company competing with the Microsoft Xbox One.

Egos aside, these day one sales are impressive and no one should doubt that.
 
Who cares that Sony just won the 100m sprint in world record time at the Olympics? It totally doesn't matter because other sprinters won it in much slower times years ago... Does that sound about right? Are some people really defending that type of logic in an article?

What a dumb argument. Sure, the generation will be decided by more than sales from one 24 hour period in a single region. However, considering the author it's pretty transparent what's going here.
 

Neff

Member
Perhaps those criticising this article should realise that the record-breaking figures of PS4 could be indicative of factors other than it dominating the games industry forever. For one, it's the first big leap in tech over a generation that's lasted 8 years and has a long-nurtured, premium prestige attached to that. For another, the games industry is much bigger than it was at the time the last record breaking consoles were released. Will PS4 be a success? Undoubtedly. WIll it become the dominant platform? Probably. But these figures aren't indicative of that, because it's just the fucking launch. That's all this article is saying. It's nothing more than an objective look amid the zealous, militant euphoria. It's not pissing on PS4. It's pissing on people who recoil in terror at the suggestion PS4 hasn't yet 'won'.
 

fiyah

Member
That's Nintendo's initial shipment. Estimations put actual sales around 2M after over a month (end of 2012). Seriously.

And comparisons to iPhones? Really IGN?

When you get 3 articles making basically the same claim from 3 different outlets in the same day you start to raise an eyebrow or two. I'm seriously awaiting Joystiq, Kotaku and Gamespot's versions.
 
I never bought into the fanboy conspiracy of "ZOMG media is BIASED!" type bullshit posts, buuuuuuut this current minimizing of the ps4 strengths and short term accomplishments is at the very least curious.

Its baffling to say the least. What exactly would any console have to do to impress them? The last time I saw anything like this was when the Dreamcast launched. Everyone in the press was saying to wait until the PS2 which in part killed the Dreamcast.At least then it made some sense since the industry was behind the PS2 to a significant degree. This time the gaming press hasn't done anything to back up their position that we should wait and buy a more expensive, less capable machine.
 

Moneal

Member
So first it was, "2m preorders world wide don't mean anything, people cancel those all the time. Lets wait for sales numbers." now its "yea they sold 1m first day in NA , but that doesn't mean anything lets wait for year 5 numbers."

sony has knocked it out of the park so far this gen. providing most gamers with what they wanted from next gen, while MS has went a totally different route. I keep seeing gaming journalists downplaying how well sony has stepped up their game for the start of this gen.

I keep seeing all the downplaying of what sony has done, either with the resolutiongate, spec comparisons, preorders, and now sales. I don't get it, just say wow sony has better specs, higher resolution, higher preorders, and now sold a crap ton of ps4s and leave it at that.
 

Psi

Member
Articles that don't ride the hype-train should be congratulated. Instead they're picked apart by fanboys who have developed an unwarranted persecution complex. It's sickening to see happen every day, the fans that are the majority throw their weight around often when it's not appropriate. This article is valid and completely innocent, yet there's a witch hunt because it doesn't congratulate the PS4 enough.

You sound like you have a persecution complex yourself, which is even more impressive if you're not a gaming journalist and it's all by proxy.

Also, have a little perspective. Start by leaving your bubble and reviewing the past year of the gaming press, do a little reading between the lines, and maybe you'll see why people are wary of a superfluous article that amounts to telling fans to not be excited about the biggest console launch in gaming history.
 
So first it was, "2m preorders world wide don't mean anything, people cancel those all the time. Lets wait for sales numbers." now its "yea they sold 1m first day in NA , but that doesn't mean anything lets wait for year 5 numbers."

sony has knocked it out of the park so far this gen. providing most gamers with what they wanted from next gen, while MS has went a totally different route. I keep seeing gaming journalists downplaying how well sony has stepped up their game for the start of this gen.

I keep seeing all the downplaying of what sony has done, either with the resolutiongate, spec comparisons, preorders, and now sales. I don't get it, just say wow sony has better specs, higher resolution, higher preorders, and now sold a crap ton of ps4s and leave it at that.

Whoa there, expecting facts like that to be reported apparently makes you an overzealous and vocal Sony fanboy. Stop prematurely demanding that Sony be crowned winner of the gen.
 

Omega

Banned
I edited my post to include this brilliant opinion on Resolution : link

one those comments are hilarious

UnnDunnArs Praetorian
jump to post
The bottom line is that the resolution of each game is largely an artistic decision made by the developer, not a limitation of the hardware.

On PC, you have your graphics sliders and resolution setting. As a PC player, you decide which combination of resolution and graphics settings gives you the best visuals and framerates.

On console it's the same, except it's the developer tweaking the settings, not the player.

So if it's 720p, it's because the developer decided that resolution netted the best combination of visuals and framerate for that hardware. They could run BF4 on Xbox One at 900p or even 1080p if they wanted, but they'd have to "move some of the graphics sliders left a bit". Or have a reduced framerate.

We know, PS4's GPU is better than Xbox One's GPU. But Xbox One has a better video scaler, so it does a better job upscaling lower-resolution rendering. So developers can get away with running the game in lower resolution and turning the graphics sliders up a little bit.

lol.
 
"Only time will tell."

I wouldn't bet on that philosophy. Anyone is a moron that assumes initial sales should be downplayed as an indicator of success. In tech, extremely high sales for a major launch proves a market beyond enthusiasts and generates a very important buzz during the holiday season. Nothing kills a system faster than a dearth of mind-share, and nothing helps it increase more than Grandma catching the news interviewing Target employees with the caption reading "1 million PS4 launch."
 
The funnier story to me is a professional journolist accusing people of being fanboys and being mad that their console of choice wasn't felated properly.
 

noobasuar

Banned
Perhaps those criticising this article should realise that the record-breaking figures of PS4 could be indicative of factors other than it dominating the games industry forever. For one, it's the first big leap in tech over a generation that's lasted 8 years and has a long-nurtured, premium prestige attached to that. For another, the games industry is much bigger than it was at the time the last record breaking consoles were released. Will PS4 be a success? Undoubtedly. WIll it become the dominant platform? Probably. But these figures aren't indicative of that, because it's just the fucking launch. That's all this article is saying. It's nothing more than an objective look amid the zealous, militant euphoria. It's not pissing on PS4. It's pissing on people who recoil in terror at the suggestion PS4 hasn't yet 'won'.

Some peoples entire lives revolve around how well thier console manufacturer of choice is doing. Like thier entire happiness or sadness depends on just this.

It's gotta be up there with some of the most pathetic things I've seen in my life.
 

Alienous

Member
I have done the opposite, and I've been struggling to comprehend how Sony's sale numbers are so high.

Has the console market spontaneously grown? The more I think about it, the more I think that Sony has just taken the lions share of market share. Nintendo's launch has almost no impact on sales, and Microsoft's Xbox One doesn't seem like it will be a ground shaker.

It'll be interesting to see how the XBONE sells.
 

starmud

Member
Any electronics launch can turn out be a huge outliner. The next 3 to months will tell a better story of what's happening.
 

Steroyd

Member
Perhaps those criticising this article should realise that the record-breaking figures of PS4 could be indicative of factors other than it dominating the games industry forever. For one, it's the first big leap in tech over a generation that's lasted 8 years and has a long-nurtured, premium prestige attached to that. For another, the games industry is much bigger than it was at the time the last record breaking consoles were released. Will PS4 be a success? Undoubtedly. WIll it become the dominant platform? Probably. But these figures aren't indicative of that, because it's just the fucking launch. That's all this article is saying. It's nothing more than an objective look amid the zealous, militant euphoria. It's not pissing on PS4. It's pissing on people who recoil in terror at the suggestion PS4 hasn't yet 'won'.

I don't think anyone is under the illusion that Sony has "already won" just from that, and in general people agree with the basis of the article of this being a marathon not a sprint, the article starts going all murky when it starts comparing the sales figures of other launches that are either a few days, a week or a month compared to Sony's 24 hour figure. And bringing up the Wii U and Dreamcast when the situations surrounding said figures are vastly different (most notable 3rd party support).

I don't think any console manufacturer has had 1 million units on hand on day one, and sold just as many in the first day, it's a positive indication that there will be PS4's on the shelves but in a positive way for once.
 

Zephyrus

Banned
I don't want to have Y2kev breathing on my neck for posting "conspiracy theories" but ever since 06 I've seen a distinct bias towards the xbox 360 by the media.

They praise every little thing it did right while downplaying everything the ps3 did. The ps3 had great games in 07 and most were dismissed by the media. Some were a real diamond in the rough (*cough* folklore *cough*).

This time you see the same thing. The media is against sony. It just is and no ammount of apologists can dissuade me from this conclusion. They're invested in seeing microsoft come out on top. From "DRM future is good for us", to "resolution doesn't matter", to "sales don't matter".

WHAT THE FUCK?

So, a system that is cheaper, has better specs and is more powerful and manage to sell a record breaking 1 million units in the country that had the xbox 360 as it's main console is something to ignore? It's not important? We shouldn't read to much into it?


Please write more doom and gloom articles while pushing forward a draconian future for me.
 

Zephyrus

Banned
Some peoples entire lives revolve around how well thier console manufacturer of choice is doing. Like thier entire happiness or sadness depends on just this.

It's gotta be up there with some of the most pathetic things I've seen in my life.

hopefully it is with you downplaying everything sony does while applauding microsoft for theirs.
 
It's true that there's a somewhat tenuous link between launch sales and long-term sales.

It's true that these numbers, in a vacuum, don't mean much.

I would add that, when looking at console launch sales, you can clearly see a trend: they are becoming more and more front-loaded. We may see a lull for the early part of next year, as so much demand has been / will be filled this year.

However, there's more to consider. Anyone with a finger on the pulse of the industry could have told you that the Wii U did not have the excitement to generate post-launch sales. Likewise, we all knew (I think) that the Gamecube and Xbox were not going to derail the PS2 juggernaut, although we probably didn't realize the size of that juggernaut at the time.

And the PS4 clearly has a lot of excitement surrounding it. It's getting a lot of attention. Its launch numbers don't mean much on their own, but the positive buzz has paid off, and there's no reason to think the future is anything but great at this point.
 
Some peoples entire lives revolve around how well thier console manufacturer of choice is doing. Like thier entire happiness or sadness depends on just this.

It's gotta be up there with some of the most pathetic things I've seen in my life.

Where do people who shit on particular pieces of electronics hardware so much that they have to be banned from discussion forums multiple times over because of it rank in relation to that, noobasuar? :)
 

noobasuar

Banned
Please read my post above. Claiming criticism of this article is pure fanboyism is, as I find myself calling it more and more, "Giesing it".

Criticism is totally fine and those expressing criticism while giving thier reasons and explaining themselves is totally cool to me. What bothers me is people reading just the thread title and losing thier shit at some perceived attack at the ps4.
 

quest

Not Banned from OT
I have done the opposite, and I've been struggling to comprehend how Sony's sale numbers are so high.

Has the console market spontaneously grown? The more I think about it, the more I think that Sony has just taken the lions share of market share. Nintendo's launch has almost no impact on sales, and Microsoft's Xbox One doesn't seem like it will be a ground shaker.

It'll be interesting to see how the XBONE sells.

I would say a combination of pent up sales from the generation being 3 years late and core gamers consolidating around Sony. That and modern supply chain assembly factories from china that has vastly improved in last 8 years. The question is how many sales of MS/Nintendo can Sony make up. To keep numbers around this generation the PS4 will need to make up 80 million from Nintendo and lets say 30-40 million from MS.
 

Neff

Member
Some peoples entire lives revolve around how well thier console manufacturer of choice is doing. Like thier entire happiness or sadness depends on just this.

It's gotta be up there with some of the most pathetic things I've seen in my life.

It's the timeless human propensity for 'them and us' animosity at play. We've done it over land, religion, sports, and now videogames of all things. I can accept it, it's part of all of us. What irks me is when people fail to identify it and revel in it. But civility is boring, I guess.
 

smurfx

get some go again
For instance, in 2000, the PlayStation 2 sold about 500,000 units in its first 24 hours on its way to capturing a huge majority of the console market in the coming years. In 2001, Nintendo's GameCube and Microsoft's Xbox sold 500,000 and 550,000 units, respectively, in their first week on store shelves, but neither console maker was able to ride launch sales to PS2-level post-launch success.

The Xbox 360 sold through a healthy 326,000 units in the US in the two weeks following its launch, according to NPD. Sega's Dreamcast, on the other hand, sold a larger 372,000 units in just four days of US sales, Sega said (in what was arguably a smaller market for video games at the time). Yet the Xbox 360 went on to be one of the most dominant consoles of its generation, while the Dreamcast languished on shelves and ceased production just over a year after launch.
ps2 ended up having a huge lead by the time the other consoles launched. not to mention that it was the follow up system to the last gen winner. same thing happened with the 360 and it having a big lead by the time the ps3 launched. the ps3 was up to 200 dollars more expensive and it could not compete with all the 360 games already out. you can't use past gen's as an example for what's going to happen because this time the competitor and the last gen winner are launching the same month and the competitor is 100 dollars cheaper. i wouldn't say the 1mil launch already won it for sony but getting a good lead to start it off is going to help the system a lot.
 

mrklaw

MrArseFace
One of the Ars staff is not happy with the opinions we're posing on their opinion article

IKEN4j4.png

Man, Arstechnica sure are touchy little buggers. If you don't fellate their articles just right, you have an agenda and a hidden bias
 
Top Bottom