~Devil Trigger~
In favor of setting Muslim women on fire
How do yuo heal yourself in Multiplayer?
1)Rank up to unlock injector~Devil Trigger~ said:How do yuo heal yourself in Multiplayer?
BobJustBob said:The so-called destructible environments are worthless because you can't destroy load-bearing walls.
Yes,it has mic support.GQman2121 said:Also, does the demo even have mic support on the PS3? I couldn't find anyone to talk with in the 90 minutes that I played.
I have a 42" Plasma and I have the PS3 version and I have no idea what you are talking about. Game looks great on my TV.GQman2121 said:The filter on the PS3 demo is blinding. I'm playing on a 46" plasma and it is just a fuzzy, blurry mess, that does nothing but distract me.
Foil said:I've had a few little hiccups, but the PS3 demo ran MUCH smoother for me than the 360 one online. Far better. I have no idea why.
Bullshit. The Bad Company demo is great. Haze? lol. Either you're crazy or just trying to be funny.
I would say your analysis of the demo blows. Anyone who thinks Haze is remotely close to the Battlefield demo in quality is most certainly about 6 cans short of a six-pack.Wax Free Vanilla said:?
the haze demo had better controls, graphics, ai, gunplay and multi-player. the battlefield demo blows.
GQman2121 said:If that's supposed to be a back of the box selling feature, then it's a flat out fucking lie.
None of the buildings I saw taking fire offered anything that I would qualify as "destructible".
Not true. Have you ever tried Frontlines: Fuel of War? Much better Battlefield game (on consoles) than Battlefield itself.Linkzg said:Not at all.
The battlefield is my favorite multiplayer game series, but after playing several matches online and giving this game many chances, I just don't find it fun to play. At first I was judging it as a Battlefield game and it fails at that, then I judged it as just a fun shooter to play, but it isn't even very fun in that regard either. I'm sure it's the best console-only gamers can do with a battlefield game, but so many aspects of this game just feel way off.
MicVlaD said:Not true. Have you ever tried Frontlines: Fuel of War? Much better Battlefield game (on consoles) than Battlefield itself.
Not surprised. They made the excellent BF1942 Desert Combat mod and helped make BF2 before EA fired them.Warm Machine said:I have yet to try the MP but so far Frontlines destroys this game.
FiRez said:My experience with this demo:
Did I kill him? BOOOM AM DEAD...NO KILLCAM?
In BF i've figured that when in doubt it was heavy armor that killed me.Rapping Granny said:This is a problem for all battlefield games, you never know what the fuck just happened.
Rapping Granny said:This is a problem for all battlefield games, you never know what the fuck just happened.
calzor said:I was impressed by the demo. Certainly leaps and bounds in the right direction, especially in comparison to Call of Duty 4.
No lag.
Vehicles.
More diverse set of weapons.
Classes are accutely different.
Destructibility, to a degree.
No kill cam [it just became annoying after a while]
I'm in the occupation of judging the two in every aspect, BF: BC wins in all categories. It's like Call of Duty 4 and Warhawk had a child. Although it's far from perfect - the effectiveness of some weapons is dominant and destructibility is kind of meh considering it's the main selling point. It should be dynamic like in Killzone 2.
FabCam said:I haven't experienced any lag at all (PS3 version)
Moray said:No way, what's there is way better than nothing. And it's definitely a step in the right direction that I hope more games will follow. Someone will eventually overcome the technical/gameplay design hurdles that I'm sure fully destructible buildings would cause.