-
Hey, guest user. Hope you're enjoying NeoGAF! Have you considered registering for an account? Come join us and add your take to the daily discourse.
Battlefront beta - PC Performance Benchmarks
- Thread starter Turin Turambar
- Start date
Exalted Kezia
Member
I had to bump it down to medium to get around 50-60 at 1440, so you might be able to get away with high settings at 1080.
Hip Hop
Member
Post Process and Ambient Occlusion, both set to Medium while everything else on Ultra. I get around 60fps with my GTX 670.
Set the FXAA to low too. on 1080p
icecold1983
Member
It is a clean install and I got a pretty modest GPU.
The OC os not active, I heard is a problem with Frostbite D:
its your gpu dude. its not stable at whatever clock its running at.
Smushroomed
Banned
80-90 fps solid both levels
1440p
85 fov
all setting to ultra + fxaa
4670k oc to 4.4
980ti SLI (even usage)
16gb ram
rog swift gsync on
1440p
85 fov
all setting to ultra + fxaa
4670k oc to 4.4
980ti SLI (even usage)
16gb ram
rog swift gsync on
StarlordDial
Member
Ranges from 75-90 but consistent on the 85fps mark
980ti
5820k
16gb ram 3k
Acer 1440p gsync monitor
980ti
5820k
16gb ram 3k
Acer 1440p gsync monitor
machemachete
Banned
Any way to stabilize it? D:
OldGangWarily
Member
I get better performance on single GPU than with SLI on. I get roughly 50 fps with single GPU on 4K with all ultra except no AA. Get about 42-45 with SLI on.
Rig
i7-4790K @ 4.8GHz
16GB RAM
GTX Titan X SLI
Samsung EVO SSD
EDIT: What the hell happened to Gsync? I turned it off and I got 80 fps or so with SLI on in 4K.
Rig
i7-4790K @ 4.8GHz
16GB RAM
GTX Titan X SLI
Samsung EVO SSD
EDIT: What the hell happened to Gsync? I turned it off and I got 80 fps or so with SLI on in 4K.
lordfuzzybutt
Member
Use msi afterburner, unlock power limit, increase it to the max.
If that still doesn't fix it, reduce core clock by 10mhz and try again.
if your still getting the dx error, give this a try:
Right-click on the game in Origin.
Choose Game Properties.
Type -novid -noborder -windowed in the box (without the quotation marks).
Check Disable Origin in Game for this game
I was having the same problem and this worked for me.
Smushroomed
Banned
hmm weird SLI things
980ti SLI 100% resolution = 80-90 fps
980ti single = same
980ti SLI 200% resolution = 30-40 fps
980ti single = <30 fps
SLI adds something at the higher end? I set my monitor to 144 fps
980ti SLI 100% resolution = 80-90 fps
980ti single = same
980ti SLI 200% resolution = 30-40 fps
980ti single = <30 fps
SLI adds something at the higher end? I set my monitor to 144 fps
machemachete
Banned
Shadowplay.
icecold1983
Member
lower clocks, increase voltage or both
I'm just happy this Nvidia driver version installs on windows 10 without issues, the last driver update would refuse to install :/
Running great for me. Ultra settings @ 1440p and I'm getting 50-100 FPS, usually north of 55 on borderless window mode for that sweet tripple buffering. I'm using Riva server to cap to 60 FPS now.
780ti
i5 4690k @ 4.4 Ghz
windows 10
Running great for me. Ultra settings @ 1440p and I'm getting 50-100 FPS, usually north of 55 on borderless window mode for that sweet tripple buffering. I'm using Riva server to cap to 60 FPS now.
780ti
i5 4690k @ 4.4 Ghz
windows 10
Dictator93
Member
If anyone's interested I get between 32 and 40 fps on my laptop on high settings at 1080p on Hoth:
i7 4710HQ, 8GB, GTX 860M
I've actually tried to fiddle with AA settings but disabling it seems to have absolutely minimal impact on performance. Is this normal? I would love to get to 60FPS on Hoth but don't want to compromise graphics fidelity too much...
I checked my FPS using Shadowplay, is there a better way to do so?
i7 4710HQ, 8GB, GTX 860M
I've actually tried to fiddle with AA settings but disabling it seems to have absolutely minimal impact on performance. Is this normal? I would love to get to 60FPS on Hoth but don't want to compromise graphics fidelity too much...
I checked my FPS using Shadowplay, is there a better way to do so?
Dictator93
Member
That is basically a ps4 level GPU, so it would have to have similar pixel shading cost as the PS4... aka... 900p. Try the resolution slider perhaps?
Nice. I just got an 8GB R9 390. Seems it was made for this game.
Yeah, the performance analysis I've seen indicates this game isn't very CPU dependent, so older chips will pair well with a newer GPU. Again, my rig with an i7 950 lets out a sigh of relief.
I need to download the beta to be sure, but it's looking like I'll be cancelling my Xbox One pre-order in favor of the PC version.
Ultra, locked 60fps on my 970 with 50-80% GPU load. I had one crash within 5 minutes though and the GPU gets very hot compared to other games.
The game looks great. A shame the gameplay really isn't my cup of tea. A singleplayer campaign with these graphics is what I want.
Is there a console command I can use in the singleplayer mode to make me invincible? I just want to check out the environment and ignore the troopers.
The game looks great. A shame the gameplay really isn't my cup of tea. A singleplayer campaign with these graphics is what I want.
Is there a console command I can use in the singleplayer mode to make me invincible? I just want to check out the environment and ignore the troopers.
Dictator93
Member
I was imagining a dark forces or a shadows of the empire style campaign for this. That would have been cool with these production values.
Oh my God, I should never have read this now I'm completely turned off by Battlefront.
I hope Visceral Games' SP Star Wars will be worth the wait.
PunishedReaver
Member
My PC
Intel G3258 at stock speeds *3.2GHZ*
8GB RAM with a 750ti.
Runs this game at 40-60 FPS with everything at high and both texture options at Ultra in 900p with TAA enabled. Haven't tried 1080p yet since my monitor's resolution is at 900p. Had to set the game in Windowed Borderless since it kept crashing the game at full-screen, but other than that it has been working great!
Intel G3258 at stock speeds *3.2GHZ*
8GB RAM with a 750ti.
Runs this game at 40-60 FPS with everything at high and both texture options at Ultra in 900p with TAA enabled. Haven't tried 1080p yet since my monitor's resolution is at 900p. Had to set the game in Windowed Borderless since it kept crashing the game at full-screen, but other than that it has been working great!
cripterion
Member
The game runs just bad on my rig with GTX970 SLI and G-Sync or these new drivers are fucked. Either way, had my fill with SLI, ditching it for good as I see Nvidia doesn't have the intention of properly supporting it.
Just ordered a 980Ti, hopefully plays much better with G-Sync.
Just ordered a 980Ti, hopefully plays much better with G-Sync.
Dictator93
Member
I understand the frustration mate. If you oc that 980 Ti.,.. it can end basically being similarly performant in those games where SLI has good support.
cripterion
Member
Yeah I know man, ironically this beta runs better now that I removed one GTX970 lol. (It's like G-sync wasn't kicking in when SLI was on).
I feel multi monitor, G-Sync and SLI is a bad combo so removing one in the equation is a + in my book. I'm satisfied with the extra room after removing the 2nd GPU and by doing so I'm also getting rid of side intake fan that used to bring all the dust in my case.
Hopefully this EGVA step up program kicks in once Pascal cards are around too. I get the feeling I'll wanna switch to that once they reveal those cards.
bee
Member
whilst this game runs fine on these drivers, probably averaging 50fps at 4k on a titan x on the at-at level, these drivers overall are fucking terrible, horrible gpu utilization in lots of games, my save game in gta v dropped from 60 to 34 fps for instance, back to an older set and its back to 60
Dreams-Visions
Member
i7 920 stock
970 FTW+ stock
all settings on Ultra
1200p/60 no problem
970 FTW+ stock
all settings on Ultra
1200p/60 no problem
Dictator93
Member
Trying out some AA: captures are from a video made with shadowplay... so quality is not perfect
FXAA
"TAA"
"TAA" + 150% resolution scaling
The TAA is of questionably better quality than FXAA "high". It really does not even seem to work IMO.
FXAA
"TAA"
"TAA" + 150% resolution scaling
The TAA is of questionably better quality than FXAA "high". It really does not even seem to work IMO.
Chubzdoomer
Banned
I wasn't sure where to post this, but since this is a "benchmark" thread I thought I'd post it here.
This game has some serious issues with AMD GPUs. The most noticeable one (aside from stuttering menus) is that the moment you join a game and spawn, you're hit with horrible stuttering/pausing for the first minute or so, which renders the game unplayable. Afterwards, the game actually becomes playable and the stuttering only reappears every now and then (and usually just for a couple seconds or so).
I have an R9 270X and I've seen others with R9 280/290/380/390 GPUs reporting the same exact issues over on Reddit, so I'm convinced it's an AMD-specific thing.
This game has some serious issues with AMD GPUs. The most noticeable one (aside from stuttering menus) is that the moment you join a game and spawn, you're hit with horrible stuttering/pausing for the first minute or so, which renders the game unplayable. Afterwards, the game actually becomes playable and the stuttering only reappears every now and then (and usually just for a couple seconds or so).
I have an R9 270X and I've seen others with R9 280/290/380/390 GPUs reporting the same exact issues over on Reddit, so I'm convinced it's an AMD-specific thing.
Smushroomed
Banned
I might be blind because I can't never tell different AA from each other
Well, they're all trying to solve the same problem - although sometimes in different ways.
Post process AA tends to blur or soften the image a bit. MSAA will sample geometry and will typically do a good job of that, but completely ignores many other forms of AA - it's also a big hit on performance unless you're running a forward rendering engine.
cripterion
Member
So glad I ditched my GTX 970 SLI.
Game is running smoothly with one GTX 980Ti and G-Sync working normally now. Breath of fresh air.
Game is running smoothly with one GTX 980Ti and G-Sync working normally now. Breath of fresh air.
fierrotlepou
Member
Is it me or is the "high" setting the highest for the beta? Can't seem to choose ultra.
In custom You can definitely set Ultra.
It allowed me to choose Ultra.
Am the only who cant tolerate LOD on anything other than Ultra?
Wanted to play it in 100-120fps, but its not going to happen with one 970 ;/ ~70fps is still good i guess with gsync.
I really need to test other settings, like i dont want to decrease Effects to lower than Ultra, because particles are just too amazing to give up ;p
Same goes for mesh layer quality, tessellation is awesome ;p
For now i'm playing with everything on Ultra, except for AO and Shadows and 1080p@120% Resolution Scale + TAA. Seems to work well on Hoth and stay mostly over 60fps, but i fear that Endor wont be as forgiving.
Wanted to play it in 100-120fps, but its not going to happen with one 970 ;/ ~70fps is still good i guess with gsync.
I really need to test other settings, like i dont want to decrease Effects to lower than Ultra, because particles are just too amazing to give up ;p
Same goes for mesh layer quality, tessellation is awesome ;p
For now i'm playing with everything on Ultra, except for AO and Shadows and 1080p@120% Resolution Scale + TAA. Seems to work well on Hoth and stay mostly over 60fps, but i fear that Endor wont be as forgiving.
chromatic9
Member
Yeah, I'd love a single player campaign. I understand tacking on one would be a bad idea but with this tech they should look at a full story game later on. Could mean getting others to help story board it. I love what they have here but have no interest in the matches.
Game runs great on my i7 930 and GTX 970. Get 80-100fps on ultra 1080p and around 30fps at 4k. Still not seeing a reason to upgrade yet and have no issues using 6gb of DDR3. There's so much hysteria around any PC release.
Frame rate is off the charts dropping the res down, like 150-200fps.
Yeah, it doesn't seem to resolve subpixel structures any better than the FXAA version.
Weak!