FriedConsole
Banned
Every AAA game coming out. Every release is people making big deals out of nothing and people with stupid expectations being disappointed. 2 months later is when you can hear real opinions on a AAA game.
Yeah but the people who were saying the PS3 was good value were probably talking about the blu-ray thing in the first place.
Yeah but the people who were saying the PS3 was good value were probably talking about the blu-ray thing in the first place.
If that were the case, we would have seen another NES vs Master System situation in North America. But things were in Sega's favor around 1990-ish, Nintendo had to break up their monopoly on third party games in NA and they jumped into the 16bit arena two years late. Yeah they still 'won' in the end, but it was a narrow victory. But personally, I blame Sega for the downfall of Sega as a hardware manufacturer.
Well, the argument was over diversity and variety. The reality is though there's a ton of variety and diversity on Wii U, unless you decide to disqualify the fastest growing segment of the industry out of hand. I just used a 1:1 game count to help show that Wii U does in fact have a ton content, but that doesn't mean every game is equivalent. This also works on the high end though, something like Assassin's Creed IV, Black Ops 2 or NFSMW is orders of magnitude larger in terms of resource demand that something like Soul Reaver, UT or TXR. So should those really be 1:1 either?It's not really like that at all though. Sure you can take the high end of indie games today, and there's some overlap with the lowest ends of retail games back then... but as a whole they're simply not comparable at all. Including XBLA for 360 would be fine, as you'd also include the directly comparable offerings from PSN for PS3... XBLIG on the other hand represents a similar scenario.. an alternative distribution platform where the cream of its offerings are comparable with some of the less ambitious XBLA games, but as a whole are a whole separate tier of game where a 1:1 numbers comparison is loaded as all hell. If you include FortressCraft... then why not also JellyCar, The Impossible Game etc?
To be clear, if I was comparing Dreamcast offerings to Wii U offerings... I absolutely would count something like FAST Racing Neo as a consideration... but I wouldn't be reducing the discussion to numbers in order to make it seem like the machine had healthier third-party support... because it doesn't. It's really just Nintendo and some indies (who typically aren't publishers at all, let alone major ones), in comparison to Dreamcast receiving releases from many of the most prominent publishers for much of the system's life, with a few notable exceptions (primarily Square and EA). If "a game is a game is a game" made any sense to describe third-party support, then most (every?) consoles get beat by Windows Phone. If every XBLA arcade was swapped out for a retail release then the 360 would be boxing with the fucking PS2 for third-party support.
The software droughts for Wii U are basically legendary at this point, and are felt by owners of the machine despite access to the eShop, and this is because the games generally offered their are generally closer to a mobile game (even if still really good) than a Splatoon. This was not the case (or even a problem) for the Dreamcast right up to when it was discontinued... you could easily ignore all other consoles, and have constant substantial releases to keep you occupied... and they weren't all from Sega, like is the case comparatively with the Wii U. And of those game that were Sega's they also weren't mostly Smash Bros #5, Mario Kart#8, 2D Mario #39, 3D Mario #5 etc either.
Right now it's the irrational love for the PS3's first couple of years. Where was all of that back in 07/08?
Genesis has a pretty great library outside of Sonic games - in no particular order, Gunstar Heroes, Alien Soldier, Revenge of Shinobi, Shinobi III, the Streets of Rage trilogy, Ristar, Mega Turrican, Rocket Knight Adventures, Contra Hard Corps, Castlevania Bloodlines, Animaniacs, QuackShot, Castle of Illusion, World of Illusion, Shining in the Darkness, Shining Force and its sequel, the Phantasy Star games (barring III, YMMV on that), Crusader of Centy, Pulseman, Wonder Boy in Monster World, Monster World IV, the Thunder Force series, MUSHA, the superior Aladdin game, Mortal Kombat with blood instead of sweat - need I go on?I don't see how this is revisionist when it's true."The Sega Genesis was always a terrible system and the only good games for it were Sonic 1-3."
Genesis has a pretty great library outside of Sonic games - Gunstar Heroes, Revenge of Shinobi, Shinobi III, the Streets of Rage trilogy, Ristar, Mega Turrican, Rocket Knight Adventures, Contra Hard Corps, Castlevania Bloodlines, Animaniacs, QuackShot, Castle of Illusion, World of Illusion, Shining in the Darkness, Shining Force and its sequel, the Phantasy Star games (barring III, YMMV on that), Crusader of Centy, Pulseman, Wonder Boy in Monster World, Monster World IV, the Thunder Force series, MUSHA, the superior Aladdin game, Mortal Kombat with blood instead of sweat - need I go on?
That's not even getting into sports games, which (IIRC) were generally more popular on Genesis than SNES for whatever reason, and a large part of why that race was so competitive back in the day. Mostly not getting into it since it's not really a genre I care for on any system; nevertheless, NBA Jam was one of the top four bestsellers on the console.
I was to busy playing Ratchet and Clank Tools of Destruction, Uncharted and PES 2008 x)
Right now it's the irrational love for the PS3's first couple of years. Where was all of that back in 07/08?
Some folks would have you believe that the first Motorstorm and Heavenly Sword were as well received as The Witcher and Bloodborne.
this is a huge oneEveryone seems to write off Amy Hennig's massive contribution to the Uncharted series as a whole. I've seen people on neogaf dismiss her as "just a writer" and other things like that.
3 games, one of which being an annual third party series. Atleast mention Motorstorm and Folklore too. But then that's only 5 games
gamecube being nintendo's best platform or whatever.
the gamecube isn't a terrible console, but romanticizing the period as the last time nintendo 'really got it, man' is pretty removed from what i recall that period being like.
Who the fuck says thisthis is a huge one
A new one is Final Fantasy 7's apparently "terrible gameplay"
yep ww was a baby back in the day now it's the best game ever"Wind waker is a baby game" I remember this shit from elementary school! Got ignored every damn time I tried to sing the games praises, now EVERYONE is suddenly super nostalgia for it. Also halo 4 is a good game, at the time everyone wanted to tell me I was wrong, now its story is held in pretty high regard.
Does anyone say that? I feel like the opposite seems to be repeated more generally, at least in sentiment; that PS2 was somehow a hardcore only console that sold to 150m hardcore gamers.Imru al-Qays;188970494 said:PS2 was a casual console that sold well due to its appeal with non-gamers.
"Square went to shit after merging with Enix: FFX-2, FFXI, KH, etc."
Playstation 3 was a great value for the price at launch.
Yup, that one always makes me laugh.GameCube having as good a catalogue as PS2? I'll give you Xbox more even though it was also overshadowed by PS2. Each platform had their exclusives though.
That happens, but with Gamecube specifically I think there was also an air of anti-Wii/anti-casual sentiment to it.People just pick the Nintendo console they grew up with. Early 20 somethings were 6-9 years old when Gamecube launched. That age group isn't exactly uncommon on GAF. Nintendo 64 as a whole (and not just Ocarina of Time, Mario 64, and a few other games) gets way more love now than it did when I first started posting on these forums.
I expect a lot more "The Wii was Nintendo's best console" types on GAF in another 5 years.
Everyone who pretends they used to be hyper competitive melee players in an era where online wasn't even a thing.
I preferred Brawl. Why? More characters, more stages, final smashes, more fun.
The Dreamcast is the big one on GAF for sure. People hailing it as the greatest console ever made that was too far ahead for it's time whilst subsequently shitting on the Wii U even though it's the closest thing we've gotten to a Dreamcast 2 (Both of them being low selling consoles with a small but extremely good library that primarily failed due to the critical errors of the makers)
A 800$ box that had jack shit for games well unless you liked nier or hazeThey were selling an $800+ box for $500/$600. That's a fact.
sörine;188971334 said:Does anyone say that? I feel like the opposite seems to be repeated more generally, at least in sentiment; that PS2 was somehow a hardcore only console that sold to 150m hardcore gamers.
Best example I can think of:
"GamerGate was originally about ethics, but bad people took over and made it about harassment."
It was never about ethics. It originated entirely because of a salty ex-boyfriend's grudge toward a female game developer, and his (unfortunately successful) attempt to incite 4chan's hatred towards her.
A 800$ box that had jack shit for games well unless you liked nier or haze
I really don't get the WW posts. WW is my 2nd favorite Zelda and the first game I owned on my NGC. I knew there was controversy at the time but I think the hate for WW in overblown. After I came to GAF I found out that people disliked sailing.I know there are a lot of new people here, but really: GAF absolutely hated the cartoon Link in Wind Waker. The people who suddenly love Wind Waker must be new people. Lol
Yeah I remember my dad only had movies tooI bought mine to be a blu-ray player initially. 1st gen blu-ray players were all $500+ and many had performance issues. I don't think I even bought a PS3 game until a few months in.
sörine;188970056 said:Well, the argument was over diversity and variety. The reality is though there's a ton of variety and diversity on Wii U, unless you decide to disqualify the fastest growing segment of the industry out of hand. I just used a 1:1 game count to help show that Wii U does in fact have a ton content, but that doesn't mean every game is equivalent. This also works on the high end though, something like Assassin's Creed IV, Black Ops 2 or NFSMW is orders of magnitude larger in terms of resource demand that something like Soul Reaver, UT or TXR. So should those really be 1:1 either?
Even if we decide to cut out everything except the bigger traditional publisher efforts (so EA, Activision, Namco, Capcom, Ubisoft, WB, Disney, Midway, Konami, Square Enix/Eidos, Wii U Sega, etc), Wii U and DC really aren't all that far apart. And their support windows from these publishers are pretty similar too, basically the first one to two years for general support and then reduced down to targeted audience support after (ie: arcade ported fighters/shooters for DC, Lego/Skylanders/Infinity/JD for Wii U).
I think the droughts argument is a bit specious too. It's not objectively based as Wii U's game totals prove, again it seems to be more a subjective take based on the wait between Nintendo tentpoles. Which itself is sort of a holdover narrative from the N64 era, we had the same arguments on GC and even Wii, and they weren't really any truer then either. If you actually look at Wii U's schedule, the only year with significant amounts of time between releases was in early 2013 and that's not uncommon for a post release period. Dreamcast avoided it yes, but then Dreamcast also launched with a year's worth of Japanese content built up. To get an equivalent you'd have to imagine Wii U launching September 2013 with all the games released before then squeezed into it's launch window and following months.
Final Fantasy VI is the best in the saga
Imru al-Qays;188972666 said:There's a contingent (I think of hardcore Nintendo fans) who seem to think that the PS2 was successful because it appealed to "the mass market" of non-gamers in the same way the Wii did, and that the PS4 is doomed because it doesn't appeal to this market as effectively.
"the genesis only had sawnic and crappy sport games"
"donkey kong country is a crappy game that only coasted on grafx"
Genesis has a pretty great library outside of Sonic games - in no particular order, Gunstar Heroes, Alien Soldier, Revenge of Shinobi, Shinobi III, the Streets of Rage trilogy, Ristar, Mega Turrican, Rocket Knight Adventures, Contra Hard Corps, Castlevania Bloodlines, Animaniacs, QuackShot, Castle of Illusion, World of Illusion, Shining in the Darkness, Shining Force and its sequel, the Phantasy Star games (barring III, YMMV on that), Crusader of Centy, Pulseman, Wonder Boy in Monster World, Monster World IV, the Thunder Force series, MUSHA, the superior Aladdin game, Mortal Kombat with blood instead of sweat - need I go on?
That's not even getting into sports games, which (IIRC) were generally more popular on Genesis than SNES for whatever reason, and a large part of why that race was so competitive back in the day. Mostly not getting into it since it's not really a genre I care for on any system; nevertheless, NBA Jam was one of the top four bestsellers on the console.
Milon's secret castle and Zelda 2 are excellent games
"Mass Effect 2 turned the series into shootbang".
I get what people are trying to say when they air these grievances, because I'm in agreeance on the wavelength, but the statement is still bullshit. It's a pet peeve of mine when Mass Effect is whimsically romancised as some rich role playing game deep with non-combat solutions, when 90% of quest arcs revolved around "shoot the guy in the face", and the deep role playing systems were 1 or 2 basic as fuck stat checks and minigames.
People just pick the Nintendo console they grew up with. Early 20 somethings were 6-9 years old when Gamecube launched. That age group isn't exactly uncommon on GAF. Nintendo 64 as a whole (and not just Ocarina of Time, Mario 64, and a few other games) gets way more love now than it did when I first started posting on these forums.
I expect a lot more "The Wii was Nintendo's best console" types on GAF in another 5 years.
Yeah but REmake is way scarierHow about "Resident Evil 4 isn't scary"
The game is plenty scary and creepy the first time around.