yeah those plus the NES when they revived the industry, really lucky, super lucky, boy they must have a lot of four leaf clovers around, those lucky, lucky, lucky people at Nintendo
There's no denying that Nintendo has been in the right place at the right time, more than a couple of times, and that not all of it comes down to expert planning. Even in the example you just mentioned.
The NES/Famicom was built to cash in on the boom that Atari created. In 1983, Nintendo was literally in negotiations with Atari to hand the Famicom over to them and let Atari release the
Nintendo Atari Entertainment System in America. And then the great Atari crash of 1983 happened. That has to be some of the worst timing in the history of videogames. And it was too late to pull out. Nintendo was already committed. They
had to release the NES into the smoking ruins of Atari's wake, they had to fight the uphill battle of convincing retailers that the NES wasn't going to bomb, and once they did that they found themselves alone in the clear blue sea with 99% marketshare, something that should've been nearly impossible had Atari not imploded and taken everyone else down with them.
The Roman philosopher Seneca said that luck is what happens when preparation meets opportunity. Nintendo has certain skills. When they're in the right place at the right time, they can succeed in ways that others seemingly can't. But Nintendo has been known to falter when no opportunities present themselves.
Thomas Edison said that genius is one percent inspiration and ninety-nine percent perspiration. That doesn't quite describe Nintendo, IMO. It more describes Nintendo's competition.