• Hey, guest user. Hope you're enjoying NeoGAF! Have you considered registering for an account? Come join us and add your take to the daily discourse.

Bravely Default censored for western release

Status
Not open for further replies.

Jintor

Member
What incredible sounding writing. Truly, without censorship this could have been the next Planescape Torment or Last of Us.

You're really being petty right now. That's not the point of this thread and you know it.

I mean, so far BD's plot is completely meh so far, even allowing for some big twist somewhere along the line, but you know it's not the point of the discussion at all.
 

Jomjom

Banned
Eh Zero clearly looks older and I think the fact that shes a nympho and has a group of men to satisfy her sexual desires is why she wears such clothes. Its also said she doesn't even care how she looks.

Also her costumer is nowhere near ridiculous as a bikini with a thong.

Don't know how to avatar quote, but at least in that picture, that's not a face of an adult. She clearly looks older compared to the BD characters if you find chibi characters to look like toddlers, but it's equally clear that she doesn't look like an adult.

As to the bolded, I live in California, I see bikinis with thongs all the time. I don't think I've ever seen anything based in reality close to what Zero's wearing.

Now don't get me wrong, I don't actually think there's anything wrong with DOD3 (preordered already). I just responded to your post because your questions about BD seemed like they mostly could apply to DOD3 too.
 

Ratrat

Member
The contradiction is that the poster is stating that a problem is that they look like children. Zero does not look like an adult.

I mean the first words of person I responded to were, "Yes, the problem here is that they look young..."
Well, DOD3 is an adult rated game who's story depicts sexual deviants. The 'problem' may be the point. Besides Zero is not even remotely comparable to BDs in game models.
 

kiryogi

Banned
They have to enter a beauty contest to try and lure out someone and they think they need to win it, but eventually they decide they don't actually need to so they don't end up using it. The bikini is reused later as part of an sidequest entrapment plot to draw out a different enemy. It doesn't go so well.

It's dumb but whatevs

Slightly?
The scene worked out in the end because Agnes is pure as can be thankfully. On the other hand yes, Edea's thing was probably off the deep end there. Regardless that's probably the only real pitfall in the writing unless we want to debate Hayashi's love of time loops and parallel universes
 
You're really being petty right now. That's not the point of this thread and you know it.

I'm just kidding (which I guess should have made clearer, because I've given TLoU plenty of flak for its writing).

But again, that's a silly fan-servicey line of plot that I don't blame the localization team for wanting to bump the ages up for. I just don't think arguing for artistic integrity really matters in regards to the character ages here.
 

Jomjom

Banned
Well, DOD3 is an adult rated game who's story depicts sexual deviants. The 'problem' may be the point. Besides Zero is not even remotely comparable to BDs in game models.

That's fine, but that wasn't what the poster stated was the problem. It was that the characters look like children, but are sexualized, regardless of the game's ESRB rating. It's not like if you make a game rated M or AO, child porn is suddenly ok.

So again, the contradiction is that Zero also does not look "of age".


Again, like I've said, I'm not saying there's a problem with DOD3, I'm merely raising it because the poster I responded to seems harsh and judgmental about all kinds of stuff about BD, like showing of thighs, disappointment in Yoshida, etc., but I'm questioning whether he/she feels the same way about DOD3.
 
Don't know how to avatar quote, but at least in that picture, that's not a face of an adult.

As to the bolded, I live in California, I see bikinis with thongs all the time. I don't think I've ever seen anything based in reality close to what Zero's wearing.

Now don't get me wrong, I don't actually think there's anything wrong with DOD3 (preordered already). I just responded to your post because your questions about BD seemed like they mostly could apply to DOD3 too.

Context bro. Thongs and bikini's are fine.....on the beach. Who wears a thong and bikini when going into battle? Lets forget about the armour thing because not all games have to realistic but its still a ridiculous costume.

I don't think what is here applies to Zero, since she clearly looks older, and her dress goes with her character of being a nympho.

2455496-a4.png

Lastly this is an M rated game.
Are you telling me zero looks like a child?
 
I'm just kidding (which I guess should have made clearer, because I've given TLoU plenty of flak for its writing).

But again, that's a silly fan-servicey line of plot that I don't blame the localization team for wanting to bump the ages up for. I just don't think arguing for artistic integrity really matters in regards to the character ages here.

The anticipation of seeing the bikini was a big part of the plot line as well. It was all pointlessly risqué
 

Kintaro

Worships the porcelain goddess
First of all, we have a very different understanding of adorable. :D

And yet, he features proportions found on little children, to me he looks like a very ugly two year old.

Look up the therm "Kindchenschema".

I understand the term and the study behind it.

However, I can see the differences. I don't see "baby" in that SD art. Or of Ryu's or Chun Li's or in Bravely Default's. I don't. I just see a cute, deformed version of them. I don't see children there because I grasp the connection between the original character and the deformed version.

To be quite honest, the fact people here go straight to "it looks like a child" freaks me the hell out. o_O

I guess I'm the weird one.

Lastly this is an M rated game.
Are you telling me zero looks like a child?

The two fifteen year old sexual deviants sure do.

Should I mention that Five keeps a 14 year old boy on call for sex too?
 

Jomjom

Banned
Context bro. Thongs and bikini's are fine.....on the beach. Who wears a thong and bikini when going into battle? Lets forget about the armour thing because not all games have to realistic but its still a ridiculous costume.

I don't think what is here applies to Zero, since she clearly looks older, and her dress goes with her character of being a nympho.



Lastly this is an M rated game.
Are you telling me zero looks like a child?

Her body may not, but her face definitely does. It's round and she wears a gigantic bow on her head.

Thongs and bikinis are fine on the beach, just as Zero's costume is fine in the I dunno (bedroom?). From what I've seen though she wears that in combat, but I like that you've conveniently proposed to forget about the "armour thing because not all games have to be realistic" to explain Zero's costume's feasibility. However, when it comes to BD, it gets no quarter because somehow bikinis and thongs are held to the highest standard of realism.

Context bro.
 

Garcia

Member
Well. . . Strangely enough this is one of those threads where you really don't want to feel like you're fitting into one of the 2 sides of the spectrum. Both are equally extremist in some way or the other.

It just keeps delivering.
 

catmario

Member
I'm playing japanese version and using english subtitle.
I have no problem to use originally intended(?!) costume thing apparently.

I can avoid censorship things hehe.
 
Good thing they "censored" it. I like the style of the world and the promise of a good jrpg (finally) but the design of the characters pushes all the wrong buttons for me. Sexual innuendo combined with chibi style is just wrong.
 
Being cute is great. I wish everything and everyone were cute.

And cuteness isn't something that just applies to children. Plenty of adults and other animals are very cute.
Being cute doesn't make you any less of an adult or mature. I'm an adult, and I want to be as cute as possible.
 

ZeroX03

Banned
As far as the plot goes, it makes a lot more sense for Edea and Ringabel to be older, and for Agnes to wear more modest clothes. As far as gameplay goes it changes nothing. This is really a non-issue,
 
Being cute is great. I wish everything and everyone were cute.

And cuteness isn't something that just applies to children. Plenty of adults and other animals are very cute.
Being cute doesn't make you any less of an adult or mature. I'm an adult, and I want to be as cute as possible.

Being cute and looking like a ten year old in a sm-outfit are two different things. It would be very hard to show this game to a non-gaming female friend of mine without risking to look like a person with barely legal sexual preferences. With the japanese design it would be plain impossible.
 
Her body may not, but her face definitely does. It's round and she wears a gigantic bow on her head.

Thongs and bikinis are fine on the beach, just as Zero's costume is fine in the I dunno (bedroom?). From what I've seen though she wears that in combat, but I like that you've conveniently proposed to forget about the "armour thing because not all games have to be realistic" to explain Zero's costume's feasibility. However, when it comes to BD, it gets no quarter because somehow bikinis and thongs are held to the highest standard of realism.

Context bro.

If you seriously think a thong and bikini has the same inappropriateness as Zero's costume then lol.

The reason I said to ignore armour is because then literally every game will look nonsensical. Theres only a couple of games that have represented fantasy armour appropriately.

I understand the term and the study behind it.

However, I can see the differences. I don't see "baby" in that SD art. Or of Ryu's or Chun Li's or in Bravely Default's. I don't. I just see a cute, deformed version of them. I don't see children there because I grasp the connection between the original character and the deformed version.

To be quite honest, the fact people here go straight to "it looks like a child" freaks me the hell out. o_O

I guess I'm the weird one.



The two fifteen year old sexual deviants sure do.

Should I mention that Five keeps a 14 year old boy on call for sex too?

Well I certainly did not know about that because I haven't played the game >.<
 
No! It's okay! It's M Rated! Neither of them look like children!

I'm outta here.

To be fair, Drakengard isn't really in the same ballpark as Bravely Default. I haven't played 3 yet and probably won't, but the series (as well as Nier) uses intentionally disgusting, disturbing, and sickening imagery on purpose because it's integral to the story and tone. This argument about BD centers more on the fact that the underage sexy costumes are really only there for the sake of fanservice.

That doesn't mean Drakengard is free from any criticism, just that the debate around it should probably be "are these disturbing like incest elements properly handled in service of the story?" rather than "I think it's inappropriate for this game to talk about incest at all." Drakengard (again, the first one at least, haven't seen 3) at least presents its fucked up shit as fucked up shit.
 
To be fair, Drakengard isn't really in the same ballpark as Bravely Default. I haven't played 3 yet and probably won't, but the series (as well as Nier) uses intentionally disgusting, disturbing, and sickening imagery on purpose because it's integral to the story and tone. This argument about BD centers more on the fact that the underage sexy costumes are really only there for the sake of fanservice.

That doesn't mean Drakengard is free from any criticism, just that the debate around it should probably be "are these disturbing like incest elements properly handled in service of the story?" rather than "I think it's inappropriate for this game to talk about incest at all." Drakengard (again, the first one at least, haven't seen 3) at least presents its fucked up shit as fucked up shit.

I really do have to question why fans would find the butt crack of a 15 year old pixelated character pleasing. Why is this fan service?

I would think fan service for this type of game would be little nods to the older FF's or something like that.
 
I really do have to question why fans would find the butt crack of a 15 year old pixelated character pleasing. Why is this fan service?

Well, like many people have come into the thread to point out, the chibi models "represent" a more realistically proportioned human.

However, at the end of the day that means the costumes are representing a more realistically proportioned fifteen year old wearing belts as underwear, which doesn't really do that defense any favors.
 
They have to enter a beauty contest to try and lure out someone and they think they need to win it, but eventually they decide they don't actually need to so they don't end up using it. The bikini is reused later as part of an sidequest entrapment plot to draw out a different enemy. It doesn't go so well.

It's dumb but whatevs
Was Toriyama a consultant on this project? Oh wait, VN writer.
 
non-gaming female friend of mine
It seems like everyone looks "10 years old" to some people.:/

I've heard the same arguement for Korean rapper E.via/Tymee. That she shouldn't sexualize her body because she "looks too young". She's almost 28 years old, she has a right to do whatever she wants with her body.

Designing characters like this doesn't encourage anything other than it's okay to look a certain way, and to be attracted to that. It doesn't encourage people being attracted to children. And it doesn't give someone any sexuality.

Also, I don't think your friend being female has anything to do with anything. I hope you just mentioned that to be more complete.
 
It seems like everyone looks "10 years old" to some people.:/

I've heard the same arguement for Korean rapper E.via/Tymee. That she shouldn't sexualize her body because she "looks too young". She's almost 28 years old, she has a right to do whatever she wants with her body.

Designing characters like this doesn't encourage anything other than it's okay to look a certain way, and to be attracted to that. It doesn't encourage people being attracted to children. And it doesn't give someone any sexuality.

Also, I don't think your friend being female has anything to do with anything. I hope you just mentioned that to be more complete.

That person is an actual 28 year old human being and not a canonically 15 year old video game character, so I don't think it's really appropriate to apply the same standards.
 
That person is an actual 28 year old human being and not a canonically 15 year old video game character, so I don't think it's really appropriate to apply the same standards.
You're right, she's characterized as a 15 year old in this game.

Which makes things totally different and inappropriate. Adults shouldn't fantasize about 15 year olds.
 
I have hopes that technological improvements someday, may allow for me to become cuter.

I would like to be between 4 and 5 feet tall. But I can't change my height safely right now.
I'm looking into buying Tria hair remover, when I have the money, and possibly surgery.

I'm also interested in facial surgery to make my face rounder and cuter. But I've heard so many stories about the dangers of plastic surgery, that I'm scared to do so.
I'm trying to be patient and do research, waiting until I know something is safe. Hopefully I won't grow old when the technology is here, either.

But reading and hearing things like this has me worried. Not only will the technology not come for me to look this way. But that if it does, people will try to make it illegal.
That people will make it illegal to look a certain way. The way I want to look.
...Well, ok then...
 

Trojita

Rapid Response Threadmaker
I have hopes that technological improvements someday, may allow for me to become cuter.

I would like to be between 4 and 5 feet tall. But I can't change my height safely right now.
I'm looking into buying Tria hair remover, when I have the money, and possibly surgery.

I'm also interested in facial surgery to make my face rounder and cuter. But I've heard so many stories about the dangers of plastic surgery, that I'm scared to do so.
I'm trying to be patient and do research, waiting until I know something is safe. Hopefully I won't grow old when the technology is here, either.

But reading and hearing things like this has me worried. Not only will the technology not come for me to look this way. But that if it does, people will try to make it illegal.
That people will make it illegal to look a certain way. The way I want to look.

ldOyrxi.gif
 

Mephala

Member
I prefer the new costumes. I find myself wondering if I can categorize this as censorship or just modifying to suit a different audience/culture. Are they the same thing and is it always bad? Especially when I prefer characters being older than 15 and prefer the new designs. Can't speak on the loss of innuendo but I feel a little bummed by it.
 
You're right, she's characterized as a 15 year old in this game.

Which makes things totally different and inappropriate. Adults shouldn't fantasize about 15 year olds.

I know you're being sarcastic, but really think about this - they are sexualized 15 y/o characters that look like toddlers.

I know people are mad that this thread was derailed, and I am part of that - so I'm going to bounce and let the other merits of the game be discussed.
 

puzl

Banned
I really can't understand how people think looking at literal minors, dressed in ridiculously over-sexualised "clothing" using sexual innuendo and suggestion is in any way acceptable in video gaming today. For every game like Journey or The Last of Us, which are trying to bring the gaming medium out of the manbaby stone-age and present it as a mature, artistic genre for gameplay and storytelling, we have games like this, which still treat women (or in this case, young girls) as nothing more than dolls to dress up and objectify. Changing their age still doesn't hide the fact that what you see on the screen look like children in thongs. Just plain creepy on every level possible. I'm honestly shocked that many of you can defend this. I don't give a shit if you consider it censorship or differences in culture; it's just plain disgusting.
 
I really can't understand how people think looking at literal minors, dressed in ridiculously over-sexualised "clothing" using sexual innuendo and suggestion is in any way acceptable in video gaming today. For every game like Journey or The Last of Us, which are trying to bring the gaming medium out of the manbaby stone-age and present it as a mature, artistic genre for gameplay and storytelling, we have games like this, which still treat women (or in this case, young girls) as nothing more than dolls to dress up and objectify. Changing their age still doesn't hide the fact that what you see on the screen look like children in thongs. Just plain creepy on every level possible. I'm honestly shocked that many of you can defend this. I don't give a shit if you consider it censorship or differences in culture; it's just plain disgusting.


/
 

BGBW

Maturity, bitches.
I really can't understand how people think looking at literal minors, dressed in ridiculously over-sexualised "clothing" using sexual innuendo and suggestion is in any way acceptable in video gaming today. For every game like Journey or The Last of Us, which are trying to bring the gaming medium out of the manbaby stone-age and present it as a mature, artistic genre for gameplay and storytelling, we have games like this, which still treat women (or in this case, young girls) as nothing more than dolls to dress up and objectify. Changing their age still doesn't hide the fact that what you see on the screen look like children in thongs. Just plain creepy on every level possible. I'm honestly shocked that many of you can defend this. I don't give a shit if you consider it censorship or differences in culture; it's just plain disgusting.
You do realise it's not just the women right?
BDFTS_Ringabel_Bonus_Costume_Artwork.png


And this costume was completely cut, not even edited.
 
I really can't understand how people think looking at literal minors, dressed in ridiculously over-sexualised "clothing" using sexual innuendo and suggestion is in any way acceptable in video gaming today. For every game like Journey or The Last of Us, which are trying to bring the gaming medium out of the manbaby stone-age and present it as a mature, artistic genre for gameplay and storytelling, we have games like this, which still treat women (or in this case, young girls) as nothing more than dolls to dress up and objectify. Changing their age still doesn't hide the fact that what you see on the screen look like children in thongs. Just plain creepy on every level possible. I'm honestly shocked that many of you can defend this. I don't give a shit if you consider it censorship or differences in culture; it's just plain disgusting.

I'm not defending the game or expressing any opinion about it, but reasoning that these kind of games shouldn't exist so that gaming can "grow up" doesn't make sense.

Books and movies also offer content that is of questionable taste, that doesn't make the medium as a whole immature. There are people who enjoy these games for reasons that some might not agree with, but that doesn't mean they shouldn't exist. There need to be more "mature" games, but that doesn't mean there have to be less that are like this.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top Bottom