Why?
Because the police should have carefully investigate and take more precaution instead of going Max Payne "shoot first, ask questions later" on the victim.
Why?
This anti-police sentiment is one of the worst things to come out of our generation, and that's saying something
This anti-police sentiment is one of the worst things to come out of our generation, and that's saying something
Are such operations filmed as part of the standard operating procedure? (If not, why not?)I wonder how much fo this is true, and how much is completely and utterly made up?
If I call the police here in Germany and tell them my neighbour has bombs, explosives and such stuff, you can be sure they will first investigate whether thats true instead of raiding a house and shooting my neighbour...
Are such operations filmed as part of the standard operating procedure? (If not, why not?)
That would solve the accountability issue.
Most states don't have body can laws. The ones that do, funnily, have time fought tooth and nail by police departments.Are such operations filmed as part of the standard operating procedure? (If not, why not?)
That would solve the accountability issue.
Only 100k? After the lawsuits against the city are done, we'll be in the 7 or 8 figures easily.Police handled the situation poorly, I admit. But something has to be done to people like this. If not serious jail time, then the bill for the swat team. The cost of medical care, and the cops, and their insurance premiums, and the vehicles usage probably would cost about 100k easily. That would likely be much more of a deterrent than any jail time.
No it isn't.This anti-police sentiment is one of the worst things to come out of our generation, and that's saying something
And what do they do if there's a hostage situation? Take their time and conduct an investigation?
Thankfully they used rubber bullets. So many armchair law enforcement experts who have no clue what it's like to be in those shoes.
I hope the pieces of garbage involved with the call get as much jail time as possible.
For shooting an unarmed, innocent man posing no threat square in the face?
And what do they do if there's a hostage situation? Take their time and conduct an investigation?
Thankfully they used rubber bullets. So many armchair law enforcement experts who have no clue what it's like to be in those shoes.
I hope the pieces of garbage involved with the call get as much jail time as possible.
This anti-police sentiment is one of the worst things to come out of our generation, and that's saying something
This anti-police sentiment is one of the worst things to come out of our generation, and that's saying something
It might not be sufficient on its own, but it certainly helps in establishing the facts.We have video of police shooting unarmed people in the back while they are face down on the ground. Video tape means nothing as long as people still give the police a pass.
I have no idea how you would rationally argue against such a requirement.Most states don't have body can laws. The ones that do, funnily, have time fought tooth and nail by police departments.
Nor do I. But the argument is made to legislatures that it impinges on their "ability to do their job" somehow and it usually works.I have no idea how you would rationally argue against such a requirement.
Clearly, as a society we depend on the people we've entrusted with executive power to follow the established procedures and precautions exactly, and we need to be able to verify that.
The police really is incompetent.
They shoot unarmed people. They shoot children. They shoot pregnant women.
They shoot people that happens to have a different skin colour than their own.
They shoot everything that doesn't pose a threat...
It happens again and again on a yearly basis, and people still say something like this?
We wouldn't have anything to yell about if we thought about what it's like to be in someone else's situation.And what do they do if there's a hostage situation? Take their time and conduct an investigation?
Thankfully they used rubber bullets. So many armchair law enforcement experts who have no clue what it's like to be in those shoes.
I hope the pieces of garbage involved with the call get as much jail time as possible.
You do get that not every police officer is evil, right? I honestly believe some people around here sit behind their computers, see a video, and goes "Yup, that's how that happens in every situation ever." I don't know how some people can't comprehend that one thing doesn't apply to everything. If a doctor kills a patient, does that mean most doctors are bad?We have video of police shooting unarmed people in the back while they are face down on the ground. Video tape means nothing as long as people still give the police a pass.
I have no idea how you would rationally argue against such a requirement.
Clearly, as a society we depend on the people we've entrusted with executive power to follow the established procedures and precautions exactly, and we need to be able to verify that.
In fact in hostage situations SWAT are taught not to act rashly because they hostages could be put in harm's way.
And what do they do if there's a hostage situation? Take their time and conduct an investigation?
Thankfully they used rubber bullets. So many armchair law enforcement experts who have no clue what it's like to be in those shoes.
I hope the pieces of garbage involved with the call get as much jail time as possible.
We wouldn't have anything to yell about if we thought about what it's like to be in someone else's situation.
You do get that not every police officer is evil, right? I honestly believe some people around here sit behind their computers, see a video, and goes "Yup, that's how that happens in every situation ever." I don't know how some people can't comprehend that one thing doesn't apply to everything. If a doctor kills a patient, does that mean most doctors are bad?
EDIT: The poster above me has some sense.
We wouldn't have anything to yell about if we thought about what it's like to be in someone else's situation.
You do get that not every police officer is evil, right? I honestly believe some people around here sit behind their computers, see a video, and goes "Yup, that's how that happens in every situation ever." I don't know how some people can't comprehend that one thing doesn't apply to everything. If a doctor kills a patient, does that mean most doctors are bad?
EDIT: The poster above me has some sense.
You do get that not every police officer is evil, right? I honestly believe some people around here sit behind their computers, see a video, and goes "Yup, that's how that happens in every situation ever." I don't know how some people can't comprehend that one thing doesn't apply to everything. If a doctor kills a patient, does that mean most doctors are bad?
Shoot/beat the shit out of people first, ask questions later.Seriously they had time to identify the guy, but not enough time to read the situation? I guess I'm just being an armchair expert.
A doctor making a medical mistake is not comparable to a officer with a gun shooting somebody. One has intent to kill, the other doesn't. We shouldn't brush it off because being a justice officer is a difficult job. Killing somebody or performing an action that can kill somebody needs to be investigated and it needs action taken if that person wasn't even guilty of a crime.We wouldn't have anything to yell about if we thought about what it's like to be in someone else's situation.
You do get that not every police officer is evil, right? I honestly believe some people around here sit behind their computers, see a video, and goes "Yup, that's how that happens in every situation ever." I don't know how some people can't comprehend that one thing doesn't apply to everything. If a doctor kills a patient, does that mean most doctors are bad?
EDIT: The poster above me has some sense.
Well that what happens when you live in a "Shoot First, ask questions later" training policy.
So I just Googled rubber bullets and that was a kill shot right?
I get that these guys go in hard but surely given how easy it is to set up this kind of thing these days, there may be cause for a modicum of restraint? Protect and serve and all that.
It might not be sufficient on its own, but it certainly helps in establishing the facts.
I have no idea how you would rationally argue against such a requirement.
Clearly, as a society we depend on the people we've entrusted with executive power to follow the established procedures and precautions exactly, and we need to be able to verify that.
According to police reports from a lieutenant and sergeant on-scene, Mr. Dobbs father advised that there was a gun in the apartment and that he could not be sure whether or not these were credible threats from his son.
Even if we take the police statement at face value, and we shouldn't given the conflict of interest.This thread is bonkers. People should investigate more before posting.
Police called into the house twice. Had actually evacuated the rest of the family, and we're talking with Dobbs when he chose to disregard them and turn away to "get his girlfriend."
Terrible situation all around, but this kid put himself and the police in a bad situation.
Oh good, he's not dead. Thread title should be clear about that.
This thread is bonkers. People should investigate more before posting.
Police called into the house twice. Had actually evacuated the rest of the family, and we're talking with Dobbs when he chose to disregard them and turn away to "get his girlfriend."
Terrible situation all around, but this kid put himself and the police in a bad situation.
This thread is bonkers. People should investigate more before posting.
Police called into the house twice. Had actually evacuated the rest of the family, and we're talking with Dobbs when he chose to disregard them and turn away to "get his girlfriend."
Terrible situation all around, but this kid put himself and the police in a bad situation.
Or if the police had cameras to verify their story.There would be no issue if some shit head hadn't called the police because of some video nonsense
Quit victim blaming
But this kid put himself and the police in a bad situation.
Even if we take the police statement at face value, and we shouldn't given the conflict of interest.
Lol no. An innocent man did not put himself in a position to GET SHOT IN THE FACE.
Yeah, why would he lie in his bed? Any normal person would pull their gun out and shoot at a person like that.
Unbelievable, this kid...
We wouldn't have anything to yell about if we thought about what it's like to be in someone else's situation.
You do get that not every police officer is evil, right? I honestly believe some people around here sit behind their computers, see a video, and goes "Yup, that's how that happens in every situation ever." I don't know how some people can't comprehend that one thing doesn't apply to everything. If a doctor kills a patient, does that mean most doctors are bad?
The police is worse! They are supposedly professionals who assess and investigate situations and respond appropriately.
Instead as soon as some random person makes a call they send in a fucking SWAT team and shoot an innocent guy in the face? Those dumbass cops should go to prison because they shot an innocent person, "someone told us ..." is not an excuse for their own incompetence.
The guy who made the call is an idiot but locking him up for 20 years is ridiculous, for what? Lying to the police? Because that's all he did, had he called a competent police department no one would have been shot at all.
Of course he should get punished somehow but not to such an extent that he spends years in prison because he cannot be blamed for the cops involved being untrained, trigger happy, agressive wannabe soldiers who seem to think they live in a war zone and everyone who isn't them is an enemy.
The police is worse! They are supposedly professionals who assess and investigate situations and respond appropriately.The worst scum is the prankster .. but it's appalling that US police are always shoot first, ask questions later.
You'd think they'd have a negotiator or common sense to gauge the situation. Their lack of professional standards gives other police officers a bad reputation.
No, but if american doctors killed patients every other day because they do everything wrong that can go wrong in a certain situation and throw scalpels and mentally ill people to get them to take their medication I might suspect that there's a problem. Especially if these things don't happen in otger countries.You do get that not every police officer is evil, right? I honestly believe some people around here sit behind their computers, see a video, and goes "Yup, that's how that happens in every situation ever." I don't know how some people can't comprehend that one thing doesn't apply to everything. If a doctor kills a patient, does that mean most doctors are bad?.