These articles are based on FUD, it's like they're trying to put a negative spin on Sony's outlook for next gen, so people can warm up to MS.....I'm trying to figure out who such articles are meant for, because it's not fooling anybody...Nobody cares about puff pieces, they don't work....Get the games and people will come......
Trying to engineer good-will for MS before they've done anything is perhaps more reason to worry if anything.....It's just like when the media blew up crossplay, bc etc......Sony sold more consoles after E3........Games sell consoles, not puff pieces....
Okay look, I'm going to break it down since it seems like a lot of people don't see the obvious.
The ONLY, and I repeat--ONLY--reason the PS3 stumbled was because the pricing on it was absolutely stupid and it was essentially a modern Sega Saturn that was way too difficult to develop for. That's it. No one's ever liked Microsoft. No one ever wanted an Xbox. The ONLY reason the 360 did well was because Sony completely bungled the pricing on the PS3 and made it difficult to develop games for. I really need to hammer this home because people don't seem to get it: the 360 wasn't a Microsoft success; it was a Sony failure.
The thing is, I don't see where the pessimism for Sony's outlook is coming from, at this point you have to maufacture it and go way out of leftfield to concoct such a formula......
As for the bolded and other points raised in your response........The 360 had a 54.2% failure rate, whatever final installbase you see on wikipedia is just a half-shell....People had to keep on buying 360's because MS convinced them that XBLIVE was the holy grail and they wanted to continue playing with friends.......Of course, MS replaced a tonne of 360's too and lost over a billion+ trying to mitigate the train wreck that RROD was......
The point is, under these circumstances how could anybody believe MS was destined to win this gen beginning 2013, their actual 360 installbase was more in the range of 40 million, just as XBOX-ONE is now, besides, their software run dry past 2009 when they started to shovel more kinect ware.....Whilst PS3 released some of the best games on the PS3 post 2009 and beyond....
People are pretending MS won that gen, they didn't, with their failure rate they were way behind PS3.......360 installbase success is not as simple as just watching the figures, it's just a padded system for an over half-rate failure ratio...So there's more to it than what you see......So when people went into 2013 writing articles about how MS is going to dominate and they went on to write all the "most balanced console" puff pieces, they were just setting themselves for a fall giving the stats and history...and it's the same thing here...We even forget that the media was pro TV TV TV, snap, skype and kinect and some even defended MS's 2013 DRM.....So it's not strange that these articles are popping now, if anything, I expect these type of articles to double from henceforth and the train to go full choo-choo when the next gen consoles are officially revealed in early to mid 2020.....