DeepEnigma
Gold Member
FUD
This is pretty much what everyone is saying Sony will do.. release an underpowered underwhelming box like the PS4 pro and call it a day and go coasting along on their fanbase.Just make the PS5 backward compatible. This is all they need to do to win next generation.
Charging for online on F2P games is anti-consumer. With all the crossplay talk, no one ever calls out Microsoft about it. That decision right there affects way more Xbox gamers than crossplay ever would. Nintendo or Sony doesn't do it.That’s not arrogance. Here I’ll do the same thing you just did for Microsoft.
1. Advertising VR then refusing to provide it for their customers on Xbox One X
2. Refusing to remove F2P games from pay wall
3. Charging people on game pass extra for playing online.
Again I reiterate, those are not arrogance. Simply just business decisions that they decided would not affect them financially.
You make a good point.Charging for online on F2P games is anti-consumer. With all the crossplay talk, no one ever calls out Microsoft about it. That decision right there affects way more Xbox gamers than crossplay ever would. Nintendo or Sony doesn't do it.
The world knows the PS3 ended up passing the 360 in the end, but here in the US, 360 dominated the PS3. .
You got a source for that. Everything aside from a debunked VGCHARTZ article points to the PS3 finishing 3rd last gen.
I genuinely believe a lot of these articles are bought and paid for by team Xbox. All the articles about Microsoft are glowing and use fantastical words like “dominate next gen, most powerful hardware ever, and 4 billion potential customers.” Rinse and repeat. Then when there’s a hit peice on Sony it’s either a reach, an unknown, or blatant lie.
Microsoft is going all out next gen and media will be a huge part of that. I’m sure the giant bomb guys, polygon, waypoint, and maybe gamespot will declare ps5 dead long before we even officially see it, all on Microsoft’s dime no doubt.
Official trackers shows it is true.You got a source for that. Everything aside from a debunked VGCHARTZ article points to the PS3 finishing 3rd last gen.
In the US, they might have finished 3rd, but worldwide I believe PS3 just squeeked past 360 in the end. My point I was trying to make was here in the US 360 outsold PS3 rather easily so the OPs article may be talking more about MS overtaking Sony in the US next gen instead of worldwide. And as far as software sales go, 360 dominated NPD software sales regularly. It wasn't even close here in the US.You got a source for that. Everything aside from a debunked VGCHARTZ article points to the PS3 finishing 3rd last gen.
Click bait article by Ben Gilbert. To save you all the trouble, and because the op omitted the relevant parts of the article, this is all Ben cites to back up his claim.
- Sony being stubborn with cross-play
- Recent corporate quotes about synergy between Sony entertainment division's - equated to Xbox One TV, TV, TV.
Dude, your disdain for anything Microsoft or Xbox is unsettling. I've read some hum-dingers about Xbox before but yours are without a doubt the most distasteful, most toxic bit of vile I think I've read about anything Xbox in quite some time. There's no way I'd trust your opinion any further than how to burn boiling water. Do you even read your posts? Jesus.I think it's pretty obvious what he's saying.
Phil Spencer, the do-nothing suit that's been packaged and sold to us like he's Gaming Jesus™, supposedly pulled Microsoft from out of the muck and made them the gaming powerhouse they are today (despite the Xbox One still having no exclusives or really any reason to exist at all). These shitty shill articles are trying to paint Sony as declining, needing a "Phil Spencer" shot in the arm like Microsoft supposedly got when absolutely nothing changed other than gamers getting subjected to another smarmy talking head making empty promises constantly.
Dude, your disdain for anything Microsoft or Xbox is unsettling. I've read some hum-dingers about Xbox before but yours are without a doubt the most distasteful, most toxic bit of vile I think I've read about anything Xbox in quite some time. There's no way I'd trust your opinion any further than how to burn boiling water. Do you even read your posts? Jesus.
it's hard because it's far away, I mean who can say what will happen in the future, but 2010 might be too soon for a console refresh. 2012 or later might be preferable D:
Microsoft's problem #1 (which they couldn't have addressed overnight, hence it's not a mistake) is weaker set of exclusives.
IMHO, the problem with both the PS3 and the Xbox One was they were overpriced and underpowered. I don't see Sony doing that again.
He is right on one thing though.Dude, your disdain for anything Microsoft or Xbox is unsettling. I've read some hum-dingers about Xbox before but yours are without a doubt the most distasteful, most toxic bit of vile I think I've read about anything Xbox in quite some time. There's no way I'd trust your opinion any further than how to burn boiling water. Do you even read your posts? Jesus.
One thing that can harm Sony big time is letting Sony (California) censor games, even those who aren't even being released in US.
i wouldn't really say PS3 was under powered...just a lot more work needed to get it to perform on multiplats for much of its life..1st party titles speak for themselves...i just hope the next gen is more competitive...more competition the better..hopefully Sony will come out swinging spec wise cuz you know MSFT will if the X is anything to go byThey did it recently with the pro.
i wouldn't really say PS3 was under powered...just a lot more work needed to get it to perform on multiplats for much of its life..1st party titles speak for themselves...i just hope the next gen is more competitive...more competition the better..hopefully Sony will come out swinging spec wise cuz you know MSFT will if the X is anything to go by
i wouldn't really say PS3 was under powered...just a lot more work needed to get it to perform on multiplats for much of its life..1st party titles speak for themselves...i just hope the next gen is more competitive...more competition the better..hopefully Sony will come out swinging spec wise cuz you know MSFT will if the X is anything to go by
Fake news.
What a stupid story and it’s just that made up story.
says who? Games that take advantage of the Pro look amazing. I’ve had a blast with that system.Compared to the X and even the standard PS4, the Pro was kinda underpowered and unnecessary
Compared to the X and even the standard PS4, the Pro was kinda underpowered and unnecessary
very good point there sir...they needed to come out swinging mid gen wise since the 1 was struggling..if hey released same year im sure things would have turned out MUCH differentAre we sure about that? MS had an extra year and their mid-gen console cost an extra $100. Would the two mid-gen refreshes be that much different if they had came out the same year?
Compared to the X and even the standard PS4, the Pro was kinda underpowered and unnecessary
Apparantly they are, according to sales. Better get used to itNintendo? Not the same thing as they don't compete for the US living room. That's the Sony vs MS battlefield.
playstation 3 outsold the xbox 360 by the end of the generation.... the xbox one being at 41 million vs the ps4's 92 million is not the same as the ps3 being at 86 million and the 360 being at 84 million.
playstation 3 outsold the xbox 360 by the end of the generation.... the xbox one being at 41 million vs the ps4's 92 million is not the same as the ps3 being at 86 million and the 360 being at 84 million.
The Pro powers the best games released this gen at higher resolutions, that alone makes it necessary for the millions who purchased PRO...... Which happens to be a much larger installbase over XBONEX.Compared to the X and even the standard PS4, the Pro was kinda underpowered and unnecessary
Apparantly they are, according to sales. Better get used to it
I'm not saying most will have Switch as their only console (apart from maybe a lot of families who don't necessarily need cinematic AAA games) but having a Switch + either PS or Xbox is a very probable outcome at this point.
This is pretty much what everyone is saying Sony will do.. release an underpowered underwhelming box like the PS4 pro and call it a day and go coasting along on their fanbase.
Compared to the X and even the standard PS4, the Pro was kinda underpowered and unnecessary
No one was saying this early this gen though.
Just like the ps3 / xbox 360 possibly outselling xbox with such a massive fanbase is not success.Says you? Overall PS4 Pro is still selling a lot and possibly more than Xbox One X is in absolute numbers and powering some incredibly looking games... not sure why it would be underpowered and sales and results seems to say it has a point being out there and all (not unnecessary).
Just like the ps3 / xbox 360 possibly outselling xbox with such a massive fanbase is not success.
I want to see both parties go for powerful expensive next gen. I have money though so its easy for me to say.
This is from 5 years ago.
![]()
We also had sites pop-up like PS4vsXboxOne.com (if I got the name correctly) which doesn’t exist anymore that kept track of the exclusives each would receive.
Compared to the X and even the standard PS4, the Pro was kinda underpowered and unnecessary
Its not funny, its hilarious how much Sony's success bothers them.It's funny how non-Pro users are telling us, Pro users, how bad we feel and how greatly we have been scammed by Sony. Tell that to my exclusive games on 4K HDR or my PSVR with better resolution thanks to the additional power. Still waiting for the "high-fidelity VR" Microsoft announced with Scorpio reveal, just to play down Sony's.