Nobody knows yet. The trailer says "Covert missions" and the Walmart listing says Spec Ops missions or something, but nobody knows at this point.so uhm....as one of the few people on the globe that plays cod mostly for the single player (battlefielder here),does this have some sort of story campaign?or is it just like the spec ops missions?
i liked burning skies btw
I played through the demo twice - it was completely underwhelming, which might not be the fairest impression given it was just a demo.. but the bad reviews stopped me buying it. I was super hyped for it and impressions here were generally horrible. Again, another wasted opportunity.Did you play through Burning Skies?
The full game was better than the demo. Don't get me wrong, it wasn't a 9, but it was fun enough, especially for a handheld FPS. The worst part imo was the lack of mp modes. But to each his own, I wouldn't spend my money on something I didn't enjoy either.I played through the demo twice - it was completely underwhelming, which might not be the fairest impression given it was just a demo.. but the bad reviews stopped me buying it. I was super hyped for it and impressions here were generally horrible. Again, another wasted opportunity.
Anyway - I don't want to be shitting on people's hard work, as I get the impression both these games are/were rushed out.
Well there are only 8 people that bought a VITA, so it doesn't make sense to have it any higher.
History showed that they have dropped the ball on all portable versions of COD though and this was brought up multiple times in previous threads.
Ayway - I don't want to be shitting on people's hard work, as I get the impression both these games are/were rushed out.
Are we assuming they didn't start development until RE shipped? If so, yes, that would be a very short dev cycle.Ehm, it's not Sony's game?
They did achieve that by cutting of a lot of the animations (which were sub-par to begin with) still a fun game though. Anyway I don't think it's due to technical limitations, it could just not be realized within the dev time/budget which was probably heavily constrained.
That is probably because people thought that Activision wouldn't drop the ball on a revered franchise. I was looking forward to it. The footage and the dev's history has now made me rethink my stance.
No. No company just hands over the rights to their biggest IP to another publisher to go crazy with it. Very Far fetched to believe that Sony and Act have that kind of relationship.
I'm sorry Shuhei Yoshida, if this is your idea of saving Vita with a mediocre developer for COD. You seriously need to reevaluate your thinking.
I would buy that. Got suckered into the minis version NOVA, what a pile of shit. This one looks decent though. I really thought Gameloft would put more stuff out on vita after Dungmeon Hunters, though that probably sold like shit for being a $40 version of a $3-$12 game.Should have let GameLoft do CoD.http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4uYF-d7qwYQ Nova 3 Multiplayer.
Come to think of it, why does the Wii version only have 5vs5? The Wii is clearly much more powerful than the PSP. The Wii version runs at 30fps too, so it is not related to keeping the game at 60fps. I wonder what technical stuff that makes these choices. Still pity about 4vs4 though :\If you want a more damning example, Medal of Honor: Heroes on the PSP had 32-person multiplayer back in 2006.
"Going by this thread" = speculations being doneReally?
Hype completely killed. I could get by the bad visuals but Nhilistic... really?
Same here, was wondering about that too. Beaten Uncharted 3 about 3-4 times and cant think of any aweful parts, so i'm curious what he means about a lot of aweful aspects.I've played through that game 3 times, I didn't find one bit of it even remotely close to awful. Also, Burning Skies was decent, but I played through it twice, not sure about you.
If Sony pays for all this, i guess they should be listed as the publisher. I guess we will know soon enough when the game comes out who the publisher is.Obviously this is just speculation and there's no way to prove it, but I'm fairly certain Sony is footing the bill for this game. Activision has nothing to lose if Sony handles all the development and marketing, it's free money for them.
Should have let GameLoft do CoD.http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4uYF-d7qwYQ Nova 3 Multiplayer.
Activision was never a big supporter of the PSP - they released a single CoD game for PSP all the way back in 2007 (compared to like five or six CoD games on DS). Then all of a sudden they're the very first game announced exclusively for Sony's next portable and the Activision guy is brought on stage to spout off Sony PR hyperbole like "NGP will change the way people play games on the go". And Sony treats CoD Vita as their key release during every keynote (even when they only had a logo to show on-screen at E3) and now there's a holiday bundle for it too.
4 v 4 multiplayer is the biggest dissapoint for a game all about the multiplayer. Curious how they designed the maps and modes with so few players.
Funny thing this game costs $6.99 and COD will cost $50in all seriousness, I think Gameloft can do a way better work than Nihilistic
If Sony pays for all this, i guess they should be listed as the publisher. I guess we will know soon enough when the game comes out who the publisher is.
Completely uninterested if it doesnt have 3G multiplayer, yeah I know the technology is not there yet, but I can't see the appeal of this game if you need to be within range of Wi-Fi, why not just play a console game then?
Probably controls like shit. This game isnt going to be worse than a FPS that solely uses touch.Should have let GameLoft do CoD.http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4uYF-d7qwYQ Nova 3 Multiplayer.
I am just amazed at the cooked shit we are being fed for $50 plates because its called Caviar. SHAME!Probably controls like shit. This game isnt going to be worse than a FPS that solely uses touch.
Maybe in the US, not here in Germany though. Anyway if people are desperate about playing this over 3G (have fun, lulz) just hook it up to your smartphone hotspot, much better choice to begin with.Because free wifi is pretty much all over.
Probably started earlier, but seeing the trailer and assuming they use the same engine it doesn't look like it had a lot of time in the oven.Are we assuming they didn't start development until RE shipped? If so, yes, that would be a very short dev cycle.
MoH:H2 on Wii had 32 players as well, like I said not a technical limitation probably.Come to think of it, why does the Wii version only have 5vs5? The Wii is clearly much more powerful than the PSP. The Wii version runs at 30fps too, so it is not related to keeping the game at 60fps. I wonder what technical stuff that makes these choices. Still pity about 4vs4 though :\.
I just hope you don't believe that. Plus afaik Sony holds no stock in Nihilistic. Going by Wiki Activision even worked with them before.Going by this thread it appears Sony put their own guys on it because Activision wouldn't touch it.
http://youtubedoubler.com/?video1=h...com/watch?v=wGZEMJy_sds&start2=25&authorName=
Well I guess all that work on porting Black Ops 1 to the Wii can pay off further now...
Thank you for this. Vita looks (and hopefully plays) miles better than the Wii version.
I have MW Trilogy, BlOps 1&2 and WaW, this looks like a poor downscale, just to play on the move.
I'll pass thanks.
I'm not even convinced that it looks that much better than the wii version but maybe I'm crazy. I'd certainly take an up port of the Wii version of Blops with the full multiplayer over declassified, and I'm sure most other people would as well.
Hopefully declassified is just being put out there to have something, and there are plans for more comprehensive support in the future.
There's really no reason to think this game would look better if Treyarch made it. There has been one dual analog FPS on a handheld ever, and it was made by this studio. There has only been one FPS ever on the Vita, and it was made by this studio.
No, I'd just get the full fat version. I was hoping for something a little different ala KZ Liberation, not the same game we've had already, just with worse graphics. Seems a little pointless.If it had been just the Blops2 multiplayer, or straight port of the upcoming blops 2, would you have been more likely to get it?
Unit 13 isn't a first person shooter.Unit 13?
And, for that matter, what about comparing it with RE: Mercenaries 3D? Sure, it's not dual analog, but that's a semantic argument anyway. It may well have more variety of content, but that's not actually all that clear from the promotional video thus far. Blops *ought* to knock Mercenaries into a cocked hat, and I'm not convinced it does. It *may* be doing more than Mercenaries, we'll have to see about that.