I just wish more people got into MH. With how active the MH topics are, you would imagine more people would check it out.
Exactly this.
I just wish more people got into MH. With how active the MH topics are, you would imagine more people would check it out.
They're even porting MHFG to Wii U, I wouldn't think Capcom would do that if they wouldn't make money. However, they're also porting it on PS3 which I imagine will see more success than the 360 or the Wii U.
I just wish more people got into MH. With how active the MH topics are, you would imagine more people would check it out. And with MHTri on the Wii supposedly hitting 1 million in the west, there would be a lot more people.
How is it irrelevant though? No matter who is footing the cost it's impossible to see how they would get a return of investment from putting this on a console that been selling like the Wii U has. Now if you say it's an investment in the future that's one thing. THAT I can understand. But to answer "$$$" when asked why would one port it to the Wii U is something totally different.
Sadly after MH3G it's almost expected in MH topics...
Exactly this.
Porting this to the Wii U AND localizing it AND running an ad campaign AND supporting the servers in the west as well as Japan can NOT have been covered by the sales this thing has generated in the west.
I'm sorry but unless I see some sales numbers I just don't buy that.
Out of all the oddball decisions for Capcom to make I think that one confuses me the most.
To be fair it's a very polarizing game series. Mostly because of the gameplay. For some it's the best thing, for others it's clunky, difficult and frustrating.
What's sad to see however is those that choose to disregard it based on it's graphical quality or lack thereof. The heart of MH is gameplay, and that gameplay is not impeded in anyway by that perceived lack of graphical quality.
Pretty sure the Wii U version of Tri G was dirt cheap to make, and Capcom has admitted that they considered the Wii U version a smash hit in terms of sales. Monster Hunter 4 would likely sell even better.
MH4 another Cacpcom BOMBA?
MH4 another Cacpcom BOMBA?
I don't know about Monster Hunter 4 specifically, but I definitely think future Monster Hunter games could benefit tremendously from stuff like Pokemon and Animal Crossing.
The big audience for Monster Hunter are primarily middle/highschoolers right? A bunch of the Pokemon X/Y kids that didn't necessarily get a PSP might find themselves picking up a new Monster Hunter game a few years down the line.
They aren't supposed to sell MH to ppl under age of 17.
Isn't it C?
Yep.I don't know about Monster Hunter 4 specifically, but I definitely think future Monster Hunter games could benefit tremendously from stuff like Pokemon and Animal Crossing.
The big audience for Monster Hunter are primarily middle/highschoolers right? A bunch of the Pokemon X/Y kids that didn't necessarily get a PSP might find themselves picking up a new Monster Hunter game a few years down the line.
I think that Capcom has the odds stacked against them regarding this desire. PSP's LTD was sitting at 16M when Monster Hunter was released, and I have the feeling that the PSP's userbase was more homogenous in Japan than the 3DS' currently is. People who want Animal Crossing are not necessarily the same people who want Monster Hunter.
I know that Monster Hunter 3G was a relatively early game on the 3DS, but it sold nowhere near as well as 2G on PSP. A slower start is understandable, but I would have expected stronger continued sales going forward. Low/near launch install bases never really held back the other major series like Final Fantasy or Pokemon.
Yep.
Capcom actually released MH Felyne (that cute spin-off) to attract more female and young players to the franchise, which led to MHP3 record sales.
I read your post, but I still don't understand why you won't buy a 3DS to play the game. I'll buy whichever system has this franchise vita, wii u, android, i dont care as long as the quality is there.Hahaha, I love the pretentiousness of some of you guys posting here. Port begging, like third party developers should need reasons for getting their product out on as many consoles as possible. My favourite comments being:
and:
Correct me if I'm wrong, but hardware sales come around from both first and third party software. I'm not talking about saving the Vita at all, as far as I'm concerned, the best is yet to come there. But the point remains, at E3 you saw lots of big third party companies at the platform holders conferences to advertise their products and hopefully sell more of them.
Do you think they only turn up after the platform makers first party titles have sold enough consoles to deem them worthy of development? What is this, Wii-U? (Okay, too low, I'm just playing.)
I don't see why Capcom wouldn't want to bring Monster Hunter to Vita. It's got a great following on PSP and the brand is somewhat synonymous with handheld gaming, Nintendo isn't the only company in this space and both Sony and Capcom could profit on this. Ubisoft posted positive sales on Vita with Rayman and Assassin's Creed. The potential is there, nobody seems to use it and the more Capcom ingnore it, the more some fans become indifferent to it and like me, I'll stop caring and just give it amiss. Soul Sacrifice was just as good a game as Monster Hunter, even if it is a clone. I'll just buy future Soul Sacrifice installments when they're released and Monster Hunter if it comes to Vita when it's cheap. Sony profit on those sales and Capcom, less so.
See? Missing potential.
Yet, people will say "If you want to play Monster Hunter, buy a 3DS." PFFFT! It's not Capcom's job to sell 3DS', thats on Nintendo.![]()
pretty much every MH announcement has gone this way. If it was coming to Vita, the thread would be full of people complaining that it's not Ps4.
Ok, this bullshit really needs to stop. I could care less where MH goes at this point, but it's pretty damn irritating seeing this air of shitty superiority coming from Nintendo fans about people wanting MH on another platform when they've only had it on Nintendo platforms since a few years ago. Let's not forget that NDS fans were asking the same reason why MH wasn't coming to NDS and coming to PSP instead. Port begging isn't great, but pull your heads out of your asses and stop acting like you haven't wanted a game on another platform yourselves.
.lol Capcom and their sky high expectations for every game they release
Ok, this bullshit really needs to stop. I could care less where MH goes at this point, but it's pretty damn irritating seeing this air of shitty superiority coming from Nintendo fans about people wanting MH on another platform when they've only had it on Nintendo platforms since a few years ago. Let's not forget that NDS fans were asking the same reason why MH wasn't coming to NDS and coming to PSP instead. Port begging isn't great, but pull your heads out of your asses and stop acting like you haven't wanted a game on another platform yourselves.
I've observed this forum since the DS was conceived and I very rarely ever saw people here clamoring for a port to the DS as I don't even think it was considered technically feasible, where as every thread I've read on the MH series for 3ds has revolved around wanting Vita or PSP ports. I'd be curious to see actual side by side evidence, but I don't think most DS fans were dying for this series as they had not played it before, so in that context it makes some sense.
With that said, fans of MH need to buy a 3ds and get over it, not so bad owning both and it's not like we didn't know this was a thing pretty early on, if anything wasn't the MH to 3ds move done before Vita even released?
Ok, this bullshit really needs to stop. I could care less where MH goes at this point, but it's pretty damn irritating seeing this air of shitty superiority coming from Nintendo fans about people wanting MH on another platform when they've only had it on Nintendo platforms since a few years ago. Let's not forget that NDS fans were asking the same reason why MH wasn't coming to NDS and coming to PSP instead. Port begging isn't great, but pull your heads out of your asses and stop acting like you haven't wanted a game on another platform yourselves.
Ok, this bullshit really needs to stop. I could care less where MH goes at this point, but it's pretty damn irritating seeing this air of shitty superiority coming from Nintendo fans about people wanting MH on another platform when they've only had it on Nintendo platforms since a few years ago. Let's not forget that NDS fans were asking the same reason why MH wasn't coming to NDS and coming to PSP instead. Port begging isn't great, but pull your heads out of your asses and stop acting like you haven't wanted a game on another platform yourselves.
They could break records if they broke away from Nintendo
RBY aren't called "the best selling RPG of all time" for nothing lolI can see pokemon x/y breaking 10 million easy but i'd bet against it breaking the red/blue/yellow numbers. I'd love to be wrong on this though.
They could break records if they broke away from Nintendo
I'm going to need proof of that. I doubt there were as many posts shitting every MH thread during the PSP era.
And please, you're so transparent with the "Nintendo fans" strawman... It can't be that people who genuinely care about MH are pissed about every single thread (except the OTs) about the games devolving into port begging mess. It must be the Nintendo fans being all uppity about it... Especially when pretty much none of the people with those shitty posting habits have ever participated in a MH OT.
I have no horse in this race (Ive always thought MH looks a bit shit tbh) But I have to say Ive found the "no port begging" rule to be one of the most bizzare on Neogaf. We are all consumers at the end of the day of course we are going to want games on our hardware of choice.
I have no horse in this race (Ive always thought MH looks a bit shit tbh) But I have to say Ive found the "no port begging" rule to be one of the most bizzare on Neogaf. We are all consumers at the end of the day of course we are going to want games on our hardware of choice.
Its like me finding a feature of iOS and saying "Id love to have this on android". Responces like "buy an iphone" are silly because its not something intrinsictly linked to the devices hardware.
I do understand that it does stifle discussion somewhat, but unless someone is say "X console is shit, X company has stole our gaymes, why is this happening ARRRRGH" I really dont see the issue.
You like MH and have a 3DS? cool, happy for you. But I dont see the problem with people who are turned off by Nintendo or any other companies polices and ecosystem wanting a game to be on a platform more akin to their tastes. This is not a first party title, nor is it a title that could only run on a 3DS. Considering that Capcom want record breaking sales, its not fair fetched to say that those sales could be aided by beinf multiplatform.
Its a problem with volume. I've seen threads go bad, especially before the rule, where, no joke, upwards of 70% of posts in a thread are "I want this on platform X"
At that point its just noise. No-one is discussing anything.
Which is fair enough. Like I said, I have no problem with people calling out drive-by trolling or people shitting repeatedly the platform a game its on, while claiming it would do better on X or Y.
But the general sentiment that you are not allowed to say you want to play an exclusive title unless you are willing to go through the considerable expense of buying new hardware is in my view a bit messed up, especially in the context of a thread like this.
Was that talk on the DS ever prevalent, though? There was never any hope of Capcom squeezing the game down to DS specs, and I think that most people understood that.
Not to be "That Guy" but you don't happen to have any sales figures on any of that do you? Because that you make this whole discussion a lot more productive.
"Furthermore, 'Monster Hunter 3 (Tri) G HD Ver.', which was our first title for the new home video console "Wii U" that was launched in December 2012, also became a smash hit. However, its package sales were generally soft."
They could break records if they broke away from Nintendo
Which is fair enough. Like I said, I have no problem with people calling out drive-by trolling or people shitting repeatedly the platform a game its on, while claiming it would do better on X or Y.
But the general sentiment that you are not allowed to say you want to play an exclusive title unless you are willing to go through the considerable expense of buying new hardware is in my view a bit messed up, especially in the context of a thread like this.
Complaining about the people complaining about the people port begging.
We've reached a new level today NeoGAF. One not even Goku with all his training has achieved yet!
Complaining about the people complaining about the people port begging.
We've reached a new level today NeoGAF. One not even Goku with all his training has achieved yet!
On the Vita?
You really think that game alone would sell three million systems alone? That's about what it would have to do in order to even stand a chance of breaking the series record.
I mean really people. This is kinda getting insane.