I really don't want to get dragged into this mire too much, but it is kinda similar. The Vita is far more powerful, region free, and has a second analogue stick. If this was a game I was passionate about, I'd be bummed out that it was arriving on my other handheld.
That said, it is what it is and as a Vita 'fan', I find the port begging a little embarrassing. People need to just let it go.
While I'm sure MH4 will sell well, I doubt it will outsell 3 on the PSP. I just don't see 1 in 3 3DS owners owning the game, nor have I seen any indication that the franchise is on the rise. Surely Capcom knows this.
5 million is a very tall order. Even MHP3rd didn't get there, so I highly doubt it. But it will depend on the legs and how well this co-exists with Pokemon leading to the holidays. It could go either way, I think.This guy wants MH4 to sell 5 million, for those who don't know.
Same reason that a guy with a 360 and a beastly gaming rig would rather see a game available on his beastly gaming rig, I guess.Why, though?
I agree. I thought it was a shame that Sony lost MH, and I think it's had a devastating effect on the Vita as a viable platform, but it's done now. It's over. It isn't going to change, in fact it's less likely than ever. That's why I say it's kind of embarrassing.The platform shift was announced before the Vita even launched. It's ancient history now. Why is this still an issue two years later? It's not like the Vita even has the hardware sales to justify a port at this point.
I really don't want to get dragged into this mire too much, but it is kinda similar.
Actually, I wouldn't mind if it was like Bayonetta or Breath of Fire or Final Fantasy. Those are mostly actual fans of the franchise speaking out. I guarantee you that most of the thread ruiners in MH threads have not touched a single MH game. It's a big difference.I don't know what to say, man. Ignore it?
It's like Bayonetta 2 or Breath of Fire 6. I'd imagine it was the same when FF changed platforms back in the day. Sometimes devs / publishers make moves that frustrate a large portion of their fanbase and the vocal minority tend to be very vocal indeed. I'd imagine that any port-begging in the official thread for the game will be punished very harshly.
People vocally oppose the very concept of developing for iOS at all.
I agree. I thought it was a shame that Sony lost MH, and I think it's had a devastating effect on the Vita as a viable platform, but it's done now. It's over. It isn't going to change, in fact it's less likely than ever. That's why I say it's kind of embarrassing.
A Wii U release could be possible, because Capcom sits on Nintendos lap regarding to the MH series. But only if the Wii U sales increase this holiday (but this is likely with all these big upcoming games).
Seriously Why the hell should Capcom have to save it? Also there seems to be a crap ton of port begging going on.
Anywho I hope it sells well I know I will be there for launch.
If anything, Vita owners should be rallying behind God Eater 2, as that looks to be the game that could truly fill in the Monster Hunter void. I'd be worried that, if that game doesn't move big numbers on Vita, that a God Eater game could land on 3DS, further exacerbating the situation for Vita. Thus, I would assume Vita owners should let go of Monster Hunter and focus on that title.
It's kind of a given especially since the series originated and was popular on PlayStation systems.
Yeah, I can see the difference, it was just the first game that popped into my head after Bayo 2. I'm sure there have been plenty of other franchises in the past that have jumped platform, and I'd imagine it always inspires the same sort of ire.Kinda, but Monster Hunter 4 seems to be quite similar to the last few Monster Hunters, whereas BoF6 is going in a completely different direction. If I was a fan of BoF and had a smartphone (which both is not the case), I'd be bitching a lot about BoF, not primarily because it's on a smartphone (I hate the dl-only model, so I'd be opposed to that, too), but because the game seems to be a too drastic departure from the last games of the series. The outcry because of BoF6 is more comparable to the one because of Banjo Nuts & Bolts than the one because of MH4.
I don't presume to know whether the port-beggers have played previous entries or not. You might well be right, or you might be doing them a disservice. I mainly tell you to ignore it for your own peace of mind, not because I think you should lie down and take it because they're on the side of righteous truth or anything.Actually, I wouldn't mind if it was like Bayonetta or Breath of Fire or Final Fantasy. Those are mostly actual fans of the franchise speaking out. I guarantee you that most of the thread ruiners in MH threads have not touched a single MH game. It's a big difference.
And why would MH fans ignore these people? We get gems out of it like 'compelling textures'.
I doubt many of us even care or lose sleep over this issue. But I just find it fundamentally strange that a MH fan is not allowed to point out 'gosh, so much port begging' in a MH thread, whereas port beggers who've never played any of the games get a free pass. In essence that's kind of what you're telling me: let them port-beg, MH-fans ignore them and don't reply. There's something wrong with that.
The ballad of the Gen 8 handhelds has already been written. There isn't a title on either side that will change anything now or in the future.If anything, Vita owners should be rallying behind God Eater 2, as that looks to be the game that could truly fill in the Monster Hunter void. I'd be worried that, if that game doesn't move big numbers on Vita, that a God Eater game could land on 3DS, further exacerbating the situation for Vita. Thus, I would assume Vita owners should let go of Monster Hunter and focus on that title.
Yeah, I can see the difference, it was just the first game that popped into my head after Bayo 2. I'm sure there have been plenty of other franchises in the past that have jumped platform, and I'd imagine it always inspires the same sort of ire.
I don't presume to know whether the port-beggers have played previous entries or not. You might well be right, or you might be doing them a disservice. I mainly tell you to ignore it for your own peace of mind, not because I think you should lie down and take it because they're on the side of righteous truth or anything.
The ballad of the Gen 8 handhelds has already been written. There isn't a title on either side that will change anything now or in the future.
Possibly, but I cannot understand this - and this is coming from someone who had to buy a Vita for a single series jumping ship: Monkey Ball turning from a Nintendo exclusive (with some ports for other platforms) to a Vita-exclusive.
I really don't want to get dragged into this mire too much, but it is kinda similar. The Vita is far more powerful, region free, and has a second analogue stick. If this was a game I was passionate about, I'd be bummed out that it was arriving on my other handheld.
That said, it is what it is and as a Vita 'fan', I find the port begging a little embarrassing. People need to just let it go.
That's only true in Japan.RBY aren't called "the best selling RPG of all time" for nothing lol
The ballad of the Gen 8 handhelds has already been written. There isn't a title on either side that will change anything now or in the future.
WOa! Monkey ball still exists?
You bought a Vita, just to play a SEGA title?Possibly, but I cannot understand this - and this is coming from someone who had to buy a Vita for a single series jumping ship: Monkey Ball turning from a Nintendo exclusive (with some ports for other platforms) to a Vita-exclusive.
OK, I'm on really dodgy ground here, but that might be because the game is really ugly, even for a 3DS game. They seem to have (understandably) prioritised animation over everything else, so whilst it looks OK in motion, it looks horrific in screens. It looks worse than MH3 at first glance.If they're complaining about ground textures over the new weapons/monsters shown they clearly never care about it before begging for a port.
Eh, barring some sort of freak-of-gaming-nature, it's over. The Vita isn't going to attain any sort of mainstream acceptance, let alone mount any sort of challenge against the 3DS.We were searching for more coffin nails when MH exploded on PSP, I wouldn't rule out everything...
I guarantee you that most of the thread ruiners in MH threads have not touched a single MH game. It's a big difference.
You bought a Vita, just to play a SEGA title?
People vocally oppose the very concept of developing for iOS at all.
OK, I'm on really dodgy ground here, but that might be because the game is really ugly, even for a 3DS game. They seem to have (understandably) prioritised animation over everything else, so whilst it looks OK in motion, it looks horrific in screens. It looks worse than MH3 at first glance.
It's like Bayonetta 2 or Breath of Fire 6.
drag :lolOk I get why Vita owners are so pissed....If they only have God Eater now....
"iOS is an abomination unto the Lord!"
*The crowds part - SmokeyDave appears. Hushed silence*
"May he who is without a smartphone cast the first nokia."
Vita boys were excited for Ragnarok and Valhalla Knights though. They should stan harder for God Eater.
drag :lol
Vita boys were excited for Ragnarok and Valhalla Knights though. They should stan harder for God Eater.
I'm confused. Are the people blasting Capcom in this thread big Monster Hunter fans who will buy the game on their 3DS but just lament the potential lost sales, or are you blasting Capcom because you will never be caught dead buying a Nintendo system (or just a 3DS) but there's no other way to play this game?
Why is that a given? Final Fantasy originated and first became popular on Nintendo systems.
I won't buy a console for a single game. I can get one from work with 25% off if I so wanted too, but I won't. Same reason I haven't bought a 360. I had owned a Wii-U from February up until April then sold it.
So you seriously think there was nobody back in 1997 who wanted FF7 on the N64?
I see nothing wrong with the bolded statement, and if you think everyone begging for a port is a sorry Vita owner who can't get over the fact it went to the 3DS, then you're clueless. There's more to these things than blind fanboyism. What's really absurd is some of these narratives some people here created.Exactly. We had people hyping up those games and Soul Sacrifice as "Monster Hunter's replacement on Vita", and many eagerly anticipating the releases. The energy seems to have been drained now, and people have resorted to port begging and blind optimism.
I have no horse in this race (Ive always thought MH looks a bit shit tbh) But I have to say Ive found the "no port begging" rule to be one of the most bizzare on Neogaf. We are all consumers at the end of the day of course we are going to want games on our hardware of choice.
So you seriously think there was nobody back in 1997 who wanted FF7 on the N64?
I see nothing wrong with the bolded statement, and if you think everyone begging for a port is a sorry Vita owner who can't get over the fact it went to the 3DS, then you're clueless. There's more to these things than blind fanboyism. What's really absurd is some of these narratives some people here created.
They really didn't.But people moved on.
I think it'll do real well, but breaking records usually involves multiple platforms.
But people moved on. It's been two years already. Vita owners need to let it go.
I never said there was anything wrong with the bolded statement. My point was that the enthusiasm a lot of Vita owners had has seemingly evaporated, and all we see now is port begging.
If this was a general update about the game then there would be very few (if any) people in this thread stating they would like a Vita version. No, this is a debate about sales (baited by Capcom themselves with there 'statement'), and more platforms generally means better sales and that is what's been put forward.
The ballad of the Gen 8 handhelds has already been written. There isn't a title on either side that will change anything now or in the future.
Any my point was its unhealthy to view *everyone* discussing multiplatform releases as a starving Vita owner who can't get over where the series has headed. It's sort of an offensive and ignorant broad brushstroke.But people moved on. It's been two years already. Vita owners need to let it go
I never said there was anything wrong with the bolded statement. My point was that the enthusiasm a lot of Vita owners had has seemingly evaporated, and all we see now is port begging.
Or Nintendo shouldn't have paid a lot of money, so that it stays exclusive to the 3DS (which I still believeMaybe Sony should prove that the Vita is a platform worth putting games on.
But people moved on. It's been two years already. Vita owners need to let it go.
I never said there was anything wrong with the bolded statement. My point was that the enthusiasm a lot of Vita owners had has seemingly evaporated, and all we see now is port begging.
I think he is not talking about those in the vita thread but those who port beg 3ds games.The Vita threads have plenty of people happy with the system. But keep trying to push that blind fanboy narrative.
Or Nintendo shouldn't have paid a lot of money, so that it stays exclusive to the 3DS (which I still believe)