• Hey Guest. Check out your NeoGAF Wrapped 2025 results here!

Captain America: Civil War SPOILER Thread - #TeamThanos

Status
Not open for further replies.
After causing an explosion as a distraction, breaking into someone's property, participating in a battle that destroyed a lot of property (and got someone crippled) and breaking law.
What did he expect?

To not go into super Guantanamo and have Tony try to play like he had the moral high ground
 
I like the part where Bucky is like "I won't kill anyone."

[Immediately bashes one guy repeatedly against a wall and throws a massive cinder block at another]
 
Dude he was in jail

Well, more like a super-prison.

But Cap did warn him about that. You don't go doing that then be pissed at the outcome you knew what was going to happen.

To not go into super Guantanamo and have Tony try to play like he had the moral high ground

Tony knew he wasn't though. In fact Tony was about to say something but then Clint just mouthed him off.
 
Except Hawkeye was part of a team of superpowered criminals and Tony actually had the moral high ground (until the end when he went "You killed my mama!!!").

Super-powered criminals? I don't think we watched the same movie!

Iron Man's position was backed by the UN, an establishment that Steve has reason to believe (based upon Avengers, and Winter Soldier) might not always have the best agenda. The great thing about this movie is that neither side was 100% "right".
 
He's the only character I feel is off, everyone is fine.

Oh god we're going to need to pick sides here

but ya Clint mouthed off because he's tired of Tony at that point

But they only talked once in the film. I mean, I guess he's probably holding a grudge on him or something, but in this movie alone it feels a bit weird.
 
The problem with Steve's position isn't that he's against answering to the U.N., it's that he's against answering to anybody.

At one point he makes this terrible argument about "we can only be responsible if we answer to no one" and it's like, what?
 
A part of me doubts that all of the "Secret Avengers" holed up in Wakanda

If that's the case that's going to make Ant-Man and The Wasp a somewhat awkward movie to pull off. Hawkeye probably just went home because his house is already in a location no one but Fury and the rest of the Avengers knows of.

Honestly don't understand the Hawkeye complaints - they had him and the rest locked away even tighter then the villains.

How though

All of the heroes are at least locked up in something resembling a traditional holding cell

Bucky and Zemo were locked up onto what I pretty much assume is the same thing they have to shit on
 
The problem with Steve's position isn't that he's against answering to the U.N., it's that he's against answering to anybody.

At one point he makes this terrible argument about "we can only be responsible if we answer to no one" and it's like, what?

In the MCU, who would you trust to make the call as to when to get involved? In the real world, I'd agree with you obviously.

Cap doesn't cause what happens in Avengers 1, he helps solve, he finds out that SHIELD was taken over by Hydra and stops them from killing possibly millions and in Age of Ultron he helps clean up Tony's mess. At what point should Cap say, you're right, I can't trust my own actions so someone else better govern me?
 
Maybe Cap retrieved them when he freed them.

So they're gonna be chillin' in Wakanda in the mean time then?
 
I am so glad Cap got them out of the prison. IT would be funny if thanos or whomever from space attack and Ross has to go to the raft to ask the avengers for help.
 
In the MCU, who would you trust to make the call as to when to get involved? In the real world, I'd agree with you obviously.

Cap doesn't cause what happens in Avengers 1, he helps solve, he finds out that SHIELD was taken over by Hydra and stops them from killing possibly millions and in Age of Ultron he helps clean up Tony's mess. At what point should Cap say, you're right, I can't trust my own actions so someone else better govern me?

Well, the U.N. idea is dumb because the U.N. can't agree on what color the sky is. What they should do is elect for themselves a council who can decide things like when to intervene while giving them some measure of limited autonomy and have this council be accountable to the leadership of a coalition of like-minded countries.
 
Yo when Ant-Man turned giant my cinema got fucking hyped! I got hyped! That whole fight was hype! Cap vs Iron Man at the end was hype too!

Will watch this movie again!
 
In the MCU, who would you trust to make the call as to when to get involved? In the real world, I'd agree with you obviously.

Cap doesn't cause what happens in Avengers 1, he helps solve, he finds out that SHIELD was taken over by Hydra and stops them from killing possibly millions and in Age of Ultron he helps clean up Tony's mess. At what point should Cap say, you're right, I can't trust my own actions so someone else better govern me?

Cap doesn't really cause it but the events of Avengers pretty much draws back entirely to Thor. SHIELD began weapons development as a response to the knowledge that they're outgunned against the world and Loki invades Earth primarily because he has a grudge against Thor.

In regards to The Winter Soldier I... guess you could argue that to some extent Cap is responsible? But it's less because of an inherent or indirect phenomenon and more because of decision management. From the way I interpreted how Ross tried to spin it, the ensuing disaster came about as a result of Cap being convinced that SHIELD had to be completely obliterated. Nick wanted to just get the Helicarriers out of the way but Cap decided everything had to go, hence his insistence of "the price of freedom is high". Ultimately that's a large point they're trying to hammer home, that it's not so much whether the Avengers are heroes/vigilantes, but that they're dangerous when given autonomy, and there's plenty of evidence to show Cap is a risk when it comes to being a sole authority as well. This movie is pretty much an embodiment of that fact.

Like Vision said; causality etc.
 
Also something from the airport scene that is really well done is how the music is played in a very somber way. Instead of "Whoa cool action" it moves your thoughts to "oh shit this is actually happening like this"
 
The romance between Captain and Sharon Carter was so underdeveloped.

Like, they just kiss out of nowhere - and that's not to mention the passing of classified information
 
Cap should at least be hold accountability for Lagos incident

I keep going back to this, but IF accountability was a thing in the MCU, Tony Stark should be jailed for Ultron. Then sure, hold all the avengers accountable for their actions regardless of what good they do.

Cap doesn't really cause it but the events of Avengers pretty much draws back entirely to Thor. SHIELD began weapons development as a response to the knowledge that they're outgunned against the world and Loki invades Earth primarily because he has a grudge against Thor.

In regards to The Winter Soldier I... guess you could argue that to some extent Cap is responsible? But it's less because of an inherent or indirect phenomenon and more because of decision management. From the way I interpreted how Ross tried to spin it, the ensuing disaster came about as a result of Cap being convinced that SHIELD had to be completely obliterated. Nick wanted to just get the Helicarriers out of the way but Cap decided everything had to go, hence his insistence of "the price of freedom is high". Ultimately that's a large point they're trying to hammer home, that it's not so much whether the Avengers are heroes/vigilantes, but that they're dangerous when given autonomy, and there's plenty of evidence to show Cap is a risk when it comes to being a sole authority as well. This movie is pretty much an embodiment of that fact.

Like Vision said; causality etc.

They touch on this in the movie, that by simply being, they have an impact on the world. I think that is an interesting thread to pull on and may lead up to Infinity War (like the tesseract led to chitauri).

However I'm still not sure how (in the MCU) capitulating to government oversight solves that.
 
His whole triad against Iron Man felt so out of character from him. Usually he's calm, snarky but usually approachable.
If you watched AoU, he showed plenty color and temper lol.

Though I don't remember him being snarky, usually just professional.

"I don't think we've met before, I'm Clint"
"I don't care"
*Panther proceeds to whoop Clint's ass*
Like against Vision, he knew he would lose. He was just buying time.
 
Super-powered criminals? I don't think we watched the same movie!

Iron Man's position was backed by the UN, an establishment that Steve has reason to believe (based upon Avengers, and Winter Soldier) might not always have the best agenda. The great thing about this movie is that neither side was 100% "right".

Blowing up stuff, helping a suspect escape, beating up cops and destroying property is generally against the law. That has nothing to do with the UN. In addition he operates in countries that (for all we know) may have ratified the treaty.
I get that it is fundamental to the appeal of superheroes. I don't mind. I suspend my disbelief because it's fun. That doesn't mean that they are in any way right.
 
Man that villain. Kinda like, he didn't bring down the movie at all, far from it, but he wasn't great. Well acted mind, but not great.

I think I like him so much because he fit in perfectly with the theme and concepts of the movie. He really was just some random guy getting revenge on the Avengers because they destroyed his life and never really took accountability. It fits so well that he isn't the focus and is just the spark to start Iron Man and Cap fighting.
 
Blowing up stuff, helping a suspect escape, beating up cops and destroying property is generally against the law. That has nothing to do with the UN.

The suspect in question, was a "shoot to kill" target based upon a traffic-cam video that showed his likeness near the scene. Apparently "guilty till proven innocent (or dead)" is the thing in the MCU?

Cap don't stand for that!
 
I went to a screening last night that showed the first two Captain America movies before it. Going from the highway destruction of Winter Soldier where tens of civilians must have died to "a handful of people got blown up in this building THIS IS TOO FAR" was a little weird, loved it overall though.

My only real issue was during the Cap/Bucky/Panther chase scene, there were so many really terribly shot landings. So many jarring cuts where cap was falling straight as an arrow then the scene cut and he was landing at and angle and rolling. Or when Bucky is parkouring down the side of the building and kinda just float down onto a ledge (which i apparently wasn't the only one to notice, a lot of people laughed at it.) They are minor complaints though and the rest of the movie is so solid it really doesn't matter.

I like the part where Bucky is like "I won't kill anyone."

[Immediately bashes one guy repeatedly against a wall and throws a massive cinder block at another]

The fact that they joked about it was the best.
 
Blowing up stuff, helping a suspect escape, beating up cops and destroying property is generally against the law. That has nothing to do with the UN. In addition he operates in countries that (for all we know) may have ratified the treaty.
I get that it is fundamental to the appeal of superheroes. I don't mind. That said, legally speaking they are criminals, some of them with superpowers, that cause a lot of damage.
On that basis, the Avengers members would have been arrested by their respective 1st movie appearance.
 
I think anyone who has had a fight with their friend know how devastating losing a friend can be. Especially if you used to rely on them to back you up. It stings even more than losing a BF/GF because with them at least you can still say "let's stay friends". Which is why the ending was very effective to me. Nothing cuts deeper than the realisation that your friend has completely ignored your feeling/grief while he backs another friend of his. I can't blame Tony for feeling bitter.
I felt that "He's my friend" - "so was I" exchange was corny when I watched the trailer but in context it actually felt heartbreaking.

On that basis, the Avengers members would have been arrested by their respective 1st movie appearance.
And if they actually did get arrested by their respective 1st movie appearance, they did not exactly have any ground to protest, either.
 
Man that villain. Kinda like, he didn't bring down the movie at all, far from it, but he wasn't great. Well acted mind, but not great.

He was my favorite bit tho, his motivations and actions were so human and relatable. I don't think what he did was right, but I could understand how it became his only path forward after such a devastating emotional trauma caused by people who appear to be almost gods compared to him.

His comments about stronger people having failed to fight the avengers was so great, and he made it clear early on that he didn't want a bodycount but he would do that if it was his only option.... #TeamZemo

Edit - plus he's a great example of what vision is talking about with causality.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top Bottom