• Hey, guest user. Hope you're enjoying NeoGAF! Have you considered registering for an account? Come join us and add your take to the daily discourse.
  • The Politics forum has been nuked. Please do not bring political discussion to the rest of the site, or you will be removed. Thanks.

Chrome to over IE this year!

Status
Not open for further replies.

MCD

Junior Member
Nov 9, 2006
15,372
0
0
that's a problem with/choice of gaf. For some reason it falls back to IE7 rendering.

I am glad I am not the only one here!

I get blank single posts like this as well:

 

ThatObviousUser

ὁ αἴσχιστος παῖς εἶ
Apr 14, 2007
47,876
0
1,450
Probably a <meta http-equiv="X-UA-Compatible"> tag in GAF.

Ah yup, sixth line of this page's source:

<meta http-equiv="X-UA-Compatible" content="IE=EmulateIE7" />

That solves that then.
 

dbztrk

Member
Dec 16, 2009
3,044
15
890
I may have to look into this browser. I've been getting rather annoyed by Firefox's large memory usage.
 

Jamesfrom818

Banned
Mar 1, 2007
19,829
0
0
818
For the folks complaining about Chrome not having mouse gestures, you do know that there are extensions for that, right?

I use Chrome for just about everything. I only use Firefox to download porn flv files.
 

reilo

learning some important life lessons from magical Negroes
Feb 23, 2007
51,878
0
0
What? IE9 has some of the best dev tools. The only feature it lacks is right-click inspect.

The dev tools are abysmal. They are slow and clunky, Javascript error reporting sucks and the interface is brutal.

Probably a <meta http-equiv="X-UA-Compatible"> tag in GAF.

Ah yup, sixth line of this page's source:

That solves that then.

What? Evilore, can you please explain if you are reading this?
 

Araxen

Banned
Dec 6, 2008
254
0
0
I still use FireFox because they have the most powerful extension support out of all the browsers. Chrome's extension support is hampered and is part of the reason why Chrome doesn't have noscript yet.
 

ClosingADoor

Member
Apr 6, 2009
16,923
0
0
Amsterdam
In the end, a good amount of people will still use IE, Firefox, Chrome, Safari and I still have to check everything in a billion browsers. Chrome getting more marketshare doesn't change that, but let's hope this competition keeps all the parties pushing out better versions to make browsing faster and easier.

And it's rather sad that people are complaining about the lack of Adblock for a browser. If the ads bother you that much, don't go to the website. I hope IE will never allow that 'feature' at least.
 

LogicStep

Member
Mar 29, 2009
7,406
0
0
Whenever Adblock Plus works as good on Chrome as it does on FF (it just doesn't block stuff as good from my experience) and I can get addons like Video Download (to download any video on a site like Youtube) then I could try Chrome. But FF works just fine for me.
 

Number45

Member
Jun 6, 2011
12,062
0
0
UK
Giving Firefox a try. It's definitely a lot better than last time I used it, but I'm still not convinced it's as quick as Chrome in real world usage for me.
 

LiquidMetal14

hide your water-based mammals
Jan 18, 2007
46,825
317
1,580
The Confederate United States of America
Chrome is the only browser to not give me memory errors and has all the plugins I want. All 1 of them!

I tried FF for a while and I actually had that before Chrome but things just worked out for Chrome to win me over. It wasn't some browser fanboy allegiance. IE has been ok but just a pain to use for a while. I think it would be tolerable on mobile platforms though.
 

Nicktendo86

Member
Mar 24, 2009
7,497
206
1,100
35
London
It's so great that consumers have so much choice when it comes to things like web browsing now. It is very odd that Google haven't sorted out Chrome for Android yet, I got my first ever Android device last October (Galaxy S2) and love everything about it but was shocked to find it doesn't have Chrome pre-installed, seems such a no brainer. Good to know it is on the way though!
 
Jul 15, 2004
19,934
0
0
37
UK
It's so great that consumers have so much choice when it comes to things like web browsing now. It is very odd that Google haven't sorted out Chrome for Android yet, I got my first ever Android device last October (Galaxy S2) and love everything about it but was shocked to find it doesn't have Chrome pre-installed, seems such a no brainer. Good to know it is on the way though!

Android handsets tend to have up to date webkit based browsers -- the only android platforms I'd really like to see a full featured Chrome on are the large-screen handsets, tablets and laptop hybrids.
 

Synth_floyd

Banned
Jun 12, 2005
6,217
0
0
I used to use Firefox maybe 2 years ago but it kept freezing and crashing. I switched to Chrome and have never looked back.
 

Nicktendo86

Member
Mar 24, 2009
7,497
206
1,100
35
London
Android handsets tend to have up to date webkit based browsers -- the only android platforms I'd really like to see a full featured Chrome on are the large-screen handsets, tablets and laptop hybrids.

I must say actually I have never had a problem with the stock web browsing on my GS2, only thing I would want is some form of tabbed browsing so I can quickly flick between pages. No big deal though.
 

brotkasten

Member
Sep 4, 2009
39,227
0
720
On the edge
Giving Firefox a try. It's definitely a lot better than last time I used it, but I'm still not convinced it's as quick as Chrome in real world usage for me.

"Not convinced", heh. Reminds me of something Stumpokapow said in the WP7 thread.

Yeah spot on, people bash IE because of the name now rather than actually using it and seeing it's a perfectly good browser now.

Microsoft reap what they sew. Firefox is experiencing the same thing now, as people leave for Chrome largely due to perception issues rather than real ones. *shrugs*

FF is the new IE.
 

santouras

Member
Sep 28, 2006
5,078
0
0
Also, Firefox has live bookmarks. Why the other browsers haven't copied that idea, I'll never know.

imo live bookmarks are terrible. RSS readers should allow you to read the content without going off to the site. Before I switched to google reader I used the built in rss reader in opera which is fantastic. Absolutely destroys live bookmarks.

EDIT:
also I'm not sure if people are trolling with the "chrome for android" comments. The android browser IS chrome mobile.
 

surly

Banned
Aug 13, 2009
3,094
0
0
I tried Chrome out for a couple of weeks, but I ended up going back to Opera. I installed a plug-in for mouse gestures in Chrome, but it was disabled on some pages for security reasons. That was annoying. The password manager just didn't work with some sites that use particular log-in methods. Even just scrolling up and down regular web pages seemed jerky in comparison.

There are other little things too. In Chrome, I can highlight a word/term, right-click it, then do a Google search for that word/term. In Opera, I can do the same, but I can search using any of the search engines and custom searches I've created, so I can highlight the name of an XBLA game on here, for example, and search for it on the Marketplace on Xbox.com.

Chrome didn't seem very customisable either. In Opera, I can remove any buttons I like. I can also choose from hundreds of custom buttons and just drag and drop them from a web page straight to the toolbar, so for instance, I have a home button that has a drop-down bookmarks list next to it. Some of the buttons I have in my Opera toolbar do different things depending if you click them, or hold the mouse button down. I couldn't see any way of doing things like that with Chrome.

Also, when I first started using a browser with tabs, I had the tabs at the bottom of the screen and so that's where I like them to be placed. In Opera, I can put the tabs on any of the 4 sides of the screen. In Chrome they're stuck at the top.

It's a good browser, but it's not for me.
 

Number45

Member
Jun 6, 2011
12,062
0
0
UK
"Not convinced", heh. Reminds me of something Stumpokapow said in the WP7 thread.
I can run tests and time pages etc. but if the experience feels slower or more clunky (which is the primary reason I can't use IE at all) then that's the only test I care about. I'm spending some time with it at work anyway, I'm not going to dismiss it without giving it a good go - until I switched to Chrome last year I was a pretty avid FF supporter.
 

Vagabundo

Member
Feb 10, 2007
11,730
4
0
Dublin, Ireland (Place of Legend)
I moved to chrome from firefox years ago due to firefox performance issues with multiple tabs. I see no reason to return to firefox. I sync all my bookmarks/history across multiple platforms using chrome. Chromes performace is always cutting edge. I'm not sure where firefox can compete. They would have to really come up with some killer feature for me to move back. Firefox still seems slower and clunky when I do use it.

IE isn't even on my radar.
 

kehs

Banned
Feb 4, 2010
33,753
0
0
EDIT:
also I'm not sure if people are trolling with the "chrome for android" comments. The android browser IS chrome mobile.

The browser on android is webkit based, but it's no relation to Chrome.

There will however be a Chrome specific version for android soon.
 

Sharp

Member
May 6, 2007
21,361
0
0
I'm getting memory leaks like crazy from Firefox 9. 10 tabs and its over a 1GB in memory use. I can close all my tabs and wait for about 5 minutes and still see 550MB in the taskmanager for firefox.exe. It's sad to see them fall apart because they have a great extensions collection.
If you add up the memory each of Chrome's tabs takes you'll find it's equally bloated memorywise. Chrome keeps it per-process though, which means when you close the tab it kills all the memory associated with it.
 

Windu

never heard about the cat, apparently
Mar 29, 2007
35,905
0
0
with Windows 8 coming out, i think that will help keep IE afloat unless google releases a metro version of Chrome at release. But i'm glad to see people using the better browser though. (although IE is a lot better than it used to be, which i guess isn't saying much, but it is a good alternative now at least).
 

MWS Natural

Member
Jul 23, 2007
14,146
2
1,245
I used to be cool with Firefox, but then it just stopped being....good. I can't really explain it. Now I use Chrome on all my machines.

Same. Firefox was awesome but it has just been really unstable for me in the latest few releases. I am fully Chromed now.
 

longdi

Ni hao ma, fellow kids?
Jun 7, 2004
8,744
6,435
1,890
i use this instead of gestures, swiping while holding down mouse button is not fun.
 

FLEABttn

Banned
Mar 30, 2005
8,219
0
0
35
NOVA
I can't help but feel that a good number of memory leaks that Firefox still experienced are caused by problematic extensions versus Firefox itself. I suppose an argument could be made that Firefox shouldn't allow extensions to do that, but I don't feel as if that's a very compelling argument.
 

kehs

Banned
Feb 4, 2010
33,753
0
0
i use this instead of gestures, swiping while holding down mouse button is not fun.
http://www.logitech.com/assets/31255/4/wireless-gaming-mouse-g700.png[img][/QUOTE]

How overt do think the swiping for gestures is? It's no more than one or two cm of movement.
 
Apr 14, 2008
10,656
1
0
New Orleans
I still use Firefox. I need to give Chrome a shot at some point, given all the other Google services I use.

Do Gmail and Google Music have any extra bells and whistles in Chrome?
 

Tenks

Member
Jan 10, 2008
6,557
0
0
Columbus
Chrome is the best hands down. I'd use IE over FF. Bloated piece of crap. However I'm not going to use either so it doesn't matter.
 

longdi

Ni hao ma, fellow kids?
Jun 7, 2004
8,744
6,435
1,890
How overt do think the swiping for gestures is? It's no more than one or two cm of movement.

true but once you go g700, you cant go back! best web surfing is best when my other hand is free to do any thing i like!
 

FLEABttn

Banned
Mar 30, 2005
8,219
0
0
35
NOVA
I use Chrome so I hope it's secure but 'nobody tried' isn't the same as 'nobody could'.

I'd argue if nobody bothered it's because they had no idea how to so figured why not waste their time at the event.

It's not like they think all these exploits up on the fly. Research goes into this. If nobody came to the table, it's because nobody thought they had anything to bring to the table.

Similarly though, trying to hack something at Pwn2Own and failing isn't the same as "nobody could".
 

Tenks

Member
Jan 10, 2008
6,557
0
0
Columbus
I use Chrome so I hope it's secure but 'nobody tried' isn't the same as 'nobody could'.

There was money on the table. If they could hack it they'd hack it. Its not like they go into these competitions blindly and without known exploits. Which is why the "time" to hack is always misleading. So it is safe to assume if no one tried to exploit Chrome it is because no one knew how to do it.
 

K.Jack

Knowledge is power, guard it well
Mar 10, 2007
24,183
0
1,410
Since this thread is about how awesome Chrome is, I'd like to ask this here, since I've given the browser many chances:

Can someone tell me why Chrome is the only browser in which I can't ctrl+i and ctrl+b to italic and bold, when making forum posts?
 

Plywood

NeoGAF's smiling token!
May 27, 2009
58,581
2
0
This isn't directly related to Chrome but I hate Google's html5 player. Sometimes it runs well other times it runs like ass on both Chrome and Firefox.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.