• Hey Guest. Check out your NeoGAF Wrapped 2025 results here!

College Football 2010 Week 1: Destiny Unmanifested

Status
Not open for further replies.
mre said:
It makes me sad to see mid-majors getting nice things. They should just go back to the kitchen and fix some damned dinner for the big boys.
Boise st. will be wearing the new nike pro combat uni's against VT next week
 
andycapps said:
Go Dawgs!

Yea, Lets go Dawgs!

negreenfield said:
Well, I have season tickets again this year. Last year my son was only a few months old when the season started so I decided to only go to a few games when I could get tickets. I think he's now ready to go to all the games with me so I'm ready to start brainwashing him into thinking everything UGA = evil, everything Georgia Tech = good.

I always wondered how Tech fans were made. Now I know. They have to be brainwashed! :D :lol
 
mYm|17| said:
Boise st. will be wearing the new nike pro combat uni's against VT next week

So will VT.

It's the Nike Pro Combat Season Premier! Football game shown as a bonus!
 
Lonestar said:
So will VT.

It's the Nike Pro Combat Season Premier! Football game shown as a bonus!

Here's a question. Maybe someone knows the answer. I have a feeling that the Bama-SJSU game is going to be regionally blacked out this weekend on ESPN3 as its a pay-per-view game. Now, you can register ESPN3 while you're at home so that you can view it even if you're out and the place you're at doesn't have an agreement with ESPN to grant access to ESPN3. If I register ESPN3 here, in Florida, will I be able to log-in to ESPN when I'm back in Alabama, and have it recognize the fact that my computer was registered in Florida for the sole purpose of bypassing the blackout restrictions?
 
Wow so Cody Johnson is going to be our starting back. Can't say I saw that coming ( maybe because I'm not an insider ) but I thought for sure it would be Fozzy Whittaker or Tre Newton. I still wish Malcolm Brown could forgo his senior year in HS and play for us >.>
 
perfectchaos007 said:
Wow so Cody Johnson is going to be our starting back. Can't say I saw that coming ( maybe because I'm not an insider ) but I thought for sure it would be Fozzy Whittaker or Tre Newton. I still wish Malcolm Brown could forgo his senior year in HS and play for us >.>
Cody is going to be fine. All reports from fall practice point to him being the right back for this offense.
 
perfectchaos007 said:
Wow so Cody Johnson is going to be our starting back. Can't say I saw that coming ( maybe because I'm not an insider ) but I thought for sure it would be Fozzy Whittaker or Tre Newton. I still wish Malcolm Brown could forgo his senior year in HS and play for us >.>

He is the most touted of the recruits and is supposed to be in much better shape than he has been. I think you are also going to see more or a pro-style offense out of Texas and a downhill running game than we've seen in recent years.

Think more Major/Simms and less VY/Colt.

That said, I expect it to be running back by committee and Trey will get some nice playing time.
 
StoOgE said:
He is the most touted of the recruits and is supposed to be in much better shape than he has been. I think you are also going to see more or a pro-style offense out of Texas and a downhill running game than we've seen in recent years.

Think more Major/Simms and less VY/Colt.

Long Live the RRIP!

StoOgE said:
That said, I expect it to be running back by committee and Trey will get some nice playing time.

That's been pretty much my thought as well. We don't have a feature back.
 
mre said:
Here's a question. Maybe someone knows the answer. I have a feeling that the Bama-SJSU game is going to be regionally blacked out this weekend on ESPN3 as its a pay-per-view game. Now, you can register ESPN3 while you're at home so that you can view it even if you're out and the place you're at doesn't have an agreement with ESPN to grant access to ESPN3. If I register ESPN3 here, in Florida, will I be able to log-in to ESPN when I'm back in Alabama, and have it recognize the fact that my computer was registered in Florida for the sole purpose of bypassing the blackout restrictions?

Thought this was the case, but I doubt it. I registered at work, which uses charter. It does have espn3. I then tried that username at home, which is bright house, and it does not carry it. It would not work.
 
I did a google search for Turner Gill, as I thought I'd change my avatar to a picture of him. The 5th or so link down is already a fireturnergill.com site, lol
 
StoOgE said:
He is the most touted of the recruits and is supposed to be in much better shape than he has been. I think you are also going to see more or a pro-style offense out of Texas and a downhill running game than we've seen in recent years.

Think more Major/Simms and less VY/Colt.

That said, I expect it to be running back by committee and Trey will get some nice playing time.

Major Applewhite was the first QB I remember playing for UT. I liked those years. We should have beaten Colorado in that Big 12 title game. Simms just had a bad day and then we take him out in the second half and put in Major and he throws a 70 yard TD on the first play. My friend today was telling me how unfortunate it was that Chris Simms wasn't liked as much as Applewhite or any other of our QB's. I told him probably it's because he was from New Jersey
 
perfectchaos007 said:
Major Applewhite was the first QB I remember playing for UT. I liked those years. We should have beaten Colorado in that Big 12 title game. Simms just had a bad day and then we take him out in the second half and put in Major and he throws a 70 yard TD on the first play. My friend today was telling me how unfortunate it was that Chris Simms wasn't liked as much as Applewhite or any other of our QB's. I told him probably it's because he was from New Jersey

Chris Simms telegraphed his throws. Not a big deal when playing Rice or UH. However, against a well trained defense like the early 2000s OU defenses, they would eat that shit up.

Also, Simms could have easily been as well liked as Major was... if he didn't throw 3 picks and fumble once in the 2001 Big 12 Championship game.
 
ConfusingJazz said:
Chris Simms telegraphed his throws. Not a big deal when playing Rice or UH. However, against a well trained defense like the early 2000s OU defenses, they would eat that shit up.

even still back in 2001 we were just 3 points from going to the MNC. I guess it was a Applewhite/Simms co-effort to get to that point but still that does show me that Mack does have sucess using pro-style offenses. I think we'll have a good year if a running back steps up. Hopefully Cody Johnson steps up

edit: also Colt McCoys brother won the back up QB position. I guess we'll see him play on Saturday in 4th quarter garbage time. Connor Wood should redshirt...or transfer if I were him.
 
SyNapSe said:
I did a google search for Turner Gill, as I thought I'd change my avatar to a picture of him. The 5th or so link down is already a fireturnergill.com site, lol

There we go! Gill, smiling, happy as a motherfucker. We maybe loaded up with 2*'s and on our way to 10 loss seasons but people are going to enjoy it!
 
perfectchaos007 said:
even still back in 2001 we were just 3 points from going to the MNC. I guess it was a Applewhite/Simms co-effort to get to that point but still that does show me that Mack does have sucess using pro-style offenses. I think we'll have a good year if a running back steps up. Hopefully Cody Johnson steps up

We almost got in through the back door. To even get in that position, that last week in the Big 12 regular season was fucked up. Oklahoma lost to Oklahoma State, and Colorado beat Nebraska. It was more exciting then our beat down of A&M that weekend.

We didn't really play anyone that year, and probably would have been put in a mudhole by Miami.
 
ConfusingJazz said:
We almost got in through the back door. To even get in that position, that last week in the Big 12 regular season was fucked up. Oklahoma lost to Okie State, and Colorado beat Nebraska.

We didn't really play anyone that year, and probably would have been mudholed by Miami.

We thrashed CU in the regular season though. oh man I just loved how they showed Miami kill us in the cotton bowl in "The U" documentary. We need to play that school again soon.
 
perfectchaos007 said:
edit: also Colt McCoys brother won the back up QB position. I guess we'll see him play on Saturday in 4th quarter garbage time. Connor Wood should redshirt...or transfer if I were him.

Case is more ready at this point, but Connor Wood has a higher ceiling. His place on the depth chart is definitely not a punishment.

What sites are you guys reading? Try Burnt Orange Nation and Barking Carnival.
 
perfectchaos007 said:
We thrashed CU in the regular season though. oh man I just loved how they showed Miami kill us in the cotton bowl in "The U" documentary. We need to play that school again soon.

That documentary pissed me off when they didn't show the Bama-Miami game of 1992. They just had to stop the damn thing in 1991. Pussies.
 
Lonestar said:
Thought this was the case, but I doubt it. I registered at work, which uses charter. It does have espn3. I then tried that username at home, which is bright house, and it does not carry it. It would not work.

I'm begging you to visit this thread. It has nothing to do with espn3. Thx.
 
perfectchaos007 said:
even still back in 2001 we were just 3 points from going to the MNC. I guess it was a Applewhite/Simms co-effort to get to that point but still that does show me that Mack does have sucess using pro-style offenses. I think we'll have a good year if a running back steps up. Hopefully Cody Johnson steps up

edit: also Colt McCoys brother won the back up QB position. I guess we'll see him play on Saturday in 4th quarter garbage time. Connor Wood should redshirt...or transfer if I were him.

We don't talk about that game ever.

I was a very very drunk freshman and hit Chris Simms with a coke I bought at the concession stand mixed with rum on his way out of the game in the 3rd quarter. Miami would have murdered us, but still.

Anyway, Mack's problem wasn't a pro style offense. It was a lack of general toughness on the team and a lot of shitty attitudes. We were a paper tiger/airport team. Looked the part, didn't show up in big games. Given our recent history, I think those days are behind us. Also, our D coordinator isn't a complete idiot that spins down players and mugs at the LOS.

And Shaggy Bevo is the best UT site out there period. Barking Carnival isn't terrible.

Hornfans.com is a shell of it's former self, but it's archives are my only proof that I coined the phrase Godzillatron.
 
fuck probation i'm slowly starting to get more excited for this season than I thought I would. Pac10 games should be fun regardless of having no chance at a bowl.
 
I pretty much lurk only, but I may as well throw in on the predictions.


Ohio State
Utah
USC
Missouri
otre Dame
Kentucky
Connecticut
Kansas State
Northwestern
TCU
LSU
Iowa
BYU
Cincinnati
Virginia Tech by 13 points
 
JCX said:
Nice article on Nebraska's transition to the Big 10. Sounds like some spy stuff in parts.

http://www.omaha.com/article/20100830/BIGRED/708309872
Best link ever...in one of these college football threads.


Would have been nice to hear from Powers and Beebe, but the amazing insight from the rest of the article is more than enough for me.

Actually, I'd really like to know who else was on the Big Ten's cut list and who else they were in contact with besides Rutgers, Missouri, and ND.
 
Subitai said:
Actually, I'd really like to know who else was on the Big Ten's cut list and who else they were in contact with besides Rutgers, Missouri, and ND.

It's not like this roller coaster ride is over. It's just on hiatus until the season's over. Well, except for BYU.
 
Subitai said:
Actually, I'd really like to know who else was on the Big Ten's cut list and who else they were in contact with besides Rutgers, Missouri, and ND.

They were definitely in contact with Texas and Texas A&M at one point. Pittsburgh has almost for sure been in talks with them as well.
 
Subitai said:
Actually, I'd really like to know who else was on the Big Ten's cut list and who else they were in contact with besides Rutgers, Missouri, and ND.

I know arrogance, but I have to believe the first calls were to ND, then Texas. I mean, anyone else remember the phrase "Tech Problem"?
 
StoOgE said:
They were definitely in contact with Texas and Texas A&M at one point. Pittsburgh has almost for sure been in talks with them as well.
I'm talking about after they went through their ~20 school spreadsheet. Except for fantastic research dollar$, Pitt didn't bring nearly enough of what the Big Ten was looking for. Especially since, despite recent success and past titles, Pitt has started to feel less like the 2nd best football school in PA and more like another NE basketball school.
pitt-yellow-out.jpg



By the end of May, I got the impression the MDC had already prompted Texas and Texas A&M to look at the Big Ten as a secondary option since bringing Texas Tech somewhere ended up being very important, so a similar meeting to the one Nebraska had might not have occurred. Rutgers and Missouri also had a lot to offer and at that point were dying to sit down to make their case, while ND was always the natural #1 choice that was never really an option yet had to be heard just in case.
 
jjasper said:
Texas didn't want to go anywhere. It is why they leaked the MDC before it went down.
Texas wants as much money as it can get, like all schools, yet unlike most other schools, wanted to maintain its large influence. It could have maintained a lot of that influence in the MDC where it would have lost a significant amount of it in the Big Ten. On the other hand, Texas politicians certainly didn't want Texas to go anywhere.
 
Nebraska really is a great fit in the Big 10. It makes sense geographically, athletically, educationally (with Nebraska's renewed and intensified focus on research) and economically. Sure, Nebraska only has 1.8 million people or so, but it is another college football powerhouse. This is just one more reason why every cable/satellite operator in Nebraska, Kansas, and Western Iowa absolutely must add Big Ten Network to their slates and every game will get that much more ad revenue in the pot.

Better so than with the Big XII, it appears. It seemed to many that they were running with their tail between their legs, but it seems like much of the whole conference seemed to depend on them and that even with a lack of much success (at least traditional Nebraska success) over the last 6 years) they were still the other big dog in the conference.

Great, compelling read. I am excited for this year, but completely floored for 2011.
 
Ganhyun said:
Yea, Lets go Dawgs!



I always wondered how Tech fans were made. Now I know. They have to be brainwashed! :D :lol
Well, at least you guys have the Fulmer cup locked up again this year! Preseason number 1 again, WTG!

And sadly, we just don't have the sidewalk fans UGA has, I guess the dumb rednecks in the state sort of just gravitate to all that is UGA.

Doing my part to turn the ratio of the state if my son decides not to go to Tech (and he's not going to UGA, or I'll disown him... j/k... sort of). :-)
 
Nebraska has a 37.5 point spread on Western Kentucky! Man, I would hate to be them on Saturday.

In other news, Fresno St is favored on Cinci, and Kansas St is favored over UCLA.

Gonna be a great weekend!
 
The Oklahoman said:
The future?

As Brandon Weeden prepares, he hopes — and so do Cowboys fans everywhere — to pick up where he left off in the second half of last year's Colorado game, there's talk of OSU's great quarterback depth and a flourishing future.

Johnny Deaton, Clint Chelf and Nate Sorenson.

And, oh yes, J.W. Walsh.

One of OSU's top recruits for 2011, Walsh plans to arrive in Stillwater in January to begin his Cowboys career.

Until then, however, he's got business to tend to, taking aim at a Texas state championship.

And so far, his aim is sharp.

Walsh and his Denton Guyer teammates opened their season Friday night with a 45-7 rout of Waxahachie. And Walsh was superb, throwing for a career-best 340 yards with four touchdowns. He connected on 15 of 20 passes and his TDs covered 59, 39, 38 and 10 yards.

Walsh made it look easy against a traditional power.


"Coming into it, we didn't expect it to be like this at all," Walsh told the Denton Record-Chronicle. "We thought we'd get a good test, and that wasn't the case. We came out and from the very beginning, and we were hitting on all cylinders."

Walsh's Wildcats rolled up 566 yards of offense and he found eight different receivers for completions.


"That's exactly what I envisioned," Walsh said. "We threw to all of them. When you can complete balls to all those guys, it makes the defense throw fits because they can't stick on one main guy."

Read more: http://www.newsok.com/article/3490257#ixzz0yBhCnRMe
Mmm... tastes like Sooner tears
2-3 years from now
.

Walsh is going to be perfect for our new system, plus we've got Herschel Sims coming in at RB, who is a prototypical Holgorsen offense RB: compact, quick, and powerful. Feels good man.
 
AlteredBeast said:
Nebraska really is a great fit in the Big 10. It makes sense geographically, athletically, educationally (with Nebraska's renewed and intensified focus on research) and economically. Sure, Nebraska only has 1.8 million people or so, but it is another college football powerhouse. This is just one more reason why every cable/satellite operator in Nebraska, Kansas, and Western Iowa absolutely must add Big Ten Network to their slates and every game will get that much more ad revenue in the pot.

Better so than with the Big XII, it appears. It seemed to many that they were running with their tail between their legs, but it seems like much of the whole conference seemed to depend on them and that even with a lack of much success (at least traditional Nebraska success) over the last 6 years) they were still the other big dog in the conference.

Great, compelling read. I am excited for this year, but completely floored for 2011.

1) NU is the 4th most important school in the Big 12 for bringing in money. Texas, OU and Aggy all have larger fanbases and larger metro areas that they pull in.
2) You do not fit in academically with the Big 10. I guess Michigan State maybe.
3) You left because Texas walked into the Big 8 which was controlled by OU and NU and took complete control of it. NU fought tooth and nail to keep the Big 12 offices from moving to Dallas. Tooth and nail to keep the championship game from being permanently moved to Texas. Tooth and nail to keep partial qualifiers. And guess what happened? You lost every major political battle in the big 12 to daddy Texas so you turned tail and ran to a conference where you might actually mean something... you are a football program that has been searching for relevancy ever since Miami tore you a new one.

Enjoy daddy Michigan, Ohio St and Penn St.
 
Subitai said:
Texas wants as much money as it can get, like all schools, yet unlike most other schools, wanted to maintain its large influence. It could have maintained a lot of that influence in the MDC where it would have lost a significant amount of it in the Big Ten. On the other hand, Texas politicians certainly didn't want Texas to go anywhere.

Texas wants to go independent. The writing is as clear as day with their scheduling going forward.

The MDC was their escape plan if the Big 12 completely imploded before they were ready to leave. They kept that from happening by selling a bill of goods that won't come true (SEC money) so they could get the pieces in place to go independent in football. Who knows, we may join the MDC in other sports or the Big 12 might actually survive as a basketball conference.
 
The latest on Pac-12 stuff:

* According to those same sources, the current “lean” — and that’s all it is right now — is to split the league in a North/South manner with all four California schools together in the South with the Arizonas.

When I expressed mild surprise (”The Northwest schools are OK with that?”), the response I got was: Expect to see major scheduling concessions for schools in the North and perhaps even changes in the TV revenue distribution.

* A nine-game conference season is a lock.

* The debate over the location of the championship game — neutral site vs. the higher ranked/seeded team’s home field — continues within league circles.

* Yes, Colorado is giving every indication that it will spend two more seasons in the Big 12 because the school and the league can’t work through the exit fees.

But the guess here is that the Pac-10 intervenes at the last minute with enough cash to make CU’s arrival happen sooner rather than later.

As it should be.

Nine-game conference season: good. I like that setup, and the only reason it was such a disadvantage was that nobody else was doing it. With the Bigs both doing it, that won't be so much the case anymore.

I'd prefer home-field for the championship game, but I can see how that might cause logistical problems.
 
StoOgE said:
1) NU is the 4th most important school in the Big 12 for bringing in money. Texas, OU and Aggy all have larger fanbases and larger metro areas that they pull in.
2) You do not fit in academically with the Big 10. I guess Michigan State maybe.
3) You left because Texas walked into the Big 8 which was controlled by OU and NU and took complete control of it. NU fought tooth and nail to keep the Big 12 offices from moving to Dallas. Tooth and nail to keep the championship game from being permanently moved to Texas. Tooth and nail to keep partial qualifiers. And guess what happened? You lost every major political battle in the big 12 to daddy Texas so you turned tail and ran to a conference where you might actually mean something... you are a football program that has been searching for relevancy ever since Miami tore you a new one.

Enjoy daddy Michigan, Ohio St and Penn St.

1) 4th most important school for bringing in money? How does someone quantify that?

Nebraska makes more money period than any other program barring Penn St, Notre Dame, and Texas. larger fanbases and larger metro areas means dick if the Huskers still outgain them moneywise. If there were no A&M, the viewship of college football in Texas wouldn't drop at all. If there were no Nebraska, it would drop in all of Nebraska a ton as well as parts of Iowa and Kansas. Maybe not 5 million or something, but there are 2 million Nebraska fans in just this state and the bordering cities.

2) You guess Michigan St. what?

3) Most of this is obvious. I don;t know why you even took the time to type other than to stroke your fandom. I think Nebraska felt betrayed that everyone voted to shift the power to the south rather than balance the equation as far as conference title, conference headquarters, and etc. go. Plus, when you are the top dog for so long, why not look to greener pastures when things aren't going as hot? I think Nebraska's stock has just soared and everyone else seems to agree. They now have an avenue to recruit in Ohio, Michigan, and the rest of the midwest. They weren't getting a lot of Texas recruits anyway, so this will only help them.

So, they are going to receive more research money, better recruiting, more TV money, similar climate (balanced competition late in the season, and they get to be the powerhouse again if they do an East/West alignment. You call it running with their tail between their legs, I call it smart business.
 
Lonestar said:


D'oh!

And for the record, the inaugural Big XII championship game is what kindled my deep affection for Texas. I love UT.
 
Rutgers is just a bad cultural fit for the Big 10.

With that said, I think it would be great for the school academically, to join the Big 10.

Take advantage of that Big 10 U.S. News boost.
 
Ugh, Monday can't come fast enough, got my tix for the game, should be an awesome atmosphere, despite TheDanny not opening up the parking lots early for tailgating.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top Bottom