Agent_4Seven
Tears of Nintendo
Remedy only knows for which framerate / GFX settings exactly these specs targeted at. But it sure as hell better be for 1440p 60 all maxed.
Ray trace me if old.
Last edited:
-
Hey, guest user. Hope you're enjoying NeoGAF! Have you considered registering for an account? Come join us and add your take to the daily discourse.
Control Official PC Requirements: Your 1080Ti's / 2080's better be ready folks
- Thread starter Agent_4Seven
- Start date
Remedy only knows for which framerate / GFX settings exactly these specs targeted at. But it sure as hell better be for 1440p 60 all maxed.
Ray trace me if old.
Agent_4Seven
Tears of Nintendo
Very true. Only with 1080Ti native 1080p 60 is achievable without temporal image reconstruction technique. I haven't played the game on my current Z390 high-end build yet, but with 4790K paired with 1080Ti and 16GB of RAM native 1080p 60 all maxed was achievable no problem which I can confirm. But... I know many will not agree with me on this, but in this situation and with such cool and unique visuals, overall GFX quality etc.... I do think that such high requirements are absolutely justified and Quantum Break is one of the very few games in regard to which I can say this, hands down one of the best looking games of current generation along with Arkham Knight on PC.
Good question.
Last edited:
jonnyXx
Member
GTX 1060/RX580 MINIMUM...
Remedy only knows for which framerate / GFX settings exactly these specs targeted at. But it sure as hell better be for 1440p 60 all maxed.
Ray trace me if old.
How can GPU that are comparable to Xbox One X be the minimum required to run the game on PC!?
manfestival
Member
Geez talk about needing brute force just to play a game lol
JohnnyFootball
GerAlt-Right. Ciriously.
I've seen people griping for many years that they miss the days of games bringing a system to it's knees. "The industry needs another Crysis"
I've always said: Be careful what you wish for.
I've always said: Be careful what you wish for.
Last edited:
ResilientBanana
Member
Looks like my 1080 is finally aging.
Agent_4Seven
Tears of Nintendo
There's no need for another Crysis cuz original game till this day and 12 years later bringing high-end systems to their knees
And it supports them.... in a form of 980Ti and if 6GB VRAM is the minimum this game needs, but we don't know for which frame rate, screen resolution and settings yet, by knowing Remedy my guess is.... 1080p 30 FPS with a mix of high and medium settings.
Last edited:
The Cockatrice
Member
There was a video posted somewhere with raytracing on which I'm assuming was playing on a 2080TI I think and it had like the worst framerate you can imagine, below 30's as well. I'm pretty sure this will run like hot garbage.
Edit: found it but doesnt say what PC specs they are using but I can only imagine they dont have a weak ass PC
Based on Quantum Break I highly advise anyone getting this on PC to wait until benchmarks pop up.
Edit: found it but doesnt say what PC specs they are using but I can only imagine they dont have a weak ass PC
Based on Quantum Break I highly advise anyone getting this on PC to wait until benchmarks pop up.
Last edited:
kingbean
Member
You okay, Dick?
ClanOfNone
Member
I feel this pain.
fran.fernandez
Member
PlayStation 4 it is.
lukilladog
Member
Those requirements can´t be justified, it´s a console game... base requirement should be a gtx 1050 for steady and smooth gameplay.
JareBear: Remastered
Banned
Hopefully my i7-4960x and 1070ti can manage 1440p at high-ish settings
StreetsofBeige
Gold Member
The forever bulge on PC specs.
Hey PC gamers, got a question coming from a console worm like myself.
Assuming the avg game's medium or max setting gets you a good performing game on a recommended system spec, in your opinion in the past 5 or 10 years, CPU/GPU/Ram has increased a lot. But have graphics/physics/AI improved the same fold?
Or have games no doubt been better, but seems like lots of wasted PC specs (PC spec overkill for what you get)?
Hey PC gamers, got a question coming from a console worm like myself.
Assuming the avg game's medium or max setting gets you a good performing game on a recommended system spec, in your opinion in the past 5 or 10 years, CPU/GPU/Ram has increased a lot. But have graphics/physics/AI improved the same fold?
Or have games no doubt been better, but seems like lots of wasted PC specs (PC spec overkill for what you get)?
Last edited:
Silent Viper
Banned
To be fair QB was bad only on Windows store as it suffered by UWP bs. Control uses win 32
Last edited:
Silent Viper
Banned
Can't compare with consoles as optimization is different. Play the game before judging it.
Agent_4Seven
Tears of Nintendo
Cuz Remedy (or whoever porting the game to PC) don't give a crap about optimisation for PC platform.
PS. I forgot to mention that I've meant DX11 version of Quantum Break and not shitty AF MS Store and DX12 only version of this game.
Last edited:
Silent Viper
Banned
Once PS5 out 1080 will be minimum
xrnzaaas
Member
They either don't care about people who are comfortable with the idea of playing on lower settings or, and that's sadly more likely, it's going to be horribly optimized even with Ray Tracing turned off.
Last edited:
Kenpachii
Member
I won't be buying a game that is shit optimized.
They give me a half decent product and i will buy it. Sorry aint supporting broken products.
And yes you can compare it really easily.
They are not the only devs in town that port console games to pc. If a base ps4 and xbox one can run this game, there is absolute zero need for those minimum specs. There is nothing in the trailers that even remotely needs this hardware to function.
unless they give us some complete next gen experience over console versions. But honestly nothing in the footage looks remotely needing that.
There recommend 1080 ti requirement is even more of a joke.
Last edited:
The Cockatrice
Member
Would make sense since there is no way besides forums/metacritic to voice their opinions about the port on Epic Store. Just "buy it and deal with it suckas". Of course this is just an opinion, there could still be doing optimizations up until release but we know how this industry works don't we? It'll probably run good in a year or so when it launches on Steam.
Screamer-RSA
Member
Those sure are interesting requirements. I wonder what fps the "minimum for ray-tracing" = 2060 is targeting? If its 60 then all the other requirements don't make sense at all.
Last edited:
Endless Fluff
Banned
Maybe they're using the same engine "tricks" they used with QB, like... image gets rendered 4 times or some other bullshit, otherwise the GPU requirements make absolutely no sense. I'll wait and see where this goes, so far it looks bad in terms of optimization.
Armorian
Banned
PS5 GPU will be ~1080 power but it will render games in 30 fps (most) and north of 2560x1440, so this GPU should run quite well in 1080p. But Nvidia may abandon Pascals in the future...
The Bloody-Nine
Member
My 1080Ti would be ready....if I knew anything about this game.
Armorian
Banned
It's TPP with physic powers from Remedy. It looks good on trailers.
TeamGhobad
Banned
Console is becoming a much more attractive proposition, you can either buy a gpu for 500dollars that will be outdated in 2 years OR buy a console that lasts 8-9years.
