cgcg said:This is Crytek what do you think? Guaranteed it's PC running with *console* specs lol.
In spite of it saying all footage is from the 360 version?
cgcg said:This is Crytek what do you think? Guaranteed it's PC running with *console* specs lol.
zlatko said:This is some weird ass shit. Why in the fuck didn't they do this BEFORE Crysis 2? Why in the hell are they announcing this a month before release?
Fucking idiotic.
onQ123 said:" Official Recommended System Requirements
OS Windows XP / Vista
Processor Intel Core 2 DUO @ 2.2GHz or AMD Athlon 64 X2 4400+
Memory 2.0 GB RAM
GPU NVIDIA GeForce 8800 GTS/640 or similar "
now just think what devs can do with a console with the same specs as the high end gaming PC that we have now.
Based on the release date it is probably an XBLA & PSN release with the price and marketing to match.zlatko said:This is some weird ass shit. Why in the fuck didn't they do this BEFORE Crysis 2? Why in the hell are they announcing this a month before release?
Fucking idiotic.
This is using Cryengine 3, right? Crysis 2 was a showcase for the engine, and they probably wanted to build some reputation on the consoles first.zlatko said:This is some weird ass shit. Why in the fuck didn't they do this BEFORE Crysis 2? Why in the hell are they announcing this a month before release?
The PC version was 6gb something. So doesn't seem like it.Grayman said:Based on the release date it is probably an XBLA & PSN release with the price and marketing to match.
It sold 3 million afaik.Salacious Crumb said:Crysis 2 performed below expectations and this a quick and easy way to recuperate some of the losses incurred from porting the cryengine to consoles. That'd be my guess.
It sold 3 million copies across all platforms as of more than two months ago, so it sold better than the original Crysis, but there's no telling if it sold enough better to justify the dramatically increased budget.Salacious Crumb said:Crysis 2 performed below expectations and this a quick and easy way to recuperate some of the losses incurred from porting the cryengine to consoles. That'd be my guess.
Toby said:Yay, now even console owners can experience the mediocrity that is Crysis.
jet1911 said:"New effects!"
Video show shitty looking explosion. Impressive.
The game itself in the grand scheme was absolutely mediocre. The trailer just points out how stupid the gaming idustry press is. "One of the classics" etc.Wallach said:Ah right, I forgot people still try to pretend this game sucks because of how far ahead of everything else it was technically when it came out.
antonz said:The game itself in the grand scheme was absolutely mediocre. The trailer just points out how stupid the gaming idustry press is. "One of the classics" etc.
It was ahead of its time graphically and thats where all its hype comes from. It was a rather bland FPS
bhlaab said:If this was possible all along why did Crysis 2 have such small, narrow levels? Are you telling me they actually did that intentionally??
Some PC players seemed to really like Crysis' 360 pad support. I don't like shooters at all on a gamepad but I imagine for hardcores the suit shortcut controls (2x crouch, melee, sprint, backwards) would work better than aiming does on a controller.Max said:If you (presumably) can't play this like NanosuitNinja with a controller, why play it at all?
NBtoaster said:In spite of it saying all footage is from the 360 version?
No it wasn't. You were given a lot of freedom in the game along with some spectacular gameplay mechanics. Just because it doesn't have a cutscene every 10 minutes doesn't mean it's bland.antonz said:The game itself in the grand scheme was absolutely mediocre. The trailer just points out how stupid the gaming idustry press is. "One of the classics" etc.
It was ahead of its time graphically and thats where all its hype comes from. It was a rather bland FPS
Meisadragon said:This is using Cryengine 3, right? Crysis 2 was a showcase for the engine, and they probably wanted to build some reputation on the consoles first.
The PC version was 6gb something. So doesn't seem like it.
It sold 3 million afaik.
jooso said:Should I play this before Crysis 2? For story continuity or something
antonz said:The game itself in the grand scheme was absolutely mediocre. The trailer just points out how stupid the gaming idustry press is. "One of the classics" etc.
It was ahead of its time graphically and thats where all its hype comes from. It was a rather bland FPS
Oh nice!Snuggler said:I look forward to seeing their definition of "remastered".
Oh please, even with it's lackluster third act, it's 10 times the game of any singleplayer shooter released since, including it's sequel. It was as far ahead of it's time in gameplay as it was in tech, unfortunately the singleplayer shooter market has collapsed into who can make the player feel most like a glorified dolly operator.antonz said:The game itself in the grand scheme was absolutely mediocre. The trailer just points out how stupid the gaming idustry press is. "One of the classics" etc.
It was ahead of its time graphically and thats where all its hype comes from. It was a rather bland FPS
I've seen that in a lot of game trailers. It's pretty normal.chickdigger802 said:I'm pretty sure I saw the xbla and psn logo at the end of the trailer though. Crazy optimization?
The first half of crysis 1 is some of the best fps I've ever played. Graphics are some of it but the sandbox gameplay was a bigger part.antonz said:The game itself in the grand scheme was absolutely mediocre. The trailer just points out how stupid the gaming idustry press is. "One of the classics" etc.
It was ahead of its time graphically and thats where all its hype comes from. It was a rather bland FPS
PS3 owners are used to playing mediocre FPSs anyway.Toby said:Yay, now even console owners can experience the mediocrity that is Crysis.
Haven't played farcry.ReaperXL07 said:So i'll be honest my Rig has never really been able to handle crysis all that well so I never really got a chance to play it. So what type of shooter is it? The Trailer almost makes it look like a Farcry sort of sandbox shooter, but would that be accurate, or is it more level based with wide open areas for each level.
Looks interesting, I actually think this one looks more interesting than 2 did. So I may pick this up if the PS3 version does not have any major flaws.
KareBear said:http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tc13-JhcZfQ
It looks a little worse than Crysis Pc on medium settings i know because i played it that way recently on a laptop.
WickedLaharl said:10FPS gaming FUCK YEAH
disappeared said:Are we talking, like, Ridley Scott remastered, or George Lucas remastered?