No it's not. Murder is wrong.
That's not the question. The question is if he committed murder.
That's not the question. The question is if he committed murder.
I don't know how to respond to this.
I don't know how to respond to this.
That's not the question. The question is if he committed murder.
Yup. Given the state of both India's culture and police force, I don't think going to them was a real option.I don't agree, but I understand
I don't have kids (yet), but if I did, I could see myself doing something like this if my daughter was able to ID the person that did it.
That's not the question. The question is if he committed murder.
This dad has now committed a worse crime than his victim.
Can you elaborate?
Yeah, I can't get behind this. He could have killed a totally innocent person. I don't see how anyone can see this as OK.
What? It should be fucking simple to respond. The man murdered someone, it doesn't matter what his victim is alleged to have done. Due process and presumption of innocence is one of the bedrocks of a functioning moral society. The courts should decide and if found guilty he should have served the appropiate sentence. Now the father has thrown his own life away. And yes I'd feel the same if it was my own daughter.
That's not the question. The question is if he committed murder.
Can you elaborate?
I think they mean the torture part.
Personally, I consider rape to be a worse crime than murder. But that's just me.
I probably wouldn't kill but I would have beat the shit out of him.I don't have kids (yet), but if I did, I could see myself doing something like this if my daughter was able to ID the person that did it.
But then you leave your daughter without a parent at an age where they (arguably) need you the most...
It was completely selfish of the dad
Can you elaborate?
So what did he do. Yes I'm asking you.That's not the question. The question is if he committed murder.
It happened in India? Dude was probably guilty.
It happened in India? Dude was probably guilty.
You can't just kill someone because an emotional teen told you something.
Ask the child, not the parent, and I know people who'd easily pick death. You're naive if you think otherwise.You have a child and two options. You can choose to have them raped, or choose to have them murdered. Pick one.
Do they need to?
You have a child and two options. You can choose to have them raped, or choose to have them murdered. Pick one.
Ask the child, not the parent, and I know people who'd easily pick death. You're naive if you think otherwise.
The alleged rapist probably knew the family and assumed the girl wouldn't tell his father.Why would you want to hang out with the father of the girl you raped? What a weird story.
his daughter had told him about the alleged rape as soon as it had happened.
I don't know how to respond to this.
So.... was... was the guy really guilty of the crime? or uh.... hm... not good... not good at all...
What this father did was obviously wrong, but you need to take into consideration that this happened in India. Local courts are super corrupt. Expecting due process is probably a bit naive.
Because there are many reasons for a daughter to lie.
She got pregnant, but panicked and said someone raped her. She wanted attention, and lied about it to get sympathy.
I'm not saying she lied. But why would you not report it? The father is completely in the wrong. You can't just kill someone because an emotional teen told you something.
Most false rape reports appear to fall into two categories, neither of which comes close to the regrettable sex claim: 1) Situations where a rape did, in fact, happen, but the wrong man was accused of the crime and 2) Situations where a mentally unstable woman makes the whole thing up and there was no sexual contact at all.