Macam said:I haven't followed comics in years, but I sorely miss Andy Kubert's art. I may have to dig up the Waid/Kubert run as that sounds like a fun romp.
You talk about Superman's style, but then claim Batman routinely assassinates people?Pandaman said:superman wouldn't pulp batman from a mile away, even if he seriously wanted batman dead, that's just not his style. did superman prime fly around zapping people from a mile away?
batman on the other hand would just walk up to clark and stab him with a shard of kryptonite while supermans on the john.
Kubert did "Whatever Happened to the Caped Crusader" last year. Sometimes I LOVE Andy Kubert's art to death, sometimes I am very meh on it. His work on KaZar was in the love category.Macam said:I haven't followed comics in years, but I sorely miss Andy Kubert's art. I may have to dig up the Waid/Kubert run as that sounds like a fun romp.
Oh yes, I agree. They excelled at the teen superheroes. Some artists are made for just a certain style of things. It is how I feel about Mark Bagley. He is made for Spider Man and the more normal proportioned heroes. His Hulk and whatnot just looked eh, but his Spider Man work was phenomenal. Same with Thunderbolts.evil solrac v3.0 said:damn, Tom Grummet and Doug Hazzlewood, an art team that could month in and month out bring in top quality art. and they could draw the perfect teenage superhero.
zlatko said:Both are fucking awesome.
I'm just sad that DC universe doesn't have Green Lantern as a mentor.![]()
woodypop said:Thor toasted him with a lightning bolt in Siege. Heh, his ass got served.
PhoncipleBone said:Oh yes, I agree. They excelled at the teen superheroes. Some artists are made for just a certain style of things. It is how I feel about Mark Bagley. He is made for Spider Man and the more normal proportioned heroes. His Hulk and whatnot just looked eh, but his Spider Man work was phenomenal. Same with Thunderbolts.
evil solrac v3.0 said:Lobo is also immortal. Heaven decreeded that he was too much trouble to keep in either realm so they wrote a clause that says Lobo isn't accepted if he dies. if Lobo loses a limb, he grows it back. if Lobo "dies" (like his head cut off) and bleeds he can grow a clone from his blood. (previously that feeb Dox had poisoned Lobo's blood so he lost the ability but he got it back) Feetal'z gizz. how can any of you bastiches think that hockey puck has a chance against th' main man?
![]()
Ookami-kun said:Has this thread mentioned JLA/Avengers? It's one of the best crossover series because it respects BOTH sides unlike Marvel vs. DC.
MC Safety said:Marvel vs. DC was a big crossover event sponsored by both companies and pored over by Marvel and DC editors alike. Obviously, everyone involved thought it was fair and respectful of both universes.
So. In what way was this crossover disrespectful to either side. Please be specific.
KidGalactus said:Re: Superman v/s Batman.
On paper, Superman is superior to Batman in every conceivable way. He's an alien god-man who's invincible and has been evidenced lifting a million pounds without significant stress.
HOWEVER, once you consider the character of each, the scales slide into more of an equilibrium. Superman's emotions preclude him from thinking in cold logic, which he would need in order to win against an opponent who knows and will exploit his every weakness.
As currently established in the lore, Batman will win more often than Superman in a story. However, this kind of depends on the writer. In the real world, Batman would be pulped in a fraction of a fraction of a second, sure. But this isn't the real world, and that'd hardly make for an interesting story anyhow, would it?
Parallax said:probably because marvel vs dc was fan votes for matches instead of an actual storyline unlike jla avengers, where the characters from both worlds intermingled and even had relationships with each other.
His New Warriors stuff wasn't bad, but he started to improve greatly once he took over Amazing Spider Man back in the early 90s.krypt0nian said:And New Warriors....say it. SAY IT! <huff huff>
Parallax said:probably because marvel vs dc was fan votes for matches instead of an actual storyline unlike jla avengers, where the characters from both worlds intermingled and even had relationships with each other.
Anticitizen One said:JLA/Avengers was boring as hell. DC vs. Marvel was fucking awsome im just disappointed that we never got a Superman vs. Spider-Man fight. Since I always viewed them as the "mascots" of their respected universes.
Yeah, totally digging Taskmaster's inclusion in MvC3.PhoncipleBone said:http://www.ign.com/videos/2011/01/17/marvel-vs-capcom-3taskmaster-introduction-trailer
From the gaming side for Marvel vs. Capcom 3. But Motherfucking Taskmaster is going to be in the game! BOO YA! And it is interesting seeing all the people in the thread have no idea who the character is. But that is just badass!
Taskmaster vs. Batman would be epic.woodypop said:Yeah, totally digging Taskmaster's inclusion in MvC3.
I would love to see a Taskmaster vs. Deathstroke fight. Drawn by Perez, of course.
PhoncipleBone said:His New Warriors stuff wasn't bad, but he started to improve greatly once he took over Amazing Spider Man back in the early 90s.
G-Fex said:If Deadshot can't kill Batman, what makes you think Punisher can?
The only other person possible that could do it maybe cause I don't know everything Marvel is Black Panther.
Ephemeris said:I can cosign this. Because Black Panther is the black Batman.
Epic.Spike Spiegel said:
G-Fex said:The Black Panther punks the fantastic four.
And he's got Storm? Panther's the man!
Varna said:Can anyone explain to me how the whole... Earth 1, 2, Prime, etc work? I've always been curious why DC felt the need to have them mingle with each other. Seem like a much better idea just to reinvent the heroes every few decades or so unless you are coming to a definitive ending at some point.
Varna said:Can anyone explain to me how the whole... Earth 1, 2, Prime, etc work? I've always been curious why DC felt the need to have them mingle with each other. Seem like a much better idea just to reinvent the heroes every few decades or so unless you are coming to a definitive ending at some point.
Varna said:Can anyone explain to me how the whole... Earth 1, 2, Prime, etc work? I've always been curious why DC felt the need to have them mingle with each other. Seem like a much better idea just to reinvent the heroes every few decades or so unless you are coming to a definitive ending at some point.
Varna said:Another thing I don't understand. Why doesn't Superman just go into Gotham and just fuck up all the villains?
Just a problem I notice when two very different kind of super heroes exist in the same world.
Thanks Spike Spiegel.
routine, no.Freshmaker said:You talk about Superman's style, but then claim Batman routinely assassinates people?
Darkseid is a different case altogether.Pandaman said:routine, no.
but when batman had to kill someone, he shot him with little fuss.
considering how often superman beats him, i'd think a rogue superman would warrant the same level of consideration.PhoncipleBone said:Darkseid is a different case altogether.
The difference is that Bruce likes and respects Clark.Pandaman said:considering how often superman beats him, i'd think a rogue superman would warrant the same level of consideration.
Batman didn't mind doing that himself when he briefly gained Superman's powers.G-Fex said:I don't think Batman would like it if Superman came to Gotham and fought his villains. Batman didn't even like it when Spider-man showed up.