Did the devs really say that they've had the game running at a constant 30fps or did they say it'd be that way for launch?
And it just seems like the whole discussion is pointless if we don't even know any details about the build they played or how old it is.
As I pointed out earlier that's a cherrypicked example - literally a split second from a 14 minute video where the average framerate is between 24-30 fps. Now it's just fanboy fodder.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=v2neFwBuRUQ - Around the 4:40 mark in that video.
I waited hours FOR THIS?
Man, I've defended you in the past. No gameplay footage of this game is averaging 28 to 30 fps. None that I've seen anyway. Yes it's less shit now. But it's still clearly shit.
It's still the only game I'm aware of on Xbox One that is running *worse* than equivalent titles last gen. Defend the system as much as you feel it needs.
Do not defend Capcom Vancouver for releasing a game that's running at a lower frame rate and the same resolution with poorer anti aliasing, than the original game in the series, which was a launch window title for the Xbox 360.
If you think this shit is acceptable, you will get more of it.
Would you like Ryse to have these framerates? Answer honestly please.
Looking at those, it's odd that the article seems to try to imply the framerate only drops when there's a lot happening on screen with lots of zombies and that they note the lowest they saw it go was 16fps, when in that screenshot it's 10fps.Oh, you mean like this?
Look at all those zombies in those shots.
basically.
no one was claiming the game's terrible frame rate wasn't better than the terrible frame rate it used to have.
we're just saying it's still terrible. and it is. and all of the videos people are posting to prove it doesn't have terrible framerate...
have terrible framerates!
For the action and sheer number of enemies I saw on screen, the framerate is more than acceptable.
but, let's be honest, we know exactly what some people are doing here, and they clearly seem to have zero reservations about using intellectually dishonest arguments.
MOTHER OF ALL CREATION3 months ago:
2 months ago:
Today:
LOLOLOLOLSorry for the bullying, but this is just too good.
![]()
DYING HERE![]()
![]()
OH GOD CAPTAIN THE IRONY HAS STRUCK OUR SHIP AND IT IS RAPIDLY TAKING ON WATER
RED ALERT RED ALERT MEN OVERBOARD
![]()
![]()
You're trying to speak common sense and truth to some people (not all) operating entirely on the blatant intent to mislead people with false, cherrypicked samples because they know the video evidence all over the internet, even that 14 minute video in DF's own article, doesn't support their position. I mean, really, who does that? People are cherrypicking only what supports what they want to say, but not acknowledging what they see in the videos, of which there is a wealth of footage available online for people to watch of the final or near final build of this game performing well. You think it's hard for me to snip a chaotic moment with solid performance? Of course that isn't hard, but what is the damn point when people can just watch the videos? That's what I find so strange.
Again, videos all over the internet showcase the game performs quite solidly by Dead Rising's standards. There are drops in performance at times, but nothing nearly as bad, or as consistent, as what some people are trying to pass it off as, and, seriously, look at the crazy number of zombies. We are literally looking at upwards of what seems like hundreds at times. There's footage of some pretty chaotic scenes performing rather strongly with the near final or final builds of this game, and then there seems to be some scenes that are more stressful than others. There's a gif up there of fps apparently going lower with almost nothing happening, but then in that same DF footage, you have a scene with them busting through zombies in some vehicle, and destroying what I think looks like some construction site at a solid 28-30fps.
Major parts of that DF footage do in fact hover in the 28-30fps range. I'm not surprised if some are genuine, but, let's be honest, we know exactly what some people are doing here, and they clearly seem to have zero reservations about using intellectually dishonest arguments.
using intellectually dishonest arguments.
Intellectual honesty is an applied method of problem solving in academia, characterized by an unbiased, honest attitude, which can be demonstrated in a number of different ways, including but not limited to:
1. One's personal beliefs do not interfere with the pursuit of truth;
2. Relevant facts and information are not purposefully omitted even when such things may contradict one's hypothesis;
3. Facts are presented in an unbiased manner, and not twisted to give misleading impressions or to support one view over another;
4. References, or earlier work, are acknowledged where possible, and plagiarism is avoided.
Again, videos all over the internet showcase the game performs quite solidly by Dead Rising's standards
when in that screenshot it's 10fps.
:/
You're trying to speak common sense and truth to some people (not all) operating entirely on the blatant intent to mislead people
Again, videos all over the internet showcase the game performs quite solidly by Dead Rising's standards. There are drops in performance at times, but nothing nearly as bad, or as consistent, as what some people are trying to pass it off as, and, seriously, look at the crazy number of zombies. We are literally looking at upwards of what seems like hundreds at times.
some people are doing here, and they clearly seem to have zero reservations about using intellectually dishonest arguments.
I'm not surprised if some are genuine, but, let's be honest, we know exactly what some people are doing here, and they clearly seem to have zero reservations about using intellectually dishonest arguments.
I dunno, is this on the release build? Still looks very fun. Too bad I am not getting a next gen console, cause I am still interested in this game despite the frame drops and the resolution and everything else. I am still hoping it comes for PC but if it doesn't I won't be too heart broke. And it is capcom so who knows.
Even if this is a lifetime exclusive...
Dead Rising 3 super mega street killer won't be.
![]()
![]()
OH GOD CAPTAIN THE IRONY HAS STRUCK OUR SHIP AND IT IS RAPIDLY TAKING ON WATER
RED ALERT RED ALERT MEN OVERBOARD
![]()
![]()
loads of parts in the video where the player isn't killing zombies, or where there aren't lots of zombies, are in the 28 to 30 fps range. sure. great. have a cookie.You're trying to speak common sense and truth to some people (not all) operating entirely on the blatant intent to mislead people with false, cherrypicked samples because they know the video evidence all over the internet, even that 14 minute video in DF's own article, doesn't support their position. I mean, really, who does that? People are cherrypicking only what supports what they want to say, but not acknowledging what they see in the videos, of which there is a wealth of footage available online for people to watch of the final or near final build of this game performing well. You think it's hard for me to snip a chaotic moment with solid performance? Of course that isn't hard, but what is the damn point when people can just watch the videos? That's what I find so strange.
Again, videos all over the internet showcase the game performs quite solidly by Dead Rising's standards. There are drops in performance at times, but nothing nearly as bad, or as consistent, as what some people are trying to pass it off as, and, seriously, look at the crazy number of zombies. We are literally looking at upwards of what seems like hundreds at times. There's footage of some pretty chaotic scenes performing rather strongly with the near final or final builds of this game, and then there seems to be some scenes that are more stressful than others. There's a gif up there of fps apparently going lower with almost nothing happening, but then in that same DF footage, you have a scene with them busting through zombies in some vehicle, and destroying what I think looks like some construction site at a solid 28-30fps.
Major parts of that DF footage do in fact hover in the 28-30fps range. I'm not surprised if some are genuine, but, let's be honest, we know exactly what some people are doing here, and they clearly seem to have zero reservations about using intellectually dishonest arguments.
On a completely unrelated note, does anybody remember AltogetherAndrews and Haze?
It's the UPSCALER.Jesus fuck this killed me. I am out for the night. This one did me in.
I love you guys.
Major parts of that DF footage do in fact hover in the 28-30fps range. I'm not surprised if some are genuine, but, let's be honest, we know exactly what some people are doing here, and they clearly seem to have zero reservations about using intellectually dishonest arguments.
Again, videos all over the internet showcase the game performs quite solidly by Dead Rising's standards.
On a completely unrelated note, does anybody remember AltogetherAndrews and Haze?
Your desperation is pretty pathetic, and the same goes for anyone else pretty much making a fool out of themselves if they're actually batshit insane enough to believe the performance of Dead Rising 3 right now is anything remotely close to what it was like back then. Do you even realize what the heck Dead Rising 3 performed like back then? The performance was downright atrocious. We aren't talking a few drops here and there. It was almost 100% unplayable, even with very little happening on screen. The current state of the game is a pretty big ass leapfrog over the older builds. The performance, on average, is in the 28-30fps range in most gameplay scenarios according to that 14 minute DF video that they feel covers a wider range of gameplay scenarios.
Months ago you could barely encounter a small number of enemies without performance completely grinding to a halt. Now you can literally encounter seemingly hundreds of enemies and mow them down with pretty solid performance, with some drops here and there, but never to the point of being completely unplayable, particularly because it rebounds pretty nicely heading right back up to the higher performance numbers. So, nice try at the troll, but it's a pretty epic fucking fail on your part for the simple fact that it showcases an almost laughable level of ignoryance regarding how far this game has come performance wise compared to 3 or 2 months ago. But, who am I kidding? Of course some of the trolls occupying this thread know Dead Rising's performance today can't be compared to the way it was months ago, but if they admitted that much, what ever else would they have to say?
Yea, please use your head. The performance of Dead Rising 3 today is absolutely nothing like what it was back then. I don't know who you guys think you're fooling with this act of yours that pretty much lives and dies on the need to hide clear evidence of what old dead rising 3 looked like, but you're comparing video evidence on DF that hovered more around 28-30fps on average in their longer video to this...?
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=btc39u9MQvo
There's even moments when the player is by himself, not surrounded by much of anything, where the performance is down a ditch.
Yet another video of the game at Gamescom, played by IGN. Anybody who watches these and can seriously come away claiming that Dead Rising 3 right now performs anywhere quite as bad as these older builds did on an almost consistent basis is, well, completely full of shit. There's honestly no other way to put it.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aVSxzKJ8VMY
And with that, I'm done here. All people have to do is watch the videos and judge for themselves with the footage available online today of the final build of the game in action. Know why the people talking shit didn't have the balls to post these older videos showing what performance of the older builds were really like? Because it would show they were lying. Simple as that.
literally looking at upwards of what seems like hundreds
This is one of the more entertaining threads I can remember in recent times, especially since this console war shit started up again. Usually after an hour or two I'm done with threads like that but this one keeps getting better. It's the opposite of a judd apatow movie.
Launch title.
I'm sure Dead Rising 4 will look less like a PS360 title and have a much higher framerate during busy sections.
I don't get it. Why the hell is everyone jumping on this SenjutsuSage guy? So what if he's biased? I've seen worse demonstrations of bias around here. Just ignore the fanboys and move on.