"If every episode of The Simpsons is a celebration, which we try to make it, then the movie is like a big celebration. It's a way of honoring the animators, allowing them to really strut their stuff and really go as far as they can with the art of the handwritten gesture. It's a way of honoring the writers, because we were able to get the best all-star writers of The Simpsons and write our hearts out, and it's a way of honoring all the great actors."
— Matt Groening.
The Simpsons Movie is a weird one. It's a film that exists...but for some reason I keep forgetting it exists. Maybe because deep down, I don't really want to remember it.
As an absolutely colossal Simpsons fan around the time the film was being worked on (like most sane people), I remember feverishly going through film magazines, reading interviews given by the writers talking about how the script for The Simpsons movie had been worked on for close to five years. The best and brightest writers from the show's past and present had returned by the dozens to work on it...with each and every joke in the movie being polished to a fine shine in anticipation for release
But then the film came out. And in all honesty, it struck me as a bit rubbish. The story was completely aimless and forgettable...and worse, I didn't even really find the film that funny. It was like a below average modern Simpsons episode. Where was the classic Simpsons humor? Where was the heart? Why did so much of the film revolve around Homer acting like such a momentous prick all the time, making the whole thing feel so mean spirited?
Looking back on it now, the whole thing seemed rather surreal...
Remember that the villain eventually chosen to star in the movie was not iconic Simpsons villains Mr Burns or Sideshow Bob, but instead the forgettable head of an environmental agency played by Albert Brooks? What was that about?
Remember when the President of the United States in the film was Arnold Schwarzenegger, not Rainer Wolfcastle, despite the fact that the whole point of that character was that he was Springfield's version of Arnold Schwarzenegger?
Remember when there was a gag in the film that revolved around showing Bart Simpson's penis?
Maybe this is just me, though. Surprisingly, I checked online today to see the film mostly got pretty good reviews (89% on Rotten Tomatoes!). Yet the film doesn't seem to have made much of a cultural impression, even among die-hard Simpsons fans.
So what say you, GAF? Does the film have it merits? Is it an under-appreciated classic up there with the very best Simpsons episodes? Or does The Simpsons Movie deserve to be forgotten after all?
— Matt Groening.
The Simpsons Movie is a weird one. It's a film that exists...but for some reason I keep forgetting it exists. Maybe because deep down, I don't really want to remember it.
As an absolutely colossal Simpsons fan around the time the film was being worked on (like most sane people), I remember feverishly going through film magazines, reading interviews given by the writers talking about how the script for The Simpsons movie had been worked on for close to five years. The best and brightest writers from the show's past and present had returned by the dozens to work on it...with each and every joke in the movie being polished to a fine shine in anticipation for release
But then the film came out. And in all honesty, it struck me as a bit rubbish. The story was completely aimless and forgettable...and worse, I didn't even really find the film that funny. It was like a below average modern Simpsons episode. Where was the classic Simpsons humor? Where was the heart? Why did so much of the film revolve around Homer acting like such a momentous prick all the time, making the whole thing feel so mean spirited?
Looking back on it now, the whole thing seemed rather surreal...
Remember that the villain eventually chosen to star in the movie was not iconic Simpsons villains Mr Burns or Sideshow Bob, but instead the forgettable head of an environmental agency played by Albert Brooks? What was that about?
Remember when the President of the United States in the film was Arnold Schwarzenegger, not Rainer Wolfcastle, despite the fact that the whole point of that character was that he was Springfield's version of Arnold Schwarzenegger?
Remember when there was a gag in the film that revolved around showing Bart Simpson's penis?
Maybe this is just me, though. Surprisingly, I checked online today to see the film mostly got pretty good reviews (89% on Rotten Tomatoes!). Yet the film doesn't seem to have made much of a cultural impression, even among die-hard Simpsons fans.
So what say you, GAF? Does the film have it merits? Is it an under-appreciated classic up there with the very best Simpsons episodes? Or does The Simpsons Movie deserve to be forgotten after all?