Most people don't really associate Metal Gear with Nintendo and I think Snake's inclusion was primarily because Kojima asked Sakurai to put Snake in the game. I'd like to think he'd ask him again this time around.
I don't even know why he's in there if Nintendo systems don't even get mainline MGS's until way later.
Wii Fit Trainer will wreck that witch's shit.
![]()
![]()
I cannot understand this logic at all. It's a game featuring iconic characters the developers thought would be fun to throw into the game. I already mentioned the Ice Climbers and their active status. What about Earthbound/Mother characters? I say we boot their asses out of there until they start making more games! Why do I need to be reminded of those characters when there aren't new games promoting Nintendo platforms anymore?
Didn't the Miiverse leak suggest that the Wii U would be getting a Metal Gear game in some form?
*Sigh* If only she was real, she and I would be a perfect match. ;_;
Lol you really comparing Nintendos own properties to a 3rd party character? Nintendo can do whatever the hell they want with them.I cannot understand this logic at all. It's a game featuring iconic characters the developers thought would be fun to throw into the game. I already mentioned the Ice Climbers and their active status. What about Earthbound/Mother characters? I say we boot their asses out of there until they start making more games! Why do I need to be reminded of those characters when there aren't new games promoting Nintendo platforms anymore?
No, Snake isn't even Snake anymore. Until Hayter is back, Snake can eat a dick.
I love these crazy conspiracy theories SSB Nintendo purists have wrapped around inside their heads to justify why Snake was in Brawl but why that was a super special case that can never happen again.
I cannot understand this logic at all. It's a game featuring iconic characters the developers thought would be fun to throw into the game. I already mentioned the Ice Climbers and their active status. What about Earthbound/Mother characters? I say we boot their asses out of there until they start making more games! Why do I need to be reminded of those characters when there aren't new games promoting Nintendo platforms anymore?
Are you suggesting that this wasn't true when Brawl was released?
Lol you really comparing Nintendos own properties to a 3rd party character? Nintendo can do whatever the hell they want with them.
Didn't the Miiverse leak suggest that the Wii U would be getting a Metal Gear game in some form?
Well, when Kojima first asked it was around the time of Melee when Metal Gear Solid was actually relevant on the Gamecube. When Sakurai put him in Brawl he was just "keeping his promise" when he told Kojima he'd put Snake in the next game since Melee was too far in development, even if the timing wasn't appropriate at all (which it wasn't).
Can't see this happening again.
I don't want any characters dropped :-/
I'd say he deserves it, but at the same time there are so many characters I'd rather have than him.
That doesn't even make sense. The Ice Climbers etc. you mentions are NINTENDO assets. The can put whatever characters they want in their game. Snake isn't. The devs didn't put Snake in Smash because it would be fun, it was Kojima begging Sakurai to put his character into the game.
The point is that some are basically arguing that only active ambassadors of Nintendo platformers should be in the game. "What have you done for me lately?" Me? I'm not arguing anything. I have no special criteria for who should or shouldn't be in the game other than characters I think are cool. For instance, I really want Little Mac in the game. Do I have some eloquent justification for it? No. I just like the character, and Nintendo has the rights to him anyway.
I'd take Bayonetta over Snake any day of the week.
There's no way. For one, Snake was never iconic enough to belong in the first place. But the way Kojima seems to be actively against ever working on a Nintendo console, not even considering ports, should be enough of a reason. At this point having a Kojima character is the same as having a Sony character. Like, they might as well add in Kratos. Just give his moveset to a Nintendo character that could conceivably use explosives and move on.
He certainly has no business sharing a fighting arena with the likes of Wolf O'Donnell and Wii Fit Trainer.
Like Sonic and Megaman?
If Sakurai didnt want Snake in the game, he would not have put it in the game. If he accepted all the request of people, we would have a roster full of Mortal Kombat, Street Fighter and Tastunoko characters.
Those are Nintendo characters in a Nintendo fighting game. Any third party additions should be iconic on the level of Mario and Link, not Wolf and Wii Fit Trainer.
Those are Nintendo characters in a Nintendo fighting game. Any third party additions should be iconic on the level of Mario and Link, not Wolf and Wii Fit Trainer.
LOLThere's no way. For one, Snake was never iconic enough to belong in the first place. But the way Kojima seems to be actively against ever working on a Nintendo console, not even considering ports, should be enough of a reason. At this point having a Kojima character is the same as having a Sony character. Like, they might as well add in Kratos. Just give his moveset to a Nintendo character that could conceivably use explosives and move on.
Metal Gear is one of the longest running, still active gaming series around. Try again.
Snake had the best level taunts. He had a different taunt by character.
30 min of exclusive taunts most people dont know about. That's pretty cool.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yNNvvymdceU
Snake should be booted from the roster. If Kojima wants him in smash so badly he can start bringing some snake games to nintendo platforms.
I said you were comparing, not arguing. It was a poor comparison.The point is that some are basically arguing that only active ambassadors of Nintendo platforms should be in the game. "What have you done for me lately?" Me? I'm not arguing anything. I have no special criteria for who should or shouldn't be in the game other than characters I think are cool. For instance, I really want Little Mac in the game. Do I have some eloquent justification for it? No. I just like the character, and Nintendo has the rights to him anyway.
And yet its presence on Nintendo platforms has minimal.
Metal Gear is one of the longest running, still active gaming series around. Try again.
I feel like we're going in circles here. Really, the gist of it amounts to "I don't want him there because of stupid fanboy bullshit." Because we just keep shifting criteria around because of convenience.
but the Castlevania characters are no longer relevant atm, outside of not-Alucard and DraculaI don't mind Snake but if Konami is going to have representation in Smash it should really be a Castlevania character, particularly Simon. Castlevania represents that Nintendo nostalgia just as much as Mega Man and Nintendo's properties.