Brilliant Disaster
Member
I don't care what system is comes for only that it hits the states.
They do still pull big numbers. Even on systems like PSP and 3DS the spinoffs did 500k+ in the US alone. It's just not 4m+ big like Final Fantasy.Huh, what's the reason for the decline? I thought the series as a whole pulled big numbers consistently
I would say DQVI and DQIX were also top of the line for their systems visually.DQVIII was really top of the line PS2 visuals and presentation when it was released, so I assume that's what they're referring to. That's honestly the main thing I can think of that separates it from other DQ games.
Huh, what's the reason for the decline? I thought the series as a whole pulled big numbers consistently
Only appropriate response.Hopefully we actually get this one.
sörine;109691173 said:I would say DQVI and DQIX were also top of the line for their systems visually.
So handheld games are irrelevant now ?
It's not really about being better than 7 or 5. It's simply that 8 was the last fully traditional Dragon Quest, with no feeling of missing something when played offline. It's also the series peak in presentation (DQ X looked much less detailed and lush, despite being developed for a nominally more powerful system than the PS2). High end presentation is probably not reasonable to expect from the next game, with a high likelihood for the 3DS to be the platform of choice. It does however give DQ8 an edge in people's memories.To those who are saying they hope it is like 8, what do you mean? Is it all just about graphics/voice (English release only)? What makes 8 in your guys' minds better than say 7, or 5?
Whether you count it or not, Dragon Quest 9 is a "main game in the series."Technically when a games been on consoles its whole life i dont count handheld as main games in the series... sure the handheld versions were pretty decent... but not relevant in my eyes. i want main iterations of great games on home consoles, not bite sized mobile games...
Technically when a games been on consoles its whole life i dont count handheld as main games in the series... sure the handheld versions were pretty decent... but not relevant in my eyes. i want main iterations of great games on home consoles, not bite sized mobile games...
Technically when a games been on consoles its whole life i dont count handheld as main games in the series... sure the handheld versions were pretty decent... but not relevant in my eyes. i want main iterations of great games on home consoles, not bite sized mobile games...
DQ9 was released in Europe. So in context of the conversation I quoted, there's no reason to invalidate it for any other reason aside from handheld snobbery, which is silly. And that's coming from someone who doesn't buy handheld consoles.
My grip on reality is just fine.
Irrelevant since VIII?DQ hasnt been relevant since VIII, at this point id bet on seeing Blue Dragon 2 on XB1 (or consoles) before a new DQ on Consoles (one that isnt handheld or mobile) (and yes i know theyre different developers and dont have anything to do with each other... im just saying...)
If the PS4 gets a DQ title it will probably be X since Nintendo is open to multiplatform online
Irrelevant since VIII?
What happened to IX?
sörine;109690072 said:Only the first KH ever did 4m+ in the west. KH2 didn't and KH3 probably won't either.
If the PS4 gets a DQ title it will probably be X since Nintendo is open to multiplatform online
Irrelevant since VIII?
What happened to IX?
However, when Horii made the comment, Dragon Quest X producer Yosuke Saito and chief planner Anzai Takashi looked as though they werent expecting him to say that, as if it might have been something he shouldnt have said.
okay you caught me... i didnt play IX because i didnt own a DS for very long... its just weird counting mobile or handheld games as part of the main line... i know it IS part of the main series... its just...
ehhhh... i just want a full fledged homeconsolepowered title...
PS4 would melt around the world trying to run that in real time, so no.
Will temper expectations until platform is announced.
If Sony Bankrolled a PS4/Vita exclusive version of this they could sell a ton of systems in Japan.
dammit this, hopefully, a full console version, but SE does love that 3DS,, so I'm not getting my hopes up for anything..
If SE loved the 3DS then where's my FF V and VI remake ;_;dammit this, hopefully, a full console version, but SE does love that 3DS,, so I'm not getting my hopes up for anything..
That would be quite the expensive moneyhat.
Yes.When did they say that they weren't making any more? LOL
I've never played any of the Dragon Quest games before. Should I pick up DQ9 on the DS?
That would be quite the expensive moneyhat.
Platform is irrelevant if it doesn't get localized.
Expecting 3DS/Mobile myself.
You don't think it would be worth it to lock-in Japan with PS4 sales? It's already dominating console sales everywhere else.
It probably will be 3DS, but I so doubt it'll be mobile. Now an eventual port to mobile is a different story.
I want a good console DQ, VIII is still best in the series and something 9 doesn't even come close to.
It would probably cost a fraction of what Square Enix has bankrolled for Final Fantasy XV.
You don't think it would be worth it to lock-in Japan with PS4 sales? It's already dominating console sales everywhere else.
IX had the better gameplay (class change, treasure map, better overworld, story), but I'd want all that on a full HD console version way more though.I want a good console DQ, VIII is still best in the series and something 9 doesn't even come close to.
People wanting it to not be on a Nintendo platform are forgetting that Nintendo is probably the only way the game would be translated to begin with.
4HOL/BD replaced them. They're not doing FFIII/IV DS level remakes on any platform now, iOS/Android get janky ports while VC/PSN get roms.If SE loved the 3DS then where's my FF V and VI remake ;_;
People wanting it to not be on a Nintendo platform are forgetting that Nintendo is probably the only way the game would be translated to begin with.
Other than the IQ, I don't really see anything unachievable in that for PS4. The character models are fairly simple, the assets aren't anything too wonderful otherwise either, the texture work isn't anything too amazing and while they might have to tone down some of the vegetation, it probably shouldn't have to be anything too much worse than what is in that trailer.PS4 would melt around the world trying to run that in real time, so no.
FFXV has been in full development only from mid 2011 and not with a Ubisoft/Rockstar-like 1000+ person team. While it will be an expensive project by the time they release it and they've undoubtedly spend a lot of money on it so far, I doubt it's as expensive as you are imagining it is. Certainly nowhere close to the kind of sums Sony would have to spend to moneyhat a PS4 exclusive DQXI in a situation where SQEX was planning to develop it for something else and Sony wanted them to change their minds.It would probably cost a fraction of what Square Enix has bankrolled for Final Fantasy XV.
Depends. If it was for PS4, then SQEX would undoubtedly localize it themselves, as PS4 is very strong outside Japan. If it's on 3DS, then yeah, SQEX might hesitate releasing it outside Japan. DS hasn't really been all that good for DQ, other than IX.People wanting it to not be on a Nintendo platform are forgetting that Nintendo is probably the only way the game would be translated to begin with.
Depends. If it was for PS4, then SQEX would undoubtedly localize it themselves, as PS4 is very strong outside Japan. If it's on 3DS, then yeah, SQEX might hesitate releasing it outside Japan. DS hasn't really been all that good for DQ, other than IX.
Thats a pretty big assumption to make.