• Hey Guest. Check out your NeoGAF Wrapped 2025 results here!

EA: "We lost some fans with Dragon Age 2"

Fredescu said:

Yes really. It's great that fantasy is going through a revival in all sorts of media right now, but I'll be damned if a lot of it ain't crappy elves and annoying dwarfs.

DA2 provided some good characters. Varric the Dwarf and Meril the quirky elf. Those were fresh and cool.

Dragon Age 1s character much like Mass Effect 1 are full of abysmal characters.
 
The_Technomancer said:
Ehhhhhh...I disgree...I think? Mass Effect has some really great lore and world building despite being utterly mediocre in almost every other respect. Maybe they can't do both.

ME2 killed that shit.
 
HK-47 said:
So? ADnD 2 sucked. BGII succeeded on content and encounter design.


Aaannnnnd... I sort of agree. I loved it at the time, but in retrospective, it's the worst D&D system.
Still, it gave Bioware the entire breath of assets (classes, spells, monsters, abilities, skills, rules, mechanics, items, everything).

The amount of balancing and adapting they had to do on those games was minimal. Compared to inventing an entirely new system with mechanics developed and balanced from the ground up, it was obscenely simple. Even the worst D&D system to date takes a shit on the vast majority of the WRPG systems. Their entire attention span could go to dialogues, story, and encounter design. They were basically sunday night Dungeon Masters designing their adventures.

And I have a share of perplexities on the consistency of their success in doing so.
 
DennisK4 said:
DA2 is nothing like Mass Effect 1
Right. It's a better game.

EDIT: AH FUCK, I thought you wrote ME2 for some reason. I'll leave this anyway:

I LOVE TALKING ABOUT THIS

ME1 - Better ideas and story, horrible execution

ME2 - Rather than make those awesome ideas work, they're scrapped and replaced with a game that winds up being a lot better than ME1 (even though I'd like to have seen what they ended up with if they decided to just fix the problems)
 
Vigilant Walrus said:
Yes really. It's great that fantasy is going through a revival in all sorts of media right now, but I'll be damned if a lot of it ain't crappy elves and annoying dwarfs.

DA2 provided some good characters. Varric the Dwarf and Meril the quirky elf. Those were fresh and cool.

Dragon Age 1s character much like Mass Effect 1 are full of abysmal characters.

When you can sum about Merrill's entire character in two words, that character is a piece of shit.
 
Reusing the same 3 locations for every battle in the game and having the enemies spawn from thin air during every battle was sure innovative EA!

If you want to realize how much this game sucks ass go play the witcher 2 for 30 minutes.
 
epmode said:
Right. It's a better game.

I LOVE TALKING ABOUT THIS

ME1 - Better ideas and story, horrible execution

ME2 - Rather than make those awesome ideas work, they're scrapped and replaced with a game that winds up being a lot better than ME1 (even though I'd like to have seen what they ended up with if they decided to just fix the problems)
I am trying to comprehend what I am reading here....you are saying DA2 > ME1 ?
 
Game2Death said:
So is the consensus here that the first is really good?

C7bB8.gif
 
HK-47 said:
When you can sum about Merrill's entire character in two words, that character is a piece of shit.

You can do the same for the entire Origins cast, and you can generally do so using *names* and not adjectives.
 
Game2Death said:
So is the consensus here that the first is really good? I have a PC that could play it.

Its ok. you could do a lot better though. just get an infinity engine game.
 
Game2Death said:
So is the consensus here that the first is really good? I have a PC that could play it.
Well, here were the results of 2009's GotY thread: http://www.neogaf.com/forum/showpost.php?p=19253957&postcount=17

NeoGAF 2009 GotY Awards said:
(Rank) (Game Title) (Total Points)
01 Uncharted 2: Among Thieves 1690
02 Batman: Arkham Asylum 905
03 Demon's Souls 613
04 Dragon Age: Origins 593
05 Assassin's Creed 2 513
06 New Super Mario Bros. Wii 452
07 Killzone 2 447
08 Street Fighter IV 414
09 Infamous 396
10 Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 2 383
11 Borderlands 284
12 Flower 272
13 Left 4 Dead 2 217
14 Resident Evil 5 195
15 Torchlight 180
16 Halo 3: ODST 147
17 Shadow Complex 140
18 Forza Motorsport 3 135
19 Ratchet & Clank: A Crack in Time 97
20 Mario and Luigi 3: Bowser's Inside Story 87
20 Trials HD 87
I suspect the sequel won't make the top 20 though. :P
 
The two big problems I had with DA2:

1) Repeated environments / textures. I traveled the same areas far too often.

2) How encounters would have reinforcements pop in out of nowhere, making initial tactical placement worthless.


I liked the faster paced fighting in DA2 despite some abilities being quite imbalanced, but key elements were executed incorrectly. As a single playthrough though, I enjoyed DA2 - unlike other Bioware games, however, there is not a chance I'll be playing through it again.

Btw, the only correct romance in that game was Rival Merrill.
 
HK-47 said:
Sum them up then.


SPOILERS


Alister: Disney's King Arthur - lovable heir to the throne who doesn't really want power but will stand up to his duty after having basically claimed everyone else is more suited to it than him. Socially inept.
Morrighan: Morgana (still from the Arthurian myths!) - oh look, the cynical witch who wants a child from the hero for her own agenda. They weren't even trying.
Oghren: Generic Dwarf 03. Peter Jackson's Gimli.
Sten: where do I even begin? Worff? Helt? Any generic fantasy big dude?


Really, I don't need to go on. The 2 most praised characters in the game are pathetically blatant ripoffs.
 
VisanidethDM said:
SPOILERS


Alister: Disney's King Arthur - lovable heir to the throne who doesn't really want power but will stand up to his duty after having basically claimed everyone else is more suited to it than him. Socially inept.
Morrighan: Morgana (still from the Arthurian myths!) - oh look, the cynical witch who wants a child from the hero for her own agenda. They weren't even trying.
Oghren: Generic Dwarf 03. Peter Jackson's Gimli.
Sten: where do I even begin? Worff? Helt? Any generic fantasy big dude?


Really, I don't need to go on. The 2 most praised characters in the game are pathetically blatant ripoffs.

To be fair you can't really fault stories for having "similar characters". When you consider the 7 Steps of the Hero's Journey and the Heroic Archetypes you are going to step on alot of toes.
 
GrandHarrier said:
To be fair you can't really fault stories for having "similar characters". When you consider the 7 Steps of the Hero's Journey and the Heroic Archetypes you are going to step on alot of toes.

That's agreeable, but DA:O doesn't even try to break away from the stereotype. It dives in and rolls in the mud screaming "RELATE WITH ME! RELATE WITH ME! I'M THAT THING YOU ALREADY KNOW ABOUT! I'M ACCESSIBLE! I'M LIKE YOU!".

Besides, you can make "cardboard" characters with charm (think Minsc) and you can make stereotyped characters that validate their uniqueness (think Garrus). And I'm just sticking to Bioware games.
 
Margalis said:
Clearly they don't understand. If they did they wouldn't lay the blame on the fans for not appreciating all the exciting "innovations."

Fucking this. How full of yourself do you have to be to be like "you know the fans didn't appreciate the revolution that was Dragon Age 2".
 
VisanidethDM said:
That's agreeable, but DA:O doesn't even try to break away from the stereotype. It dives in and rolls in the mud screaming "RELATE WITH ME! RELATE WITH ME! I'M THAT THING YOU ALREADY KNOW ABOUT! I'M ACCESSIBLE! I'M LIKE YOU!".

Leiliana? A foreign spy who broke away to become a priestess, but finds herself dragged back into the middle of combat, but still struggling to keep her faith?

I mean, it's not unique or anything, but it's hardly cliched. Same with Morrigan and her relationship with her caretaker.

Alistair was Carth 2.0. Sten was boring as wood. Oghram was Jackson's Gimli.
 
WanderingWind said:
Leiliana? A foreign spy who broke away to become a priestess, but finds herself dragged back into the middle of combat, but still struggling to keep her faith?

I mean, it's not unique or anything, but it's hardly cliched. Same with Morrigan and her relationship with her caretaker.

Alistair was Carth 2.0. Sten was boring as wood. Oghram was Jackson's Gimli.


Leiliana was a good character IMHO. But overall, DA2's cast was definitely not inferior. Bioware didn't change attitude (Fenris is Wolverine, Meryll is Tali), but some characters (and ironically, the "nasty" ones) came out better than most of the DA:O ones.
 
VisanidethDM said:
That's agreeable, but DA:O doesn't even try to break away from the stereotype. It dives in and rolls in the mud screaming "RELATE WITH ME! RELATE WITH ME! I'M THAT THING YOU ALREADY KNOW ABOUT! I'M ACCESSIBLE! I'M LIKE YOU!".

Besides, you can make "cardboard" characters with charm (think Minsc) and you can make stereotyped characters that validate their uniqueness (think Garrus). And I'm just sticking to Bioware games.

it's funny but I can relate to Bioware's villains more than my party members. At least their villains are more or less human and make mistakes. I also like Wynne because she was talking about stuff I have experienced. That's pretty much it. Garrus and Tali are totally overrated.

oh, I also like Jacob because he was extremely normal and therefore resembled a real human (and was labeled "bland" and "uninteresting" because of it).
 
HK-47 said:
When you can sum about Merrill's entire character in two words, that character is a piece of shit.

Ehh no. She was AWESOME. A complete failure. Flawed, pathethic, broken. a relateable elf. I DIED when she had her entire clan killed. her middle name must be WRONG CHOICES because that's all she did.

And that's why she was my love interest, when I got dumbed by the slutty sea pirate, who probably had a surgically removed penis anyway.






Also Alistar was much more than Carth 2.0. Carth 2.0 was Lieutenant Kaidan Alenko.
 
Vigilant Walrus said:
Ehh no. She was AWESOME. A complete failure. Flawed, pathethic, broken. a relateable elf. I DIED when she had her entire clan killed. her middle name must be WRONG CHOICES because that's all she did.

And that's why she was my love interest, when I got dumbed by the slutty sea pirate, who probably had a surgically removed penis anyway.






Also Alistar was much more than Carth 2.0. Carth 2.0 was Lieutenant Kaidan Alenko.

No, Kaidan was Carth Beta.
 
VisanidethDM said:
That's agreeable, but DA:O doesn't even try to break away from the stereotype. It dives in and rolls in the mud screaming "RELATE WITH ME! RELATE WITH ME! I'M THAT THING YOU ALREADY KNOW ABOUT! I'M ACCESSIBLE! I'M LIKE YOU!".

Besides, you can make "cardboard" characters with charm (think Minsc) and you can make stereotyped characters that validate their uniqueness (think Garrus). And I'm just sticking to Bioware games.

Oh I agree. One of my favorite book series of all time is the Belgariad. And that has some of the most tropiest tropes that ever did trope for characters. So its entirely possible. But it can't be all that surprising if and when characters fall flat.
 
HK-47 said:
When you can sum about Merrill's entire character in two words, that character is a piece of shit.
Thats all of Bioware's characters for the last 7 years. I doubt the BG characters hold up that great when you hold them up to the same scrutiny.
 
truly101 said:
Thats all of Bioware's characters for the last 7 years. I doubt the BG characters hold up that great when you hold them up to the same scrutiny.

they don't but I just started the game. More text =/= better characters.
 
subversus said:
they don't but I just started the game. More text =/= better characters.
Anyone who expects more from a video game character than generic weekday afternoon cartoon characters is setting themselves up for disappointment. Why bother? Shepard isn't any better than GI Joe's Duke, Saren is certainly no Cobra Commander Its well past time to just accept that and move on.
 
truly101 said:
Good, ME1 was an awful RPG. Good game, turrible RPG.
I think (hope?) when people say they want Mass Effect to "return to ME1," they mean the type of game ME1 tried to be, not what it actually was. Because ME1 was a mess in a lot of ways.
 
truly101 said:
Anyone who expects more from a video game character than generic weekday afternoon cartoon characters is setting themselves up for disappointment. Why bother? Shepard isn't any better than GI Joe's Duke, Saren is certainly no Cobra Commander Its well past time to just accept that and move on.
Torment got it right so it's definitely possible.
 
EA, the only people that are 'fans' of you are the people who are oblivious to what you do. You may publish some nice games every now and then, but they certainly don't benefit from your presence.

"Innovations and things we've done"...what a weak apology, lol.
 
epmode said:
Torment got it right so it's definitely possible.

I'm sort of sick of Torment being trotted out in every RPG discussion like this. It's practically the poster child for the phrase "the exception, rather than the rule." And while the story and world were excellent, the actual gameplay was terrible, even for its time. And the world was straight taken from other sources. So to compare a game that has to build it's own world is kinda unrealistic.

The writing in Torment is still unmatched, however, so I'm not shitting on the game or anything. But let's at least recognize that it has a lot of flaws that other RPGs get raked over the coals for.
 
truly101 said:
Anyone who expects more from a video game character than generic weekday afternoon cartoon characters is setting themselves up for disappointment. Why bother? Shepard isn't any better than GI Joe's Duke, Saren is certainly no Cobra Commander Its well past time to just accept that and move on.

The Witcher 2, Bioshock, Planescape Torment, Vampires Masquerade Bloodlines and some other games had a great cast of characters. Your argument became foul almost 10 years ago. I'd add Red Dead Redemption there but these are just cutscenes.
 
WanderingWind said:
I'm sort of sick of Torment being trotted out in every RPG discussion like this. It's practically the poster child for the phrase "the exception, rather than the rule." And while the story and world were excellent, the actual gameplay was terrible, even for its time. And the world was straight taken from other sources. So to compare a game that has to build it's own world is kinda unrealistic.

The writing in Torment is still unmatched, however, so I'm not shitting on the game or anything. But let's at least recognize that it has a lot of flaws that other RPGs get raked over the coals for.

You need to approach Torment more as an interactive novel than a standard video game. I don't think that's necessarily a bad thing, either.
 
Zefah said:
You need to approach Torment more as an interactive novel than a standard video game. I don't think that's necessarily a bad thing, either.

I agree, but it is still classified as a game. And if we're going to hold another RPG to a set of standards, we can't pretend that Torment was any better in those regards.
 
WanderingWind said:
I'm sort of sick of Torment being trotted out in every RPG discussion like this. It's practically the poster child for the phrase "the exception, rather than the rule." And while the story and world were excellent, the actual gameplay was terrible, even for its time. And the world was straight taken from other sources. So to compare a game that has to build it's own world is kinda unrealistic.

The writing in Torment is still unmatched, however, so I'm not shitting on the game or anything. But let's at least recognize that it has a lot of flaws that other RPGs get raked over the coals for.

Because other RPGs arent structured like Torment. Its an evolution of the text adventure in the skin of an RPG. And I hate when people only consider combat with gameplay. And while Torment's world is taken from Planescape, thats a TTRPG, so its made for creating stories. Not to mention matching up to Planescape, probably the most interesting and best written TT universe ever, is a pretty mean feat.
 
DennisK4 said:
Baldur's Gate II was a much better game than Torment and gameplay-wise a much better comparison to DA

Its has better combat and more content. The content isnt has good and the story and dialogue side of the gameplay is vastly inferior.
 
Top Bottom