Fredescu said:Really?
DA2 is nothing like Mass Effect 1vocab said:"We tried to innovate"
Just stop. You looked at Mass Effect 1 for your innovation and copy and pasted.
The_Technomancer said:Ehhhhhh...I disgree...I think? Mass Effect has some really great lore and world building despite being utterly mediocre in almost every other respect. Maybe they can't do both.
HK-47 said:So? ADnD 2 sucked. BGII succeeded on content and encounter design.
Right. It's a better game.DennisK4 said:DA2 is nothing like Mass Effect 1
Vigilant Walrus said:Yes really. It's great that fantasy is going through a revival in all sorts of media right now, but I'll be damned if a lot of it ain't crappy elves and annoying dwarfs.
DA2 provided some good characters. Varric the Dwarf and Meril the quirky elf. Those were fresh and cool.
Dragon Age 1s character much like Mass Effect 1 are full of abysmal characters.
I am trying to comprehend what I am reading here....you are saying DA2 > ME1 ?epmode said:Right. It's a better game.
I LOVE TALKING ABOUT THIS
ME1 - Better ideas and story, horrible execution
ME2 - Rather than make those awesome ideas work, they're scrapped and replaced with a game that winds up being a lot better than ME1 (even though I'd like to have seen what they ended up with if they decided to just fix the problems)
See the edit. Sorry!DennisK4 said:I am trying to comprehend what I am reading here....you are saying DA2 > ME1 ?
HK-47 said:When you can sum about Merrill's entire character in two words, that character is a piece of shit.
Cool, I worried for your sanity a moment there....epmode said:See the edit. Sorry!
Game2Death said:So is the consensus here that the first is really good? I have a PC that could play it.
Game2Death said:So is the consensus here that the first is really good? I have a PC that could play it.
Well, here were the results of 2009's GotY thread: http://www.neogaf.com/forum/showpost.php?p=19253957&postcount=17Game2Death said:So is the consensus here that the first is really good? I have a PC that could play it.
I suspect the sequel won't make the top 20 though.NeoGAF 2009 GotY Awards said:(Rank) (Game Title) (Total Points)
01 Uncharted 2: Among Thieves 1690
02 Batman: Arkham Asylum 905
03 Demon's Souls 613
04 Dragon Age: Origins 593
05 Assassin's Creed 2 513
06 New Super Mario Bros. Wii 452
07 Killzone 2 447
08 Street Fighter IV 414
09 Infamous 396
10 Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 2 383
11 Borderlands 284
12 Flower 272
13 Left 4 Dead 2 217
14 Resident Evil 5 195
15 Torchlight 180
16 Halo 3: ODST 147
17 Shadow Complex 140
18 Forza Motorsport 3 135
19 Ratchet & Clank: A Crack in Time 97
20 Mario and Luigi 3: Bowser's Inside Story 87
20 Trials HD 87
VisanidethDM said:You can do the same for the entire Origins cast, and you can generally do so using *names* and not adjectives.
HK-47 said:Sum them up then.
EA said:innovation
VisanidethDM said:SPOILERS
Alister: Disney's King Arthur - lovable heir to the throne who doesn't really want power but will stand up to his duty after having basically claimed everyone else is more suited to it than him. Socially inept.
Morrighan: Morgana (still from the Arthurian myths!) - oh look, the cynical witch who wants a child from the hero for her own agenda. They weren't even trying.
Oghren: Generic Dwarf 03. Peter Jackson's Gimli.
Sten: where do I even begin? Worff? Helt? Any generic fantasy big dude?
Really, I don't need to go on. The 2 most praised characters in the game are pathetically blatant ripoffs.
GrandHarrier said:To be fair you can't really fault stories for having "similar characters". When you consider the 7 Steps of the Hero's Journey and the Heroic Archetypes you are going to step on alot of toes.
Margalis said:Clearly they don't understand. If they did they wouldn't lay the blame on the fans for not appreciating all the exciting "innovations."
VisanidethDM said:That's agreeable, but DA:O doesn't even try to break away from the stereotype. It dives in and rolls in the mud screaming "RELATE WITH ME! RELATE WITH ME! I'M THAT THING YOU ALREADY KNOW ABOUT! I'M ACCESSIBLE! I'M LIKE YOU!".
subversus said:oh you're THAT guy.
DA2's combat is much, much worse than DA:O
WanderingWind said:Leiliana? A foreign spy who broke away to become a priestess, but finds herself dragged back into the middle of combat, but still struggling to keep her faith?
I mean, it's not unique or anything, but it's hardly cliched. Same with Morrigan and her relationship with her caretaker.
Alistair was Carth 2.0. Sten was boring as wood. Oghram was Jackson's Gimli.
VisanidethDM said:That's agreeable, but DA:O doesn't even try to break away from the stereotype. It dives in and rolls in the mud screaming "RELATE WITH ME! RELATE WITH ME! I'M THAT THING YOU ALREADY KNOW ABOUT! I'M ACCESSIBLE! I'M LIKE YOU!".
Besides, you can make "cardboard" characters with charm (think Minsc) and you can make stereotyped characters that validate their uniqueness (think Garrus). And I'm just sticking to Bioware games.
HK-47 said:When you can sum about Merrill's entire character in two words, that character is a piece of shit.
Vigilant Walrus said:Ehh no. She was AWESOME. A complete failure. Flawed, pathethic, broken. a relateable elf. I DIED when she had her entire clan killed. her middle name must be WRONG CHOICES because that's all she did.
And that's why she was my love interest, when I got dumbed by the slutty sea pirate, who probably had a surgically removed penis anyway.
Also Alistar was much more than Carth 2.0. Carth 2.0 was Lieutenant Kaidan Alenko.
VisanidethDM said:That's agreeable, but DA:O doesn't even try to break away from the stereotype. It dives in and rolls in the mud screaming "RELATE WITH ME! RELATE WITH ME! I'M THAT THING YOU ALREADY KNOW ABOUT! I'M ACCESSIBLE! I'M LIKE YOU!".
Besides, you can make "cardboard" characters with charm (think Minsc) and you can make stereotyped characters that validate their uniqueness (think Garrus). And I'm just sticking to Bioware games.
Thats all of Bioware's characters for the last 7 years. I doubt the BG characters hold up that great when you hold them up to the same scrutiny.HK-47 said:When you can sum about Merrill's entire character in two words, that character is a piece of shit.
truly101 said:Thats all of Bioware's characters for the last 7 years. I doubt the BG characters hold up that great when you hold them up to the same scrutiny.
Anyone who expects more from a video game character than generic weekday afternoon cartoon characters is setting themselves up for disappointment. Why bother? Shepard isn't any better than GI Joe's Duke, Saren is certainly no Cobra Commander Its well past time to just accept that and move on.subversus said:they don't but I just started the game. More text =/= better characters.
I think (hope?) when people say they want Mass Effect to "return to ME1," they mean the type of game ME1 tried to be, not what it actually was. Because ME1 was a mess in a lot of ways.truly101 said:Good, ME1 was an awful RPG. Good game, turrible RPG.
Torment got it right so it's definitely possible.truly101 said:Anyone who expects more from a video game character than generic weekday afternoon cartoon characters is setting themselves up for disappointment. Why bother? Shepard isn't any better than GI Joe's Duke, Saren is certainly no Cobra Commander Its well past time to just accept that and move on.
epmode said:Torment got it right so it's definitely possible.
epmode said:Torment got it right so it's definitely possible.
truly101 said:Anyone who expects more from a video game character than generic weekday afternoon cartoon characters is setting themselves up for disappointment. Why bother? Shepard isn't any better than GI Joe's Duke, Saren is certainly no Cobra Commander Its well past time to just accept that and move on.
WanderingWind said:I'm sort of sick of Torment being trotted out in every RPG discussion like this. It's practically the poster child for the phrase "the exception, rather than the rule." And while the story and world were excellent, the actual gameplay was terrible, even for its time. And the world was straight taken from other sources. So to compare a game that has to build it's own world is kinda unrealistic.
The writing in Torment is still unmatched, however, so I'm not shitting on the game or anything. But let's at least recognize that it has a lot of flaws that other RPGs get raked over the coals for.
Zefah said:You need to approach Torment more as an interactive novel than a standard video game. I don't think that's necessarily a bad thing, either.
epmode said:Torment got it right so it's definitely possible.
zoukka said:This example does not apply anymore.
WanderingWind said:I'm sort of sick of Torment being trotted out in every RPG discussion like this. It's practically the poster child for the phrase "the exception, rather than the rule." And while the story and world were excellent, the actual gameplay was terrible, even for its time. And the world was straight taken from other sources. So to compare a game that has to build it's own world is kinda unrealistic.
The writing in Torment is still unmatched, however, so I'm not shitting on the game or anything. But let's at least recognize that it has a lot of flaws that other RPGs get raked over the coals for.
DennisK4 said:Baldur's Gate II was a much better game than Torment and gameplay-wise a much better comparison to DA