There seems to a very strong vocal
Minority that values 1080p over locked 60 FPS. I could quote a long line of posts if you wish, but would I prefer to use my time more productively.
The reason Wolfenstein had no backlash is because there was no marketing deal and no instance of "parity" before that to make people skeptical like there has been now with D3, Destiny and ACU.
There is a clear difference between how things were then and how they are now and if you can't see that, then I don't even know what to say.
Also, Destiny and D3 were always 1080p on PS4 even though there was "parity", if this wasn't the case for AW I believe it would be bigger than those scenarios.
I'm sure some would believe that the PS4 is just being held back whether it is actually true or not due to the nature of the situation.
Also, I never said it would be everyone, " I said some will care about it and others won't." Of course I don't think that everyone will. Not everyone cared about ACU either or thought that it was forced by Microsoft, but I believe that the outcry would be bigger than the current scenario we have here. I find it funny that you actually believe that "they won't even represent a minority", but I won't hold that over your head. I also don't see those individuals getting constantly ridiculed either, but sure.
It might not be as big as the ACU thread because that one had awful PR, but I think it would be bad because of the line of events that happened before it leading to a lot of skepticism, not necessarily whether it's a bad or good thing for the game (as that varies from person to person).
I don't know why you keep saying that I said it's the same situation either, when I never said that. I mean anyone with half a brain knows that there would be a difference in PR so you're not really telling me anything there. Even without the PR, the ACU situation still would've been big. The horrible PR just inflated it even more.
Also, I missed nothing. By the time that I posted that(10th page), pretty much everyone already knew about the difference in the multiplayer resolution and many knew about it long before this thread when Sledgehammer themselves talked about it.
The only "new" news was how the campaigns ran and that's what I discussed because that is what was relevant at the time that I posted. You replying to my post saying that I should mention multiplayer when I already mentioned the dynamic scaling effectively accomplished nothing and makes it seem like you're just trying to start an argument.
We both have our stance on the matter and that's fine. I really disagree with what you're saying, but I'd rather be playing Sunset or AW right now than banter over a scenario that will never happen.
I never intended for this to be a hot topic anyway until you quoted me for whatever reason. There was no issue with the post.