ThreePiMatt
Member
Kotaku, of course, not above kicking someone when they're down. The guy has apologized and his career more or less ruined but Kotaku has got more articles to write.
"i will kiss you on the vagina"
goddamn indiestatik dude, you are the dumbest piece of shit ROFL
... So why didn't she said anything? The guy does come off as a comply sexist idiot but a think She should of told him to stop those comments if she decided to go public or else it really comes off as a one side story.
This is a pretty apt comparison.That level of thirst is something i'd expect from a stream monster trolling on twitch.tv
Kotaku, of course, not above kicking someone when they're down. The guy has apologized and his career more or less ruined but Kotaku has got more articles to write.
She addresses this in the new article. She was dumbfounded and continued to answer his original query hoping he would just drop it. She was also struggling as to whether or not her outright rebuffing would burn a bridge with a potential press contact.
That was uncomfortable to read.
Apologies for my ignorance here, but why would you want somebody like that as a press contact? No thank you.
Kotaku, of course, not above kicking someone when they're down. The guy has apologized and his career more or less ruined but Kotaku has got more articles to write.
can someone point me to the other thread about this topic?
I remember Jaffe was on a roll there, I want to know how it all ended.
If I had to guess, I'd say there must've been several bans out of that thread.
I don't see how this story says anything about the industry judging by the chat log. Is it because she is a developer or because he happen to know who she is and wanted to pull down her pants? Otherwise this is just a story of what women have to deal with from guys who don't know any better and are sexually frustrated.It's not really about kicking him while he's down. The article is citing this incident only to spur on a broader conversation on what women in the industry have to deal with and if it can change.
I am mortified by my behavior as it was not only completely inappropriate, but it was fueled by alcohol and depression. My younger brother committed suicide last year and ever since then I haven’t been myself.
Kotaku, of course, not above kicking someone when they're down. The guy has apologized and his career more or less ruined but Kotaku has got more articles to write.
I don't understand why game devs seem to be so backed up. They really don't have to be desperate and creep on women, especially the ones that they work with. Is there something wrong with going out and meeting women and not dropping creeper lines. If dudes are backed up that bad there are hook up apps available. No need to hold in until the point where you give off "I'm gonna hump you and you'll like it," vibes and saying stupid shit because you're awkward and backed up to your eye balls with semen.
That makes sense he'll defend any and everything....but David Jaffe's going to try anyway!
I've learned this too. Yet somehow I always scroll down and peek. I don't even realize that I do it until it's too late. I think I need help. ;_;If I've learned anything from the internet, don't ever read the comments.
... So why didn't she said anything? The guy does come off as a complete sexist idiot but I think She should of told him to stop those comments if she decided to go public or else it really comes off as a one sided story.
Aaaaaand here we go. Nevermind that the article addresses this already huh, we gotta think of the poor harasser. Stupid wench couldn't just "deal with it" and had to ruin a man's career, dammit!"You're being a bit creepy. . ."
Not really sure how the above doesn't end the conversation, and place the guys comments in context for him. The guy is obviously weird and boundary crossing, but have we really evolved to this kind of society where they "best" thing to do is air every bit of dirty laundry/inappropriate behavior instead of you know - dealing with it.
Kotaku, of course, not above kicking someone when they're down. The guy has apologized and his career more or less ruined but Kotaku has got more articles to write.
Based on some of the posts and comments I've seen, not nearly often enough.How many times are they going to run this story?
I don't see how this story says anything about the industry judging by the chat log. Is it because she is a developer or because he happen to know who she is and wanted to pull down her pants? Otherwise this is just a story of what women have to deal with from guys who don't know any better and are sexually frustrated.
"You're being a bit creepy. . ."
Not really sure how the above doesn't end the conversation, and place the guys comments in context for him. The guy is obviously weird and boundary crossing, but have we really evolved to this kind of society where they "best" thing to do is air every bit of dirty laundry/inappropriate behavior instead of you know - dealing with it.
Calling it a "major" website is a bit of a stretch. The guy ran a Kickstarter to raise $35k just to keep the site afloat.
I am surprised at Kotaku's restrain to not include the perspective of David "The signal" Jaffe, but then again the story is about a woman being harassed.
Oh God. I was aware of Jaffe's stance on this issue, but was unaware of that particular comment. By not telling him to fuck off she was signalling that it was okay?! Come on, man. Jesus, why does anyone think it's okay to talk to someone like this unless they specifically say it's not wanted?
"Won't somebody think of the thirsty?"Kotaku, of course, not above kicking someone when they're down. The guy has apologized and his career more or less ruined but Kotaku has got more articles to write.
Morrigan Targaryen said:Aaaaaand here we go. Nevermind that the article addresses this already huh, we gotta think of the poor harasser. Stupid wench couldn't just "deal with it" and had to ruin a man's career, dammit!
I think he means that since she is getting divorced her vagina is open for business and she was hinting at it by bringing it up.
She addresses this in the new article. She was dumbfounded and continued to answer his original query hoping he would just drop it. She was also struggling as to whether or not her outright rebuffing would burn a bridge with a potential press contact.
Now people can stop with the bullshit victim blaming "oh why didn't she just tell him to stop?!".
Why do I even bother to ninja edit, anyway I did read the article linked and I definitely understand her state of mind but I still can't take this kind of one sided story at face value.
Why do I even bother to ninja edit, anyway I did read the article linked and I definitely understand her state of mind but I still can't take this kind of one sided story at face value.
Solely based on what posted I think the guy is a sexist pig I'm not defending is comments but I will hold further judgment faced with what I've read.I've learned this too. Yet somehow I always scroll down and peek. I don't even realize that I do it until it's too late. I think I need help. ;_;
Aaaaaand here we go. Nevermind that the article addresses this already huh, we gotta think of the poor harasser. Stupid wench couldn't just "deal with it" and had to ruin a man's career, dammit!
Based on some of the posts and comments I've seen, not nearly often enough.
Kotaku, of course, not above kicking someone when they're down. The guy has apologized and his career more or less ruined but Kotaku has got more articles to write.