Monkeygourmet
Banned
Seeing this makes me really, really want a sequel to Infamous Second Son. I loved the Seattle setting of that title and it still looks incredible to this day, gameplay was very fun also just the city was a little ‘empty’
-
Hey, guest user. Hope you're enjoying NeoGAF! Have you considered registering for an account? Come join us and add your take to the daily discourse.
First Spider-Man Remaster Gameplay on PS5
- Thread starter Maxwell Jacob Friedman
- Start date
- Trailer
Imtjnotu
Member
Might do a play through on both just to enjoy both
Sethbacca
Member
It's me. I'm that guy. Screw 60fps mode. I'll take visuals mode all day on this and MM.
Umbral
Member
Higher framerates resolve motion better, preserving detail when things are moving, so it does in fact “look” better.
Last edited:
I must admit that while the 60fps does look great, this is a very very smooth 30fps. It looks really good.
I'm going to experiment with both and see what I prefer. But from what I've seen so far that RT is going to be hard to give up. It looks REALLY good, some of the best I've seen.
EDMIX
Member
Agreed. I'm ok with that with this remaster.
SafeOrAlone
Banned
I'm not even going to look at ray tracing, because I don't need that kind of fomo in my life. I know I'll just barely prefer 60fps over it and I don't want to face that comedown when I switch over.
I don't know how much it's to do with how different individuals process moving images (maybe some people are more sensitive to it than others) but to me at least 60fps LOOKS much better as well as feels much better.
It's a little bit like hugely increasing the resolution of the image, to me. I can suddenly appreciate the details much more clearly as the action plays out. It's like I have a constant focus on the screen whereas there's more of a vague impression of things at 30fps.
It's a big difference to me. It's a much much bigger difference than 1440p and 4K, say. For me, anyway.
Krappadizzle
Member
Game looks so much better at 60fps.
Bo_Hazem
Banned
Screenshots being cooked! Taken from Tom Warren's video of Spider-Man Remastered on PS5:
(Note: These are video stills, not photo mode)
(Note: These are video stills, not photo mode)
Fbh
Member
It looks good but I sort of need a direct comparison. Other than the nicer reflections it looks pretty similar to how I remember it looking on ps4 Pro. The 60fps mode is really nice and it's also great that based on the Miles Morales analysis from Digital foundry it's an actual locked 60 fps mode and not one of those uneven "targeting 60fps" ones.
New Peter sucks.
He looks too young, which doesn't fit the setting as he is supposed to be somewhat experienced already. And he looks too much like "Not Tom Holland" which gives it the same awkward look as the Avengers Game.
New Peter sucks.
He looks too young, which doesn't fit the setting as he is supposed to be somewhat experienced already. And he looks too much like "Not Tom Holland" which gives it the same awkward look as the Avengers Game.
mckmas8808
Mckmaster uses MasterCard to buy Slave drives
Very interesting take. I guess some are more sensitive to it than others like you said. I NEED that RT though.
Jon Neu
Banned
Arachnid
Member
Yeah, I'm waiting for a Splinter Cell game to take full advantage of ray tracing. That will be the pinnacle.
Vick
Member
What's indisputable is that the panel's way of handling motion plays a huge role, almost as prominent as the nature of said panel between CRT, plasma, LCD and OLED.
The Fartist
Gold Member
VFXVeteran right now:Screenshots being cooked! Taken from Tom Warren's video of Spider-Man Remastered on PS5:
(Note: These are video stills, not photo mode)
Bo_Hazem
Banned
VFXVeteran right now:
That's nothing, btw, wait for the next batch.
skneogaf
Member
I assume dynamic resolution with ray tracing and a few tweaks here ab
Dynamic resolution is the in thing so no problem with allowing whatever machine it's on to do as much resolution as possible and if pro version of the consoles come out then they can go much higher.
Dynamic resolution is the in thing so no problem with allowing whatever machine it's on to do as much resolution as possible and if pro version of the consoles come out then they can go much higher.
dano1
A Sheep
Same here. Need to see every pixel on my 4K tv!
Umbral
Member
I’d rather have a consistent resolution and consistent framerate. I hope this trend of dynamic resolution dies soon.
dano1
A Sheep
Bo_Hazem
Banned
Second batch of screenshots, focusing on the insane details from a video by GameRiot. Note that these are video stills, not photo mode so there are so much details lost in the process:
Insanely detailed body hair! Crazy!
Insanely detailed body hair! Crazy!
mckmas8808
Mckmaster uses MasterCard to buy Slave drives
Second batch of screenshots, focusing on the insane details from a video by GameRiot. Note that these are video stills, not photo mode so there are so much details lost in the process:
Insanely detailed body hair! Crazy!
INSANE! Thanks for these.
looks like some ppl are rly esnsitive to fps or they just pretend they are. i mean first you need to have proper HDTV to notice those diff on consoles. not on monitor , on HDTV thats where consoles will be connected anyway.
im ok with 30fps for everything, so full visual modes for me plz, thank you.
im ok with 30fps for everything, so full visual modes for me plz, thank you.
Bo_Hazem
Banned
Some have OLED's, and they really have bad stutter at 30-24fps.
N30RYU
Member
Miles should have this too
Karmic Raze
Member
Second batch of screenshots, focusing on the insane details from a video by GameRiot. Note that these are video stills, not photo mode so there are so much details lost in the process:
Insanely detailed body hair! Crazy!
Looks amazing. I’m actually really glad I waited to play this game now.
Lethal01
Member
Lethal01
Member
Not as weird as having bad lighting.
Fake
Member
You don't need to understand. Just to accept. I'll pick native 4k30 at my first play because of my new TV and after beat the game my next will be the 60 fps mode.
Now, if you're talking about 'multiplayer' thats is another story.
The way I try to explain it is that it's not so much that 30 looks bad - it looks fine, really, tbh - but that 60 just looks REALLY good. Way clearer - the image really pops.
I'm not some fundamentalist about it - Uncharted 4 at 30fps still looks WAY better than Uncharted 3 at 60fps - but when the trade off is something like resolution, especially now 4K is such a ridiculously high base, then I'd almost always choose the extra frames.
Certainly the footage I've seen so far of Miles Morales, I've tended to be much more wowed by the performance mode than the fidelity one.
Monkeygourmet
Banned
People should really get used to the 30fps modes as once the gen rolls on 60fps options will likely disappear.
I can’t believe for a second the next gen Assassins Creed title will have a 60fps option, for example.
I can’t believe for a second the next gen Assassins Creed title will have a 60fps option, for example.
Games of Today
Member
Now please can I just have the option to play with Peter's original face. There was nothing wrong with it and I honestly think the new face is so much worse.
pixelation
Member
He looks a thousand times better than the PS4 Peter, you must be in need of glasses dude.
Last edited:
Vick
Member
I knew it looked very different as i didn't recall the intro looking as ''flat'' in the original.
Nice to have a more ''correct'' and ''realistic'' upgrade, but since i'll have to keep a Pro for P.T. anyway i can totally see myself playing the original version from time to time, given how much artistic difference there is between the two.
Last edited:
EDMIX
Member
Second batch of screenshots, focusing on the insane details from a video by GameRiot. Note that these are video stills, not photo mode so there are so much details lost in the process:
Insanely detailed body hair! Crazy!
Nice! I can only imagine what Insomniac have in store for Spiderman 2
Vick
Member
High quality videos:
www.gamersyde.com
Man, this looks amazing.
Until we can show you some raw footage of Marvel's Spider-Man: Miles Morales tomorrow, we are allowed to put up a bunch of videos of Marvel’s Spider-Man Remastered. Just like in the new standalone, the game features 2 graphics modes on PS5. You can e
Until we can show you some raw footage of Marvel's Spider-Man: Miles Morales tomorrow, we are allowed to put up a bunch of videos of Marvel’s Spider-Man Remastered. Just like in the new standalone, the game features 2 graphics modes on PS5. You can either choose to play with the Fidelity mode...
www.gamersyde.com
Man, this looks amazing.
Basically im saying reducing the resolution to 1440p and doubling the fps to 60 doesn't leave enough headroom for Ray Tracing with consoles. For a Nvidia 2080 yea sure, for a XSX or PS5 no.
1440p/60fps is 89% the pixel throughput of 4k/30fps. Not enough headroom for Ray Tracing for Consoles.
But 1080p/60fps is half (50%) the pixel throughput of 4k/30fps, thus enough headroom to implement Ray Tracing for Consoles.
Last edited:
Vick
Member
Had to boot the original game after all these videos and the hype suddenly collapsed.
1) The game feels super smooth to play, both for character responsiveness and camera speed and clarity in motion. Don't know what magic they used but i'd never compromise visuals for an FPS increse in what i'm playing. What an incredible job they did.
2) Visuals themselves are jaw-dropping, even more so than any video i've seen of the Remastered. The motion blur shutter speed, DoF, lighting, shadows, everthing just punches you right in the face. Just took these completely randomly in the span of 5 minutes, i after switched to the Animated Suit and the city looked photorealistic when swinging. Completely photorealistic, 100%, like a documentary or better yet, like some Who Framed Roger Rabbit shit.
1) The game feels super smooth to play, both for character responsiveness and camera speed and clarity in motion. Don't know what magic they used but i'd never compromise visuals for an FPS increse in what i'm playing. What an incredible job they did.
2) Visuals themselves are jaw-dropping, even more so than any video i've seen of the Remastered. The motion blur shutter speed, DoF, lighting, shadows, everthing just punches you right in the face. Just took these completely randomly in the span of 5 minutes, i after switched to the Animated Suit and the city looked photorealistic when swinging. Completely photorealistic, 100%, like a documentary or better yet, like some Who Framed Roger Rabbit shit.
But the 4k30 mode already has ray tracing!!!
Why would they need additional headroom to retain it in a 60fps version so long as resolution is reduced enough to equalise the total number of pixels rendered??
Last edited:
1080p/60fps is alot less expensive than 4k/30fps.
Lethal01
Member
Second batch of screenshots, focusing on the insane details from a video by GameRiot. Note that these are video stills, not photo mode so there are so much details lost in the process:
Insanely detailed body hair! Crazy!
The hair is in cutscene not gameplay.
Sorry you aren't allow to be impressed.
Last edited:
So what? You haven't answered the question. Do you even understand the question?
Lethal01
Member
Just look at this shit..
Choosing a mode be like:
You don't need to choose.
It puts you in the correct mode by default.
TGO
Hype Train conductor. Works harder than it steams.
Not just motion either, overall it can give the impression of higher resolution because of it
But that's only under the same Resolution.
Actual Higher Resolution will always look better though and as long as the framerate is stable and locked will look fantastic imo
Last edited:
Elcid
Banned
Samesies. 60 FPS feels nice in some games and feels bad in others. I genuinely prefer 30FPS in most games.