• Hey Guest. Check out your NeoGAF Wrapped 2025 results here!

Forced Camera inclusion "against consumer choice"' Says Sony

I don't actually buy that they didn't plan to ship with the camera originally. Why else would they preload the camera demo stuff on the PS4, which was one of the first things they should about the console.

No, I'm convinced they watched MS walk into a meat grinder and rapidly changed their minds, which also allowed them a very nice price point.

Preloaded games/software that require the camera on every PS4 as well as a nightlight on every single dualshock 4 controller. I don't think there's any question they intended to do it. Fortunately they didn't.
 
How many PS Eyes have been sold in comparison to Microsoft's Kinect? Isn't there a big gap between the two? I'm pretty sure Kinect was the fastest selling consumer electronic device of all time, so I'm sure MS market for this type of tech is different/large than Sony's. Different strokes for different folks I guess.
 
You know what else is anti-consumer, Sony?

79-261-368-TS
1,000,000 times over.
 
How? I'm still paying for both even if I just mostly want everything outside of those features.

Don't really see what you are trying to get at or say.

The camera in the iPad adds a tiny cost to the entire device. The camera with the XB1 is a massive addition to the cost. Easily on the order of 1/5 of the price.

Again, big difference between the iPad and Kinect.
 
Your question makes no sense. The iPad camera is integrated right into the device is a seamless manner. The Kinect is anything but that. It also dramatically increases the cost of the product, which is dumb when you consider how few people actually want to use it.

24 million people isn't a few. The camera obliviously couldn't be built into the box what's your solution on how to better implement it?
 
"We obviously cut the camera at the last second to easily undercut the One, now we're going to repaint it as a pro consumer move"
 
Yeah it is, you can't start some games w/o having one. Name one other device in 2013 that doesn't have internal storage.

My friend bought the Slim 360 for Halo 4 with the 4 Gig. He wanted to play online but couldn't because multiplayer required download to be installed. He was livid when he spent (100?) more on a HDD.
 
Can't believe people are falling for this.
Sell a system at a loss - gouge customers on accessories

Its nothing new and sony shouldn't be applauded for it.
 
Could it be that not including peripherals in the standard sku can doom them to obscurity? Devs can just look at the camera sales and decide its not worth it to develop games that use that tech. That said adoption of new tech vs price point, price point should be prioritized every time.
 
Controller lights and DVD licences? ITT: People who would not only fail to argue their way out of a paper bag but be talked into a ponzi scheme by it.

The fact that it's against consumer choice is not even a remotely contentious statement but here we are.
 
So you're implying that the move from a D-pad to analog sticks is the same thing as paying $100 for a gimmick that has already been a proven dud for gaming over the last several years? Just wanna be clear on how far you're actually stretching.

I think a lot of people are stretching the $100 dollars for a way more advanced camera system and OS of the Kinect. Actually the Kinect wasn't a dud. It did quite well.

Also, the Dualshock reference was that looking to the future is not a bad thing. I couldn't even think of how I used a D-pad for the things I use analog for now. I'm just saying that people are stretching what Microsoft is "trying" to do way out of proportion.

They are not forcing anyone to pay for their console so how is it anti-consumer? And like I said before, I'm a gamer and will get the PS4 first because I want to see the graphical jump and it's cheaper, but I'm going to see if Microsoft can back up the Kinect claim.

Don't be such a pessimist.
 
The card is needed to combat piracy. Sony is protecting the Vita's interest.

Holy shit. A micro SD card costs around 60$ less for 32gb. Your telling me it costs that much to implement DRM? GTFO. It's a pure money grab. Open your eyes.

Make it optional.

Why? They want it to be integral and integrated on a system level. You don't have to use it. That's like telling Sony I want an even cheaper PS4 so let me buy a HDD separately. Also I don't like the idea of a touchpad or the lightbar. Let me buy a cheaper DS4 without them. Unnecessary costs to me.
 
You can't put 'Forced Camera Anti-Consumer' in quotes in your headline, along with "says Sony" if no one said those words. OP and the person who wrote the article are both guilty of shitty reporting.
 
The camera in the iPad adds a tiny cost to the entire device. The camera with the XB1 is a massive addition to the cost. Easily on the order of 1/5 of the price.

Again, big difference between the iPad and Kinect.

It's still money that I'm being forced to pay for a feature I have no interest in.

Overall, instead of ranting/complaining, I see what other features a product has outside of something that I don't want and decide if it's still worth it. If not, I simply buy an alternative device. The whole use of the word "forced" is silly to me. No one is forcing you to spend your money. If you don't want something a device comes with to that great length then simply don't buy the device.
 
sony fucked with the memory card prices,thats a given,but psn plus aliviates that,also making your hard drive excusive ( aka 360) was also a big fuck up,i dont know sony do things in a extrange way,sometimes they do really good things ( you can change HDs,you can use bluetooth accesories,pulse headsets will work on ps4,etc,etc) and sometimes wrong things,card prices,but as i said before,i dont see many people making the same noise about apple hardware GB prices,,thats its rip off with capital letters and people seems to be ok with that

Yep. Sony have no right to play the anti consumer card after they pulled this shit.



they have the right,one thing wrong doesnt evaporates their other good things
 
24 million people isn't a few. The camera obliviously couldn't be built into the box what's your solution on how to better implement it?

This assumes people who actually bought a 360 Kinect (For whatever reasons) would want to buy another one (Considering how bad Kinect software sold, I'm guessing not many would).

Plus, that still leaves the vast majority of 360 owners who had no interest in the device being stuck with having to pay for it if they want to keep playing on Xbox next gen. What about them?

Yep. Sony have no right to play the anti consumer card after they pulled this shit.

Good thing Gara didn't play the "anti-consumer card" then, isn't it?
 
he is not joking..vita cards are expensive,and people made a big noise about that with total reason,but the difference on a 8 vs 16 gb on a ipod,iphone o ipad its 100 bucks...100 bucks for mere 8 gb but apple seems to have a pass in this thing

btw

agains consumer choice its not the same as anticonsumer

The reason is that Apple isn't selling the same or better memory card for another product (digital cameras) for 25% of the price. Sony does. At least in the PSP days I could use the memory stick for other things. This one is locked down NES/Famicom style.
 
The market will tell us in short order which approach was correct. Say, two years max.

Kinect will either have some cool implementations or it won't, while Move/Eye are practically stillborn from the third party pov.

Sony PR/Marketing has been on a roll, but they're skirting close to the edge with this one.
 
again, he never says anti-consumer.

he says its against consumer choice.

and with all the people yearning for a cheaper kinect-less bundle in other threads I'd say he's right.

however, MS sees Kinect as a full-on input device as much as a controller, so I don't think its wise to have a kinect-less box.
 
It's still money that I'm being forced to pay for a feature I have no interest in.

Overall, instead of ranting/complaining, I see what other features a product has outside of something that I don't want and decide if it's still worth it. If not, I simply buy an alternative device.

You're right about that, and that's exactly why the PS4 is going to sell a lot more than the XB1.
 
Anti consumer products by Sony:

- Securom
- Laptops that can't change batteries without changing the bios
- PSVita / Memory stick cards
- Walkman players that need to go through a client (they stopped this.)
- UltraViolet
- Camcorders which can only output to a codec that works in Sony Vegas


.... the list goes on.
 
Holy shit. A micro SD card costs around 60$ less for 32gb. Your telling me it costs that much to implement DRM? GTFO. It's a pure money grab. Open your eyes.
Open my eyes to what?

If the memory card was priced a lil bit lower most of you wouldnt be complaining about the proprietary memory card.
 
I'm pretty sure Kinect was the fastest selling consumer electronic device of all time, so I'm sure MS market for this type of tech is different/large than Sony's.

They've long since lost that record, since Apple has moved the iPhone to more carriers and started doing massive worldwide launches.

Kinect sold very well at first, but sales cratered over the next couple of years as the gimmick wore off and the games were janky and stale. 10 million sold in the first couple months, then only another 12 million sold in the 2-3 years after that.
 
The reason is that Apple isn't selling the same or better memory card for another product (digital cameras) for 25% of the price. Sony does. At least in the PSP days I could use the memory stick for other things. This one is locked down NES/Famicom style.

apple doesnt want you to use any sd card at all,thats another "free pas" they got

Anti consumer products by Sony:

- Securom
- Laptops that can't change batteries without changing the bios
- PSVita / Memory stick cards
- Walkman players that need to go through a client (they stopped this.)
- UltraViolet
- Camcorders which can only output to a codec that works in Sony Vegas


.... the list goes on.

you know sony computer entertainment its a very different thing than the rest of sony no? because if we gonna star about microsoft lawsuits on other fields...
 
If that's a real conclusion you draw from his statement, then I feel bad for you. Sometimes people amaze me.

I didn't draw any conclusions based on his statements. I can make up my own mind as to what is anti-consumer, thanks. The answer will be different for everyone, I suspect. I don't need a video game executive to tell me.

Please don't tell me that you drew any conclusions from his statements. There's nothing there.
 
They've long since lost that record, since Apple has moved the iPhone to more carriers and started doing massive worldwide launches.

Kinect sold very well at first, but sales cratered over the next couple of years as the gimmick wore off and the games were janky and stale. 10 million sold in the first couple months, then only another 12 million sold in the 2-3 years after that.

24 mil is 24 mil
 
Know what else is anti-consumer? Charging 60 dollars for a game and then forcing consumers to pay a yearly fee to access the online portion of those 60 dollar games. Sony does it though. MS made a killing doing it. Know what else is? An account system that ties your purchases to your hardware instead of to you (Nintendo).

If you're looking for a pro-consumer hobby, gaming isn't for you. Buy from the corporation that screws you the least.
 
Translation: "We wanted to beat the X1 on price as much as possible."

Edit: This post has already been misinterpreted, so I'll clarify that I'm not suggesting the camera was retroactively removed from the standard PS4 package.
I definitely think it was removed. The light bar on the controller seems very odd both functionally and designwise without a camera. My guess is that the camera was removed sometime between the controller design was finalized and the PS4 E3 showcase, probably quite close to the latter. Media Molecule's odd game even suggests that Move controllers might've been a pack-in too originally. Seems like a waste for those guys to develop an accessory game, imo.
 
Open my eyes to what?

If the memory card was priced a lil bit lower most of you wouldnt be complaining about the proprietary memory card.

Okay. But its priced two to three times higher than the competition and does nothing better. There is no excuse. Its anti-consumer, because they're making consumers spend insane amounts of money compared to other types of cards so Sony doesn't risk their card formats getting hacked as easily.
 
Know what else is anti-consumer? Charging 60 dollars for a game and then forcing consumers to pay a yearly fee to access the online portion of those 60 dollar games. Sony does it though. MS made a killing doing it. Know what else is? An account system that ties your purchases to your hardware instead of to you (Nintendo).

If you're looking for a pro-consumer hobby, gaming isn't for you. Buy from the corporation that screws you the least.

Wow, that's retarded. Nice job Nintendo.
 
Top Bottom