QuickKick89 said:Seriously, how can this system survive with an 8.8 to carry it for 6 months to a year (more likely a year)
Zelda is not, nor will it ever be "an 8.8" despite what some fat guy thinks.
QuickKick89 said:Seriously, how can this system survive with an 8.8 to carry it for 6 months to a year (more likely a year)
PantherLotus said:Red Steel
Maxrpg said:It's also quite possible that they're reviewing everything on the system less because they want to really shine Zelda nice.
GregK said:Red Steel might have looked pretty good for the time, had it been released a few years ago. But between all the bland, blurry textures, the sluggish frame rate, and the plain-looking weapons and characters, it's decidedly below par by today's standards
clearacell said:This is what I'm not liking about these reviews from GS
Their graphical standards are impossibly high for what the Wii is capable of...they expect stuff to look like 360 and PS3 games.
I mean, they're gonna have to knock Mario Galaxy's graphics because it probably could have been done on the Gamecube, even though it looks absolutely beautiful.
QuickKick89 said:Does Mr. GTA/Halo/Madden have anything to buy other than Zelda?
BlindN-Fan said:I don't get what reviewers are getting at..This game looks as decent has Half Life 2 and as far as im concerned Half Life 2 is a brilliant looking game. Way above my expectations.
Look at the damn explosions..can't wait to experience em in person.
BlindN-Fan said:I don't get what reviewers are getting at..This game looks as decent has Half Life 2 and as far as im concerned Half Life 2 is a brilliant looking game. Way above my expectations.
Look at the damn explosions..can't wait to experience em in person.
hyp said:i guess the question we should be asking everyone is... did you really expect this game to score higher than a 7?
Look at the damn explosions..can't wait to experience em in person.
clearacell said:This is what I'm not liking about these reviews from GS
Their graphical standards are impossibly high for what the Wii is capable of...they expect stuff to look like 360 and PS3 games.
I mean, they're gonna have to knock Mario Galaxy's graphics because it probably could have been done on the Gamecube, even though it looks absolutely beautiful.
Xeke said:Are you kidding??? RE4 looks much better then Red Steel as does Super Mario Galaxy.
Vieo said:Is GameSpot a joke site?
said:Red Steel isn't completely devoid of merit, but it's a half-baked, buggy game that feels rushed and poorly executed. There's a good concept in here somewhere, as a swords-and-guns shooter pitting you against yakuza villains certainly seems like it could be very exciting. However, the experience itself hardly fulfills any of the promises behind it. So if you're looking for an exciting new way to simulate gunning or cutting lots of dudes down using the Wii Remote, you'd best keep looking.
damn, I wish I could know what a game should score before playing it! What's your secret?xhadoukenx said:Zelda is not, nor will it ever be "an 8.8" despite what some fat guy thinks.
clearacell said:Yeah, but if they employ the same logic to a Wii game that looks like RE4 (which is roughly about as good as the Wii can push), GS can still say "it looks like a PS2 game, not up to the current gen standards".
BigBoss said:Your username really suits you.
Shard said:Mommy, I wanna get off the insanity train. Seriously, did anybody have truly high expectations for Red Steel?
Tim the Wiz said:Not totally unexpected. Red Steel's been iffy for quite a while and Kasavin is probably the only GameSpot reviewer I trust.
Otherwise, UbiSoft has really dropped the ball in terms of quality, outside of Rayman and well, Rayman? But the Wii [third-party] launch lineup isn't that shot to hell though, I mean Call of Duty 3, Metal Slug, Trauma Center and Monkey Ball look particularly solid.
Xeke said:If the Wii truly is GC 2.0 its worst games should look as good as RE4.
I never did, but I had expectations that it would receive a high 6 and/or low 7 score. I think most other Websites will do this.Shard said:Mommy, I wanna get off the insanity train. Seriously, did anybody have truly high expectations for Red Steel?
QuickKick89 said:What makes me a troll and makes Anihawk a smarmy jerk?
GhaleonEB said:damn, I wish I could know what a game should score before playing it! What's your secret?
Verano said:
Do you think we should take them seriously anymore?
Amir0x said:how far we've come, though!
Remember when the first grainy photos of Red Steel came from Game Informer, and the Nintendo fanatics were like "HOLY SHIT LOOKS ON PAR WITH 360 GAMES I DONT CARE WHAT YOU SAY"
and then, oh precious reality, as the weeks and weeks progressed and they saw what it really looked like, and how it really played like... and well... times change so fast, don't they? You don't even have time to savour the madness anymore :lol
AniHawk said:Not really impressed. Looks like Perfect Dark Zero at best.
Shard said:Mommy, I wanna get off the insanity train. Seriously, did anybody have truly high expectations for Red Steel?