Karma Kramer
Banned
typhonsentra said:I don't think so.
Well I do... the main character looks more realistic in the new shots... sry [/canadian]
typhonsentra said:I don't think so.
typhonsentra said:I don't think so. Look:
http://img.hexus.net/v2/gaming/screenshots/x360/gears_x360_large_1.jpg
The textures looked more like something from Bioshock. Nice to see hair though.
i hope by "most of us" you mean "everyone but you" considering you're the one arguing that the cutscene models weren't the same as the ingame models.typhonsentra said:Point taken, and most of us knew that already. But thanks for the confirmation.
REV 09 said:i hope by "most of us" you mean "everyone but you" considering you're the one arguing that the cutscene models weren't the same as the ingame models.
NinSoX said:I thought this was about Gears of Wear, not typhonsentra's thoughts of GOW Discussion.
here you gotyphonsentra said:Some of those shots are from cutscenes, which would obviously be from the singleplayer mode and would look better than the ingame models. Even then, it doesn't look as good.
Ingame as in "In the gameplay".REV 09 said:here you go
typhonsentra said:Ingame as in "In the gameplay".
Even nicer!Tieno said:
typhonsentra said:He's right though. This game looks nothing like the bullshots from last year, not even the non-interactive cutscenes.
SnakeXs said:Or "ingame" as in "stop it, your foot's in your mouth, run along now, thanks".
typhonsentra said:Ingame as in "In the gameplay".
What you are doing is furiously de-railing the thread.typhonsentra said:Whatever, if you want to lie about what I said and make it fit into what you want it to be, that's your perogative. I'll leave now before I get ganked again for not pretending this game looks as good as good as it did last year.
might want to edit that out.Karma Kramer said:No you #### you are saying the cut-scenes look better then the in-game character models... implying that the cut-scenes aren't real-time..
I really don't know what you are trying to argue here...
GhaleonEB said:What you are doing is furiously de-railing the thread.
GTFO.indie85 said:Poor xbots, I smell desperation in the air.
I guess some 'compromises' were made to get this thing running more than 15fps, the shots.do.not.lie
SnakeXs said:So, guys, how about that E-Day?
Seriously, this game has a small chance of being a huge let down, but if everything is aligned right, God we're gonna be in for a treat.
X06 better bring a ton of new footage and media and info. Make it happen, Cliffy. Trailer + gameplay footage, in HD, on Live. Mmm mmm.
m0dus said:and Karma--I think he's actually implying that the game uses more detailed realtime models in cut-scenes, which, as far as I know, is a pretty flimsy bass for criticizing the game, but whatever.
typhonsentra said:If everyone will just shut-up about what I said, how about we let this be my last post in this thread?
??? the ingame footage from E305, TGS05, X05, G4TV, and E306 does.not.lie.either. The shots look great, and we've seen the game in motion plenty of times to get a feel for how truly impressive it is.indie85 said:Poor xbots, I smell desperation in the air.
I guess some 'compromises' were made to get this thing running more than 15fps, the shots.do.not.lie
Looks as good, or better, than what we saw last year. And we know how it runs from E3.indie85 said:Poor xbots, I smell desperation in the air.
I guess some 'compromises' were made to get this thing running more than 15fps, the shots.do.not.lie
They were running at 15fps thoughREV 09 said:??? the ingame footage from E305, TGS05, X05, G4TV, and E306 does.not.lie.either.
Stoney Mason said:Well I'm going to get the game this fall since I have a 360 and since it's the most hyped title this fall for it but to be honest I don't really know why. I don't really know what makes it unique. I saw the E3 videos and they look cool I guess but I didn't really see anything gameplay wise that blew my mind or I had never seen before. Just curious as to why others are very excited for this title when I don't quite get it. And this ain't a troll post. I own a 360. I'm getting the game so don't pull out the I'm a secret Ps3 fan card. I ain't getting that system probably ever and I've yet to even really see a decent title on that system. So why are you people excited for this game and are there any more details on the mulitplayer? It's at least 8 on 8 right? If not I'm going to be a little upset. Thx.
indie85 said:They were running at 15fps though
I'm taking a guess and say that we won't be enjoying your witty posts for much longerindie85 said:They were running at 15fps though
Eh, the footage and impressions for the people who played it disagrees. I know it stings when the reality doesn't jive with your desperate trolling, but that's life.indie85 said:They were running at 15fps though
Gameplay wise, it'll probably not reinvent the wheel, but it seems like the stuff it aims to do, it'll do really well. Borowing from other games and improving on things. It has great graphics and good action horror gore vibe, all very polished. Gameplay impressions from journalists have been very positive. Epic is the developer and CliffyB is a 'poet' in describing/pimping his game.Stoney Mason said:Well I'm going to get the game this fall since I have a 360 and since it's the most hyped title this fall for it but to be honest I don't really know why. I don't really know what makes it unique. I saw the E3 videos and they look cool I guess but I didn't really see anything gameplay wise that blew my mind or I had never seen before. Just curious as to why others are very excited for this title when I don't quite get it. And this ain't a troll post. I own a 360. I'm getting the game so don't pull out the I'm a secret Ps3 fan card. I ain't getting that system probably ever and I've yet to even really see a decent title on that system. So why are you people excited for this game and are there any more details on the mulitplayer? It's at least 8 on 8 right? If not I'm going to be a little upset. Thx.
I don't know really, it just looks like a head-splattering good time.Stoney Mason said:Well I'm going to get the game this fall since I have a 360 and since it's the most hyped title this fall for it but to be honest I don't really know why. I don't really know what makes it unique. I saw the E3 videos and they look cool I guess but I didn't really see anything gameplay wise that blew my mind or I had never seen before. Just curious as to why others are very excited for this title when I don't quite get it. And this ain't a troll post. I own a 360. I'm getting the game so don't pull out the I'm a secret Ps3 fan card. I ain't getting that system probably ever and I've yet to even really see a decent title on that system. So why are you people excited for this game and are there any more details on the mulitplayer? It's at least 8 on 8 right? If not I'm going to be a little upset. Thx.
indie85 said:Poor xbots, I smell desperation in the air.
I guess some 'compromises' were made to get this thing running more than 15fps, the shots.do.not.lie
Also, bear in mind the gameplay is very different from a fps. It's much more tactical, and team-oriented. So 16 players is not required. That said, I have not seen any final number yet. I'm hoping for 6 vs 6.Stoney Mason said:Well I'm going to get the game this fall since I have a 360 and since it's the most hyped title this fall for it but to be honest I don't really know why. I don't really know what makes it unique. I saw the E3 videos and they look cool I guess but I didn't really see anything gameplay wise that blew my mind or I had never seen before. Just curious as to why others are very excited for this title when I don't quite get it. And this ain't a troll post. I own a 360. I'm getting the game so don't pull out the I'm a secret Ps3 fan card. I ain't getting that system probably ever and I've yet to even really see a decent title on that system. So why are you people excited for this game and are there any more details on the mulitplayer? It's at least 8 on 8 right? If not I'm going to be a little upset. Thx.
Have you even looked at his other posts?Wollan said:I'm not really in this discussion but why would you want to ban a guy that points out the fps issue? It had fps issues albeit not 15fps(this year). But ok, if this means the mods will go through other threads and clean up some, please do.
He just switched tactics, from crying "downgrade" to "well it runs at 15fps". Which is does not. It DID have issues at E3 in transitions in the SP demo. But that's not what he's doing.Wollan said:I'm not really in this discussion but why would you want to ban a guy that points out the fps issue? It had fps issues albeit not 15fps(this year). But ok, if this means the mods will go through other threads and clean up some, please do.
GhaleonEB said:Also, bear in mind the gameplay is very different from a fps. It's much more tactical, and team-oriented. So 16 players is not required. That said, I have not seen any final number yet. I'm hoping for 6 vs 6.
Stoney Mason said:Well the fact that it's more tactical I really didn't know. I like Ghost Recon and I know it won't go that far but if it's even just a bit more tactical than your average FPS then I would like that. I guess it's sort of silly to demand a set number when I haven't exactly seen the size of the environments but what I don't want is 4 on 4 running around in Call of Duty size worlds. That was annoying.
Karma Kramer said:My word of advice is just wait till the game comes out and rent it. It you like it buy it... if not then don't.
indie85 said:Wow, campaign of bannage just for me?
I must be popular
Seems you guys can give it, but not take it eh? Something to think about.
cue another page of ''off with his head''