But was the original Major so extremely Asian looking in the first place? I think Scarlett fits nicely with how the first movie looked.
![]()
here we go again.
But was the original Major so extremely Asian looking in the first place? I think Scarlett fits nicely with how the first movie looked.
![]()
So I figured it would be fun to recut the trailer to Wamdue Project's "King of my Castle" as an homage to the old music video. It's pretty hard to make the frantic first trailer for the movie fit to the more mellow song and it doesnt really fit...but I figured it would be a fun exercise anyway
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iKrxRdhtoZo
No one would be interested in that movie. The only reason anyone is excited for this is because its chanelling the aesthetic HARD. People didn't attack Edge of Tomorrow because, aside from being awesome, it was based on a light novel that hardly anyone even in Japan gave a shit about.Whitewashing would be less of an issue if they Edge of Tomorrow'd it and gave it some of its own Western flair and personality. They could have brought their own unique vision to the property rather than aping Japanese aesthetics and yet again, giving us Scarlett Johansson as audience-surrogate for an exotic, foreign metropolis. Even if it's not free of its own issues, at least Lost in Translation ties it into its narrative and themes.
Weta Workshop did the weapons, costumes, and props for the film, which Paramount showed off at the recent GITS media event:
Whitewashing would be less of an issue if they Edge of Tomorrow'd it and gave it some of its own Western flair and personality. They could have brought their own unique vision to the property rather than aping Japanese aesthetics and yet again, giving us Scarlett Johansson as audience-surrogate for an exotic, foreign metropolis. Even if it's not free of its own issues, at least Lost in Translation ties it into its narrative and themes.
lol, you mean turning characters who came from all places of the world into an all white cast?
Have you actually looked at the cast?
The movie is not an all white cast. At least keep your critique in line with reality. The leads are white, but otherwise it's a fairly diverse cast for a big tent Hollywood movie. Whether the majority of them get actual meaningful roles in he film is obviously yet to be seen.
This dude made a short critique of the trailer, as to why he doesn't like it.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=i-mqcTjnvYA
Some extrapolations but also good points which some stuff I haven't catched before and makes me slightly more worried
It'd be like having Akira without the Geinoh Yamashirogumi score... just no.
okay, so, why is this video unlisted?
Afraid of another Ghostbusters?
Anyway, it's weird that they picked Johanssen and then decided to make the whole thing look exactly like the anime adaptation. She looks so out of place in that setting that I have to ask why they didn't just hire an Asian lady who wouldn't. Yeah I know, bewbs. But aside from that.
I've been following the news for this movie pretty closely so I'm well aware that they have Japanese actors for the rest of their outfit, Section 9 or whatever it'll be called here. My critique is in line with how they've decided to showcase their film in this trailer which for most people serves as their first exposure. Obviously how the film actually is remains to be seen, but my impression so far is that it continues the trend of Asian people getting no roles of substance in American film and television as well as the white perspective in which we're expected to view the world they depict, consequently othering the people which inhabit this fascinating world. I'd love to be proven wrong on both accounts when the film releases, really. For better or for worse I look forward to seeing the final product because you're right, I am dabbling in conjecture.Have you actually looked at the cast?
The movie is not an all white cast. At least keep your critique in line with reality. The leads are white, but otherwise it's a fairly diverse cast for a big tent Hollywood movie. Whether the majority of them get actual meaningful roles in he film is obviously yet to be seen.
Style over substance, always a reliable draw.No one would be interested in that movie. The only reason anyone is excited for this is because its chanelling the aesthetic HARD. People didn't attack Edge of Tomorrow because, aside from being awesome, it was based on a light novel that hardly anyone even in Japan gave a shit about.
It wouldn't look as jarring as only giving white people the role of protagonist, side-kick, and villain imo. The decision to keep it in Japan feels superficial and I doubt they'll have much to say about the setting which previous works haven't covered. But who knows, maybe they'll prove me wrong. Hell, I'd love to eat some crow this instance.lol, you mean turning characters who came from all places of the world into an all white cast?
It wouldn't look as jarring as only giving white people the role of protagonist, side-kick, and villain imo. The decision to keep it in Japan feels superficial and I doubt they'll have much to say about the setting which previous works haven't covered. But who knows, maybe they'll prove me wrong. Hell, I'd love to eat some crow this instance.
If my memory is correct the city is based on a skyline of a city in china and the TV series focused on the setting not the movies if I remember correct (haven't seen Innocence in a while).
The manga is explicitly set in Japan and has a lot of political stuff but the aesthetic of the city scape in the movie was based on HK. When the movie was made HK wasn't part of China.
On this topic, I've recently watched the 1995 movie and it did kind of bother me how the movie never actually acknowledges it takes place in Hong Kong, despite it clearly looking like it.
The new movie takes this a step further by being (partially) filmed in Hong Kong, pretending it's set in Japan and having a largely white cast.
Cyberpunk is all style over substance. Like it's considered the genre standard to tart up American cities to look Japanese because Japan was the shocking new technological nation in the 70s. Hong Kong looked exciting to the Japanese who made the movie in the 90s so Japan suddenly looked like Hong Kong. If you don't like the jarring fakery of cutting up realistic imagery and playing around with it then you don't like Cyberpunk. There is nothing less Cyberpunk than authentic or believable Cyberpunk.
That's pretty clearly one of the Star Ferry boats, which are a pretty distinct Hong Kong thing mentioned in pretty much every guide book. Including this and saying it's Japan is a bit like including the Eiffel tower in your movie and saying it's set in Germany. And then there's shots like this:
Showing signage that is distinctly Chinese due to the lack of katakana/hiragana. This is especially relevant since the new movie does include, and prominently at that, signs with katakana in them. And, of course, the final shot of the movie makes it pretty explicit that it's Hong Kong
Like the Star Ferry, the distinct island/mainland split is one of the more distinct features of Hong Kong.
It's not a big deal mind you, and I actually love Cyberpunk, but The 1995 GITS movie took it much further than "Japan suddenly looking like Hong Kong". My point is that the movie clearly takes place in Hong Kong and not Japan, but they just kind of ignore that. For example, this shot:
That's pretty clearly one of the Star Ferry boats, which are a pretty distinct Hong Kong thing mentioned in pretty much every guide book. Including this and saying it's Japan is a bit like including the Eiffel tower in your movie and saying it's set in Germany. And then there's shots like this:
Showing signage that is distinctly Chinese due to the lack of katakana/hiragana. This is especially relevant since the new movie does include, and prominently at that, signs with katakana in them. And, of course, the final shot of the movie makes it pretty explicit that it's Hong Kong
Like the Star Ferry, the distinct island/mainland split is one of the more distinct features of Hong Kong.
There's basically nothing that evokes Japan in the movie, not even a single mention of it taking place there (unlike the other GITS adaptations) but plenty of things that bring Hong Kong to mind. I would have loved it if the movie acknowledged it more, especially since anime set in real countries outside of Japan is so rare. It would have been nice if it was actually set outside of Japan, even if it would make it rather non canon to the franchise as a whole.
Oshii based the setting for Ghost in the Shell on Hong Kong. Oshii commented that his first thought to find an image of the future setting was an Asian city, but finding a suitable cityscape of the future would be impossible. Oshii chose to use the real streets of Hong Kong as his model. He also said that Hong Kong was the perfect subject and theme for the film with its countless signs and the cacophony of sounds. The film's mecha designer Takeuchi Atsushi noted that while the film does not have a chosen setting, it is obviously based on Hong Kong because the city represented the theme of the film, the old and the new which exist in a strange relationship in an age of an information deluge. Before shooting the film, the artists drew sketches that emphasized Hong Kong's chaotic, confusing and overwhelming aspects.
Original concept: Ruthless cyborg who is a master of manipulating the technology of the day operates in a corrupt political system but is still driven by the "ghost" that is her human conscience.
Trailer: What am I, they made me this way, must remember my past, kill kill kill.
Seems a bit unfair to compare the original concept to a Hollywood movie's first teaser. It's not like that concept is really conveyed in the first trailers for the anime's original English release either.
GITS takes place in the fictional Japanese city of Niihama, Niihama Prefecture (New Port City, but that doesn't mean the design couldn't be inspired by a real world setting. Oshii has stated in interviews that he referenced Hong Kong to realize his vision of the city.
I don't agree with this sort of defence because it assumes the trailer is either deliberately misleading people about the content of the film or that not much thought is put into the presentation of movie trailers. It's more likely that this is a copy of a copy of a copy and it's not quite clear what it is copying any more.
What is the point of this? Rupert Sanders is not going to make a film equal to Oshii's. I've seen many of the scenes in this trailer already, in the original film. Seeing it again, in live action, handled by lesser talents, is not a draw.
Much rather the budget for this went to a new animation project for Oshii. I can't imagine what he could do with full control and a large budget today, but it could be fantastic, which this has utterly no chance of being.
While true regarding anime, Ghost in the Shell has Asian looking characters, you can tell who is AsianAnime characters generally don't look asian.
I'm very confused seeing how the setting looks pretty asian, geisha robots and Kitano shooting a dude in the head etc etc. but we got white people as leads?
Idunno I'd kinda be less off put if it was just redone in America at that point.
I'm ambivalent about the Major's casting. On one hand an unknown actress would have been perfect, but of course for obvious financial reasons that wasn't going to happen. On the other hand is not really that much of a stretch that in the future lonely cibernetics scientists were going to make their female cyborgs to look like freaking Scarlett Johansson.
I think it's nailing the look. I'll be happy with a half decent movie. Not the biggest fan of the original but I think theyou could make a decent movie from those themes.
Serious question what sort of location is this:
supposed to even be? Like there's water at foot level and a bunch of signs, is this supposed to be an area people ever actually walk through? What is its function? Sewage? The water looks totally clean.
Genuinely ignorant as to whether or not there are places like that irl.
I think it's an alley. Pretty sure a lot of the imagery was inspired by the Kowloon Walled city which was a massive condensed slum that had a bunch of little shops with signs and very little room to walk.Serious question what sort of location is this:
supposed to even be? Like there's water at foot level and a bunch of signs, is this supposed to be an area people ever actually walk through? What is its function? Sewage? The water looks totally clean.
Genuinely ignorant as to whether or not there are places like that irl.
Clint Mansell is scoring the movie? Niiiiice. I think this is turning out better than expected.
I subscribe to the interpretation that 95 Motoko can be played by Scar Jo (Would prefer someone that resembles motokos facial structure more)
Motoko and Puppet Master being identical is intentional.
![]()
And when she sees her self, and a huge portion of the movie is her doubting if she is herself or programmed to think shes herself etc.
![]()
Compared to the next entry into the series by Oshii with Geisha bots.
Although In innocence the Geisha's look somewhat similar but with added uncanny
![]()
Its clearly inspired the most from the 95 movie so Scar Jo being cast as Motoko isn't the slight I think most are making it out to be.
The bigger issue is the cyborg gore we are going miss out on with its rating.
Serious question what sort of location is this:
supposed to even be? Like there's water at foot level and a bunch of signs, is this supposed to be an area people ever actually walk through? What is its function? Sewage? The water looks totally clean.
Genuinely ignorant as to whether or not there are places like that irl.
The placement of the signs in the GITS shot doesn't make the most sense since you couldn't really see them when walking along the street (as opposed to the signs in the real world example), but it's close enough.
Clint Mansell is scoring the movie? Niiiiice. I think this is turning out better than expected.
I think it's an alley. Pretty sure a lot of the imagery was inspired by the Kowloon Walled city which was a massive condensed slum that had a bunch of little shops with signs and very little room to walk.
Excluding the water (which is just flooding after heavy rainfall I guess) there's plenty of places in Hong Kong that look pretty similar, particularly in Kowloon. Mong Kok and Tsim Sha Tsui are the most well known examples, but similar scenes can be found all over Hong Kong. Something like this for instance:
The placement of the signs in the GITS shot doesn't make the most sense since you couldn't really see them when walking along the street (as opposed to the signs in the real world example), but it's close enough.
But it's true, the actor's chosen look like the original anime film characters and I don't see the problem because of that.here we go again.
But it's true, the actor's chosen look like thr original anime film characters
People keep referencing the purple haired Major From the later series which yes looks more Asian and looks completely different.
The opening in the trailer when she wearing the goggles, that what Major looks like
Batou look fantastic yet I heard people say he has been whitewashed...?
![]()
Like what!?
I suppose they could have gotten another Agent of Shield (Chloe Bennet) to play Major
would that had been a better?
Youtubers dude I've seen people complain about the whole castName anyone who's said that? When the movie was announced people were asking for Ron Pearlman as Batou. I don't think I've heard many complaints about him being whitewashed.
And Chloe Bennet's dad is Chinese American. Is that what you were getting at?
Youtubers dude I've seen people complain about the whole cast
And yes I know her dad is Chinese American
I like the girl myself so I wouldn't have minded her being Major actually
But I think Scarlet atleast in thr trailer is more of a match to the original Major From GITS