• Hey, guest user. Hope you're enjoying NeoGAF! Have you considered registering for an account? Come join us and add your take to the daily discourse.

Halo Online modders working to strip micro-transactions, release worldwide

Status
Not open for further replies.

feel

Member
MS and 343i seem so dumb. Just put a good port of Halo 3 on Steam with dedicated servers and a decent price and rake in the dollars you geniuses..
 

meanspartan

Member
I don't think he cares what you think, but hey, maybe you'll get a response.

I just took it as truth that people have individual motivations, which sounds like reality, versus the story's simplified version where 40 people are all thinking and feeling the exact same thing and things need to be dramatized + digestable for hits.

If you are indeed involved in this, Id advise you to stop. Even though they fucking deserve it. Id love to see them eat shit for their empty promises (listed above) but its not worth getting yourself in trouble over.
 

Bsigg12

Member
MS and 343i seem so dumb. Just put a good port of Halo 3 on Steam with dedicated servers and a decent price and rake in the dollars you geniuses..

Who's to say that isn't coming? All we know is that Halo Online was intended for Russia, so they obviously have some PC work going on.
 
This doesn't make any sense. I didn't steal any assets or art for the game.
Microsoft can make money for the game as much as they want. I don't care. I'm not doing this in spite to Microsoft like this article or "Woovie" tells you to think.


I don't know how stating my motive would make it any less or more as "piracy" to a lot of you guys. This article seems to have worked at selling the green-skinned pirate hacker to a lot of you guys to the point of just not making sense or being hysterical. I enjoy playing halo and seeing it on my pc screen is and messing around with it as well as understanding the engine to do other fun stuff. Not a scrap of code in the gitlab i posted screams "PIRACY" but people like Wizman choose to ignore that and would rather think that all the dozens of people involves are all thinking the same thing and want the same thing like some good-guy-bad-guy tv show. Circumventing the online-access controls does not concern me. Everything we have done is on par with the typical cheat-engine memory-poking stuff you see people do to other games with cheat engine and you don't consider that piracy.

So what is the ultimate goal? Do you want to study and alter the source code to create custom halo maps a la Forge? Are you studying the code to eventually migrate work to a different engine (ex. Unreal Engine 4). You guys obviously have access to source code and assets.
 
I dont know what MS expected, honestly, did they think "lets release this in Russia only...The rest of the world will surely not hack/mod/pirate this....." OR this is some sort of twisted marketing scheme, to then announce Halo MCC for PC. Something smells way way off in this behaviour.
 

Synth

Member
I'm not going to run to the mods just because I disagree from a moral standpoint. If you edit your post, I'll edit my quote to reflect the change.

Thanks for the offer. :)

I'm going to leave my post as it is though, and assume any mods can tell that it's not serious, and was posted in agreement of Miles' point above it (this current post may even help).

Of course, it that doesn't work out, then this could all be rather embarrassing.
 
i could be wrong but isn't the game multiplayer only?

i mean if you try to play the pirated version you will be at the very least IP banned and possibly reported to the cybercrime authority of your country.

so all people will be able to do is run around empty levels wondering what could have been, and although not a fan i dont see the huge harm in that.

if however the leak enables the possibility of setting up private servers for the pirated versions that shit is definitely not okay.

slighty offtopic but i think the reason most arent jumping at the chance, reasonbly as it might be, to defend microsofts honor in this is because some of their decisions in the past have been questionable at best to down right hostile to pc gamers.
 

Doffen

Member
I dont know what MS expected, honestly, did they think "lets release this in Russia only...The rest of the world will surely not hack/mod/pirate this....." OR this is some sort of twisted marketing scheme, to then announce Halo MCC for PC. Something smells way way off in this behaviour.

I guess they didn't think people would go nuts over a beta.
 

Magwik

Banned
i could be wrong but isn't the game multiplayer only?

i mean if you try to play the pirated version you will be at the very least IP banned and possibly reported to the cybercrime authority of your country.

so all people will be able to do is run around empty levels wondering what could have been, and although not a fan i dont see the huge harm in that.

if however the leak enables the possibility of setting up private servers for the pirated versions that shit is definitely not okay.

slighty offtopic but i think the reason most arent jumping at the chance, reasonbly as it might be, to defend microsofts honor in this is because some of their decisions in the past have been questionable at best to down right hostile to pc gamers.
The source code of an older build was uploaded to 4chan and they are modifying the (stolen) source code to make the game into the one they want it to be, which means the multiplayer isn't the same as the official game, it'll also be P2P. It's 100% theft.
 
i could be wrong but isn't the game multiplayer only?

i mean if you try to play the pirated version you will be at the very least IP banned and possibly reported to the cybercrime authority of your country.

so all people will be able to do is run around empty levels wondering what could have been, and although not a fan i dont see the huge harm in that.

if however the leak enables the possibility of setting up private servers for the pirated versions that shit is definitely not okay.

slighty offtopic but i think the reason most arent jumping at the chance, reasonbly as it might be, to defend microsofts honor in this is because some of their decisions in the past have been questionable at best to down right hostile to pc gamers.

This is definitely looking like it is moving towards a MP game hosted peer-to-peer.

I would love for them to study the source code, re-engineer it, and recreate the game in another engine (UE4, Unity5) with a custom SP campaign using pre-made assets. Of course, that might not happen.
 

Crayon

Member
Well, yea... we don't fundamentally disagree with anything here, other than that you thought the initial response to your post was worth combatting head on, with anything other than a "well yea... obviously...".

Maybe there is some good conversation to be had on the motives of those working on this, and I'd be interested for the member here to elaborate more beyond "don't believe their lies". It'd have to be a very convincing argument though, considering that whatever motive they have, they're still taking and redistributing someone else's work against their will.

I was mean to fox avatar because he quoted my general comment and responded with some horseshit. I should have ignored him but im not perfect. I should mention that it was nice of you to respind, tattoo dwarf, after i was rude.

Anyway... Lets hope that our guest provides a well articulated argument. I havent read the link yet. Weather you see it as clear cut crime or morally ambigous its surely interesting and the converstation is most fruitful when we are tolerant of each others point of view. Btw i am more than tolerant of your point of view. I understand completely where youre coming from.
 
So what is the ultimate goal? Do you want to study and alter the source code to create custom halo maps a la Forge? Are you studying the code to eventually migrate work to a different engine (ex. Unreal Engine 4). You guys obviously have access to source code and assets.

personally I'm just tinkering with the engine for the pure fun of it like the old halo 1 PC modding days. Which is all that we are capable of now for the most part. A lot of old information from modding halo 3 and even halo 2 is working for this game. Some other guy is possibly doing networking stuff but to think that we can get some full-featured private server that simulates all of their endpoints and services 1:1 enough to replace the need for the original servers completely is very silly. Some extent of that might be possible but it's not something that all of us want. Circumventing the cash-shop stuff is something that is strangely and recently dwelled upon by journalists in an attempt to label everyone involved as some piracy-supporting demon or something.
 

Synth

Member
slighty offtopic but i think the reason most arent jumping at the chance, reasonbly as it might be, to defend microsofts honor in this is because some of their decisions in the past have been questionable at best to down right hostile to pc gamers.

Whilst I can somewhat understand that, I still don't think its something that should be encouraged. If A steals B's purse, that doesn't mean I think it's acceptable when B sets A's house on fire.

Not only that, but people seem to forget that they may just be fucking over the wrong person. Microsoft as a company may be one entity, but the people there are just like us... and in this case the most impacted here would probably be Saber Interactive.. who you probably don't have a very substantial list for.
 
I guess they didn't think people would go nuts over a beta.

A MP Halo game on Pc...its very naive to think that people wouldnt go crazy about this, and make private servers for this. I mean, Pc community have been asking for a Halo game for years and years, they knew it would be received like this, the question is....why did they still do it ?!
 
So copyright infringement isn't stealing now? Trying to circumvent a revenue source isn't something that should be frowned upon? I generally don't give a crap about mega corps but this affects normal people just like you and I. If you can't empathize with them, I feel sorry for you.
Copyright infringement is not (necessarily) stealing, no, since it does not always result in commercial loss.

What they are doing bothers me as much as people listening to or watching a video on Youtube uploaded by someone who doesn't own the content, using AdBlock on Twitch, sharing their Netflix/HBO Go account details with friends, using copyrighted content as an avatar on an online forum, playing (JPN exclusive) PSO2 with the unofficial English patch, or using a VPN to overcome region restrictions (whether this means watching a video or getting a region-specific discount on a game) does.

It is entirely understandable (and logical) that a corporation would protect their IPs, copyrights, and financial interests and think they should work on incentivizing people not infringing upon their copyrights, but that doesn't evoke an emotional response from me.
 

koolin101

Neo Member
best way to fight piracy is make getting what the pirates are giving easier directly from a legit source. The people want Halo on PC across the whole world (who would have thought, duh, except for 343 of course), then give it to them and there will be no reason for this project to even exist.
 

Maztorre

Member
I didn't argue for people to sit quietly, I argued that they shouldn't play an unauthorized version of a game. Your view looks to be quite black and white.

I mean it's a beta. If Halo Online was RTM and still no sign of a western release you should outrage as much as you want. But going bunkers because you want day one access to an incomplete F2P game seems silly to me.

Most of us got a good taste of early access with Halo MCC and AC Unity.

Arguing that they shouldn't play an unauthorised version of a game in an anticipated high profile franchise isn't a realistic view to have though, is it? There are a large number of people out there who are hungry for a PC Halo title, and the more dedicated fans are absolutely going to peep under the hood, tinker with custom servers, bypass the region lock via VPN, etc. Never mind the community interest purely because of it being a high profile FPS franchise (which had an active mod scene when the first title was released on PC as I recall). I don't think that's bonkers at all, especially when it comes after years of waiting and vague talk of PC support that never materialised.

In the end I am completely unsurprised that this has happened and it should have been obvious to Microsoft from the moment the idea was pitched, which is disappointing. What's even more disappointing is how many people here are out for the blood of the modders, as if the genie can be put back in the bottle at this point. Someone was inevitably going to mod this game from the moment the phrases "Halo", "free to play", and "Russia only" were tied to it. In fact, for many modders the simple fact that it's a new Halo game for them to play around with after such a long wait would be reason enough, incomplete or not.
 

Doffen

Member
A MP Halo game on Pc...its very naive to think that people wouldnt go crazy about this, and make private servers for this. I mean, Pc community have been asking for a Halo game for years and years, they knew it would be received like this, the question is....why did they still do it ?!

Maybe they didn't want to do another MCC. 343i isn't even talking about a launch date for the game in Russia yet, their just saying that they've launched a closed beta there.

For all we know Microsoft might want to wait for a WW beta until they've got Windows 10 RTM.

But this is just assumptions, maybe Microsoft just said "eh fuck it, let's toy with those Master Race folks".
 
Copyright infringement is not (necessarily) stealing, no, since it does not always result in commercial loss.

What they are doing bothers me as much as people listening to or watching a video on Youtube uploaded by someone who doesn't own the content, using AdBlock on Twitch, sharing their Netflix/HBO Go account details with friends, using copyrighted content as an avatar on an online forum, playing (JPN exclusive) PSO2 with the unofficial English patch, or using a VPN to overcome region restrictions (whether this means watching a video or getting a region-specific discount on a game) does.

It is entirely understandable (and logical) that a corporation would protect their IPs, copyrights, and financial interests and think they should work on incentivizing people not infringing upon their copyrights, but that doesn't evoke an emotional response from me.

Maybe you should read up on US copyright infringement law because it is stealing and illegal. This isn't the same as watching a video on youtube or hearing downloaded music and you know it.
 
I jump on and play Murder Miners occasionally. It's about as close as you can get to Halo on PC right now but nobody is ever really playing Halo gamemodes.
 

jmga

Member
Maybe you should read up on US copyright infringement law because it is stealing and illegal. This isn't the same as watching a video on youtube or hearing downloaded music and you know it.

Bullshit.
Mods themselves are copyright infringement unless the author gives express permission to create them. You are talking nonsense.

There is a thing called fair use, that allows you to create derivative content from other people work if it is non profit.
 
Bullshit.
Mods themselves are copyright infringement unless the author gives express permission to create them. You are talking nonsense.

There is a thing called fair use, that allows you to create derivative content from other people work if it is non profit.

Um, you realize mods have to replace original assets to avoid copyright infringement, right? Also, not every company cares. Fair use doesn't apply when you steal an unreleased product to avoid micro-transactions. You are talking nonsense.
 
Maybe you should read up on US copyright infringement law because it is stealing and illegal. This isn't the same as watching a video on youtube or hearing downloaded music and you know it.
If you find a line that equates copyright infringement to stealing, then I'm all ears, but now you're making a legal argument when I was making a moral and/or ethical one.

As for the latter part, I stated that I viewed them equivalent in terms of degrees of severity (since I don't see copyright infringement as being a black and white issue). I don't see how consuming copyrighted content on Youtube, for example, when one has the means (in terms of online availability) to pay the content owner is significantly better, though.

Although I don't see any importance in my choice to not really...care.
 

VariantX

Member
MS and 343i seem so dumb. Just put a good port of Halo 3 on Steam with dedicated servers and a decent price and rake in the dollars you geniuses..

I doubt this will come to any markets where the xbox 360/ one is selling decently. I think this will be exclusive to markets where PC is the dominant gaming platform and everywhere else will just have to buy Xbox to play halo. They've had what seems like a decade to bring Halo to PC and they don't seem to have any real intentions of doing so for everyone, even in the face of demand. All this talk of streaming back and forth between PC and Xbox is not even remotely in the same universe what people have been asking for and it still involves you buying their console.
 

system11

Member
Headline should say 'pirates' instead of 'modders'.

Gives modders a bad name, this is the worst kind of entitled "we're taking this and making it free because we want to" behaviour, even bullish in the face of requests to stop.
 
If you find a line that equates copyright infringement to stealing, then I'm all ears, but now you're making a legal argument when I was making a moral and/or ethical one.

I'm not going to sit here and play the semantics game with you. Did Microsoft give this group access to unreleased code and allow them to modify the game/re-release it as they see fit? If the answer is no, then that is what most rational human beings would consider to be theft.
 

jmga

Member
Um, you realize mods have to replace original assets to avoid copyright infringement, right? Also, not every company cares. Fair use doesn't apply when you steal an unreleased product to avoid micro-transactions. You are talking nonsense.


That is nonsense knowing that majority of mods consist of replacing original assets with better ones(or just different ones) or modifying the game behavior without touching any asset.

Copyright Infringement is usually about intellectual property.

And as I have said, it is not illegal because of Fair Use:
http://www.copyright.gov/fls/fl102.html
 

Synth

Member
That is nonsense knowing that majority of mods consist of replacing original assets with better ones(or just different ones) or modifying the game behavior without touching any asset.

Copyright Infringement is usually about intellectual property.

And as I have said, it is not illegal because of Fair Use:
http://www.copyright.gov/fls/fl102.html

Yea, but a what do you call a mod that circumvents a product's payment system? Are you simply "modding" commercial software when a crack causes it to stop loading up in "demo mode"?
 
That is nonsense knowing that majority of mods consist of replacing original assets with better ones(or just different ones) or modifying the game behavior without touching any asset.

Copyright Infringement is usually about intellectual property.

And as I have said, it is not illegal because of Fair Use:
http://www.copyright.gov/fls/fl102.html

You seem to be under the impression that fair use is a magical license to steal which is ignorant.

Notwithstanding the provisions of sections 106 and 106A, the fair use of a copyrighted work, including such use by reproduction in copies or phonorecords or by any other means specified by that section, for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching (including multiple copies for classroom use), scholarship, or research, is not an infringement of copyright. In determining whether the use made of a work in any particular case is a fair use the factors to be considered shall include—
(1) the purpose and character of the use, including whether such use is of a commercial nature or is for nonprofit educational purposes;
(2) the nature of the copyrighted work;
(3) the amount and substantiality of the portion used in relation to the copyrighted work as a whole; and
(4) the effect of the use upon the potential market for or value of the copyrighted work.

source: https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/17/107

In a court of law this would not be held up as fair use. It is a clear cut case of piracy which is theft, especially when the intent is to circumvent paying money to the copyright holder. Blows my mind that you can't wrap your head around this concept.
 
still don't see why you guys are talking about stealing and piracy from microtransactions when this clearly isn't any sort of goal of ours.
 
If you are indeed involved in this, Id advise you to stop. Even though they fucking deserve it. Id love to see them eat shit for their empty promises (listed above) but its not worth getting yourself in trouble over.


for the last time, I'm not involved and I'm not even sure where you guys are getting that from.
 

Reebot

Member
Are you for real?

Nobody here is claiming Microsoft owes them a game. What they are doing is pointing out how dumb their decision-making is and how harmful it is to their goodwill among their PC customers (with the modding and the negative outcry being the natural outcome). Now if you have a good argument that how Microsoft have behaved in the PC market has made sense and how they shouldn't have expected backlash to this game I'd love to hear it, instead of rolling out the "entitled gamers" garbage. 1 FPS game isn't going to turn PC customers into console customers and MS should surely realise this by now.

Indeed they are, at the very least implicitly. Microsoft has decided not to allow people outside of Russia to access the game. That's their choice; disregarding their business model to get a hold of the game anyway while fully knowing their intent demonstrates a sense of entitlement. And that's before we get into comments along the lines of "should have given us what we wanted."

You can call the observation garbage all you want but you can't change the underlying entitlement.

The correct response here is to demonstrate demand - it is not to pirate.

And that fair use justification is a really fundamentally wrong reading of the law.
 
still don't see why you guys are talking about stealing and piracy from microtransactions when this clearly isn't any sort of goal of ours.

Did Microsoft give you access to the leaked build or are you accessing it without permission? Are the takedown notices not proof that they do not approve of what ElDorito is doing? Clearly your group doesn't care what the IP owner thinks or wants.
 

jmga

Member
Yea, but a what do you call a mod that circumvents a product's payment system? Are you simply "modding" commercial software when a crack causes it to stop loading up in "demo mode"?
I was talking about ElDorito, it doesn't do what you are saying, right?

In the case you are talking about, I suppose it depends on the "crack".

If the crack is a modified and redistributed version of an original game file, it is copyright infringement.

If the crack is completely external to the demo, let's say for example, you modify a memory address value, it can't be.
 
Did Microsoft give you access to the leaked build or are you accessing it without permission? Are the takedown notices not proof that they do not approve of what ElDorito is doing? Clearly your group doesn't care what the IP owner thinks or wants.

Sounds like you're trying really hard to convince everyone we're pirates. Seems this article worked on you.

If the crack is completely external to the demo, let's say for example, you modify a memory address value, it can't be.
This is exactly what it is doing. Even people in russia that have the game legitimately can use it so they can run around maps on their lonesome. Which is all the ElDorito software allows you to do.
 

kudoboi

Member
so would you guys still consider this piracy if all eldorito did was give international users access to play the game? lets say if the microtransactions and whatnot were still kept and Innova still earned money from it.
 

BeforeU

Oft hope is born when all is forlorn.
People are getting worried for no reason. There is no way this is Russia only thing, they are just testing the f2p fps market there. There is going to be a bigger worldwide release of this, i mean there has to be. And its all gonna somehow tie into their Windows 10 plan.

Just gotta wait.
 

Synth

Member
I was talking about ElDorito, it doesn't do what you are saying, right?

In the case you are talking about, I suppose it depends on the "crack".

If the crack is a modified and redistributed version of an original game file, it is copyright infringement.

If the crack is completely external to the demo, let's say for example, you modify a memory address value, it can't be.

Hmm... "yes" and "no" to the bolded, based on what I've heard about it so far. "No" in that, you can't currently play Halo Online multiplayer for free with all your friends. "Yes" in that it already grants instant access to weapons that would otherwise require either a time or monetary commitment. In other words, the game's payment system.

As for the internal/external stuff, that should mean that any software with either an external license, or some sort of serial is never pirated because you didn't alter the actual binaries in order to cheat the author out of his sale. Is this your stance?
 

Zomba13

Member
Did Microsoft give you access to the leaked build or are you accessing it without permission? Are the takedown notices not proof that they do not approve of what ElDorito is doing? Clearly your group doesn't care what the IP owner thinks or wants.

Just wondering, would you be saying the same things if this was post RU release with the client and all that being free to download but requiring you to be in Russia to play? Because while yeah, it's a sketchy having access to an unofficial early build that was leaked, what they are doing would be the same then or now which is essentially modding a game.

The code they are writing for their program seems to be original work right? Stuff that just interfaces with the MS code in the game? Then is the big thing that they downloaded the leaked version and whether that is the piracy bit? Because that I could see both sides for (depends on MS's release and payment plans for the final version to me).
 

FyreWulff

Member
People really don't seem to understand Halo's engine geek base in this thread.

90% of the fun is tearing Halo engines apart and seeing how they tick. Piracy is the farthest thing from anyone's mind.

And yes, this is an entire segment of the Halo fanbase. People that like to explore and push the engine around. I'm one of those types of people (but not involved in this project)

You really think people would want to play on an old ass build, anyway? Most everyone in the US will just VPN or use some other trick into Halo Online to log into the latest stable version. Most people are just having fun playing around with the engine. You can do a lot of the tricks with HPC or a modded Xbox/360 (and sometimes not even that). There's extensive community knowledge about how the engine works, which is why the progress is so fast.
 

jmga

Member
You seem to be under the impression that fair use is a magical license to steal which is ignorant.



source: https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/17/107

In a court of law this would not be held up as fair use. It is a clear cut case of piracy which is theft, especially when the intent is to circumvent paying money to the copyright holder. Blows my mind that you can't wrap your head around this concept.

Since when ElDorito is piracy or stealing?

Is it a modified and redistributed file of the game? No as far as I know.
Is distributed with any asset or file of the game? No as far as I know.
Does it come with a copy of the game itself? No.

Is GeDoSaTo piracy and stealing too? Or ReShade?
 

kudoboi

Member
People are getting worried for no reason. There is no way this is Russia only thing, they are just testing the f2p fps market there. There is going to be a bigger worldwide release of this, i mean there has to be. And its all gonna somehow tie into their Windows 10 plan.

Just gotta wait.

One theory is that MS only chooses to make it exclusive to russia in fear that it will cannibalise the halo fanbase between this, Halo MCC and Halo 5
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top Bottom