I don't think he cares what you think, but hey, maybe you'll get a response.
I just took it as truth that people have individual motivations, which sounds like reality, versus the story's simplified version where 40 people are all thinking and feeling the exact same thing and things need to be dramatized + digestable for hits.
And now I've already been quoted as well. I'm super screwed...
MS and 343i seem so dumb. Just put a good port of Halo 3 on Steam with dedicated servers and a decent price and rake in the dollars you geniuses..
This doesn't make any sense. I didn't steal any assets or art for the game.
Microsoft can make money for the game as much as they want. I don't care. I'm not doing this in spite to Microsoft like this article or "Woovie" tells you to think.
I don't know how stating my motive would make it any less or more as "piracy" to a lot of you guys. This article seems to have worked at selling the green-skinned pirate hacker to a lot of you guys to the point of just not making sense or being hysterical. I enjoy playing halo and seeing it on my pc screen is and messing around with it as well as understanding the engine to do other fun stuff. Not a scrap of code in the gitlab i posted screams "PIRACY" but people like Wizman choose to ignore that and would rather think that all the dozens of people involves are all thinking the same thing and want the same thing like some good-guy-bad-guy tv show. Circumventing the online-access controls does not concern me. Everything we have done is on par with the typical cheat-engine memory-poking stuff you see people do to other games with cheat engine and you don't consider that piracy.
I'm not going to run to the mods just because I disagree from a moral standpoint. If you edit your post, I'll edit my quote to reflect the change.
I dont know what MS expected, honestly, did they think "lets release this in Russia only...The rest of the world will surely not hack/mod/pirate this....." OR this is some sort of twisted marketing scheme, to then announce Halo MCC for PC. Something smells way way off in this behaviour.
The source code of an older build was uploaded to 4chan and they are modifying the (stolen) source code to make the game into the one they want it to be, which means the multiplayer isn't the same as the official game, it'll also be P2P. It's 100% theft.i could be wrong but isn't the game multiplayer only?
i mean if you try to play the pirated version you will be at the very least IP banned and possibly reported to the cybercrime authority of your country.
so all people will be able to do is run around empty levels wondering what could have been, and although not a fan i dont see the huge harm in that.
if however the leak enables the possibility of setting up private servers for the pirated versions that shit is definitely not okay.
slighty offtopic but i think the reason most arent jumping at the chance, reasonbly as it might be, to defend microsofts honor in this is because some of their decisions in the past have been questionable at best to down right hostile to pc gamers.
i could be wrong but isn't the game multiplayer only?
i mean if you try to play the pirated version you will be at the very least IP banned and possibly reported to the cybercrime authority of your country.
so all people will be able to do is run around empty levels wondering what could have been, and although not a fan i dont see the huge harm in that.
if however the leak enables the possibility of setting up private servers for the pirated versions that shit is definitely not okay.
slighty offtopic but i think the reason most arent jumping at the chance, reasonbly as it might be, to defend microsofts honor in this is because some of their decisions in the past have been questionable at best to down right hostile to pc gamers.
I guess they didn't think people would go nuts over a beta.
Well, yea... we don't fundamentally disagree with anything here, other than that you thought the initial response to your post was worth combatting head on, with anything other than a "well yea... obviously...".
Maybe there is some good conversation to be had on the motives of those working on this, and I'd be interested for the member here to elaborate more beyond "don't believe their lies". It'd have to be a very convincing argument though, considering that whatever motive they have, they're still taking and redistributing someone else's work against their will.
So what is the ultimate goal? Do you want to study and alter the source code to create custom halo maps a la Forge? Are you studying the code to eventually migrate work to a different engine (ex. Unreal Engine 4). You guys obviously have access to source code and assets.
slighty offtopic but i think the reason most arent jumping at the chance, reasonbly as it might be, to defend microsofts honor in this is because some of their decisions in the past have been questionable at best to down right hostile to pc gamers.
... it'll also be P2P ...
I guess they didn't think people would go nuts over a beta.
Copyright infringement is not (necessarily) stealing, no, since it does not always result in commercial loss.So copyright infringement isn't stealing now? Trying to circumvent a revenue source isn't something that should be frowned upon? I generally don't give a crap about mega corps but this affects normal people just like you and I. If you can't empathize with them, I feel sorry for you.
I didn't argue for people to sit quietly, I argued that they shouldn't play an unauthorized version of a game. Your view looks to be quite black and white.
I mean it's a beta. If Halo Online was RTM and still no sign of a western release you should outrage as much as you want. But going bunkers because you want day one access to an incomplete F2P game seems silly to me.
Most of us got a good taste of early access with Halo MCC and AC Unity.
A MP Halo game on Pc...its very naive to think that people wouldnt go crazy about this, and make private servers for this. I mean, Pc community have been asking for a Halo game for years and years, they knew it would be received like this, the question is....why did they still do it ?!
Copyright infringement is not (necessarily) stealing, no, since it does not always result in commercial loss.
What they are doing bothers me as much as people listening to or watching a video on Youtube uploaded by someone who doesn't own the content, using AdBlock on Twitch, sharing their Netflix/HBO Go account details with friends, using copyrighted content as an avatar on an online forum, playing (JPN exclusive) PSO2 with the unofficial English patch, or using a VPN to overcome region restrictions (whether this means watching a video or getting a region-specific discount on a game) does.
It is entirely understandable (and logical) that a corporation would protect their IPs, copyrights, and financial interests and think they should work on incentivizing people not infringing upon their copyrights, but that doesn't evoke an emotional response from me.
Maybe you should read up on US copyright infringement law because it is stealing and illegal. This isn't the same as watching a video on youtube or hearing downloaded music and you know it.
Bullshit.
Mods themselves are copyright infringement unless the author gives express permission to create them. You are talking nonsense.
There is a thing called fair use, that allows you to create derivative content from other people work if it is non profit.
If you find a line that equates copyright infringement to stealing, then I'm all ears, but now you're making a legal argument when I was making a moral and/or ethical one.Maybe you should read up on US copyright infringement law because it is stealing and illegal. This isn't the same as watching a video on youtube or hearing downloaded music and you know it.
MS and 343i seem so dumb. Just put a good port of Halo 3 on Steam with dedicated servers and a decent price and rake in the dollars you geniuses..
and it still involves you buying their console.
If you find a line that equates copyright infringement to stealing, then I'm all ears, but now you're making a legal argument when I was making a moral and/or ethical one.
Um, you realize mods have to replace original assets to avoid copyright infringement, right? Also, not every company cares. Fair use doesn't apply when you steal an unreleased product to avoid micro-transactions. You are talking nonsense.
That is nonsense knowing that majority of mods consist of replacing original assets with better ones(or just different ones) or modifying the game behavior without touching any asset.
Copyright Infringement is usually about intellectual property.
And as I have said, it is not illegal because of Fair Use:
http://www.copyright.gov/fls/fl102.html
That is nonsense knowing that majority of mods consist of replacing original assets with better ones(or just different ones) or modifying the game behavior without touching any asset.
Copyright Infringement is usually about intellectual property.
And as I have said, it is not illegal because of Fair Use:
http://www.copyright.gov/fls/fl102.html
Notwithstanding the provisions of sections 106 and 106A, the fair use of a copyrighted work, including such use by reproduction in copies or phonorecords or by any other means specified by that section, for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching (including multiple copies for classroom use), scholarship, or research, is not an infringement of copyright. In determining whether the use made of a work in any particular case is a fair use the factors to be considered shall include—
(1) the purpose and character of the use, including whether such use is of a commercial nature or is for nonprofit educational purposes;
(2) the nature of the copyrighted work;
(3) the amount and substantiality of the portion used in relation to the copyrighted work as a whole; and
(4) the effect of the use upon the potential market for or value of the copyrighted work.
If you are indeed involved in this, Id advise you to stop. Even though they fucking deserve it. Id love to see them eat shit for their empty promises (listed above) but its not worth getting yourself in trouble over.
Are you for real?
Nobody here is claiming Microsoft owes them a game. What they are doing is pointing out how dumb their decision-making is and how harmful it is to their goodwill among their PC customers (with the modding and the negative outcry being the natural outcome). Now if you have a good argument that how Microsoft have behaved in the PC market has made sense and how they shouldn't have expected backlash to this game I'd love to hear it, instead of rolling out the "entitled gamers" garbage. 1 FPS game isn't going to turn PC customers into console customers and MS should surely realise this by now.
still don't see why you guys are talking about stealing and piracy from microtransactions when this clearly isn't any sort of goal of ours.
I was talking about ElDorito, it doesn't do what you are saying, right?Yea, but a what do you call a mod that circumvents a product's payment system? Are you simply "modding" commercial software when a crack causes it to stop loading up in "demo mode"?
Was not expecting so many people to try and justify piracy in this thread
Did Microsoft give you access to the leaked build or are you accessing it without permission? Are the takedown notices not proof that they do not approve of what ElDorito is doing? Clearly your group doesn't care what the IP owner thinks or wants.
This is exactly what it is doing. Even people in russia that have the game legitimately can use it so they can run around maps on their lonesome. Which is all the ElDorito software allows you to do.If the crack is completely external to the demo, let's say for example, you modify a memory address value, it can't be.
Sounds like you're trying really hard to convince everyone we're pirates. Seems this article worked on you.
I was talking about ElDorito, it doesn't do what you are saying, right?
In the case you are talking about, I suppose it depends on the "crack".
If the crack is a modified and redistributed version of an original game file, it is copyright infringement.
If the crack is completely external to the demo, let's say for example, you modify a memory address value, it can't be.
Did Microsoft give you access to the leaked build or are you accessing it without permission? Are the takedown notices not proof that they do not approve of what ElDorito is doing? Clearly your group doesn't care what the IP owner thinks or wants.
You seem to be under the impression that fair use is a magical license to steal which is ignorant.
source: https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/17/107
In a court of law this would not be held up as fair use. It is a clear cut case of piracy which is theft, especially when the intent is to circumvent paying money to the copyright holder. Blows my mind that you can't wrap your head around this concept.
People are getting worried for no reason. There is no way this is Russia only thing, they are just testing the f2p fps market there. There is going to be a bigger worldwide release of this, i mean there has to be. And its all gonna somehow tie into their Windows 10 plan.
Just gotta wait.