terrisus
Member
Also:
1000AD > 600AD > 12,000BC (pre-crash) >>> 2300AD >>> 12,000BC (post-crash) >>>> 65,000,000BC >>>> 1999AD
The first three are pretty close and all great for their own reasons. I absolutely love everything about all of them.
2300AD I'm not a fan of futuristic settings, and so is a definite step lower, but is still very good.
12,000BC post-crash is good (except the Blackbird stuff, which kind of sucks >.>), but just makes me miss the pre-crash stage.
Not really a fan of prehistoric settings. 65,000,000BC's still good, just definitely at the bottom.
And 1999AD... Well, you know... >.>
1000AD > 600AD > 12,000BC (pre-crash) >>> 2300AD >>> 12,000BC (post-crash) >>>> 65,000,000BC >>>> 1999AD
The first three are pretty close and all great for their own reasons. I absolutely love everything about all of them.
2300AD I'm not a fan of futuristic settings, and so is a definite step lower, but is still very good.
12,000BC post-crash is good (except the Blackbird stuff, which kind of sucks >.>), but just makes me miss the pre-crash stage.
Not really a fan of prehistoric settings. 65,000,000BC's still good, just definitely at the bottom.
And 1999AD... Well, you know... >.>