FranXico
Member
Why would Microsoft pay Sony trolls?Not as hard as the Sony troll factory. That might be because they're being paid by the masters of AstroTurf marketing and FUD.
Why would Microsoft pay Sony trolls?Not as hard as the Sony troll factory. That might be because they're being paid by the masters of AstroTurf marketing and FUD.
Of boy. Down to my ignore list.I demand to see the PS5...I'm not satisfied.
See how silly this is. Come on...that's your argument? SONY will do what they do, in the meantime go play a game or go for a bike ride
Why not? The same standard is held for XSX with regards to games. Unless people are playing the system the XSX has no games. See how silly this is?So the ps-5 doesn't exist till you see a real photo of it being held by a social media influencer.. got it
Source?Naughty Dog admitted to being a render farm like "in engine using effects that are impossible in real-time" pre-rendered video?
Why not? The same standard is held for XSX with regards to games. Unless people are playing the system the XSX has no games. See how silly this is?
How do you know they were captured on a PS5? Have you seen a hands on hardware reveal we missed? I know I've seen an XSX teardown so a SonyToo is warranted.“SonyToo” - the thread. Interesting and well coordinated attempt at throwing F.U.D. PS5’s way by setting up a false equivalence between readiness of the console and the games and somehow tech sites not having the units months ahead of launch (nice attempt to deflect from all the major first and third party games captured on PS5 units).
Somebody ask Geoff if he saw one during the controller preview.
Is this the new FUD topic? The new “overheating” “low yields” “1080p/30”??
How do you know they were captured on a PS5? Have you seen a hands on hardware reveal we missed? I know I've seen an XSX teardown so a SonyToo is warranted.
Source?
So, it is a mass conspiracy... that is what you are going with? Xbox fans should be pissed at seeing their brand represented with such outlandish arguments like this: it makes the Xbox camp look like taken over by astroturfers or thin foil hatted conspiracy theorists.
Ok, I am game... do you see how much worse it looks like when all these third party developers would accept being part of this conspiracy with Sony and not with MS? Working with Sony to make PS5 look better and not with MS to make the same for XSX? Is that a much better outlook?
Also, have you benchmarked your software on XSX to be sure it is not bottlenecked and reaches 12 TFLOPS? Have you ran benchmarks to see the XVA really delivers 4.8 GB/s or more, what if it is bottlenecked and reaches only 500 MB/s?
Do you see how silly this conversation gets once you run into baseless F.U.D. territory?
Again, these tactics are keeping PS5 in the news cycle and making the green camp look like dominated by conspiracy theorists at best and rabid fanboys or astroturfers at worst, not awesome for the brand. Not sure what is the goal, but it cannot be this...
So, it is a mass conspiracy... that is what you are going with? Xbox fans should be pissed at seeing their brand represented with such outlandish arguments like this: it makes the Xbox camp look like taken over by astroturfers or thin foil hatted conspiracy theorists.
Ok, I am game... do you see how much worse it looks like when all these third party developers would accept being part of this conspiracy with Sony and not with MS? Working with Sony to make PS5 look better and not with MS to make the same for XSX? Is that a much better outlook?
Also, have you benchmarked your software on XSX to be sure it is not bottlenecked and reaches 12 TFLOPS? Have you ran benchmarks to see the XVA really delivers 4.8 GB/s or more, what if it is bottlenecked and reaches only 500 MB/s?
Do you see how silly this conversation gets once you run into baseless F.U.D. territory?
Again, these tactics are keeping PS5 in the news cycle and making the green camp look like dominated by conspiracy theorists at best and rabid fanboys or astroturfers at worst, not awesome for the brand. Not sure what is the goal, but it cannot be this...
I don't recall SONY doing prelaunch breakdowns with a 3rd party in past generations. https://www.neogaf.com/threads/ps4-hardware-review-thread.714861/Not revealing the price is one thing but hardware is freezed and units must be available already to ship to reviewers.
No way gen will be delayed but I can't think of a reason why Sony would not send these to say Digital Foundry etc already. Was PS4 already available to any reviewers/techsites before the actual release ?
Pay particular attention to this one:
Hahahaha wait so now we've got one of the biggest "I'm concerned for xbox because we haven't seen any games running on the X! Is the hardware a mess? Does it even exist?!" people saying there are conspiracies to make the playstation look bad lol.
Go on and build a pc for 500usd that is this small and games run and look so good. You can't do that even for ps4.It's a PC with an ugly case, gimmicky gamepad, and a closed ecosystem.
I've seen all I need to.
Sony put a big "Captured on a PS4 console" at the start of the 60fps Uncharted 4 reveal trailer, a trailer that was then revealed to be pre-rendered using effects and assets that their engine could not even run in real time. You dismissed that because they released good looking games.I do not need to say a thing, I can stay out of the thread and just let you look like an insane troll or disingenuous astroturfers who is just lashing out at anything and anyone in the process (see you picking on ND, taking a 2016 presentation about an even earlier demo from a company that shipped three of the most gorgeous titles of this generation in terms of graphics... how about you criticise Henry Cavill’s training habits next? Surely that will work out ).
Congrats on making things up and/or twist about me or what I have said (which I am sure you are going through to find scathing evidence, in or out of context), that will surely not make your position look any worse .
It's as weird as Microsoft not having shown gameplay footage of the XSX. The fact that we still don't know how big the PS5 actually is, should tell you enough. Same goes for pricing of both systems. It's bigger than you want it to be.
It is strong wishful thinking in thread form at best, yet another group chat coordinated smear campaign attempt that will not stick at worst. They are keeping PS5 in the front page and looking silly, angry and nervous, and defensive.
You think the Hotchips presentation was just a PR thing?Big is good for better cooling, cant see an issue unless you have no space under your tV.
Nobody has done a proper teardown yet as RDNA2 has not been detailed by AMD.
Even mS hotchips was missing most RDNA2 info, especially the L1 cache details and node details about power / clocks, and which of the new 20 AMD patents are hitting RDNA2....
I suspect Sony waiting for AMD to detail RDNA2 so Sony can do a proper teardown not just what the case and bits look like. MS need to do a proper tecgh breakdown as well not just a 30 minute PR thing.
You think the Hotchips presentation was just a PR thing?
I don't really agree. Sure bigger is better for cooling, but this is also a piece in your living room that you don't necessarily want to stand out. Even more so if it's so futuristic and targeted at teens.Big is good for better cooling, cant see an issue unless you have no space under your tV.
I don't really agree. Sure bigger is better for cooling, but this is also a piece in your living room that you don't necessarily want to stand out. Even more so if it's so futuristic and targeted at teens.
When it comes to the size, I also remember a lot of people laughing with how big the Xbox One was 7 years ago. It now seems that the PS5 might be even 60% larger in volume (worst case, 38x31x10). That would be crazy huge.
How is the size subjective? You can compare it to other consoles, so we know what a big console is. Aesthetics is indeed subjective, but you can give it a description to understand the design methodology.Size and aethetics of console is subjective, personally I dont care I look at the TV not the box.
How is the size subjective? You can compare it to other consoles, so we know what a big console is. Aesthetics is indeed subjective, but you can give it a description to understand the design methodology.
Imagine being such a deluded fanboy that you actually believe this rubbish.
True, but PS5 still looks like one of the worst looking if not the worst looking console I have ever seen :/. I understand it is all subjective though, but still...Size and aethetics of console is subjective, personally I dont care I look at the TV not the box.
Also bigger box is better for cooling is a fact.
Lol, this take would work better if it were not in yet another “response/balance the scales” thread
Don't agree at all when it comes to consoles. You need to take into account both design and engineering when creating a console. Otherwise why even bother putting any design in it? They could've created an even bigger box and put more emphasis on engineering, but they didn't. Why is that do you think?I think its great, engineering for function is more important than a pretty box. The shape will be needed for the cooling solution efficiency.
True, but PS5 still looks like one of the worst looking if not the worst looking console I have ever seen :/. I understand it is all subjective though, but still...
Agreed on the size argument, how quickly some in the green camp went from reacting to the size of the XSX and calling MS brave and bold for making a big console that prioritised function and cooling over form (and shouting how this would make it immune to overheating worries) to criticising PS5 for its size and pushing a form over function critique (as well as saying how PS5’s size was a sign of the console having overheating worries... despite making the opposite argument when talking about XSX size and shape).
Don't agree at all when it comes to consoles. You need to take into account both design and engineering when creating a console. Otherwise why even bother putting any design in it? They could've created an even bigger box and put more emphasis on engineering, but they didn't. Why is that do you think?
If the box is really going to be so big as the worst case scenario, they really dropped the ball, and I don't believe for a second that those high clock frequencies were planned. Otherwise why not even create an even bigger box?
What a nonsensical argument... You game all the time? Non-stop? You never receive people in your home? Why even put up paintings or anything decorative in your house...I look at my LG OLED when gaming, not the box.
What a nonsensical argument... You game all the time? Non-stop? You never receive people in your home? Why even put up paintings or anything decorative in your house...
Deluded fanboy confirmed, as if we didn't already know from your hundreds of posts trying to damage control and downplay SFS.
It's hilarious how much you lot cry about these secret discords, private chats and "coordinated attacks" on PS5 when 10 of you appear in every single thread like clockwork to screech about FUD FUD FUD!!!
The next-gen speculation thread? No thanks. I would love to discuss this with you, but not being surrounded by crazy Sony fanboys. I do agree that this is a weak troll thread, but maybe we can turn it into something proper.As a matter of fact, have 2 on the wall side by side. Looks great.
If you want to discuss frequencies, will do it in main speculation thread, this is just a dumb troll thread that is quite sad.
going all caps
I look at my LG OLED when gaming, not the box.
[...] blah
The next-gen speculation thread? No thanks. I would love to discuss this with you, but not being surrounded by crazy Sony fanboys. I do agree that this is a weak troll thread, but maybe we can turn it into something proper.
Can you refer those two patents? Wonder what the influence of the box is on the cooling solution.
More personal attacks in place of arguments...