brianmcdoogle
Member
I am highlighting an article that delves into how a vote for Hillary is more than just a symbolic vote for a female to be president. The author delineates Hillary Clinton's accomplishments in policy regarding women's issues and explores what a vote for a woman like Hillary Clinton means, and critiques some of the stances Hillary holds now.
Why the sarcasm and the derail? What is wrong with reading something that discusses the Democratic primary from a different perspective, specifically one involving women?
I'm in the middle of the article, but I just want to thank you for posting it. So far, the article, and the reaction to the article occurring in what might be a temper tantrum (I honestly can't tell when someone trolls anymore), reminded me of something Jamelle Bouie was writing about a few weeks ago on his twitter (he's a Slate reporter) on why African Americans strongly support Clinton despite things like the 90s crime bill and whatnot.
So, thanks for posting the article. I don't recall, and I haven't read it yet in this article, but did she do law work for women's issue prior to marrying Bill Clinton?