Napalm_Frank
Member
It was out sold by games such as Mario Kart 7; BLOPS Declassified; Angry Birds and 007 Legends amongst many.
idontwanttoliveonthisplanetanymore.jpg
It was out sold by games such as Mario Kart 7; BLOPS Declassified; Angry Birds and 007 Legends amongst many.
But if it doesn't sell 1 million in one day it's a bomba, didn't you know?
DyTonic said:UK gaming just sounds dull.
Don't tell me you're actually defending the fact that this title debuted at 38th place. Just stop please, you don't have to defend everything that's Sony.
Like Big Daddy, Rising Raiden and new Dante.... Sony bros is a playable trailer for upcoming games.Sony way overestimated the value of Playstation nostalgia.
Don't tell me you're actually defending the fact that this title debuted at 38th place. Just stop please, you don't have to defend everything that's Sony.
It gets people invested with these character and means they might go out and buy the games the characters feature in.
SniperHunter said:Also, Starhawk sucks.
Releasing a beta of this game was probably the worst decision they made.
Sony way overestimated the value of Playstation nostalgia.
Sony way overestimated the value of Playstation nostalgia.
Sony way overestimated the value of Playstation nostalgia.
At least they didn't underestimate the power of PlayStation.
Remember that tagline? Anyone? No? OK, I'll get my coat.
What i said is a fact. Something can chart at the bottom on its first week and still sell well. Not doing 1 million in one day doesn't automatically make it a bomba.
people don't honestly think this would have done better if crash, etc were in this
It's a bomba by standard gamer definition. Most expected mid to lower top ten for a high profile Sony release... Maybe top 15.What i said is a fact. Something can chart at the bottom on its first week and still sell well. Not doing 1 million in one day doesn't automatically make it a bomba.
people don't honestly think this would have done better if crash, etc were in this
people don't honestly think this would have done better if crash, etc were in this
What i said is a fact. Something can chart at the bottom on its first week and still sell well. Not doing 1 million in one day doesn't automatically make it a bomba.
Probably not, but it would've at least been more accepted as a genuine nostalgia trip for PS fans rather than the marketing tool for upcoming games it currently seems to be
Step up your game son.
What i said is a fact. Something can chart at the bottom on its first week and still sell well. Not doing 1 million in one day doesn't automatically make it a bomba.
UK gaming just sounds dull.
If there are new Parappa and Medieval games coming out I'm a happy man.
Well if Sony gives away half a million copies of the game with other things its clearly not a bomba. They could probably the PS3 version as two sales! Put me down for two.
I still can't believe this game was released without Cloud or Sephiroth.
To be fair, it's UK. The top 37 SKUs are probably all FIFA.
The PS3 version included both copies.can't say i'm surprised.
Wal-mart I went to had the vita copy for $39.99 and the PS3 one was $59.99
if they're crossplay why are they both priced differently?
This has been said time and time again and yet people still cant grasp it.Why are people shocked? Activision (Crash, Spyro) and Square Enix (FF ) wouldn't let Sony use their characters.
What does "a $15 PSN title" look like, exactly?
Why are people shocked? Activision (Crash, Spyro) and Square Enix (FF ) wouldn't let Sony use their characters.
Retail musing: My store sold out of it day 1 and sold out of our second shipment of it too.
I guess you guess you work at superbot?Oh they would have for sure let them use em if Sony would have ponied up the cash. Instead they went for the cheap characters that the others willingly allowed since it was easy advertising.
can't say i'm surprised.
Wal-mart I went to had the vita copy for $39.99 and the PS3 one was $59.99
if they're crossplay why are they both priced differently?
All formats chart.
Try reading the OP for a change.
Didn't this just go on sale this past Friday in the UK? This represents just 3 days at most for sales not sure at what point they compile the numbers. A little premature for bomba statements. Just putting it into perspective.
Why are people shocked? Activision (Crash, Spyro) and Square Enix (FF ) wouldn't let Sony use their characters.
All-Stars' biggest problem isn't how it looks, although that is a problem. It isn't that it comes off as a Smash Bros. clone, although that's a problem, too (In some ways I wish it was just a Smash rip-off because people really love Smash, and to have it on a Sony system would be great) It's biggest problem is that the promotional videos and gameplay footage shown ahead of its release was of party mode, the four-player free-for-all smash 'em up game type that looks about as refined and strategic as a scramble for a cheap phone on Black Friday.
The game's one versus one and two versus two modes have gone almost unnoticed. In these modes, Seth says, fighting game fans will find the deep, strategic fighting game experience every bit as satisfying as what they're used to from the usual suspects.
The free for all is where it gets a little bit more random and there are elements of variance, which has been one of our struggles, because that's all we show, he says. We just show people ping-ponging off each other and it looks random. While somebody's trying to do something serious somebody comes in and snakes him in the back, and that looks like bulls**t and everybody gets upset.
That's the joy and the sadness of free for all. It's a great mode for people at varying skill levels. Even if you never win you always feel like you got your licks in, unlike a Street Fighter, where if you're really outclassed you know it and you feel it very painfully throughout the whole match.
They keep items and stage hazards on in their ranked matches in the game. Seems to me that they really are trying to keep it non-competetive.