I hope not, because no backstory is needed. The film fills in 1) why she can use a sword (and why she uses it the way she does), 2) Kylo Ren's physical and mental condition leading into the duel, as well as his motivation and desired outcome, 3) how Rey learns her Force abilities, and 4) why she does what she does at the end. It's all right there on the screen, no backstory required.
What if Rey is Kylo Ren's dad?One of the worst examples is Snoke stepping down hard on "HAN SOLO."
Like, there's no way anyone watching the movie wouldn't have understood who Snoke was talking about. "The droid is in on the Millennium Falcon, in the hands of your father."
"I wonder who he's talk... Is Finn this guy's da--"
"HAN SOLO"
"OH SHIT, okay, yeah, that makes more sense."
On repeat viewing the name "Han Solo" starts to really stand out as a line of dialog that doesn't need to be said all that much. It's approaching "Michael" in the Lost Boys levels.
What if Rey is Kylo Ren's dad?
For the purpose of film, her being an experienced melee fighter is more than sufficient, especially since she gets utterly dominated by an actual swordsman.Interchangeable techniques with two different weapons is movie magic. There are arms schools that teach you in tiers, movement speed, and stances because they are wildly different.
This isn't really a rebuttal, though. No backstory is needed because The Force Awakens told the story of Rey's awakening. We don't need to extrapolate why Rey learns to push back on Ren during the interrogation scene, because we see her doing it. We don't need to speculate about why he doesn't kill her at the end of the duel, because we saw Snoke command him to bring Rey to him. We know how Rey knows to do what she does at the end because Maz explained it. And so on. It's all right there.Backstory is needed and it's going to happen. There's more extrapolation than evidence. Luke was essentially the same so I don't see why we can't categorize them similarly.
Maybe it doesn't do anything INCREDIBLY new but it does it pretty fine.One of the best honest trailers in a while for how spot on it is. It's stunning how creatively bankrupt and uninspired the movie is.
JJ Abrams seems to have a problem with trying to do "heart-to-heart" scenes. Star Trek, Into Darkness, and Super 8 all were weak there.Or Chewie!
On repeat viewing the name "Han Solo" starts to really stand out as a line of dialog that doesn't need to be said all that much. It's approaching "Michael" in the Lost Boys levels.
But yeah, that scene with Han & Leia on the base is probably the worst one in the whole movie. Not as bad as Han & Leia on the rope bridge in Jedi but not any sort of marked improvement, either.
It's probably a good thing they don't get to have any more heart to heart talks for the rest of the series.
For the purpose of film, her being an experienced melee fighter is more than sufficient, especially since she gets utterly dominated by an actual swordsman.
This isn't really a rebuttal, though. No backstory is needed because The Force Awakens told the story of Rey's awakening. We don't need to extrapolate why Rey learns to push back on Ren during the interrogation scene, because we see her doing it. We don't need to speculate about why he doesn't kill her at the end of the duel, because we saw Snoke command him to bring Rey to him. We know how Rey knows to do what she does at the end because Maz explained it. And so on. It's all right there.
Then her being proficient at a bostaff means she's proficient at knives, whips, or other weapons. If she appeared with a laser whip at the end you would think, "where'd she learn that?" It's the same with a sword, you're just making the connection because they appear similar. It's why Luke shooting in an X-Wing isn't comparable to shooting rats on a planet.
We also don't know how her power become enough to stop someone who could just put her to sleep at the snap of a finger. You say we understand Kylo's reasons but then we say that's just sloppy. No one wins. They'll explain it in the sequel.
40% of TFA criticism
"I expected..."
30% of TFA criticism
"It's a remake of ANH"
20% of TFA criticism
"I wanted Kylo Ren to be [Vegeta/Shadow the Hedgeog/Joker]"
10% of TFA criticism (actually true)
"Fucking Starkiller? Seriously?"
Starkiller Base was too much, for sure. It falls under the derivative category I mentioned.I feel she has a notable problem of being overshadowed by Finn and Kylo Ren in the characterization department. Like she has some character communicated, but a lot of it is rather subtle whereas with those two you have very big broad dramatic stories and personas that hit a lot harder home than Rey's.
Starkiller Base is the big problem for me. It doesn't really feel like it fits with the rest of the movie. The whole superweapon concept is introduced barely any time before it fires on some random planet system we're given no reason to care about.
While this was clumsy, the scene works in a way because while we know that Han Solo has the MacGuffin, Kylo doesn't. It works as a character moment rather than as exposition.One of the worst examples is Snoke stepping down hard on "HAN SOLO."
Like, there's no way anyone watching the movie wouldn't have understood who Snoke was talking about. "The droid is in on the Millennium Falcon, in the hands of your father."
"I wonder who he's talk... Is Finn this guy's da--"
"HAN SOLO"
"OH SHIT, okay, yeah, that makes more sense."
I remember reading the Raid guys would also be playing the Knights of Ren. Was that ever confirmed or just wishful thinking?
I remember reading the Raid guys would also be playing the Knights of Ren. Was that ever confirmed or just wishful thinking?
They don't have penises. Pause for inphallsis.
Is the old voiceover guy's microphone a paper bag?
Out of the three semi remakes ST:TFA, Jurassic World and Creed, only Creed was the only legit good one.
I hope not, because no backstory is needed. The film fills in 1) why she can use a sword (and why she uses it the way she does), 2) Kylo Ren's physical and mental condition leading into the duel, as well as his motivation and desired outcome, 3) how Rey learns her Force abilities, and 4) why she does what she does at the end. It's all right there on the screen, no backstory required.
Because people have no clue what a remake is and think basic plot similarities=remake. When others point out how stupid that is, the goalposts move to "semi remake".Why are all of these being called semi remakes?
This Force Awakens backlash is actually legit blowing my mind. It was a fantastic movie. Literally everyone in those first threads had nothing but good things to say
I guess it'll swing back around the other direction once the new movies come out and everybody hates those
Y'all are weird
I know a few people that have seen this movie.
All of them great SW fans and think they are some of the best movies ever made.
1 of them hates this new one with a passion and the others say it's mediocre.
I'd say that everyone that thinks it's a fantastic movie has their goggles on
Myself and my g/f both walked out the theater unimpressed tbh.
It's just that the people who liked it practically went crazy so it drowned out any discerning opinions.
Hell I know someone who saw it 4 times in the first week of release. Sheer madness.
My bad I meant full remakes. Was trying to be nice. TFA was so shameless at it.
Yeah, uh, who would do something like that
*Sweats*
*Pours passion tea on necktie*
Except that I found it really really smart and funny. You are not the arbiter or what is funny and what is comedic.They fouled off more than they got clean hits. It happens. Comedy isn't easy.
It's interesting the ease in acceptance of being Anakin super-strong with the force as opposed to the reluctance to accept that in Rey. People don't even question how he's the "ideal candidate," but can't help but question Rey's competency.
They also don't question how/why Kylo Ren is as strong as he is, and even though they haven't seen Snoke do ANYTHING AT ALL, they automatically assume he's just Palpatine with a different kind of raisin head.
This Force Awakens backlash is actually legit blowing my mind. It was a fantastic movie. Literally everyone in those first threads had nothing but good things to say
I guess it'll swing back around the other direction once the new movies come out and everybody hates those
Y'all are weird
Except that I found it really really smart and funny. You are not the arbiter or what is funny and what is comedic.
But yeah, that scene with Han & Leia on the base is probably the worst one in the whole movie. Not as bad as Han & Leia on the rope bridge in Jedi but not any sort of marked improvement, either.
It's probably a good thing they don't get to have any more heart to heart talks for the rest of the series.
wasn't plinkett's review supposed to be out?
This Force Awakens backlash is actually legit blowing my mind. It was a fantastic movie. Literally everyone in those first threads had nothing but good things to say
I guess it'll swing back around the other direction once the new movies come out and everybody hates those
Y'all are weird
It's coming out tomorrow.
It's coming out tomorrow.